Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Living in country vs city compare and contrast
Urban vs countryside lifestyle
Living in country vs city compare and contrast
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Living in country vs city compare and contrast
County and City Living Where you choose to live alters your lifestyle and can even define who you are. This essay will specifically compare and contrast, having a country life and a city life. Both city and country living make excellent lives, but the lifestyle chosen can have a great impact on a person’s finances, serenity, and character. City and country living commonly have expenses, though country life has more options to avoid expenses by undertaking tasks yourself. There’s nothing wrong with dwelling in the city, but it can be expensive. Everyday life has unexpected expenses, but there are expenses that can be expected. City life, as with any lifestyle, partakes things such as food and entertainment that are portions of ordinary life. …show more content…
The price of food in a grocery store is expensive and it seems to get more so every year. The price of food seems to be on a scale; with the lowest priced foods being processed, unhealthy junk and the higher priced foods being what is healthy to consume. This is fine if you don’t mind being unhealthy (which is unlikely) or if you don’t mind spending a great deal of money to keep healthy. In the city, if you wish to be entertained it’s going to cost you. For example; if you wish to practice hitting golf balls you must pay to use a driving range, or, if you shoot a gun you need to pay to use a firing range. However; if you live in the country, food and entertainment can be cheaper if not free. Country life provides ample room for growing food, or raising livestock for consumption. This means you are not limited to only buying the costly food from a grocery store. Although you must buy seeds for planting and animals for raising, it is far less costly than food from a grocery store. Regarding entertainment, country life provides plenty of it and at a low price of …show more content…
City life can be convenient for a person; they don’t have to travel very far to get what they need. This convenience can often make them unappreciative of what it is they have. City life tends to require very little physical work, consequently, a lack of physical work can often lead to laziness. Meanwhile; when a person lives out in the country, away from everything else, it tends to take longer to acquire things (whether it is the drive to a store or waiting for the internet to load). The wait for something, whether it be a necessity or not, will often make someone appreciative when they obtain the item. Country life can be a great deal of physical work. Having to do work on the land is part of the country lifestyle. Many who live in the country, live from the land and there is no room for laziness. If you are a lazy farmer you will starve to death, it’s as simple as that. This need for physical work becomes part of their character: a hard-working
Insincere? The definition is not expressing genuine feelings. This was a trait that was possessed by many people in the time period of the 1920’s. The detrimental effects of war and post-war life left many people questioning if genuine people still existed in the world. This was shown by two extremely influential writers of this time period, F. Scott Fitzgerald and E.E. Cummings, whose engrossment in the insincere life of others inspired and influenced them to write on it. F. Scott Fitzgerald, writer of the novel The Great Gatsby, and E.E. Cummings, writer of the poem “anyone lived in a pretty how town”, convey a similar theme in their works through the use of tone, imagery, and motifs. Both selections are about the insincerity and carelessness
Utopia and Il Muqaddimah both show the importance of families and social groups in the civilization they live in. Utopian families all have an equal role in the cities they live in; they are a microcosm of their city and its objective to survive; however, in Il Muqaddimah the subjects have the responsibility to help the ruler prosper. Utopians work and in return share what they earn, while subjects work for their survival. Utopians all have an equal work load and subjects hardships depend on their social status both situations lead to prosperity.
Throughout A Tale of Two Cities, Charles Dickens repeats a number of symbols and motifs. By employing these two literary devices throughout the duration of the story, Dickens is working to emphasize the importance of these specific components of the story. Motifs and symbols represent repeating ideas that help the reader to understand, as well as highlight the author’s central idea. Dickens employs the usage of symbols and motifs, such that by using both he adds a layer of significance and deeper meaning to actions, people, as well as objects. Additionally, by using symbols and motifs, Dickens is able to create a story in which both the characters, and the plot are interwoven.
F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby is about a love triangle between Gatsby, Daisy and Tom Buchanan. Gatsby wants Daisy all to himself but she is married to her careless husband Tom. E.E Cummings’ poem “anyone lived in a pretty how town” is about how any and everyone just hopes for better in their town. Both the novel and poem convey a similar theme in their works through the use of tone, imagery, diction, symbolism and motifs. Both selections are about the American dream and reveal that in order to achieve one’s dream one cannot just hope and be careless with others.
