Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Distinguish between Rear Window and Disturbia
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Distinguish between Rear Window and Disturbia
“Intelligence. Nothing has caused the human race so much trouble as intelligence,” says Stella from Rear Window. (Rear Window vs Disturbia, 1954 film Rear Window by Alfred Hitchcock and the 2007 film Disturbia by D.J. Caruso.) These two films will are addressing how the characters react in these situations due to isolation and the use of semiotic differences that each one expresses.
The women in both films gave the men something to look at. For example, in the opening scene of Rear Window, the audience sees Jefferies looking from his window over to Miss Torso who is dancing and stretching as she gets ready for her day. As in the film Disturbia, the audience sees Kale looking through
…show more content…
binoculars and checks out Ashley as she is getting undressed; as one can see both characters seem to do the same thing in their situation. In Rear Window, Jefferies is stuck in his apartment from an injury to his leg and the only entertainment he has is spying on people in his neighborhood from his Rear window. The audience sees Jefferies who sees Miss Torso dancing and stretching; then the camera pans up to two ladies who are sun bathing, and then a couple waking up from their slumber on a mattress on their balcony. As he continues to look around, he wants to look some more. Jefferies get a satisfaction or thrill from viewing others and because of this he becomes obsessed and discovers that something is not right in his neighborhood. The people, who know Jefferies such as Stella his nurse, Lisa his lover, and Lt.
Thomas J. Doyle his detective friend, point out to him that his actions are not moral. They all tell him that he is violating ones privacy and call him a peeping tom. The way he is so drawn to look around leaves him wanting more and more. The same goes for the film Disturbia. Kale is sentenced to three months of house arrest with a gps tracker stuck to his leg because he punched his Spanish teacher. There is no way for him to leave the house whereas Jefferies who has a cast on his leg from a race injury. Out of boredom Kale seeks peeping on his neighbors as his entertainment as well. Both of these characters get hooked on looking at the everyday lives of their neighborhood that they both discover a murderer. The difference is that Kale has more spying technology such as binoculars and a surveillance camera system that his friend owns whereas Jefferies does not have much of the spying equipment only a pair of binoculars and a camera that he can zoom in with. This is because of the time period in which the films were made. This also makes it easier for them to watch their prey upon the action that is taken. Kale is a loner to the outside world and only communicates with his mother and friends. He drifts away from the outside world and enters his own world of private investigation.
In Disturbia the setting takes places in a suburban area, the houses are isolated, and the character is forced to go back to his house to indulge on his neighbors activities; whereas in Rear Window the character is isolating himself from society. This is shown clearly as we see above the apartment complex where Jefferies lives in New York where the city is thriving. Both of these characters are very consumed by their obsession and become social
outcast. Another difference in the two films from what we can see is that Jefferies looks out from the only place in his whole entire apartment whereas Kale can go all over the house to peep on his neighbors. The semiotic in both of the films is slightly different in the elements that due with the time era that they were produced in. These movies were made over 50 years apart. So one has to ask themselves, did Disturibia steal some ideas from Rear window or is Disturbia just a remake? While the idea isn’t totally absurd we must take all information into consideration. Now let’s go more in depth with the film Disturbia. Opening with in fly fishing scene between father and son, the expanse of sky and mountains offers a contrast to the gloomy house arrest with which the main character Kale is soon burdened with. We can see some of Hitch’s impeccable framing implemented here. Disturbia adopts a teen popcorn movie approach, one that still could have worked if executed less predictably. Kale’s house arrest (for decking a cruel Spanish teacher) forces him into the same situation as Rear Window’s Jeff. Kale starts spying on and eventually gets involved with Ashley the literal girl next door. Unlike Jeff from Rear Window, Kale never shouts and hollers at the main women character Ashely but instead is constantly trying to impress her in his dorky teen age boy manner. Like its source material, Disturbia soon focuses on a neighbor and, in this case Mr. Turner whose conspicuous car and increasingly sinister behavior match the description of a serial killer on the loose. This uncannily matches Rear Window in the aspect of plot and conclusion. One of the primary differences between the two films is the approach to music. Hitchcock uses music sparingly in Rear Window. In fact, during the most suspenseful scenes Hitchcock masterfully sets the terror with upbeat lounge music, naturally drifting on the breeze from a nearby apartment. In contrast, Disturbia employs an alternative rock soundtrack also stuffed with violins that heavy handedly dictate when the viewer is supposed to feel fear. This also makes the guilt of its villain clear early on, while Rear Window casts Jeff’s suspicions of Thorwald in a paranoiac’s light. Disturbia’s chances of effectively modernizing Rear Window are destroyed by the third act when Caruso ridiculously pulls out every horror cliché in the book. As Kale finally finds hard proof of the villain’s guilt through surveillance video that mirrors the found footage subgenre, Mr. Turner stalks Kale and his friends with the fixated determination wielding a butcher knife, chopping through doors causing Kale to fall into a water-filled pit brimming with corpses in a scene straight out of the movie Poltergeist. Despite everything else, Rear Window will undoubtedly be a masterpiece for many years to come. I for one personally believe that Disturbia is a remake if not then at least a respectable attempt at paying homage to Alfred Hitchcock’s classic Rear Window. This isn’t a terrible thing, but without seeing Disturbia I would have never been open to the classic original that started it all.
