During the Enlightenment, prominent intellectuals such as Voltaire, Montesquieu, and Rousseau explored humanity in an age of unprecedented ideas. Their works were characterized by a focus on reason as a means to explore other key topics like progress, secularism, and government. During this same period, philosopher Mary Wollstonecraft produced similarly groundbreaking works. In A Vindication of the Rights of Women, Wollstonecraft relied on the Enlightenment ideals of progress, government, and reason to argue for the equal treatment of women. Wollstonecraft claimed that if reason was correctly applied, the current conditions and rights of women, though unacceptable, were bound to improve. Additionally, Wollstonecraft applied the typical Enlightenment …show more content…
rejection of monarchy to invoke sympathy for those without power. Mary Wollstonecraft is rarely grouped with the Enlightenment greats like Voltaire or Rousseau, yet her use of reason, government, and progress to justify women’s rights define her as a classic Enlightenment thinker. Mary Wollstonecraft reinforces her status as an Enlightenment thinker by arguing for progress, that humanity marches forward to an improved future.
For many Enlightenment thinkers, progress was the “working faith of great vitality” (Ginsberg). Prominent Enlightenment philosopher Marie-Jean de Condorcet theorized that the application of reason means there is “no limit to the perfecting powers of man” (qtd. in Spielvogel 608). Wollstonecraft employed Condocet’s idea that progress was built on reason to push for the equal treatment of women. She stated that “rational creatures” always progress, and “rise in excellence by the exercise of powers implanted for that purpose” (Wollstonecraft). Both Wollstonecraft and other Enlightenment thinkers believed that progress was innately good. Despite the many forces that tempt it otherwise, Enlightenment thinker Voltaire had faith that reason was powerful enough to guide progress in the right direction. Voltaire supported progress, “in spite of all the passions which make war on it, in spite of all the tyrants who would drown it in blood, in spite of the imposters who would annihilate it by superstition” (Ginsberg). Wollstonecraft echoed an equivalent belief in progress. She acknowledged that progress is not always a straight line, and “passions should unfold our reason” (Wollstonecraft). Just like her counterparts, Wollstonecraft recognized that “present evil would produce future good” (Wollstonecraft). Wollstonecraft’s argument for …show more content…
progress built on reason closely echoes that of her Enlightenment counterparts, strengthening her position as an Enlightenment thinker. In addition to a focus on reason in growing knowledge and ending prejudices, Wollstonecraft implemented the typical Enlightenment criticism of monarchy to support her feminist argument. Eminent philosophers condemned the use of governmental monarchies in a new age of free-thinking and individualism. Philosopher Montesquieu argued for a more fluid government in The Spirit of the Laws, revealing himself as “a relativist . . . to Montesquieu, the forms of political and social institutions varied” (Spielvogel 601). Montesquieu felt that absolute power should be avoided at all costs. Instead of a monarchy, republics were “suitable for small states and based on citizen involvement” (Spielvogel 601). When a monarchy could not be avoided, Montesquieu urged for “checks and balances created by means of a separation of powers” (Spielvogel 601). In A Vindication of the Rights of Women, Wollstonecraft, expressed her own distrust of absolute power and monarchy: “It is impossible for any man, when the most favourable circumstances concur, to acquire sufficient knowledge and strength of mind to discharge the duties of a king” (Wollstonecraft). A minority group cannot thrive under an all-powerful monarch. Wollstonecraft’s rejection of absolute monarchy matches with that of key Enlightenment thinkers, and further demonstrates her role as an Enlightenment philosopher. Mary Wollstonecraft’s beliefs regarding reason as a means of ending prejudices and of growth in knowledge match closely with those of Enlightenment thinkers.
