Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Nike's fixed and variable costs
The business level strategies of Nike
Factors affecting the emergence of sustainable fashion industry
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Nike's fixed and variable costs
Comparing NIKE’s Cost Structure
Keeping a tight grip on costs is critical to any company’s profitability and for shareholder returns. Some of NIKE, Inc.’s (NKE) margins are lower than those of its competitors. The company’s gross profit margin, in particular, has trailed that of its rivals Under Armour Inc. (UA), VF Corporation (VFC), Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU), and Adidas AG (ADDYY).
Looking at the graph below we see that, Nike Cost of Goods Sold and SG&A expenses in percentages of revenue declined from 2012 to 2015. So we here assuming that its cost structure remains same for women segment and continues to declining in near future. Under this assumption Nike can able to increase its revenue as well as could achieve its target in women
…show more content…
In this generic strategy, the company minimizes production costs to maximize profitability or reduce selling prices. Also, Nike’s differentiation generic strategy will provide unique products. For example, the company integrates cutting-edge designs for its shoes. The combined cost leadership and differentiation generic strategies will boost Nike’s performance in the global industry. A strategic objective based on the cost leadership generic strategy will grow the company’s competitive advantage through new technologies to reduce production costs and the differentiation generic strategy will maximize Nike’s profit margins, such as on new sports …show more content…
The firm should plan to continue along these lines to expand its top line.
NIKE’s shift to direct-to-consumer pays off
NIKE’s should invest significantly in expanding its retail foot-print through its direct-to-consumer strategy. This includes both bricks-and-mortar retail and digital commerce. Currently, revenues to wholesalers make up about ~78% of the sales mix. Retail sales generally have higher margins. An increase in the ratio of retail sales would positively impact NIKE’s gross margin.
NIKE’s efforts on the cost side include the use of new and lean manufacturing technologies such as Flyknit and waterless dyeing, which save costs. It’s also trying to minimize the impact of adverse currency movements by setting up an internal trading company.
Variables that could threaten NIKE’s Business Model
While the outlook appears rosy for NIKE, Inc. in women segment, there are some thorns, too, that could challenge the company’s ability to achieve its financial and operational targets. Some of these factors are discussed
A focused cost leadership strategy would be appropriate, in other words, a attention to consumers. Cost focus is a strategy that will focus on a particular buyer groups or a geographic market and attempt to serve only that place, to the exclusion of others. When looking at cost factors, there are very few options available to K-Mart in developing a pricing strategy to compete with Target or Wal-Mart. Therefore, K-Mart would not have many price strategy options available. However by using a cost focus strategy, and matching the quality of well known brands but keeping cost low by eliminating advertising and promotional expenses will save K-Mart money.
Product: As an athletic shoes producer, they try to provide better quality and more comfortable shoes that fit to the sport player through research and development. By claiming their shoes meet the physics need of different sports, which help the sport player to maximize their ability by protecting them and reduce the sport harm.
After the direction of the new shoe line has been developed, a price of each shoe will need to be determined to see if a profit can still be made. The price will be benchmarked against other shoes in the same category to make them competitive in the buying market. L.A. Gear may even try to undercut the prices if they are still able to maintain a profit to entice the consumers to try their new product and gain their loyalty. They must be careful though not to make them to inexpensive because they want the customer to feel that these are the shoes they need to perform better and the expense would be well worth it.
In order to boost revenue, management decided to develop more athletic-shoe products in the midpriced segment which are sold for $70-$90 a pair. As for the cost side to be considered, Nike planned to exert more effort on expense control. The company executives forecasted that their long-term revenue-growth targets of 8% to 10% and earnings-growth targets of above 15%.
There are numerous costs of production for Nike Company which can be placed into two categories: fixed costs and variable. Fixed costs are those that remain the same for all production and variable costs change with each project. The organization’s manufacturing process, machinery, research and development costs make up the fixed costs. On the other hand, administration, distribution, labor and raw material are the variable costs. All of these are required in the organizations operation to ensure that it remains profitable. Production cost for each shoe is between $30 and $100 and they are sold at $100 to $300. Therefore, the organization stands a good chance of making a profit (Nike, Inc., 2012).