This left Hitchcock films as some of her mother’s favorites. Pemberton, went to a Hitchcock festival as an adult, this time watching Rear Window, which she had not seen since she was a child with an objective examination, she found a scene that would shift both her and her mother’s perspective of this movie. As Jimmy Stewart’s character, Jefferies, realizes he is in danger, telephones his friend Wendell Corey, who was not at home, but he spoke with the baby-sitter who did not appear on screen, but was portrayed in a voice that would convey imagery of a “familiar black image.” Asking the inspiration for this essay “Do he have your number, Mr.
In the film Rear Window directed by Alfred Hitchcock, a significant shift of power is portrayed. This shift occurs between the protagonist of the film, L.B Jeffries and his romantic partner, Lisa Freemont. This shift also aids in outlining the main theme of the film, which is marriage, as all aspects of marriage are observed and taken into account by Jeffries. The change of dominance within Lisa and Jeffries relationship can be broken down into three stages, which develop and change throughout the film. At the beginning of the film Jeffries is shown to have the power within the relationship as he dictates the parameters of the relationship, however he is also intimidated by Lisa 's social standing. Towards the middle of the film the possession
Rear Window directed by Alfred Hitchcock was an exceptional movie with a jaw- dropping 8.6 rating on IMDb’s website. The movie is about L. B. Jefferies (protagonist), who is a well-known photographer in a wheelchair.The lack of entertainment and extreme boredom caused Jeff (Jefferies) to stare out the rear window day and night. He eyed his neighbors through this window 24/7 and revolved his wheelchair season around their personal lives. As the movie goes on Jeff feels as if Lars Thorwald (antagonist) has murdered his sick wife. He knew they were an unhappy married couple already and had some unmistakable clues. In this series of events Jeff’s girlfriend who he thought to be too perfect for him and epicene turns out be a risk-taker and brave.
Rear Window effectively demonstrates Hitchcock’s strong qualities as an author. The writer for Rear Window is not Hitchcock, and yet there are clearly many motifs and themes present which are well known for being used by Hitchcock. He is not merely following instructions on how to make the movie; he is providing his own creative adjustments. Now we will address a few of these from the film. First, drawing parallels between characters with a difference, usually a negative one, is a repeated concept in Hitchcock films.
Alfred Hitchcock’s 1954 film Rear Window is truly a masterpiece, as it uses fascinating cinematic elements to carry the story and also convey the meaning of voyeurism. Throughout the film we are in one room, yet that does not limit the story. This causes the viewer to feel trapped, similar to the main character, while also adding suspense to the detective story. The opening scene itself, draws the viewer in. In just five minutes and 27 shots, the viewer is given an introduction to the main character, his lifestyle, his condition, and his neighborhood. The lighting, the costumes, and the set are all presented in a way to catch the viewers eye, compelling them to crave more. Combining vivid lighting, edgy cinematography, and unique set design, Rear Window, proves why Hitchcock is still remembered as one of the greatest and most influential directors of all time.
Led by Laura Mulvey, feminist film critics have discussed the difficulty presented to female spectators by the controlling male gaze and narrative generally found in mainstream film, creating for female spectators a position that forces them into limited choices: "bisexual" identification with active male characters; identification with the passive, often victimized, female characters; or on occasion, identification with a "masculinized" active female character, who is generally punished for her unhealthy behavior. Before discussing recent improvements, it is important to note that a group of Classic Hollywood films regularly offered female spectators positive, female characters who were active in controlling narrative, gazing and desiring: the screwball comedy.