Echoing the popular Enlightenment belief, philosopher Montesquieu urged the population to use “reason to liberate human beings from their prejudices” (Spielvogel 601). Wollstonecraft also claimed that reason holds the power to end prejudices, and felt it “necessary to pursue the course of reason as it has been perplexed and involved in error, by various adventitious circumstances” (Wollstonecraft). Wollstonecraft expanded on Montesquieu’s idea that reason ends prejudices; prejudice is often caused by false reason: “deeply rooted prejudices have clouded reason” (Wollstonecraft). Women were seen as convincingly inferior because of a false use of reason: “Men, in general, seem to employ their reason to justify prejudices . . . . based on partial experiences on just, though, narrow views” (Wollstonecraft). In addition, both Wollstonecraft and philosophers of the time regarded reason as a way to expand knowledge. Reason was believed to lead to growth of the mind: “Our knowledge, then, is derived from our environment, not from heredity; from reason, not from faith” (Spielvogel 600). Wollstonecraft shared a similar sentiment. She affirmed the connection between reason and knowledge: “from the exercise of reason, knowledge, and virtue naturally flow” (Wollstonecraft). Both Wollstonecraft and the Enlightenment thinkers shared a
comprehensive view of reason that extended far beyond the simple presence of reason in humanity. Mary Wollstonecraft’s belief in reason as a means of ending prejudice and as a pathway to knowledge further support her stance as an Enlightenment philosopher. The Enlightenment marked a period of unparalleled intellectual growth. Great philosophers like Voltaire, Montesquieu, and Rousseau established new paths of thought through the enlightenment ideas. At the same time, Mary Wollstonecraft applied the ideas of progress, government, and reason to strengthen her argument for women’s rights. While Mary Wollstonecraft uniquely crafted an argument in support of women’s rights, she undoubtedly applied enlightenment ideals to make her point, solidifying her role as an Enlightenment philosopher. Wollstonecraft’s ideas gained traction and recognition over time, yet her work often remains separate from the original ‘elite’ class of Enlightenment thinkers. Perhaps this is because of Wollstonecraft’s unique take on these ideals, and her use of them to support women, or maybe it is because she is a woman. Wollstonecraft absolutely deserves to gain status as an enlightenment thinker.
Both Mary Wollstonecraft and Sor Juana de la Cruz are writers of the Enlightenment period, but they each approach women’s rights in a different way. While De la Druz was a Catholic nun from Mexico ad preferred to study and be alone, Wollstonecraft asserted women’s rights for all through publications directed at the masses. During the Enlightenment, people began to question old authoritative models like the Church. Our texts states, “thinkers believed inreason as a dependable guide. Both sides insisted that one should not take any assertion of truth on faith, blindly following the authority of others; instead, one should think skeptically about causes and effects, subjecting all truth-claims to logic andrational inquiry” (Puchner 92). Indeed,
"This is the very point I aim at. I do not wish [women] to have power over men; but over themselves" (Wollstonecraft 63). Wollstonecraft made this statement in response to Roseau dictating that if society "[Educated] women like men..." (Wollstonecraft 63), and women would resemble the male sex, and then carry less power over men. Instead of succumbing to men, Wollstonecraft stressed how education could elevate a women to reach equal statue in society. Following similar ideas to the Tao Te Ching and the Art of War, Wollstonecraft serves education as a tool of discipline to women who can use it to help elevate them in society. Wollstonecraft points out in her introduction that, "One cause to [the problem of women sacrificing their usefulness and strength to beauty attributes] to a false system of education..." (Wollstonecraft 6), and how a reformation and push for women to better educate themselves and look past what is currently there will help them reach higher status in society; therefore giving them their own independence. As Wollstonecraft dictates, "It follows then, I think, that from their infancy women should either be shut up like eastern princes, or educated in such a manner as to be able to think and act for themselves (Wollstonecraft
While the issue of women’s suffrage has roots based in every country in the world, most think that the initial inroads were painfully carved through the efforts of early women pioneers in America. This perception is easily formed due to the early publication of Mary Wollstonecraft’s Vindication of the Right’s of Women in 1792. However, the movement gained national attention in New Zealand in 1893 and in Australia in 1902, eclipsing the suffrage movement in Britain, Canada and America by at least 25 years. The struggle for women’s rights has been ponderous and slow moving throughout the years and not without internal divisions.
