Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Character analysis of phoenix jackson
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Character analysis of phoenix jackson
The final case of the second game deals with this concept as well. During this case, Maya Fey has been kidnapped by an assassin, who was hired by Phoenix’s defendant, Matt Engarde, who is guilty. Phoenix is given an ultimatum by Engarde, wither he defends a guilty man, or Maya dies. This case begs the question, is it better to risk harm to those you love to expose the Truth, or is it better to keep yourself and loved ones safe and obscure the Truth. As you can see, Ace Attorney often deals with the conflict between truth and Truth.
Another common element of Ace Attorney’s gospel is that of Redemption and rebirth. As discussed previously, Edgeworth starts out as a dirty and conniving prosecutor, who uses intimidation, faked evidence, and anything
…show more content…
else possible in order to secure a guilty verdict. Throughout the series though, especially after he confronts the truth about his father, he becomes reborn, and becomes more similar to Phoenix, using his abilities not for personal gain, but in order to dispense justice. He even helps Phoenix in the final case of the third game, attempting to find out the truth when Phoenix gets hospitalized after falling off a cliff. Godot also works as an example is Godot, Godot gets partially redeemed in the final case of the third game. Previously seen as just a hate filled person, after Godot murders Maya’s mother to get revenge on Dahlia, and he is caught, he finally breaks down, and admits his wrongdoings. He admits his saving of Maya was done more out of spite than an actual care for Mayas safety, and he admits that he is not a moral person. His admittance of guilt and his subsequent apology for every horrible act he has committed partially redeems Godot, he still has to serve his sentence, but it is clear he has genuinely seen the error of his ways. Ace Attorney also has some interesting insights on morality, oftentimes it is true that the crimes committed in the cases fall into shades of black and white, however, cases such as the previously discussed one involving Acro or the final case of the third game fall into many shades of gray. Ace Attorney clearly tells us that almost nothing is merely black and white, except for anything involving Dahlia Hawthorne, because she makes Satan look like the Hamburgler. Self-doubt and guilt are also some common themes in Ace Attorney.
Again, both Edgeworth and Godot have this as a major theme in their character arcs, Edgeworth is haunted by the death of his father, just as Godot is haunted by his poisoning and the death of Mia Fey. Edgeworth’s guilt prevents him from working towards justice, as he aims to achieve glory to distract him from his belief that he is a murderer. Godot on the other hand is haunted by Mia’s death, he places his guilt of not being there to protect Mia on Phoenix, which leads him to become a prosecutor just for revenge. Both of these characters, due to their own internal guilt and self-doubt, do immoral and horrible things. The Ace Attorney series teaches us not to allow our own guilt to consume us, lest we become nothing more than victims of that guilt. Edgeworth and Godot’s stories bring with them one last element of Ace Attorney’s gospel, that of the sins of the past. Both of these tragic stories involve the sins of the past coming back to haunt the present. Ace Attorney warns us not to leave previous sins unpunished, or they will come back to haunt us in the present as …show more content…
well. Fighting injustice is the most important message in all of Ace Attorney’s gospel.
Throughout the entire series, Phoenix, Edgeworth, Franziska, Maya, Mia Edgeworth’s father, and an assortment of other characters all had the express goal of fighting injustice. However, in the world of Ace Attorney, defending the accused is ridiculously difficult, oftentimes prosecutors use dirty or illegal tactics to win, and judges normally favor the prosecutors side, however, despite that, the protagonists in Ace Attorney do their best to ensure justice for all. The entire series is actually a critique of the Japanese court system, where there is a 99% conviction rate, and it is not uncommon for defense attorneys to never get anyone a not-guilty verdict in their entire career. The court system favors prosecutors greatly, and oftentimes prosecutors fight more for personal honor and profit than for actual justice. The reason the word of Ace Attorney is so silly, and believe me it is, you cross examine a parrot in the first game, is because the ridiculousness is actually a parody of Japan’s legal system, which is warped and unjust, almost to a ridiculous degree. The main point of the entire Ace Attorney series is to refute the Japanese justice system, the message of the Ace Attorney series is that the most important thing when it comes to being a member of the justice system isn’t to win, to fight for personal profit or respect, but to discover the truth, to bring justice to people. Justice is
important, and injustice must be fought against. How can a justice system be good if it doesn’t truly strive for justice? That is the question that the Ace Attorney series asks, and is the ultimate question at the heart of its gospel. As demonstrated, the Ace Attorney trilogy is no mere entertainment. It contains its own gospel, with a series of complex and enlightening messages and themes. It contains a host of well written and interesting characters, whose stories reveal information about our own society. The entire series is actually a critique of an unfair and immoral criminal justice system. Like all entertainment, Ace Attorney is not mere fun, it has its own messages and its own themes that help illuminate the world around us.
Jain, M. (2001). Mitigating the Dangers of Capital Convictions Based on Eyewitness Testimony Through Treason's Two-Witness Rule. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 761-790.
``In criminal law, confession evidence is a prosecutor’s most potent weapon’’ (Kassin, 1997)—“the ‘queen of proofs’ in the law” (Brooks, 2000). Regardless of when in the legal process they occur, statements of confession often provide the most incriminating form of evidence and have been shown to significantly increase the rate of conviction. Legal scholars even argue that a defendant’s confession may be the sole piece of evidence considered during a trial and often guides jurors’ perception of the case (McCormick, 1972). The admission of a false confession can be the deciding point between a suspect’s freedom and their death sentence. To this end, research and analysis of the false confessions-filled Norfolk Four case reveals the drastic and controversial measures that the prosecuting team will take to provoke a confession, be it true or false.
