Compare And Contrast A Rose For Emily And A Good Man Is Hard To Find

897 Words2 Pages

A Good Man is Hard to Find and A Rose For Emily: Old Habits Die Hard A Good Man is Hard to Find, by Flannery O’Connor, and A Rose for Emily, by William Faulkner, are two stories that reveal how the internal character and values of two individuals have long term consequences for themselves and those around them. Both O’Connor’s and Faulkner’s stories take place in the Southern United States during times when society was changing from what it once was in the South. The main characters inability to adapt to societal changes and overcome pride and personal biases, results in internal and external conflicts for themselves and others. Unfortunately, these conflicts, coupled with their arrogance, also lead to isolation and loss for them both. In …show more content…

Ever since she was a child, Emily and her family have always looked upon themselves as “a little too high for what they really were” (Faulkner 302). Both women are trapped products of a by gone era, yet both refuse to move past old, arrogant attitudes and biases. Regrettably, for both of them, this character trait follows them until the end of their lives. Even though the grandmother strains to bring herself down to the Misfit’s level at the end, it is only in an attempt to save herself. Emily, on the other hand, does the opposite, and makes no attempt at all to associate herself on the same level as the townsfolk of Jefferson. Eventually though, she dies alone and destitute as …show more content…

In both stories, these women thought of themselves as respectable women of high reputation and honor. However, their views and attitudes showed their true pride and contributed to the struggles and conflicts that they found within their lives and with those around them. In both women’s lives, the environment and culture around them had changed and progressed into something that neither of them had completely accepted. The former traditions and attitudes of the South that were firmly ingrained into both of them is expressed when the Grandmother states, “In my time...people did right” (O'Connor 407). This pretentious attitude by the Grandmother contributed to her relational conflicts within her own family, whereas Emily’s likeminded attitude about the past can be seen when she continually insists that, “I have no taxes in Jefferson” (Faulkner 300). Her rationale for claiming such things was based on her insistence that the town authorities “see Colonel Sartoris,” the man who had tolerated Emily and even dismissed her tax debts in the past (Faulkner 300). Yet, Colonel Sartoris has also been dead for over ten years. This overall mindset, much like the grandmother’s, contributed to Emily’s ongoing conflicts with and isolation from the residents of

Open Document