During the movie, I found that these concepts that were taught in class helped me better understand and relate to certain clips of the movie. Throughout the rest of the paper, I will be going into a bit more detail about exactly what these concepts are and mean, following that I will be giving examples from the movie that demonstrate the concepts of conflict and politeness theory.
These movies allowed female characters to embody all the contradictions that could make them a woman. They were portrayed as the “femme fatale” and also “mother,” the “seductress” and at the same time the “saint,” (Newsom, 2011). Female characters were multi-faceted during this time and had much more complexity and interesting qualities than in the movies we watch today. Today, only 16% of protagonists in movies are female, and the portrayal of these women is one of sexualization and dependence rather than complexity (Newsom, 2011).
Rowe, Lawrence. "Through the Looking Glass: Reflexivity, Reciprocality, and Defenestration in Hitchcock's"Rear Window"." College Literature 35.1 (2008): 16-37.
Stam, Robert & Pearson, Robertson., ‘Hitchcock’s Rear Window: Refluxivity and the Critique of Voyeurism’ in Deutelbaum, Marshall & Poague, Leland A. ed., A Hitchcock Reader (John Wiley & Sons: 2009).
Gender and the portrayal of gender roles in a film is an intriguing topic. It is interesting to uncover the way women have been idealized in our films, which mirrors the sentiments of the society of that period in time. Consequently, the thesis of this essay is a feminist approach that seeks to compare and contrast the gender roles of two films. The selected films are A few Good Men and Some Like it Hot.
Disturbia is centered upon a teenager and with the performance of teen movies over the course of years it showed why they took a different spin. Teen films showed a different spotlight in a way the teen demographic are relatable to the character, and Catherine Driscoll sates that “Teen film is thought more interesting” and in a way it “historically chang[ing] experience of adolescence” (Introduction – The Adolescent Industry: ‘Teen’ and ‘Film’ para. 4). According to Driscoll it started off in the 1950s, but as the years went by it started to become more popular within the teen culture and provided a new look at what other teens “stories” can be made (Modern, Cinema, Adolescence para. 1). For example, Kale is a regular teen that gets in trouble, gets in a relationship with the girl next door, and tries to find a way to stop a serial killer as well. Everybody in the film is a teen, and in the eyes of most teens, they would probably want to know what it would be like in that
The significance of the feminist film theory is that it explores the concept that women are inferior to men. Examining the theory in Alfred Hitchcock’s films, “The Birds”, “Vertigo” and “Psycho”, will display how the theory can be used to explore his films and their meaning. Hitchcock is a very monumental filmmaker and is known for his mastery at controlling the audience. Hitchcock never stated that it was prevalent in his movies, although he could have worked this theory into his movies and not even have realized it. The time period in which Hitchcock produced these films was not a time of equality for women so the subjectivity of women in his films might not have been that prominent to see, since it was a “normal” thing to society.Hitchcock
...rn society sees women as real people with intellect. Instead of not being allowed or perceived as capable of controlling their own lives and situation, today's women are expected to control their own lives without interference or constant dependence on others, or more specifically, their husbands. These advertisements demonstrate just what a drastic change has taken place in the last fifty years. Even though both ads are about cars, the body image, body language, and text portray a striking difference in the view of women. Maybe this change was brought about by the Women's Liberation Movement, maybe such subjugation just cannot last forever. But whatever the cause, the change has definitely taken place.
Feminism is a movement that supports women equality within society. In relation to film, feminism is what pushes the equal representation of females in mainstream films. Laura Mulvey is a feminist theorist that is famous for touching on this particular issue of how men and women are represented in movies. Through her studies, she discovered that many films were portraying men and women very differently from reality. She came up with a theory that best described why there is such as huge misrepresentation of the social status quos of male and female characters. She believed that mainstream film is used to maintain the status quo and prevent the realization of gender equality. This is why films are continuously following the old tradition that males are dominant and females are submissive. This is the ideology that is always present when we watch a movie. This is evident in the films from the past but also currently. It is as if the film industry is still catering to the male viewers of each generation in the same way. Laura Mulvey points out that women are constantly being seen as sexual objects, whether it is the outfits they wear or do not wear or the way they behave, or secondary characters with no symbolic cause. She states that, “in traditional exhibitionist role women are simultaneously looked at and displayed, with their appearance coded for strong visual and erotic impact so that they can be said to connote it-be-looked-at-ness.”(Mulvey pg. 715). Thus, women are nevertheless displayed as nothing more than passive objects for the viewing pleasure of the audience. Mulvey also points out through her research that in every mainstream movie, there is ...