Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Case study principles of management
Case study principles of management
Case study principles of management
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Case study principles of management
On January 14, 2017 at approximately 7:47 PM Deputy Hill and I, Deputy Bowring was dispatched 309 Apache Quitman, Texas In reference to a disturbance in progress. Upon my arrival, I spoke with Natalie Stovall who stated that her and her boyfriend had gotten into an altercation but he left the residence prior to our arrival. Natalie stated that she did not wish to pursue any charges regarding the assault. I then had dispatch run Natalie’s driver licenses to make certain she was clear from any warrants. Dispatch advised that Natalie had two warrants out of Dallas County. While waiting on conformation of warrants I asked Natalie if there was anything in her purse that I should be cautious of prior to searching. Natalie stated no I just need to set my purse inside the house and get a drink of water. Natalie then stated yes there is some marijuana, syringes, and some methamphetamine’s in the purse. …show more content…
Natalie was transported to the Wood County Jail without Incident for the two out of county warrants and being in possession of controlled substance. After arriving to the Wood County Sheriff’s Office the liquid inside the syringes, and the crystal like substance were field tested, which showed positive for methamphetamine. Body cam will be included with this case file. EOR Bowring
On June 19th of 1990, Robert Baltovich’s girlfriend Elizabeth Bain went missing. Elizabeth told her family that she was going to check the tennis schedules at her school, the University of Toronto Scarborough Campus. She never returned, but her car was eventually recovered. It was found with blood on the backseat, with forensic tests showing that it was Elizabeth’s. With no clear evidence, the “solving” of the case was completely based on eyewitness testimonies, which eventually had Robert arrested for the murder of his girlfriend.
1 Methamphetamine pipe that was retrieved from Bermudez’ salmon colored purse. The methamphetamine pipe was booked into property as evidence.
Officers conducting a warrantless search without suspicion of criminal activity from the probation officer. The original search conducted discovered controlled substances, but the warrant did not include Robert Johnson, only Bennet
On the above listed date and time, deputies arrived at Hampton County Medical Center, and made contact with the complainant regarding the above listed incident type. Deputies gathered the pertinent information needed to complete this report. The complainant and his mother wrote a voluntary statement. Photos were taken while at the Emergency Room. The complainant was issued a Victim’s Right’s Form along with a case number attached. Deputies attempted to make contact with the subject, no contact was made. Deputies cleared the call and resumed normal patrol duties.
Once the motel manager confirmed that a Summer Twilligear had rented room 114, Deputy Shanks, Sergeant Walls, Deputy Galloway, Deputy Phifer, and Deputy Timms went to the hotel to see whether this “Gunner Crapser” was the wanted man, and to attempt a “knock and talk” as a way to gain consent to search the room and look for signs of methamphetamine activity (FindLaw, 2007, Factual and Procedural Background section, para. 4). All of the officers were in uniform with their guns visible besides Deputy Timms who was in plain clothes with a concealed weapon.
While finding Umstead guilty of all the charges, they found he was not guilty of specifications alleging he was in possession of a firearm while committing the drug offenses.
The court’s decision based on the treatment of young people in this case emphasizes on the concept of social justice, which means the fair allocation of wealth, resources and opportunity between members in a society. The appellant in this case, Louise Gosselin, was unemployed and under the age of 30. She challenged the Quebec Social Aid Act of 1984 on the basis that it violated section 7 of her security rights, section 15 of her equality rights in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and section 45 of the Quebec Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms. For the purpose of this essay, we shall explore the jurisprudence analysis of section 7 and section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Section 7 states that everyone has the
Ms. Dollree Mapp and her daughter lived in Cleveland, Ohio. After receiving information that an individual wanted in connection with a recent bombing was hiding in Mapp's house, the Cleveland police knocked on her door and demanded entrance. Mapp called her attorney and subsequently refused to let the police in when they failed to produce a search warrant. After several hours of surveillance and the arrival of more officers, the police again sought entrance to the house. Although Mapp did not allow them to enter, they gained access by forcibly opening at least one door. Once the police were inside the house, Mapp confronted them and demanded to see their warrant. One of the officers held up a piece of paper claiming it was a search warrant. Mapp grabbed the paper but an officer recovered it and handcuffed Mapp ?because she had been belligerent.? Dragging Mapp upstairs, officers proceeded to search not only her room, but also her daughter?s bedroom, the kitchen, dinette, living room, and basement.
