Collective Bargaining

1003 Words3 Pages

Collective Bargaining Unions provide a vital service for employees and management by negotiating contracts, ensuring workplace safety, and representing employees in grievance hearings. While there are hundreds of unions in the United States, this paper focuses on three major unions, the National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU), the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), and the American Federation of Teachers (AFT). Furthermore, this paper will compare and contrast these agencies, summarize their roles in optimizing employee relations with organizations, describe four challenges management and union officials face, and evaluate privatization as a means of breaking public employee unions. Compare and Contrast Three Unions The NTEU started in 1938 as the National Association of Employees of Collectors of the Internal Revenue (NAECIR) to reflect their expanded membership they changed their name to NTEU in 1973 (History of NTEU, n.d.). The NTEU is an independent organization whose mission is "to organize federal employees to work together to ensure that every federal employee is treated with dignity" (Who We Are, n.d.). While the AFSCME started in 1932, in response to the depression and out fear of the reestablishment of the spoils system their mission "to promote, defend, and enhance the civil service system" (AFSCME: 75 Years of History, n.d.). Whereas the AFT started in 1916 Chicago as part of their mission, they sought to increase wages for all members including women and minorities (AFT History, n.d.). Consequently, the AFT and the AFSCME full under the AFL-CIO and the NTEU remains independent. While the AFT focuses on educators, the AFSCME centers on state and local employees and... ... middle of paper ... ...s, R. S. (2011). Blue-collar public servants : How union membership influences public service motivation. The American Review of Public Administration, 41(6), 705-723. doi:10.1177/0275074010392367 Kearney, R. C. (2011). Randi Weingarten, the American Federation of Teachers, and the challenges of policy leadership in a hostile environment. Public Administration Review, 71(5), 772-781. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02418.x Masters, M. F. (1998). AFSCME as a political union. Journal of Labor Research, 19(2), 313-350. Perry, J. L., & Wise, L. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50(3), 367-373. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/976618 Tobias, R. M. (2004). The future of federal government labor relations and the mutual interests of congress, the administration, and unions. Journal of Labor Research, 25(1), 19-41.

Open Document