Only a week earlier, on June 28, 2001, Nike had held an analysts' meeting to disclose its fiscal-year 2001 results.1 The meeting, however, had another purpose: Nike management wanted to communicate a strategy for revitalizing the company. Since 1997, its revenues had plateaued at around $9 billion, while net income had fallen from almost $800 million to $580 million (see Exhibit 1). Nike's market share in U.S. athletic shoes had fallen from 48%, in 1997, to 42% in 2000.2 In addition, recent supply-chain issues and the adverse effect of a strong dollar had negatively affected revenue.
Nike’s sweatshop manufacturing practices which can be seen through media have shown people that this company goes under the good guys images, these images which are displayed in their commercials show people that their employees are treated well and their happy in their working environment.
Many global companies like Nike, Inc. are seen as role models both in the market place as well as in society in large. That is why they are expected to act responsibly in their dealings with humanity and the natural world. Nike benefits from the global sourcing opportunities, therefore areas such as production and logistics have been outsourced to partner companies in low-wage countries like China, Vietnam, Indonesia and Thailand. As a result the company is limited nowadays to its core competencies of Design and Marketing.
The following content provided will include information regarding Nikes Inc. cash management strategies, which will include more in depth information from the previous group paper. In addition, working capital recommendations will be provided to senior management base on next year’s in the pro-forma financial statements.
... its prices (Trefis Team, 2013). Moreover, petroleum price have a significant impact on its gross margin, as petroleum is one of a raw material of apparel product. In the past few years, the company had to face with the high oil price because of global economic that decreased its gross margin (Trefis Team, 2014).
The marketing goals are: Increase customer retention, Increase eCommerce Sales, Increase our Community Involvement. The first goal specifically works towards reaching 60% repeat sales through different promotional strategies like emotional marketing and sponsoring different professional athletes. Customer retention is extremely important to maintain Nike’s market leader position. Increasing eCommerce is a major focus for Nike. Last year we were able to increase our eCommerce sales by a profitable 51%. Our second goal is to continue this trend by increasing online sales by 50% every year for the next four years. It is our belief that doing so will solidify Nike as a leader in the online athletic market. Nike truly believes that sport can change
Nike’s Asian operations had previously continued to soar generating US$300 million in 1994 in revenues to a whopping US$1.2 billion in 1997. However based on the Asian economic crisis, this had adversely affected revenues, while regional layoffs were inevitable. Nike also performed well in the European market generating about US$2 billion in sales and a good growth momentum was expected, however, some parts of Europe were only slowly recovering from an economic downturn. In the Americas (Canada and the U.S.A.), Nike experienced a growth rate for several quarters. The U.S. alone generated approximately US$5 billion in sales. The Latin American market at this point was exposed to economic volatility; however Nike still saw them as a market with “great potential for the future”.
Nevertheless, Nike is an extremely diverse company with outstanding organizational structure, impressive marketing strategy, and innovative products. The organizational structure of the Nike Corporation helped them become a leading innovator for the world with creative apparels and shoes. Their intelligent marketing strategies assist them in advertising their products to motive their customers and sell them. Their innovative product motivates customers with great performance footwear and quality designs to take on any obstacles. The Nike Corporation discovers various ways to improve their organizational structure to inspire the world.
international markets. The company wants to generate more than half of its revenue from overseas. In my opinion, Nike’s strategies and tactics are to seek on the opportunity to do the marketing on its radical, rebellious and anti-establishment images to the international markets and to benefit from its use of overseas factories to outsource manufacturing processes. For example,
In reviewing the case of New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc. it is clear that there are a few major problems that the company is facing. First of all, New Balance falls behind its other major competitors, Nike, Adidas and Reebok, in the area of marketing. Unlike its competitors, New Balance does not undertake celebrity endorsements. This puts them at a disadvantage when it comes to brand building. This also causes the company to lose out somewhat on gaining awareness on a global scale as it lacks endorsements in major sporting events. Most global brand names generate strong brand recognition through celebrity endorsements in sporting events that would give them the needed momentum to carry their brand name further into the global market.