Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Community-based corrections as an alternative to incarceration
The effectiveness of community corrections
The effectiveness of community corrections
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Community Corrections in Canada A Majority of Canada's federal offender population only a portion serve part of their sentences in prison. Canada, like the US offers the chance for offenders to serve in the community, adhering to certain conditions and be supervised by the Correctional Service of Canada (CSC). While the maximum length to be on probation is 3yrs, on any given day there will be about 95,680 more offenders on some form of conditional release supervised by the CSC. The country believes such work is essential because “experience has shown a majority of offenders are more likely to become law-abiding citizens if they participate in a program of gradual, supervised release.” Currently woman account for 20% of those released on …show more content…
community supervision. Long term and dangerous offenders are about the only ones who will not be eligible for community release. Depending on the length of your sentence is what determines when you are eligible for parole in Canada. The country utilizes community corrections sanctions such as probation, parole and electronic monitoring. Most of the conditions of p/p are the same as in the US. Everyone must remain a law-abiding citizen and depending on the type of sentence special conditions may be given, such as reporting, counseling, and community service. Research has shown them that increased punishment does not produce increase deterrence. However, the extent which community programs are used in Canada is pure evidence that the concept has been overall accepted. CSC has around 1,355 parole officers and 7,760 correctional officers.
CSC manages and maintains 91 parole offices, 15 community correctional centers and 200+ community residential facilities. In Canada to become employed as a parole/probation officer you must hold a degree in one of the following fields: social work, psychology, sociology, and criminology, possess strong verbal and written communication skills, as well as counselling/assessment skills, and be able to establish and maintain client relationships. Plus, once hired in all new probation/parole officers must successfully complete a comprehensive basic training program that builds on the research and principles of effective correctional intervention and programming. They’re given ongoing training in subjects that’ll help them perform their duties in a professional and effective …show more content…
manner. The Parole Board of Canada, has total authority under the Corrections and Conditional Release Act, to grant, deny, and revoke parole for offenders serving sentences of two or more years.
They also make the parole decisions for offenders serving sentences of less than two years in all provinces/territories with the exception of Ontario and Quebec, which have their own parole boards. Penitentiaries and parole supervision are overseen by the Correctional Service of Canada under the federal Corrections and Conditional Release Act. The National Parole Board is the conditional release judgement -maker under the same Act. It is an independent administrative tribunal of government appointees who make case by case release decisions. Canada also has a strategic plan for indigenous corrections to respond to their needs in the community due to the high amount that re-enter the system. The first person to be granted ticket of leave in Canada was Henry A. Clermont, who had been convicted of stealing a letter. On November 1899, he was released from St. Vincent de Paul Penitentiary in Montreal. The Canadian Ticket of Leave Act was based almost word for word on the British legislation. There was no reference in the text to the purpose of conditional release, though ticket of leave was generally understood to be a form of pardon. It wasn’t until 1959 when the Parole Board of Canada was created under the Parole Act. Probation is a sentence that may be passed down by a court pursuant to the
Criminal Code, which is established by Parliament, although it must be administered by the provincial or territorial jurisdiction where the crime has taken place. It may be for a period of up to three years and may be combined with a custodial sentence of up to two years less a day, in a provincial prison. Community corrections across the bridge has shown to reduce recidivism slightly. As of now it went from 43-41% with a significant difference in women and men with women dropping from 30-23% with more than half of reconvictions occurring after their sentence was up. Not to mention 93% of men and women combined, have not committed a crime while on parole in the last 10 years and 99% of them not committing a violent new act. I would have to say after researching it that Canada probably has a better system than the US. In my eyes, the US is a school to prison pipeline. The US is focused more on money and incarceration than they are on rehabilitating offenders. I see the US quick to keep building more prisons but while researching Canada I read over and over how important community corrections are to the county and the citizens. Over in Canada the community is also very involved in helping rehabilitating these offenders back into society. When you have an active community sector, the difference shows. Here in America we kind of shun offenders and even make it tough for them to get jobs. I feel like our system in the US is designed for failure. The US could probably learn a little bit from our neighbors, in my opinion.
