Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Abolishment of slavery in america
The abolition of the transatlantic slave trade
The abolition of the transatlantic slave trade
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Abolishment of slavery in america
“Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves.” - Abraham Lincoln. The conquest of the New World was not worth the cost. The colonists took advantage over the innocent Native Americans. To go along with Lincoln’s quote, the colonists who were slave owners didn’t deserve freedom. The settlers captured and confined many slaves. Spain, as a whole had many advantages in the conquest of the New World. But the damages inflicted upon the Native population was almost unrepairable. The settlers came to the New World to find groups of honest, benevolent people already living there. Columbus, of course, abuses their giving nature. According to Columbus’ letter, the Native Americans were willing to trade expensive materials for simple, cheap items. That was one of the first signs in his letter that he was going to abuse them. Abusing anyone’s hospitality is horrible but to do it to an entire population is absurd! Not only did the colonists treat the Natives so crudely but get almost the whole population infected with deadly diseases. The diseases killed plenty of innocents. They died slowly and painfully from bumps on their skin. According to the excerpt and illustration “Large bumps …show more content…
spread on people; some were entirely covered. . . .[The victims] could no longer walk about, but lay in their dwellings and sleeping places, . . . And when they made a motion, they called out loudly.” Not only did they enslave the Natives but also nearly wipe out their population with diseases. No, colonization in the New World was not worth killing innocents. One of Spain’s main goals was to introduce the Native Americans to Christianity.
But when they became slaves they were not treated as equals. In the Friar’s sermon he says “And what care do you take that they receive religious instruction and come to know their God and creator, or that they be baptized, hear mass, or observe holidays and Sundays? Are they not men? Do they not have rational souls?” Antonio de Montesinos was talking about them not being able to attend religious services. So overall Spain’s goal of them becoming Christians was ruined because of the poor treatment the slaves received. The Friar also talks about the cruel and unjust treatment of the slaves. He was explaining all of the sins the slave owners committed and how terrible they were. Which was all
true. Overall, the treatment of the Native Americans made it so the voyage to the New World was not worth what it cost. What it really cost was the lives of virtuous humans who would’ve never hurt us as we did to them. The settlers acted inhuman when handling the Native Americans. The colonists stole what they wanted (including people) and were unforgiveable. Antonio de Montesinos was completely right with his arguments against the slave owners. They were being sinful. They didn’t give their slaves freedom so they don’t deserve freedom either.
I, Francisco de Bobadilla was a colonial administrator and Spanish conquistador. I was a Knight of the Order of Calatrava and an Castilian of the Royal House . I was sent as a judge to the island of the San Salvador, where I arrested Columbus for Corruption in his government. I served as governor of Indies for 2 years .
It always maintained that taking someone’s God given right of freedom was against the church preaching’s and beliefs. In addition, some of the first emigrants to the newly discovered land (North America) were slaves themselves and they were white. One of the main reasons they immigrated to North America was to escape religious persecution. The political situation did not help either; too much support to antislavery and the church could lose the much needed support of wealthy churchgoers. The institution stopped short of actively going against the problem of slavery, instead they focused their efforts in making slavery more “tolerable” for slaves. After all, most of the church goers in the south were white slave owners and/or in some way or another supported slavery and the economic factors in benefitted. In the North, the Presbyterian Church had deplored the issue of black and religion; they were never unable or unwilling to tackle the problem from its source. In the North the free blacks had more religious freedom and were allowed to participate in churches or form their own congregations. There was another phenomenon that affected the lives of slaves in the plantations. Most owners controlled all aspects of their slaves to include religion. The owners used the Gospel as a social control method to tell the slaves why they had to obey their masters (according to God) and inculcate and foster the belief of having to serve and be faithful to their
Douglass continues to describe the severity of the manipulation of Christianity. Slave owners use generations of slavery and mental control to convert slaves to the belief God sanctions and supports slavery. They teach that, “ man may properly be a slave; that the relation of master and slave is ordained by God” (Douglass 13). In order to justify their own wrongdoings, slaveowners convert the slaves themselves to Christianity, either by force or gentle coercion over generations. The slaves are therefore under the impression that slavery is a necessary evil. With no other source of information other than their slave owners, and no other supernatural explanation for the horrors they face other than the ones provided by Christianity, generations of slaves cannot escape from under the canopy of Christianity. Christianity molded so deeply to the ideals of slavery that it becomes a postmark of America and a shield of steel for American slave owners. Douglass exposes the blatant misuse of the religion. By using Christianity as a vessel of exploitation, they forever modify the connotations of Christianity to that of tyrannical rule and
“...this religion is saying that every person, man, woman, child, slave, barbarian, no matter who, is made in the image of God and is therefore of enormous value in the eyes of God…”(Document C). “Now the Christian community, as we have it particularly in the letters of Paul, … says in Christ there is neither Jew nor Greek, neither male or female, neither slave nor free… . Here is a community that invites you, which makes you an equal with all other members of that community,” (Document D). This was beneficial to a wide range of people, especially peasants because they could have a part in society and be equal to their Christian peers.
Some consequences of the exchange are the spread of disease to the Native people and settlers, the destruction of the Native population, and the disappearance of the Natives custom’s, beliefs, and way of life. Columbus’s arrival to the Americas, land that had already been established by the Natives, resulted in a spread of fatal diseases. Disagreement between the Europeans and the Natives and the enslavement of Native people helped to wipe out the population. Document 5 illustrates the fighting that occurred between the Natives and Europeans.
