Compare And Contrast Essay On China's Jury System

The jury system has been a world epidemic for hundreds of years. Though there are jury systems in most of the known countries, many third-world countries don’t have a jury system. For example, India’s government doesn’t have any kind of a jury system. The ones that do, have similar systems, but different requirements and judicial systems.

China’s jury system is much like the United States but with a little more stricter policies. When being called for jury duty, there are always a set of rules and requirements. For instance, you have to be 18 years or older to participate in the United States system. China’s age requirement is 23 years or older. In both countries, you have to be healthy and have no criminal record. One thing that the United States has better than China is how long the jurors serve. In China, you serve for five years, constantly participating

It is based on the English common law with occasionally another law system mixed in. The system was first created by England hundreds of years ago during the Anglo-Saxon times. Even though every country is different, Common law usually takes after the United States ideas and laws. For instance, each state that the United States has, has its own, unique legal system. Australia follows the United States, while Canada follows both the U.S., Civil, and French law.

The Civil law takes up sixty percent of the world’s legal system. They got their inspiration from the Roman law heritage and have mostly focused on individual freedom. It is known for being easily accessible, well-organized, and adaptable. The rules of this system are to the point without excess detail. For citizens who are interested in the system, it is simplified for their understanding. This system has worked for many countries and is liked by their citizens. It allows individuals to freely make their own decisions and have a part in their