In the years of 1670 – 1800 there was an intellectual movement that dominated Europe on ideas that were based around reason, the movement is the called the enlightenment. This was a period of: relative political stability, economic recovery, prosperity for emerging “middle class”, new markets, and trends in consumption. Additionally, society was more accepting or more tolerable to different religions, while also applying science to world problems rather than relying on religion to fix the problem. In saying that, these ideas could not be possible without people with great minds to elicit such ideas. These great thinkers challenged their society’s traditional way of operating. Some of the thinkers discussed will be Thomas Jefferson and Mary
Mary Wollstonecraft lived in a time where women had no right to vote, no right to education beyond what their mother or governess taught them, and basically no right to individuality or an opinion. They were considered possessions and virtually had no mind of their own. She realized that this was a problem of society and openly voiced her opinions on the matter. She wrote the book A Vindication of the Rights of Women in response to a literary response to the society's so-called proper behavior of a woman and what her rights should be. But her opinions were brought on by more that the ability to think for herself; she suffered much during her childhood and throughout the years to come. Wollstonecraft dealt with the beating of her mother and sister, death of a close friend, and even a nervous breakdown of her sister. Her own experiences in her life inspired her to write a book that would cause her to be criticized harshly for her radical views.
Chimamanda Ngozi describes a feminist as “A person who believes in the social, political, and economic equality of the sexes.”During her Ted Talk from April 12th, 2013, She talks about how since she knew she was female she would have to try and prove her worth in school. She states that “I was worried that if I looked too feminine I would not be taken seriously. I really wanted to wear my shiny lip gloss and my girly skirt, but I decided not to. I wore a very serious, very manly, and very ugly suit.The sad truth of the matter is that when it comes to appearance we start off with men as the standard, as the norm. Many of us think that the less feminine a woman appears, the more likely she is to be taken seriously.” Her words ring true especially
Indisputably, Mary Wollstonecraft was one of the most influential figures of Enlightenment, also considered the ‘first feminist’. It is certain that her works and writing has influenced the lives of many women and altered the outlook of some societies on women, evolving rights of women a great deal from what they used to be in her time. It is clear that Wollstonecraft’s arguments and writing will remain applicable and relevant to societies for many years to come, as although there has been progression, there has not been a complete resolution. Once women receive so easily the freedom, rights and opportunities that men inherently possess, may we be able to say that Wollstonecraft has succeeded in vindicating the rights of women entirely.
Mary Wollstonecraft was as revolutionary in her writings as Thomas Paine. They were both very effective writers and conveyed the messages of their ideas quite well even though both only had only the most basic education. Wollstonecraft was a woman writing about women's rights at a time when these rights were simply non-existent and this made her different from Paine because she was breaking new ground, thus making her unique. Throughout her lifetime, Wollstonecraft wrote about the misconception that women did not need an education, but were only meant to be submissive to man. Women were treated like a decoration that had no real function except to amuse and beguile. Wollstonecraft was the true leader in women's rights, advocating a partnership in relationships and marriage rather than a dictatorship. She was firm in her conviction that education would give women the ability to take a more active role in life itself.