When the Spanish Conquest is referred to many people get the picture of a small party of white conquistadors beating back a horde of savages and triumphing over their foes (44). In truth, the Spanish were often outnumbered by native enemies, but too often history forgets that the Spanish were also outnumbered by their native allies (45). When the Spaniards arrived in America they found a land of native peoples divided into factions, and ready to take any advantage to gain the upper-hand against rivals (46). The Spaniards saw the division between factions and took advantage of their division, using political rivalries to defeat forces that, if they had been united, would have most likely beaten back the conquistadors (45). The first image of the conquest is one of Spanish victory, perpetuated by the bravery and skill of the mighty conquistadors. The latter results in a history that is less about the Spanish conquering the natives, and more about the natives conquering each other. History changes depending on where you are standing. When you stand from a different place the story changes, heroes become villains, success becomes defeat, and your side is justified. When we narrow how we look at historical events, we narrow our way of thinking and the knowledge we can attain. Restall purposefully juxtaposes these two views, not as a
However, Friar De Las Casas with his sermons against the greed of the colonists threatened the established order of the Spanish colonies. This established order ensured the flow of money and resources to the Spanish empire, thus allowing it to grow. When Friar De Las Casas questioned the institution of slavery in the colonies and the systematic brutalities inflicted upon the natives, he was really criticizing the Spanish empire at
The Native Americans were the earliest and only settlers in the North American continents for more than thousands of years. Like their European counterparts, the English colonists justified the taking of their territories was because the natives were not entitled to the land because they lacked a work ethic in which shows that the colonists did not understand the Native Americans system of work and ownership of property. They believed the “Indians seemed to lack everything the English identified as civilized” (Takaki, Pg. 33). Because the settlers were living far away from civilizations, to ensure that they were civilized people, the settlers had negative images of the Native Americans so that they would not be influenced and live like the how the natives do, ensuring that these groups are savages who are uncivilized. Many began to believe this was God’s plans for them to civilize the country in which many would push westward and drive the Indians out to promote civilization and progress. While the United States was still in its early stages of development,
It has played a major role in history, persecution, church, wars and most importantly in slavery. in this essay i have focus in how hypocrisy was use in race relations using the slave narrative Equiano. In Equiano 's slave narrative examines Christianity and how it allows hypocrisy in slavery. As Equiano travels he sees and learns how whites use religion as a pocketbook, whites pretended to be holy and virtue by attending church and being thrilled of their practice when in reality they were unjustly treating African slaves and not living up to the tenets outlined in the bible. Equiano studies the bible carefully; despite of the hypocrisy Equianos faces he remains loyal to god and always kept his faith in god. Once his convince of the authenticity of his spiritual transformation and studies of the bible then Equiano convert to Methodist
During the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries the majority of slave brought to the new world were young men who were mostly not especially religious. Very few Africans had previously obtained Christian beliefs prior to being shipped from Africa to the New World. The majority of slaves were, in fact, followers of...
Because it offers them the possibility of community and identity, many slaves find themselves strongly attached to religion. They cannot build a family structure and they cannot be identified by family name, but through the church, they can build a community and identify themselves as Christians. This comfort becomes virtually non-existent for it too is controlled by the slaveowners who “came to the conclusion that it would be well to give the slaves enough of religious instruction to keep them from murdering their masters” (57). The fact that one person could have the ability to control the amount of religion another person has and his purpose for having it diminishes any sense of community or identity that it may have initially provided.
Moreover, many owners later came to feel that Christianity may actually have encouraged rebellion (all those stories of Moses and the Israelites in Egypt, after all, talked about the liberation of the slaves), and so they began to discourage Christian missionaries from preaching to the slaves. African Americans have taken their own spiritual, religious journey. God was looked upon as a source of peace and encouragement. The community of enslave Africans were able to use religion and spirituality as a way of overcoming the mental anguish of slavery on a daily basis. To a slave, religion was the most important aspect of their life. Nothing could come between their relationship with god. It was their rock, the only reason why they could wake up in the morning, the only way that they endured this most turbulent time in our history.
Christianity in the context of American slavery took on many faces and characteristics. As a religion, it was used as a tool of manipulation for slave masters to further justify the institution, and particularly assert authority over their slaves. In the slave community, Christianity was adapted in the slave community as a means to shape an identity and create a sense of dignity for an oppressed people. Christianity in the context of the slave community was a means to uplift and encourage the slaves, a way in which to advance the interests of slave-holders, and in some cases, a means used to justify freedom.
He tells them that suffering is God’s greatest gift and that those who suffer will be rewarded. Some of the slaves accept the religion as truth, while others are less eager to believe everything the Count says. Jaques Lacan in Bhabha’s Of Mimicry and Man, states “the effect of mimicry is camouflage…It is not a question of harmonizing with the background, but against a mottled background, of becoming mottled- exactly like the technique of camouflage practiced in human warfare” (Bhabha, 85). The slaves are forced to mimic the slave owner’s religion. If they were to have kept their own religion, that would be an aspect of them that the colonizer wouldn’t be able to understand and, therefore, wouldn’t be able to
The role of Christianity plays an extensive part in a slave’s life. Christianity gives the slaves a sense of belonging and faith. They feel that they can depend on God for their fortunes and that He will guide them out of their misfortunes. How does religion play a role in their lives and their views on “good” and “bad” masters? The slaves that are Christian has a better and wholesome perception of life while slaves that are not Christian look at life in a pessimistic way.