Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Similarities us constitution vs texas constitution
Similarities us constitution vs texas constitution
An essay on the importance of a constitution to the nation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Similarities us constitution vs texas constitution
The Constitution is one of the most important documents in US which serves as an example, and for each state, the state constitution is the frame work or rule for each state’s government. An interesting point is that the US constitution is quite short compared to most of the state’s constitution. Moreover, the Texas constitution is the one of the longest constitutions among all of the state constitutions which there are over four hundred amendments, whereas, the Florida constitution is relatively shorter. Bill of rights in the US constitution is a compromise of the constitutions advocator’s back in the revolution time. It is not exactly what the constitution’s critics had sked for initially, but it turned out to be their lasting gift to America.(Woody …show more content…
For both Florida and Texas they are illustrated similarly. Freedom of speech and religion, Searches and seizures, Rights of Accused in Criminal Prosecutions, Right of Trial by Jury, imprisonment for debt, Treason, Right to Keep and Bear Arms, Military subordinate to civil authority, Right of Assembly Petition for Redress of Grievances, and Marriage are all mentioned in both constitutions.(Constitution of the state of Florida. Art. I and the Texas Constitution. Art. I) For some statements, they are both almost identical on wording and meaning. One thing does not change is everything is changing all the time. From time to time, the constitution is considered a “living document” which needs to be changed in order to better fit in the current circumstances. This applies to the constitutions too. While the US constitution is not easy to change, the state constitution is relatively easier. Still, since they are so important, there usually is a complicated procedure involved that requires many people’s consent to a proposed amendment. However, there are huge differences in amending the state constitutions for Texas constitution and Florida
The American way of living and thinking in Texas have changed tremendously over the past century. Political ideals are one thing that changes with time, and have transformed with the changing times well. The Texas constitution of 1876 was a landmark for the state and has been part of the state’s history since then. The Texas constitution of 1876 is still in use today but with all its harsh restrictions it is considered one of the most confusing of all the state constitutions. The constitution became one of the most prominent changes to Texas education system and politics.
Texas and Federal Constitutions contain the principles needed for a representative democratic government and both arose from different historical situations; for instance, the U.S. Constitution was made to replace the Articles of Confederation, a weak decentralized form of national government with no president or taxes, which made the government not powerful enough to start a war. The U.S. Constitution was made to improve these weaknesses by proposing a degree of centralization which increased government power. On the other hand, Texas Constitution was made to reverse or avoid the ideas of the U.S. Constitution. On one part, the U.S. Constitution wanted to empower government action whereas the Texas Constitution wanted to weaken government action. The Texas Constitution is more geared toward protecting people’s rights whereas the U.S. Constitution protects the nation’s interest. The Texas Constitution has been amended more than 300 times whereas the US Constitution includes the Bill of Rights and the subsequent
In 1918, while the rest of Europe was still engaged in World War I, a newly formed communist government was developing in Russia. Much like 18th century Americans, they had just managed to overthrow what was viewed as a tyrannical government and hoped to form a new nation free of the injustices of the previous rule. Both countries wrote a new constitution as well as a declaration of rights to facilitate this, but their respective documents had vast differences. These disparities stemmed from differences in the ideologies of the new governments. The primary objectives of the Russian Declaration of Rights of the Working and Exploited People and the later constitution were the “abolition of all exploitation of man by man, complete elimination of the division of society into classes, merciless suppression of the exploiters, socialist organization of society, and victory of socialism in all countries.” Americans wanted equality of opportunity and personal freedom instead of the social equality desired by the Russians. The American constitution and Bill of Rights were created to protect personal liberties and individual freedom while the Russians were more concerned with the welfare and equality of the population as a whole. This difference is partially due to the differences in the conditions leading to revolution in each country. The American Revolution was initiated by the wealthy in response to what they considered unfair treatment by a foreign ruler while the Russian revolution was instigated by the poor in reaction to centuries of oppression and exploitation by the wealthy within their own country.
The Constitution of the United States and the Texas Constitution share many similarities. They also have important differences due to different attitudes about what the role of government should be. It is important to know the limits of the state’s power as it can help us better understand our role as a Texas citizen.
