Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Modern gender roles in society
Gender roles in contemporary society
Modern gender roles in society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Modern gender roles in society
Into The Whiteness: A Comparative Essay of Tracks and Into the Wild
Society views those who venture into the wild either as brave or as fools, and this all depends on their survival. Robyn Davidson and Chris McCandless are examples of such adventurers. Davidson tells her own story of how she crossed the west Australian desert to the Indian Ocean in 1971 with a pack of camels and her dog in her novel, Tracks. McCandless’s story of how he left his family and home for the wild is told by Jon Krakauer in Into the Wild, written years after McCandless’s unfortunate death in Alaska in 1992. Davidson and McCandless have many similarities, and differences, in their own relationships with media, gender, technology, marginal people, nature, and survival,
…show more content…
but what connects these two adventurers is their positon of white privilege and how it affects these relationships. Abraham Maslow, a psychologist, theorized the hierarchy of needs.
He believed that only when one level of needs was met, another could be achieved. He proposed five levels, at the bottom is basic biological needs, then one’s safety needs, a need for love and affection, needs for esteem, both self-esteem and respect from others, and at the top was the need for self-actualization. Both Davidson and McCandless were on a quest for self-actualization, and from that we can infer that they had conquered all other levels of needs. Maslow theorizes that people who do not achieve the full hierarchy, do not achieve it because of deterrents in society, such as racism, homophobia and sexism. Although Davidson is a women and lived in a “cult of misogyny” (Davidson, 18) in Australia, her and McCandless were both hetero, supposedly, and came from well to do, Caucasian families putting them in a position of privilege. Also, one can infer from the fact that they are both willing to put their biological needs at risk, that they had never been in the positon previously in which their wellness was threatened. For example, someone who had previously been at risk of dying of hunger would never put themselves at risk of running out of food again. NEED …show more content…
TRANSITION. Even though both adventurers wanted to fully immerse themselves in nature, media heavily affected both of them and the journeys they took. Davidson was dependent on National Geographic funding her trip. With a promise that she would write an article for them when she returned they in turn gave her the funds that would allow her to go on this excursion, which they would later capitalize on. This deal ended up taking away some of the solitude of her trip, due to a photographer came along sporadically to take photos of her journey. Davidson’s deal with National Geographic came about because what she was doing was unique and uncommon in a women, especially an attractive, university educated and white woman. Whilst Davidson’s trip was made possible by media, media is what drove McCandless on his journey. McCandless was an avid reader and was inspired by authors such as Jack London and Henry Thoreau. When they found Chris’s body they found many novels with passages highlighted giving us insight into his way of thinking. In particular, Chris idolized Jack London, he even engraved “Jack London is king” on a piece of wood found with his dead body. Chris emulated London by mirroring an Alaskan adventure he took. Krakauer points out although that Chris gave London too much credit and often forgot that the stories he was reading were fiction. Krakauer states, “McCandless conveniently overlooked the fact that London himself had spent just as single winter in the North and that he’d died by his own hand on his California Estate at the age of forty, a fatuous drunk, obese and pathetic”. (Krakauer, 44) Chris’s eagerness to emulate his literary hero made him feel indestructible, a naivety that can be contributed to his seemingly ideal life. Interestingly, all the literary hero’s McCandless looked up to were males, people Davidson herself would not have been to identify with. The binaries of gender are something that no matter race or class are unfortunately imposed upon us; while Davidson went on her trek to escape these binaries, McCandless went on his to chase after the atypical male roles.