...ace. Vain repentance will be too late. Repentance helps only when he has the possibility to reform his actions. His grief will be useless.
The novel Theodore Boone: Kid Lawyer has a very in-depth conflict that is showcased all throughout the novel. In Theo's community, there is a high-profile murder trial about to begin. Mr. Pete Duffy, a wealthy business man, is accused of murdering his wife Myra Duffy. The prosecutors have the idea that Mr. Duffy did it for the one million dollar insurance policy he took out on his wife earlier, however they have no proof to support this accusation (Grisham 53). The defendants do however have the proof that no one saw the murder, for all everyone knew, Mr. Duffy was playing his daily round of golf at the golf course right by his house. As the trial moved on, the jury was starting to lean towards letting Mr. Duffy walk a free man. To this point, there has been no proof to support the prosecutors statements that Mr. Duffy killed h...
If that does not occur to the reader as an issue than factoring in the main problem of the topic where innocent people die because of false accusation will. In addition, this book review will include a brief review of the qualifications of the authors, overview of the subject and the quality of the book, and as well as my own personal thoughts on the book. In the novel Actual Innocence: When Justice Goes Wrong and How to Make It Right authors Barry Scheck, Peter Neufeld, and Jim Dwyer expose the flaws of the criminal justice system through case histories where innocent men were put behind bars and even on death row because of the miscarriages of justice. Initially, the text promotes and galvanizes progressive change in the legal
Tyler, Tom R. “Viewing CSI and the Threshold of Guilt: Managing truth and Justice in Reality
Have you ever told a lie to protect yourself or someone you love? People lie for their own purposes. Some people lie for themselves or for their close one. They depend on the lies so much that they do not care that their lies might hurt others. In Arthur Miller’s play, The Crucible, almost all the characters lie for their own desires and to protect their own interests. Even though lies are forbidden in their religion, some people are blind to understand the punishment of lying. The concept of lying to save oneself is also evident in “Fear Was Reason For Lying About Shooting, Woman Says” by Mary Spicuzza. The article highlights how a woman hid the truth about witnessing a murder just for the sake of her own life. Another article, “The Truth
people in these 21st century society wonder, “When is Justice to be done?” For district attorneys,
Christopher W. Behan, When Turnabout Is Fair Play: Character Evidence and Self-Defense in Homicide and Assault Cases, 86 Or. L. Rev. 733, 746 (2007).
...s from The Prosecution Function to a real life setting. My tainted movie perception of the criminal justice system no longer exists. While the process does not necessarily always have an unbelievable climax, the excitement lies in the subtle details the opposing counsels must recognize in order to gain an advantage; it truly is a mind game. The immense amount of time and effort that is put forth makes me appreciate the quality of art that lawyers possess. The knowledge and preparation it takes to be successful is astounding, and it is a pleasure to watch.
We learn of a case where finding out the truth was a devastating experience for one family. Hag Ali Khalafawy was rich because he had stolen another man’s money. When he was on his death bed he told his son of his thievery and asked that the fortune be returned to its rightful owners. The son didn’t believe it, and his father answered, “It’s the truth, no mo...
In the year 2014, law enforcement in the United States estimated 1,165,383 violent crimes reported (“D2014VC”). Imagine the number of people needed get to the bottom of all of those cases! There are an abundant amount of Americans solving mysteries every day to keep others safe. Crimes are committed all around the United States at every second of the day! In John Grisham’s The Pelican Brief, he displays a firm relation between investigators and lawyers through the Criminal Justice System of acquiring suspects and evidence, indicated in the book with an exploration of the scandals of Supreme Court Justices Rosenberg and Jensen (Grisham).
Martin was focused on winning the case by attempting to prove Aaron 's innocence. At the start of the novel, Martin stated that every person has the right to the best defense regardless of the accusation. He did however pose an ethical dilemma, he would defend the guilty and make a way to convince the jury to think otherwise. The basic ethical pillars are being violated by him doing this the main one being trustworthiness. Martin believed that it was acceptable to skew the truth, which in turns violates the ethical codes of honesty. His awareness of being dishonest, causes an unethical situation in itself. Martin was interested in becoming a big shot attorney, he often stated he did not care about his client all he was concerned with was the outcome of the case. Martin wanted to be the best win every case regardless of his client’s guilt. This raised questions while I was reading, why is this considered ethical in the workplace? It is important to have compassion, a person of integrity acts out of moral principle. This person would do what was right, even if it meant a job loss or the loss of a client. The public interest should always be placed before self-interest, which was not the case in this situation. In defending Aaron, he knew he wasn 't taking the care for Aaron 's best interest, he was concerned with his career and success over the threat to the public.
Guilt and shame can tear a person's soul away. The inevitable consequence of sin is the immediate reaction of guilt, shame, and remorse. For example: John Proctor, Elizabeth Proctor, and Reverend Dimmesdale have all committed a sin or sins and are feeling extremely guilty about it. They want to be forgiven, but they have no strength and are cowards. Forgiveness can only be obtained when these characters find the strength within themselves to speak the truth.
Starting off as a criminal defense attorney himself, John Grisham had a very valuable grasp of law before writing the novel. When writing his books, he likes to make lawyers the major characters (“GJ”). John Grisham can connect his real life