Canada’s criminal justice system largely focuses on rehabilitation, but Bourque’s harsh sentence is similar to the sentencing practices of the United States (Gagnon 2015). This is troubling as Canada’s rehabilitation focused criminal justice system appears to be working. Canada has a low rate of recidivism for offenders who have been convicted of murder (Gagnon 2015). Research shows that Canada’s rehabilitation focused criminal justice system has also worked with crimes that are not as severe as murder. Between 2010/2011 and 2013/2014, there was a 12% decrease in completed adult criminal court cases. Most cases in adult criminal court involve non-violent offenses (Maxwell 2013/2014). Similarly, in 2013, the police-reported crime rate was at it lowest since 1969 (Statistics Canada). The homicide rate is also declining, as in 2013, it represented less than 1% of all violent crime (Statistics Canada). Notably, probation was the most common sentence given in adult court cases and custody sentences were less than six months (Maxwell, 2013/2014). These types of sentences showcase the rehabilitation focused thinking of the Canadian criminal justice system and reinforce the impact and possible repercussions of Justin Bourque’s
The Canadian justice system, although much evolved, is having difficulty eliminating bias from the legal system. Abdurahman Ibrahim Hassan, a 39 year old man, died on June 11 in a Peterborough hospital, while under immigration detention. He came to Canada in 1993 as a refugee and was suffering from mental, and physical health issues such as diabetes and bipolar disorder. There was an overwhelming amount of secrecy surrounding the death of this troubled Toronto man, and to this day no light has been shed on this tragedy. (Keung, 2015) An analysis of the official version of the law will reveal how race class and gender coincide with the bias within the legal system.
This paper will be focusing on the controversial issue of mandatory minimum sentences in Canada. There has been much debate over this topic, as it has quickly become implemented for the sentencing of drug offenders, drug-related crimes and banned firearm offences. I will argue that every case that comes through the criminal justice system is different and deserves a fair trial with a sentence that is not already determined for them. There have been many cases where the judge has no discretion in the sentence due to the mandatory minimum sentences pre-determined for the case, no matter what the aggravating or mitigating factors were. I will argue that the mandatory minimum sentences in Canada should be reduced or eliminated as they result in very few positive outcomes for the offender and society, increase recidivism rates, are very expensive, and in many cases are detrimental and unjust. Throughout this essay I will discuss two main cases that represent an unjust sentencing outcome due to the mandatory minimum sentencing laws. I will stress how it should be the discretion of the judge to individualize the sentences based on the offender’s mitigating factors, aggravating factors and background. Leroy Smickle is the first case discussed through the essay, which ended with the judge striking down the mandatory minimum sentences in Ontario due to the possession of a loaded gun. Robert Latimer was also a highly controversial Canadian case about a father who killed his mentally disabled daughter out of compassion to end her severe suffering. I will be using many academic articles throughout this essay to give empirical support to the overall argument.
Canada is a country where rehabilitation has been a formal part of sentencing and correctional policies for an extended period of time (Andrews & Bonta, 2010). Furthermore, a group of Canadian researchers have examined the methodology and effectiveness of rehabilitation, and are principal figures in the correctional rehabilitation field (Cullen & Gendreau, 2000). However, despite rehabilitation being a central aspect of Canadian identity, there has been a shift in the justice system’s objectives. The rise of the Conservative government and their omnibus bill C-10, Safe Streets and Communities Act, has created a move towards retribution. Bill C-10 was passed on March 12, 2012 (Government of Canada, 2013) and was a proposal to make fundamental changes to almost every component of Canada’s criminal justice system. Law changes included new and increased mandatory minimum sentencin...
The current criminal justice system is expensive to maintain. In North America the cost to house one prisoner is upwards of eighty to two hundred dollars a day (Morris, 2000). The bulk of this is devoted to paying guards and security (Morris, 2000). In contrast with this, community oriented programming as halfway houses cost less than the prison alternative. Community programming costs five to twenty five dollars a day, and halfway houses although more expensive than community programs still remain cheaper than prison (Morris, 2000). Tabibi (2015c) states that approximately ninety percent of those housed in prison are non-violent offenders. The treatment of offenders in the current system is understood to be unjust. By this, Morris (2000) explains that we consistently see an overrepresentation of indigenous and black people in the penal system. Corporate crimes are largely omitted, while street crimes are emphasized (Morris, 2000). This disproportionately targets marginalized populations (homeless, drug addicted and the poor) (Tabibi, 2015c). The current system is immoral in that the caging of people is highly depersonalized and troubling (Tabibi, 2015c). This is considered to be a barbaric practice of the past, however it is still frequently used in North America (Morris, 2000). Another moral consideration is with the labelling of youth as offenders in the criminal justice system (Morris, 2000). Morris (2000) argues that we should see youth crimes as a social failure, not as an individual level failure. Next, Morris (2000) classifies prisons as a failure. Recidivism rates are consistently higher for prisons than for other alternatives (Morris, 2000). The reason for this is that prisons breed crime. A school for crime is created when a person is removed from society and labeled; they become isolated, angry
For years now, incarceration has been known to be the center of the nation’s Criminal Justice Center. It’s no secret that over time, the criminal justice center began experiencing problems with facilities being overcrowded, worldwide, which ended up with them having to make alternative decisions to incarceration that prevent violence and strengthen communities. These new options went in to plan to be help better develop sentencing criminal offenders.