Last week, Katera was taken into temporary custody and later released to Centerstone of Illinois. Kaella reported an argument ensued after Katera was denied permission to go to a friend’s residence located in Harrisburg over the weekend. Kaella moved from Harrisburg to her current address a few months ago. The argument started inside the residence. Kaella was in her bedroom and Katera was in her bedroom. Katera entered her mother’s bedroom screaming and yelling. Kaella could not control her daughter’s behavior. Katera hit her mother on the backside of the torso with a pot taken from the kitchen and threatened to kill her. Kaella remanded her young son to run into the kitchen and gather all the knives and kitchen utensils so that Katera could not get to them. At this point, Kaella called 911 for help. Kaella ordered Katera to go outside until the police arrived. Katera went outside and took out her anger on the vehicle. I did not observe any obvious damage to the vehicle that appeared
The case of Anne Gunter fits the modern stereotype of witchcraft accusations and the trials that resulted from them; a young girl falsely claims that an older woman or women are causing her harm using supernatural abilities they have gained through nefarious means, sending the community into an uproar. Hysteria runs rampant through the community and the poor women are harshly punished – the formulaic story plays out similarly throughout popular media, must notably in Arthur Millers’ ‘The Crucible’. Yet in the case of young Anne Gunter from North Moreton, there is a deviation from the “standard plot” of a witchcraft trial – the women are acquitted and Miss Gunter’s subterfuge is revealed. The fact that the allegations are not only proven to be false, but a confession of such is given by Anne Gunter allows the focus to shift from the actual Gunter case to what factors played into why people were accused of witchcraft. What we can infer from the Gunter case is that people in England were accused of witchcraft because of three major things: lack of power, prestige, and plenty within society.
On 07/31/2016 I, Deputy Daniel Pruitt was dispatched to 1510 South Oak in Bristow for a assault complaint.
13-3623 A2 "Child Abuse" a Class 3 Felony, A.R.S. 13-3408 A1 "Possession, use, administration, acquisition, sale, manufacture or transportation of narcotic drugs" a Class 4 Felony, and A.R.S. 13-3415 A "Possession, manufacture, delivery and advertisement of drug paraphernalia" a Class 6 Felony. While Monica was being arrested by Phoenix Police, Officer Prado watched Fiona McFadden. Officer Prado observed Fiona move a highchair towards a power box on the wall of the apartment near the apartment front door. Fiona then climbed and stood on top of her highchair and opened the lid to the power box and pointed to an extended black folding knife (see attached) with the blade out and stated: "this is daddy's knife." Officer Prado quickly removed the knife out of safety for Fiona as she was in reach of the extended knife. It should be noted that all of the narcotics in the apartment located by Phoenix Police were in reach and accessible to Fiona. It was also observed by Phoenix Police that Fiona had full access to the apartment and was not restricted to any area. This was also observed by this
The Lynne Gobbell case demonstrates that many people are not in favor of the purest form of freedom of speech. In this case, Lynne had a ‘Kerry for President’ sticker on her bumper, and although no harm came from this, her boss erupted and demanded she remove the sticker. After denying such a ridiculous request, she was fired immediately. In my opinion, this is outrageous because she was not causing anyone harm, and it affected nothing. People should be able to stand up for what they believe in, and should be able to freely represent what they stand for. Decorating vehicles should never have a negative impact on another person. For example, as a die-hard Dallas Cowboys football fan, I do not start breaking windows when I see other vehicles representing the San Francisco Forty Niners. I may not agree with what they represent, but I will gladly respect their opinions and continue to think freely while cheering for what I believe in. Mills’ harm principle suggests that the actions of individuals should only be limited to prevent harm to other individuals. It is easy to recognize that Lynne is not harming anyone, but instead she is the one being harmed; thus Mill’s would side with Lynne in a heartbeat. Karl Marx’s views on this case do not differ too much on this case as his ideas and beliefs would favor Lynne. His critiques of alienated labor and bourgeois freedom show how badly workers can be treated, as he believes workers tend to be taken for granted and treated badly by the upper class. Marx believes there are many different types of alienated labor and all affect workers in a variety of different ways. Marx and Lynne would both have defended Lynne if they were given such an opportunity to do so.
In 1992 then pharmacist Robert Ray Courtney started diluting medications that were given to patients by injection or infusion. In 1998 a sales representative from one of the drug companies, Darryl Ashley, noted a discrepancy in the amount of drugs Courtney ordered and dispensed. Eli Lilly was notified and investigated how Courtney was supplied the drugs. Finding that he did not go outside their supply chain, Eli Lilly did not pursue the issue any further. However in 2001 Ashley mentioned this in the office of Dr. Verda Hunter who sent samples of the drug in question to a laboratory for testing (Draper, 2003). In July of 2001 a federal investigation begins and on August 15, 2001 Courtney surrenders to the FBI.
Heather’s brother walked in and called the police after he witnessed his sister and her boyfriend fighting. When police came they labeled this as a case of domestic abuse due to the fact that in the alleged police report and in the article it stated that “We're told cops observed that the boyfriend had a visible mark…” thus indicating that there was physical contact during the argument which was most likely done by Heather while she was in a fit of rage in the heat of the moment. As police where discussing the incident it was said that Heather began to act aggressive towards authorities and was now being charged with battery for attacking 3 officers on top of the domestic abuse. Police checked her history to find her previous incidents involving the confrontation she had with her ex Jack Wagner and her DUI’s and substance abuse charges. Nothing else was said about the situation but that she was released on $20k bail and had a court hearing last month on March