Most of the people have a single-story house, they do not need to pay for living. People can buy land and make a home. The city does not separate resident area and free will to build own design houses. we can open stores and restaurants beside the road. The city has a public hospital and some private clinics.
setting being in the city rather than a small town, is that the cities often have many people
The burdensome excellence of living in a city: A review of Georg Simmel’s “The Metropolis and the Mental Life”
The age-old question has plagued many, “Should I live in a city or should I live in the country?”. There are many advantages and disadvantages to choosing a lifestyle in either setting, and careful examination of all aspects is needed to make the perfect decision for you.
There are numerous differences between living in a small town or a big city. Small towns and big cities each have their unique advantages and disadvantages. Where a person grows up plays an integral part in shaping their personality. And, sometimes a person’s personality can have a great impact on their preference of where to live. Preferring a small town or big city is a very individual matter. Different people have different reasons for favoring one over the other. Personally, and admitting that my views are shaped by my personal experiences, I believe the advantages of growing up in a small town – as long as that small town is in reasonably close proximity to a decent sized city.
Imagine having to choose to reside in one place for the rest of your life. Which would you opt for? Some people would argue that the hyperactive lifestyle that a big city has to offer has more benefits than living in the country. However, others would contend that the calm and peaceful environment of the countryside is much more rewarding. Several people move from the city to a farm to get away from the hustle and bustle. Likewise, some farmers have traded in their tractors and animals to live a fast paced city life. Of course, not all large cities are the same nor are all of the places in the country identical. Realizing this, ten years ago, I decided to hang up the city life in Indiana to pursue a more laid back approach to life in rural Tennessee. Certainly, city life and life in the country have their benefits, but they also have distinguishable differences.
My mother often told my sisters and me stories of her childhood move from Virginia to North Carolina. She’d describe the heartbreak of being ripped away from her home, family, and best friends. Although it was painful in the moment, in hindsight she can honestly say that the move was one of the best things that even happened to her. Here she met the love of her life and gave birth to her three girls. The change of environment impacted her life forever. In Great Expectations, Charles Dickens writes of a boy named Pip as he grows and changes as he transitions from his home in the marsh to the hustle and bustle of London. In his novel he proves that our surroundings have a life-changing impact upon us.
The two neighborhoods that I chose to use for this assignment are vastly different. The main reason is because they are on opposite sides of the country. The first neighborhood that I visited is the one that I grew up in. This neighborhood is in Connecticut, on the East Coast, all the way across the country from the neighborhood that I currently live in here in West Hollywood. Most of my family lives in Connecticut and Massachusetts and I’m the only one who lives on the West Coast. A big difference is that the neighborhood in Connecticut has houses that are more spaced out, have larger lawns, and very many more trees. There are very few apartments there, unlike where I live now where my entire street is almost all apartment buildings.
I have opinions of all the places I have lived. Each place has its advantages and disadvantages, and I am not sure if there is any place that really fits me well. In this essay, I will examine the bad and good aspects of some of the places I have lived. Then, I will compare what I consider to be "ideal" conditions with the good aspects of those places where I have lived. Lastly, I will choose the place that I think is best for me.
The first of the three texts presents a quite neutral and objective view on the matter of Simple Living. The text doesn’t display any meanings but simply tells about the negative and positive sides of Simple Living. The text opts to present the reason that lies within the people that have given their normal life up and started living simple. The text explains how people have made the switch from their normal life to their new life. They have gotten rid of all the things that are non-essential. They don’t focus on materialistic stuff and therefore they have the time to enjoy the more important things in life. Stuff like friends, family, girlfriends/boyfriends and so on. Another statement from the text is that many people prefer Simple Living because of the economic benefits. It is with no doubt remarkably cheaper. Text 1 concludes that Simple Living can lead to a better life, because of increased interaction with family etc. and less stress in your everyday life.
City life and Countryside life are two different ways of living, having its own advantages and disadvantages. The significant differences in city and countryside life are social opportunities, culture, sources of entertainment, and quality of life. Moving in the fast paced city life was difficult for me after being raised in a country area for 14 years. Thus, I can say that I have witnessed the best and the worst of these two worlds.