In every society around the world, the law is affecting everyone since it shapes the behavior and sense of right and wrong for every citizen in society. Laws are meant to control a society’s behavior by outlining the accepted forms of conduct. The law is designed as a neutral aspect existent to solve society’s problems, a system specially designed to provide people with peace and order. The legal system runs more efficiently when people understand the laws they are intended to follow along with their legal rights and responsibilities.
Studies have shown that in-prison education curriculums decrease recidivism while refining the eminence of life. However, majority of extra-curricular classes in prison have been eradicated, additional customs of job preparation have reduced, and access to exercise equipment and educational resources such as books is progressively limited. In the past five years the Correctional Service of Canada (CSC) has increased the federal budget by 40 per cent to $2.6 billion, majority bei...
The Canadian Criminal Code (1995) stated the main principles of sentencing as “to contribute, along with crime prevention initiatives, to respect for the law and the maintenance of a just, peaceful and safe society by imposing just sanctions” (s. 718). Section 718(a-f) considers the factors sentencing are to denounce unlawful conduct, to deter, to separate, to rehabilitate, to provide reparations and to promote a sense of responsibility.
As the current prison structures and sentencing process continues to neglect the issues that current offenders have no change will accrue to prevent recidivism. The issue with the current structure of the prison sentencing process is it does not deal with the “why” the individual is an social deviant but only looks at the punishment process to remove the deviant from society. This method does not allow an offender to return back to society without continuing where they left off. As an offender is punished they are sentenced (removal from society) they continue in an isolated environment (prison) after their punishment time is completed and are released back to society they are now an outsider to the rapidly changing social environment. These individuals are returned to society without any coping skills, job training, or transitional training which will prevent them from continuing down th...
Young, M. G. (1998, July). Rethinking community resistance to prison siting: Results from a community impact assesment. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 323-325.
Throughout this paper, one will obtain a better understanding of the correctional system and how it is an important aspect of the criminal justice system. Therefore, the history of corrections, their mission statement, and sentencing goals will be briefly discussed. In the correctional system, there are different alternatives to imprisonment, such as probation, parole, and intermediate sanctions. I believe that parole makes a significant impact on the criminal justice system because it gives inmates who have already served time and shown good behavior the opportunity to be released early from prison. For example, there are two primary models of parole. First, the parole board grants a prisoner their parole based on their judgement
In addition, the demographic shift in the general population not only had an affect on the increase in the average age of the prison population, but has also increased the average age of admission. In fact, the average age of the offender population in custody is 33 years old and has increased slightly each year (Government of Canada, 2013). Similar to Quebec, an increasing amount of individuals are entering prison later in life. In 2009-2010, a little over 20% of admissions to federal custody were of offenders between the ages of 40 to 49. Moreover, these offenders are considered older when entering prison for the first time (Government of Canada, 2013). In Quebec, the increase of older offenders in prison is marked by the decrease of offenders
The most surprising aspect of my internship was observing the distinct types of parolees I encountered. Despite everyone being on supervision, each case was unique. I remember learning the difference between situational and career criminals in an Introduction to Criminal Justice course. This difference was easy to see by definition, but is not highly noticeable in all probation cases. For example, there were individuals who constantly made it to their appointments, paid fees and never found themselves in trouble. Yet, there were also individuals who only reached out for help with certain situations that they could not solve on their own. Other individuals constantly needed help with a crisis or problem. There is nothing wrong with any type,
Community-based corrections alleviate overcrowded correctional facilities, reduce taxpayer burden, and rehabilitate offenders, while providing effective, efficient low cost methods of supporting public safety, community rehabilitation, behavior modification and personnel responsibility, because it uses multiple approaches and involves both legislative and judicial personnel in all steps of the process. Community-based corrections facilities are located in the community and support diverse rehabilitative programs including restitution, community service and repayment of monetary fines (Moses, 2007). Community-based correction is not incarceration; there is accountability, responsibility and supervision with graduation within nine and twenty four months of enrollment (Honarvar, 2010). Probation, day reporting and house arrest, which use global positioning satellite tracking devices, are forms of community-based corrections, which cost less than five dollars a day (Honarvar, 2010). The efficiency by which community corrections reduce cost, prison populations, and decreases this rate judges should disposition to these programs in lieu of incarceration (Honarvar, 2010). The state spends taxpayer money on building correctional facilities and staff to supervise offenders, while the research shows reduced recidivism rates when community service and other alternative methods of rehabilitation are used (Hovarvar, 2010). However, to maintain the balance of justice and rehabilitation, society demands incarceration for all criminals. Judges continue to support determinate sentencing guidelines over reducing the taxpayer’s burden and placing victimless crime offenders in community workhouses (Taylor, 2011). The issues of restitution and pub...