One can consider Davidson’s trek a feminist quest to break down traditional gender roles. Early on in her tale Davidson informs the reader of Australia’s history of misogyny, how women were brought over with sheep when the men realized that’s all the island needed. By comparing women to sheep in her writing, Davidson shows the reader how little is thought of women’s worth, how women are timid, weak and sheepish. By independently going across the desert she is openly defying the roles pushed on her by the society in which she was raised. McCandless’s relationship with his gender differs greatly, probably due to the fact that his does not have as many constricting binaries. In his quest to emulate his literary heroes, McCandless’s journey is not only one to find himself, but to also return to the historical role of a man, a role that had nothing to do with modern
technologies. Both protagonist’s aim is to find themselves in nature so they naturally have a complicated relationship with technology. Davidson try’s to limit to her exposure to technology as much as possible on her trek. She only grudgingly takes a radio with her at the insistence of her family. Davidson even admits to her foolishness in her decision to not want a radio, ”I didn’t need it, didn’t want to think of it sitting up there, tempting me, didn’t want that mental crutch, or physical link with the outside world. Foolish I suppose.” (Davidson, 97) The fact that she has the opportunity to have technology to bring with her is an example of her privilege, and the fact she refuses it, is an example of her naivety. Furthermore, she tries to avoid roads and cars throughout her journey, even though it could have made it easier for her. These desperate attempts to distance herself from society, show that she is trying to escape her privileged life and her whiteness. McCandless shares similar views on technology. While before his trek he adored his car, a Datsun he bought in high school, but he abandoned it when he began his journey into the wild. It is evident that Chris romanticized the atypical quest romance, the conquering of nature and the clear moral divides, and technology did not play a role in his idea of this. McCandless also pushed himself away from technology because his constant quest for independence, his sister Carine states, “…it was important for him to see how independent he could be”. (Krakauer 125) The fact that McCandless has to work to gain independence shows that he was privileged enough to have people who wanted to support him, from his family, the many people he met along his trip. This support may have not been extended to him if he had not
Many individuals decide to live their life in solitary; though, only a few choose to live in the wild. The book, Into the Wild, Jon Krakauer vividly paints the adventurous trek Chris McCandless went on. From the friends he made, to the hardships he went through, McCandless is portrayed as a friendly, sociable person despite the fact that he was a vagabond. Other than McCandless, there are even more individuals that have taken the risks to live in the wilderness such as, Jon Krakauer and Everett Ruess. All three of them had both similarities and differences between their own qualities as a person and their journey.
Chris McCandless has a very interesting and compelling story, which tragically ended sooner than it should have. McCandless’s story is immortalized in John Krakauer’s book, Into the Wild, which follows Chris’ story from the backstory of his early childhood, to his ventures as a teen and young adult, and all the way to the end of his life in Alaska.
When Jon Krakauer published a story about the death of a young man trekking into the Alaskan frontier in the January 1993 issue of Outside magazine, the audience’s response to Christopher McCandless’s story was overwhelming. Thousand of letters came flooding in as a response to the article. Despite the claims, especially from the native Alaskans, questioning McCandless’s mental stability and judgement, it soon becomes clear that McCandless was not just "another delusional visitor to the Alaskan frontier" (4). As Krakauer retells the life of Christopher McCandless and gives his own take on the controversy around McCandless’s death in Into The Wild, the reader also creates his own opinion on both McCandless and Krakauer’s argument. Krakauer
Into The Wild by Jon Krakauer is a non-fiction book, based on the real story of Christopher McCandless, who in the April of 1992,set off alone into the Alaskan wild. He had given all his savings to charity, abandoned his car and his possessions. Unlike others, he wanted to live a life of independence, free from materialistic pleasures and filled with nature and it’s beauty. In addition, McCandless shed his legal name early in his journey, adopting the moniker ‘Alexander Supertramp’. He travelled a lot to places such as South Dakota, Salton City before hitchhiking to Alaska. Along his journey, he befriended few people whom he was in contact with till the end. McCandless
Into the Wild, written by John Krakauer tells of a young man named Chris McCandless who 1deserted his college degree and all his worldly possessions in favor of a primitive transient life in the wilderness. Krakauer first told the story of Chris in an article in Outside Magazine, but went on to write a thorough book, which encompasses his life in the hopes to explain what caused him to venture off alone into the wild. McCandless’ story soon became a national phenomenon, and had many people questioning why a “young man from a well-to-do East Coast family [would] hitchhike to Alaska” (Krakauer i). Chris comes from an affluent household and has parents that strived to create a desirable life for him and his sister. As Chris grows up, he becomes more and more disturbed by society’s ideals and the control they have on everyday life. He made a point of spiting his parents and the lifestyle they lived. This sense of unhappiness continues to build until after Chris has graduated college and decided to leave everything behind for the Alaskan wilderness. Knowing very little about how to survive in the wild, Chris ventures off on his adventure in a state of naïveté. It is obvious that he possessed monumental potential that was wasted on romanticized ideals and a lack of wisdom. Christopher McCandless is a unique and talented young man, but his selfish and ultimately complacent attitude towards life and his successes led to his demise.
Have you ever wanted to explore the world, or even “start a new life” in the country? In the novel, Into the Wild, by Jon Krakauer, the author emphasizes about a historical young man, Chris McCandless, who is trying to begin a new life in a series based on factual evidence. Throughout the novel, Krakauer guides us to have many questions and concerns about Chris McCandless, his past life and what he had set out to do. Although McCandless was a man that many readers misunderstood, readers were still able to figure his personality out by continuously scrutinizing and taking notes. Jon Krakauer allows us to examine Chris McCandless by providing actual text and dialogue from his family and peers that he had known and ran into while living in the wild.
Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer, is a true story of the mysterious death and journey of a talented twenty-four year old Christopher McCandless. He was raised in a wealthy family and was given plenty of life opportunities, but one day decides to turn his back on everything he had in life. After graduating Emory University in 1990, Chris decided he wanted to hitchhike across the country into the Alaskan wilderness. He gave away his bank savings to charity, abandoned his car, and burned all his cash and belongings leaving no trace of Chris . McCandless then changes his name and identity, and goes by the name of “Alex McCandless”.
The book Into The Wild, written by Jon Krakauer, tells the story of Chris McCandless a young man who abandoned his life in search of something more meaningful than a materialistic society. In 1992 Chris gave his $ 25,000 savings to charity, abandoned his car and most of his possessions, and burned all of his money to chase his dream. Chris’s legacy was to live in simplicity, to find his purpose, and to chase his dreams. Chris McCandless’s decision to uproot his life and hitchhike to Alaska has encouraged other young adults to chase their dreams. Neal Karlinksy illustrates the love Chris had for nature in the passage, “He was intoxicated by the nature and the idea of a great Alasican adventure-to survive in the bush totally alone.”
The novel “Into the Wild” by Jon Krakauer goes into great detail to describe the main character, Chris McCandless, who died traveling alone into the Alaskan wilderness. McCandless, whom in the novel renamed himself Alex, left his home and family to travel to Alaska in 1992. In Alaska McCandless planned to live an isolated life in the desolate wilderness, but unfortunately he did not survive. This non-fiction novel portrays his life leading up to his departure and it captures the true essence of what it means to be “in the wild”.
Sometimes a character may be pushed over the edge by our materialistic society to discover his/her true roots, which can only be found by going back to nature where monetary status was not important. Chris McCandless leaves all his possessions and begins a trek across the Western United States, which eventually brings him to the place of his demise-Alaska. Jon Krakauer makes you feel like you are with Chris on his journey and uses exerts from various authors such as Thoreau, London, and Tolstoy, as well as flashbacks and narrative pace and even is able to parallel the adventures of Chris to his own life as a young man in his novel Into the Wild. Krakauer educates himself of McCandless’ story by talking to the people that knew Chris the best. These people were not only his family but the people he met on the roads of his travels- they are the ones who became his road family.
Maslow believed that there was a hierarchy of five innate needs that influence people’s behaviors (Schultz & Schultz, 2013, p.246-247). In a pyramid fashion, at the base are physiological needs, followed by safety needs, then belonginess and love needs, succeeded by esteem needs, and finally the need for self-actualization. Maslow claimed that lower order needs must be at least partially satisfied before higher level needs are addressed. Furthermore, behavior is dominated by solely one need
Psychologist Abraham Maslow created the hierarchy of needs, outlining and suggesting what a person need to reach self-actualization and reveal the true potential of themselves. In the model, Maslow propose that a person has to meet basic needs in order to reach the true potential of themselves. Biological/physiological needs, safety needs, love/belonging need, esteem needs according to Maslow is the fundamental frame for reaching the peak of self. The last need to be met on the scale
Unlike many of his colleagues at the time who were focusing on psychopathology, or what is wrong with individuals, he focused on how individuals are motivated to fulfill their potential and what needs govern their respective behaviors (McLeod)). Maslow developed the hierarchy over time, adjusting from a rigid structure where needs must be met before being able to achieve a higher level, to where the individuals can experience and behave in ways across the hierarchy multiple times daily depending on their needs. The hierarchy is comprised of 5 levels; Physiological, Safety and Security, Love and Belonging, Esteem, and Self-Actualization. The bottom two levels are considered basic needs, or deficiency needs because once the needs are met they cease to be a driving factor, unlike psychological needs. Loving and Belonging and Esteem needs are considered psychological needs, and are different from basic needs because they don’t stem from a lack of something, but rather the desire to grow. Maslow theorizes that individual’s decisions and behavior are determined based on their current level of needs, and the ideal level to achieve full potential culminates in self-actualization; however, operating on this level cannot be achieved until the preceding levels of needs have been
Abraham Maslow wrote the Maslow’s hierarchy of needs theory. This theory was based on fulfilling five basic needs: physiological, safety, social, esteem and self-actualization. Maslow believed that these needs could create internal pressures that could influence the behavior of a person. (Robbins, p.204)
Abraham Maslow did studies of the basic needs of human beings. He put these needs into a hierarchical order. This means that until the need before it has been satisfied, the following need can not be met (Encyclopedia, 2000). For example, if someone is hungry they are not thinking too much about socializing. In the order from lowest to highest the needs are psychological, safety, social, esteem, and self-actualization. The first three are classified as lower order needs and the last two are higher order (Hierarchy, 2000). Without meeting these needs workers are not going to be as productive as they could otherwise. The first three are considered to be essential to all humans at all times. The last two have been argued but are mostly considered to be very important as well.