The United States' Constitution is one the most heralded documents in our nation's history. It is also the most copied Constitution in the world. Many nations have taken the ideals and values from our Constitution and instilled them in their own. It is amazing to think that after 200 years, it still holds relevance to our nation's politics and procedures. However, regardless of how important this document is to our government, the operation remains time consuming and ineffective. The U.S. Constitution established an inefficient system that encourages careful deliberation between government factions representing different and sometimes competing interests.
constitution does just that. It is quite remarkable that a document, put together over 220 years ago, has held its ground and gone to influence other countries’ and states’ governments, just like our very own state of California. When comparing the U.S. Constitution with the California Constitution, readers can very much identify the similarities to one another as well as major differences that distinguish the state and the country’s government.
The United States Constitution contains the “Necessary and Proper Clause” which grants Congress the power to enact statutory laws that are “necessary and proper” for carrying out the enumerated powers (US Const. art I, sec. 8, claus. 18). Texas has no equivalent to the “Necessary and Proper Clause” in its constitution. This limits the legislature to powers only specifically written, and thus driving the requirement for frequent constitutional amendments for even minor legislative changes.
The Texas Constitution continues to be in a constant state of development as there have been 673 amendments proposed since 1876 and 491 of which have been adopted. This ability for both the Texas Constitution and the citizens themselves to adapt to change shows the strength of each. The Constitution is stronger as a result of the people and the people continue to be stronger as a result of the Constitution. With the authority that was delegated by the Texas Constitution to the Legislative, Executive, and Judicial departments the citizens of the State of Texas have been given a strong foundation upon which to build a tremendous
The Bill of Rights was created as a listing of the rights granted to citizens, the Bill of Rights serves to protect the people from a powerful government. These civil rights granted to U.S. Citizens are included in the first 10 amendments to the U.S. Constitution. Additionally, Locke’s ideas about checks and balances and the division of church and state were later embodied in the U.S. Constitution as well. The Constitution replaced a more weakly organized system of government as outlined under the Articles of Confederation. John Locke was an English philosopher who lived during 1632-1704.
In 1787, The United States of America formally replaced the Articles of Confederation with a wholly new governing document, written by the delegates who attended the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia. This document, known as the Constitution, has served as the supreme law of our land for the past 228 years. It has stood the test of time and a majority of Americans still support it today (Dougherty). The Constitution was designed in a way that allows for it to be amended, in order to address changing societal needs. Article V discusses the process by which the Constitution can be altered. This feature has enabled it to stay in effect and keep up with current times. The Constitution should not be rewritten every 19 years because it would not only weaken its importance, but it would also hurt foreign relations and continuously rewriting it would give political parties too much power.
The Texas constitution reflects the set of beliefs, ideals and principles of the individuals who drafted it. Unlike the U.S constitution, the Texas constitution is referred to as a statutory constitution. As the US constitution cannot talk about the local governments of each state, the state constitution fills in this gap out of necessity.I feel that the Texas constitution should be changed in order to amend certain parts that are considered to be outdated and also to protect the new policies that are supported by the current population of Texas. Policies are introduced into the constitution to protect them and as the texas culture changes,the new majority wants to amend what the previous majorities have done. Amending the old constitution
From the time the Texas Constitution was constructed, and still until today, a general distrust and dislike for a strong government presence manifested itself in the form of articles and amendments. Looking at the relationship between those who wrote the initial constitution, those who amended it, and its citizen whom ratify it, it may become apparent why there is so much discord, why there have been many calls to rewrite the constitution, and why those attempts have failed.
People who oppose the ratification of another constitution generally believe that the amendment process is a suitable way to allow changes to the document when needed, while also taking the power from the elected and giving it to the electorate. In other words, by adding amendments to the constitution, the constitution can still cover modern issues while limiting the finalizing power of the government, and instead, leaving this decisive power in the hands of the people. Additionally, the ratification of a new constitution could not only be a risky decision, but could potentially be a chance of failure for yet another Texas constitution. Although the current constitution is based on the infrastructure of a society that was established over a hundred years ago, the moralistic and individualistic views of conservative Texans are in compliance with the main ideas of this historic document. The present day constitution also makes it extremely difficult for any legislation to be passed or even considered, fulfilling many citizens’ wishes that the government not intervene in one’s personal life. The Texas constitution keeps the power in the electorate, always allowing for its citizens to a have a say in what should be added, while keeping as much government intrusion out as
For citizens of states to be able to just vote to change their state constitution shouldn’t be easy. The constitution was established for very important reasons. For us to have set of rules to follow on how to run the states. Even though it is the responsibility of the states to enforce the Constitution to manage the federal government, the state cannot run without the constitution. Basically the Constitution keeps everyone in line, the people and the states.
The state of Texas operates under a 131 year old constitution, comprised of 385 sections. Amendments to the Constitution are voted in and out at least every two years. The