Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Employee rights and employer responsibilities
Employee rights and employer responsibilities
Employee rights and employer responsibilities
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Employee rights and employer responsibilities
There are several terms that can be implied within a contract of employment through common law. Implied terms to a contract of employment have developed over time through the decisions made by the courts in a number of cases, these being known as common law implied terms.
Common law implied terms that have derived from case law relate to both the employer and the employee and each party has a responsibility to carry this out or risk a breach of contract.
There are five situations in which these terms mentioned could be implied into a contract:
1. The term automatically forms part of the contract as it is key to the employment relationship;
2. The term is necessary to give business efficacy to the contract;
3. The term is so obvious that the parties must have intended it;
4. It is normal custom and practice to include such a term; and
5. The way in which the contract has been performed shows that it must have been the intention of the parties to include such a term. (Smith.A, Manual 1, Employment Law & Practice, page 71)
The main implied term in common law is the duty of trust and confidence
…show more content…
There are circumstances in which there is a duty for the employer to pay the wages and provide work to the employee although if these circumstances are not taking place then there is no right to provide work as determined in the case of Turner v Sawdon [1901] 2 KB 653. For the employee, the duty to serve the employer and obey reasonable instructions is personal and they cannot ask someone else to perform their duties for them. This was identified in the case of Laws v London Chronicle Ltd [1959] 1 WLR 698. Based on this, the employee could not ask someone else to carry out their role because they are unavailable to attend work that
1.1 Explain at least four points of differentiations between contract and agreement with the help of examples.
The purpose of this paper is to analyze a specific, hypothetical employment situation encountered and to include the information regarding employment conflicts, questions, grievances, lawsuits, etc., in terms of how the situation was handled or resolved. Employment conflicts are a constant issue everyday in any organization; it is how you handle them both legally and professionally that counts.
Technology, what is it? It’s usually something new, and better than the old idea. Technology started with cars, stoves, TV, radios, etc. Cars takes somebody from one place to another, faster than walking, running, or biking and one could go places without getting tired. Stoves allowed one to conveniently be able to turn on and off heat to a cooking utensil with less clean up. The biggest contributor to making our lives easier would be computers, which has come a long way since its introduction to the world. Also, computers have the ability to be improved more, and more in time. In general, technology started off by comforting our lives. Now, the rapid growth of technology has replaced the need for one’s own intellect.
...ent of an employment contract. This is likely to be troublesome point for some time to come and likely to work on case by case basis.
Commission for Labor Cooperation (2002) “ United States Labor Law.” Viewed online on 11/18/2004 at http://www.naalc.org/english/publications/labormain.htm
(b) the other party does make the contract in the course of a business; and
This legislation does not prevent dismissals from occurring but only allows the employee to challenge their dismissal. The Unfair Dismissals Act 1977-2007 is the legislation that covers the basis for Alfie’s case. In his case, he seeks to prove that his dismissal was unfair and unwarranted. Thereby seeking redress from his employee. Many aspects of his case are pertinent to the Acts as the facts indicate.
As a consequence of the separate legal entity and limited liability doctrines within the UK’s unitary based system, company law had to develop responses to the ‘agency costs’ that arose. The central response is directors’ duties; these are owed by the directors to the company and operate as a counterbalance to the vast scope of powers given to the board. The benefit of the unitary board system is reflected in the efficiency gains it brings, however the disadvantage is clear, the directors may act to further their own interests to the detriment of the company. It is evident within executive remuneration that directors are placed in a stark conflict of interest position in that they may disproportionately reward themselves. The counterbalance to this concern is S175 Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006) this acts to prevent certain conflicts arising and punishes directors who find themselves in this position. Furthermore, there are specific provisions within the CA 2006 that empower third parties such as shareholders to influence directors’ remuneration.
Contractual agreement has always been viewed in terms of offer and acceptance. The universal principle to contract law has always been parties may get into an agreement in whichever way they deem fit and they are subject to certain terms as they choose. As far as legal requirements vital to their formation are binding contracts may be formed. Moreover a binding agreement may be manifested in terms of writing or in verbal form.
...mended that in determining whether in an individual case the term or notice was fair and reasonable, both substantive fairness (‘the substance and effect of the term’) and procedural fairness (‘the circumstances existing at that time’) be taken into account. (42)And additionally there are requirements that the contract must be written in ‘plain, intelligible language’ for a reasonable person would understand.
The English contract Offer and Acceptance General principles There are three basic essentials to the creation of a contract which will be recognised and enforced by the courts. These are: contractual intention, agreement and consideration. The Definition of an Offer. This is an expression of willingness to contract made with the intention (actual or apparent) that it shall become binding on the offeror as soon as the person to whom it is addressed accepts it. An offer can be made to one person or a group of persons, or to the world at large.
One of the last remaining strongholds of classical contract law is the notion that contracts require offer and acceptance therefore, in order for a contract to become binding, offer, acceptance, consideration and intention to create legal relations must exist. However contracts are formed in different ways for each different circumstance. (Shawn Bayern, Offer and Acceptance in Modern Contract Law: A Needles Concept, 103 Cal. L. Rev. 67, 102 (2015)
The first category of entrant is that of a contractual entrant. This class of entrant is defined by McMahon and Binchy as someone who enters “premises in pursuance of a contract between himself or herself and the occupier” . The classic examples of this category include sports spectators and concert goers. The duty owed to this type of entrant was found in the terms of the contract. If no such terms existed, as stated in the Law Reform Commission, “there is an implied term on the part of the occupier that he has taken reasonable care to make the premises safe for the contemplated purposes” . An example of implying terms can be found in the case of Callaghan v Killarney Race Course . The case centred around an injury suffered by a spectator at the races and whether the occupiers had acted with reasonable care. Maguire CJ noted that “There were no terms of contract between him and the defendant Company and the contract between them is to be implied from the circumstances of the case.” The Supreme Court dismissed the case as it was felt...
Implied terms – they are not expressed but they are adopted as “obvious” an individual must comply with (e.g) if buying a product and it is not in a good taste the consumer has the right to return it to the owner for exchange or refund.
Legal considerations play an important role in how employers and employees interact in the workplace. Common-law doctrines regarding this relationship have been established from many legal decisions made over the course of centuries (Reed & Bogardus, 2012). Common-law doctrines lay the foundation for best practices in employment which provide for both employer and employee safeguards.