Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Determinants Of Organization Culture
Determinants of organizational culture
Determinants Of Organization Culture
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Determinants Of Organization Culture
How does a company’s culture affect the team building, group cohesion, within the company? People, being social by nature, are inclined to join groups and seek others; and this does not change in the work environment. Employees want to be part of something within the work place and the company culture can affect how they invest in groups/teams in the work place.
Does the company encourage risk taking or attention to detail? Are they people or outcome focused? Do they prefer individual work or the team approach to projects? Do they promote their employees to be competitive with one another? Is the company in a growth cycle or are they just hanging on to the position they hold? The answer to these questions becomes clear by reviewing the company’s culture. In addition, this affects group cohesion through perspective, implementation, and development within that company.
Companies build teams out of the need to accomplish goals, but the culture of the group can affect the cohesiveness of the group, and the outcome of the project. What impact can a culture have on the group cohesiveness and therefore productivity? Does the team have an obligation to alter the culture to accomplish the tasks, if the current culture preempts productivity?
To explore the impact of company cultures influence on team building it is necessary to understand what parts make the whole:
1. Culture
2. Teams
3. Cohesion
Therefore, a gathering of these aspects determines the sum of the parts. Consequently, if any of these aspects if not in balance then the productivity of a team is faulty, and everyone involved loses.
Culture
Each company has a specific set of operational procedures for how their office or location runs; these can include...
... middle of paper ...
... Approach to Cultural Transformation. Burlington, MA: Elsevier.
Gitman, L. J., & McDaniel, C. (2008). The Future of Business: The Essentials. Mason, OH: Cengage Learning.
Maryland Association of CPA's. (2009, September 29). CPAs in Second Life at the AICPA Tech + Conference. Retrieved August 2, 2010, from You Tube: http://www.youtube.com/user/JTSeltra#p/a/f/2/U88bTeBpumQ
McKenna, E. F. (2000). Business Psychology and Organisational Behaviour. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
Pattison, K. (2008, August 5). Why You Should Have Your Next Business Meeting in Second Life. Retrieved August 7, 2010, from Fast Company: http://www.fastcompany.com/articles/2008/08/interview-philip-rosedale.html
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2009). Organizational Behavior. Upper Saddle, NJ: Pearson.
Schein, E. H. (2004). Organizational culture and leadership. San Fransisco: Jossey Bass.
This Paper will analyze the influence leadership, team development, motivation and chemistry has on team cohesion. This paper explores three published journal articles, and two books where results and research on leadership, team development, motivation and chemistry were collected. The research indicates that each concept intertwines with one another and all concepts influence the outcome of good or bad team cohesion. Through the use of the movie Remember the Titans this paper will help readers further understand how team cohesion is formed and influenced. Overall, it was found that if a team does not have good leadership, proper team development, and good motivation and chemistry, then team cohesion is inhibited as well as performance. These
Aspects of the perceived culture in an o organization, such as, level of communication among members, the level of support in regard for new innovations and technology, as well as the amount of support by upper level management all have a positive influence on the manner employees behave and interact with each other as well as how they treat consumers and suppliers. If employees emulate a manager that does not share the same values and beliefs of others within the organization, or that does not share a good work ethic, employees will not complete tasks and fail to be productive. It works as well in the opposite manner; when employees see a manager who supports a company’s mission, its goals, and business strategy, the organizational culture of the company will aide in providing a clear direction for employees to follow and strive towards. Ultimately, the culture supports desire business strategies and the overall mission of an organization, and the capacity of the culture is dependent on just how intensely employees share the values and basic assumption of the
They identify with the group and get support by strengthening their relationships with each other. Also, cohesiveness increases an individual and group performance (More, Vito & Walsh, 2012). In cohesive groups that value productivity, it is typical to expect the highest levels of performance. On the other hand, cohesiveness can become pathological as well. When there is a conflict between the objectives and the needs of its members, cohesiveness has a negative effect on their performance. In addition, cohesiveness of a group discourages individuality, critical thinking, and innovation (More, Vito & Walsh, 2012). Any ideas or behavior outside the group is seen as illegal, divisive, and absolutely
Teams have become integral parts and driving forces of success in organizations. A key common attribute among highly
In conclusion, team cohesion is still a difficult concept to pin down, but I believe the definition is a multi-faceted one where many factors to contribute to group cohesion. In addition, it is my belief that conflict or performance of an objective can either create cohesion or a stronger group bond. However team cohesion is achieved by the organization, it is how well the team contributes to the overall good of the group that the better the group will perform, which in turns has a positive effect on overall organizational goals.
