Columbus Pros And Cons

489 Words1 Page

“Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves.” - Abraham Lincoln. The conquest of the New World was not worth the cost. The colonists took advantage over the innocent Native Americans. To go along with Lincoln’s quote, the colonists who were slave owners didn’t deserve freedom. The settlers captured and confined many slaves. Spain, as a whole had many advantages in the conquest of the New World. But the damages inflicted upon the Native population was almost unrepairable. The settlers came to the New World to find groups of honest, benevolent people already living there. Columbus, of course, abuses their giving nature. According to Columbus’ letter, the Native Americans were willing to trade expensive materials for simple, cheap items. That was one of the first signs in his letter that he was going to abuse them. Abusing anyone’s hospitality is horrible but to do it to an entire population is absurd! Not only did the colonists treat the Natives so crudely but get almost the whole population infected with deadly diseases. The diseases killed plenty of innocents. They died slowly and painfully from bumps on their skin. According to the excerpt and illustration “Large bumps …show more content…

But when they became slaves they were not treated as equals. In the Friar’s sermon he says “And what care do you take that they receive religious instruction and come to know their God and creator, or that they be baptized, hear mass, or observe holidays and Sundays? Are they not men? Do they not have rational souls?” Antonio de Montesinos was talking about them not being able to attend religious services. So overall Spain’s goal of them becoming Christians was ruined because of the poor treatment the slaves received. The Friar also talks about the cruel and unjust treatment of the slaves. He was explaining all of the sins the slave owners committed and how terrible they were. Which was all

Open Document