It is a declaration for the equal rights of man and women. The political significance of Mary Wollstonecraft cannot be overstated—her work is regarded as one of the first greatest feminist treatises in history and is also seen as the first step towards liberal feminism. She fought equality for women in the political sphere, but she also addressed the need for equality in the social, private realm. She emphasized the need for reform in women’s status, education, and maternal duties. In A Vindication of the Rights of Woman, Wollstonecraft argues that men and women are born with the same ability to reason. Therefore, men and woman should equally be able to exercise reason and attain knowledge. And conclusively, educated women would ultimately improve society; they would become better wives and mothers (72, A Vindication of the Rights of Woman). She argues that the current education system (i.e. Rousseau’s ideas of women education) restricts women and subjects them into passivity. Women are not perceivably “smart” as men because they have not been given the opportunity to be; women receive a “disorderly kind of education” (46, A Vindication of the Rights of Woman). Women are kept in passivity, forced to superficiality and shallowness. She derides these traits that are seen as inherent to a woman’s nature and asks the powerful question: how are women supposed to contribute to society if they have been reduced to their appearance and bodily function? For a thriving, modern and true civilization to succeed, each and every individual must be encouraged to seek moral and intellectual development, including
Mary Wollstonecraft was a British feminist writer and intellectual person from the eighteenth century (“Who Is Mary Wollstonecraft?”). Raised by a violent and physically abusive father after her mother's death, Mary eventually left home to pursue a better life (“Who Is Mary Wollstonecraft?”). Though not receiving much education herself, Mary established a school for girls with her sister Eliza and friend Fanny, but it was shut down a year later because of financial issues (“On National Education”). Then taking up a job as a governess, she realized that an existence revolving around domestic labor did not suit her (Tomaselli). She next took up a position as a translator and publisher, and ultimately became an author with books such
Mary Wollstonecraft was the spear head of feminism in early England. She brought thoughts and arguments against societal norms into the minds of many that her book, A Vindication of the Rights of Woman, became household knowledge throughout the United States. Her writings and radical ideas gave her the nickname of the Mother of Feminism of the early feminist movement. Likewise, Karl Marx published his Communist Manifesto in England. His writing aroused many thoughts focused on the class norms that existed throughout the world. Both, the Communist Manifesto and A Vindication of the Rights of Woman, fight the exploitation of their respective classes and cause.
In Mary Wollstonecraft’s The Wrongs of Woman, or Maria and Mary Robinson’s The Natural Daughter women are subject to many hardships economically, simply because they are women. Women are not given sufficient opportunity, as men are, to pursue a living. Even if she is a woman of taste and morals, she may be treated as though she is a criminal and given no means to protect herself. In order for a woman to be sustained, she must marry into slavery, dishonor herself through unsavory work, or be lucky enough to be properly educated and given proper reference.
Vindication of the Rights for Women by Mary Wollstonecraft was published in 1792, during the French Revolution. Wollstonecraft preached that intellect will always govern to persuade women not to endeavor to acquire knowledge but convince them that the soft phrases, acceptability of heart, delicacy of sentiment, and refinement of taste, are most preferred. By intellect, I mean the men because they were the ones that were allowed to get an education therefore allowing them to become intellectual. Wollstonecraft cleverly does not try to prove her point through protests or accusations, but argue that women are not naturally inferior to men, but appear to be only because they lack education. She suggests that both men and women should be treated as rational beings and imagines a social order founded on reason. She believed it was unfair for women to be treated differently and passionately wanted to make a change. That it was time to let go of feelings and begin the thought process behind the rationality of the women’s predicament. Men felt that while they would get an education an...
Mary Wollstonecraft was a self-educated, radical philosopher who wrote about liberation, and empowering women. She had a powerful voice on her views of the rights of women to get good education and career opportunities. She pioneered the debate for women’s rights inspiring many of the 19th and the 20th century’s writers and philosophers to fight for women’s rights, as well. She did not only criticize men for not giving women their rights, she also put a blame on women for being voiceless and subservient. Her life and, the surrounding events of her time, accompanied by the strong will of her, had surely affected the way she chose to live her life, and to form her own philosophies.
The Enlightenment questioned the role of women. For centuries men have dominated what the role of women should be. Many male writers believed that that women were lower intellectually value to men. But there were some philosophies, which showed some positive feed back for women. They argued that women were capable of all that men are. It was the woman thinkers who added new perspectives to the women question by suggesting better improvements for woman. Those thinkers believed that woman should be better educated. They should be able to learn what men are learning. A English writer Mary Wollstonecraft (1759-1797) was the fonder of modern European feminism. She began the women movement arguing the rights of women. She declared, that women should have equal rights with education and in economic and political life.