Organizational culture is the system of shared beliefs and values that develops within an organization and guides the behavior of its members, while organizational structure is an expression of social and economic principles of hierarchy and specialization (Kinicki, 2015). Both the culture and the structure of an organization are important things for management to understand in order to successfully set and achieve an organization’s goals. Companies who excel in highly competitive fields can attribute their successful economic performance to a cohesive corporate culture that increases competitiveness and profitability. This culture is best utilized in an organization that has the necessary structure to allow its employees to coordinate their actions to achieve its goals.
Cohesion is the “glue” that binds a group of people together. It represents the unity of a group and shows the strength of the bond between group members. This is a direct reflection of the efforts that are coordinated to achieve a goal. Many factors can affect the success of group cohesion such as group size, stability, and success; however a level of group cohesion can still be achieved if the members have a willingness to work together towards the same goal. There is very little commonality between the cohesion that exists and looking at each factor, the individual might identify keys to group cohesion success. On a successful team the capabilities of the members to work together on future projects is sustainable and stronger.
It is proven that teams who work well together perform and have a higher rate of success compared to teams who do not work well together or communicate with each other. A recent article with regards to leadership discussed the topic of group cohesion and how this is a factor for success. The article discussed several situations, one about a business company, one about a sports team and one about a military operation. The article closely analyzed the leaders of the three situations and discussed the similarities and differences between the three. The main similarity between was there focus on cohesion. The article contained facts about how the business was operating and how that in recent years, production and sales as increased drastically, and one factor for this increase was the CEO implemented a mandatory team building exercise each
The concept of organizational cultures was first raised in 1970s, and soon became a fashionable topic. Organizational culture is the shared beliefs, values and behaviours of the group. Theorists of organizations believe that organizational culture represents the pattern of behaviours, values, and beliefs of an organization. Hence, studies around organizational culture have been seen as great helpful and essential for understanding organizations and their behaviours. Additionally, organizational culture has been considered to be an important determinant of organizational success. Therefore, leaders and managers pay more than more attentions on this topic, focusing on constructing and managing organizational cultures.
Cultural diversity is an essential piece of the team-building puzzle. As stated earlier, a heterogeneous team usually equals a successful team. A culturally diverse team brings the obvious cultural differences in language, dress and traditions to the table. In addition, less tangible characteristic such as moral values are equally, if not more important. These different methodologies and teachings help influence the team's direction. Persons of Western culture will have a different set of beliefs and methodologies from those of Middle Eastern or Eastern ethnicity. When team members take the time to learn and understand each culture's moral value, the result is a strong team foundation. High performance teams take and incorporate these cultural differences and use these different beliefs and values to attain the team goal.
Overall company will find it extremely hard to succeed without the support of teams. Work group members will not only help each other improve their performance but also help improve the performance of the business. Teamwork allows them to learn to trust and respect each other; this will come in handy when the business is forced to deal with a loss of a team member or loss in revenue. Creating strong hard working teams will benefit a business in the short-run as well as in the long-run. That’s what business of the 21st century should strive for.
It brought organisational culture to the performance of a company, which has become a critical topic in management department. In addition to organisational culture, organisations need to be aware and prepared for changes in the expanding workforce as business grows. Companies are faced with maximizing benefits as well as profits while minimizing negative factors that come from those changes. There is no one answer to the issue, but some of the guidelines are clear. Awareness of organisational culture, teamwork, individual performance, external environment adaptation, leadership, and measurement of organisational culture are key factors that lead a company to perform better.
The concept of organizational culture is one of the most debated topics for researchers and theorists. There is no one accepted definition of culture. People even said that it is hard to define culture and even more change it. It is considered a complex part of an organization although many have believed that culture influences employee behavior and organizational effectiveness (Kilmann, Saxton, & Serpa 1985; Marcoulides & Heck, 1993; Schein, 1985a, 1990).
Organizational culture is the key to organizational excellence and leadership is a function to create and manage culture (Chen 1992). Organizational researchers have become more aware of the importance of understanding and enhancing the cultural life of the institution. "This study is one of a group of companies with high-performance in North America, interest in organizational culture is an important element in organizational success. Tesluk et al (1997). Looking at the" soft "of the organization, the researchers claim that" the organizational culture may be suitable for a means to explore and understanding of life at work, and make them more humane and more pronounced (Tesluk et al, 1997), and the graves (1986) also stressed the importance of corporate culture, and the need for research strategies and methods of investigating the various elements and processes of the organizational culture. He argued the culture that meets the basic needs of belonging and security in an attempt to describe this gathering that culture is "the only thing that distinguishes one company from another gives them coherence and self-confidence and rationalises the lives of those who work for it. Standard that may seem random, is to enhance the life to be different, and safe to be similar, and culture is a concept that provides the means to achieve this compromise (p. 157).
Block, S. B., & Hirt, G. A. (2005). Foundations of financial management. (11th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.