Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of colonialism in Latin America
Effects of colonial rule in Latin America
Impact of colonialism in Latin America
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of colonialism in Latin America
There is a lot of literature that attributes the failure of coffee farms in Central America to the lack of fair-trade law, effective protection from international organizations, the abuses of colonial powers and their repercussions, and the impact of globalization. Based on the finding of the presented research there is a significant connection between the failure of coffee farms and the lasting impact of abusive colonial powers, or Dutch disease. There are definitely issues of fair-trade, globalization, and international organizations but they are not as impactful. Fair-trade is often the first thing that comes to mind when thinking about small coffee bean farmers and the coffee crisis. Fair-trade practices encourage the international trading community to use sustainable business practices that will ensure the livelihoods and development of small, independent coffee farmers (Utting 2009). Research shows that fair-trade efforts are attempting to alleviate the coffee crisis and have had little to no negative impact on Central American coffee farmers. Fair-trade practices are designed to provide farmers with a fair price for their produce. Coffee shops that sell fair-trade coffee beans charge extra but unfortunately the coffee farmers do not see the financial return from the fair-trade coffee (Sick 2009). There has been considerable media and hype of the ‘green’ or fair-trade coffee bean and how the collapse of the fair-trade coffee beans is the cause for the coffee industry. Consumer misconception has actually resulted in an oversupply of the coffee beans which only creates an even greater drop in coffee prices. But even consumer misconception about fair-trade coffee can be ruled out as a major cause for the crisis because Cent... ... middle of paper ... ...tion and has left a wound that Central America has never fully overcome. The villain of the coffee crisis is undoubtedly colonialism and its exploitation. Dutch disease has crippled Central America’s economy today that the majority of Central American states are considered third world and undeveloped. Globalization is not off the hook however for globalization was of the original catalyst that started the wildfire of Dutch disease. There is no way to be certain but it is likely that Central America economy and the coffee production industry more specifically have been so crippled by Dutch disease that ending exploitation may not be enough. The crippled coffee producing industry remains in a coffee crisis long after decolonization and the efforts of international organization and fair-trade policies are make a deep impact. What will it take to end the coffee crisis?
Unfortunately, not everyone involved in the production of this popular sweet benefits. Today, over 70 percent of the world’s chocolate is exported from Africa (“Who consumes the most chocolate,” 2012, para 10). While chocolate industry flourishes under international demand, the situation in Côte d’Ivoire in particular illustrates dependency theory and highlights the need for the promotion of Fair Trade. Chocolate has had a considerable impact on the country’s economic structure and labor practices.
Carrillo-Huerta, M., & Bonilla, I. M. (2005). The effect of NAFTA on mexican agricultural exports to the united states: The case of coffee beans, 1970-2003. The Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance & Business Ventures, 10(2), 76-93. Retrieved from http://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/55949/1/662664000.pdf
Millies, Stephen. "How United Fruit Robbed and Killed the People of Central America." Workers World. 3 Oct. 1996. Web. .
The economy of Latin American countries such as Argentina have often focused on only one main product at a time and imported many of the other products needed. Argentina especially followed this economic strategy in the late 1800’s. Latin American countries focus on one product it does well and does not stray from that product. The countries were just following trends and taking advantage of what the market dictates is a worthwhile product. This strategy can fall short of having long-term success and lead to a land of poverty. This was the case in most every country in Latin America, and all the economy revolved around the growth of industry in each country. Technology, increased immigration, European influence, and political policy all influenced the economic state of Latin American countries and led to economic struggles.
For my mapping assignment I chose the Central America region. This region is unique in the sense that its present situation is heavily intertwined with its colonialized past. Central America today is a place still reliant on agriculture as a notable part of their Gross Domestic Product (GDP). It is mostly the eastern side of the region that receives heavy rainfall, but on the whole, holds a climate throughout that is very welcoming for agriculture. Agriculture in general is the largest employer throughout this region. However, jobs are undergoing differentiation as the economy incorporates a more industrial and service oriented agenda. The agricultural economy is a direct byproduct of the colonial structure set in place from Spanish explorers in the early 1500’s. This export tradition is a concern for modern economists because it may be holding back the region in regards to long-term development.
The political power has had enormous affect to the Latin American economy. Most of the countries in the Latin America remained colonies for over a long period of time; therefore, they were controlled by the Europeans power. These colonies never thought of development of the Latin American countries, rather all wealth from the colonies was taken out to the home country. This situation is similar to other colonized continents such as Asia and Africa. Almost every colonized country in the world is still in the process of development. These countries were never benefited economically from the colonizers. Therefore, the historic imperialism is still harming countries in the Latin America as well as they are still underdeveloped. According to Marxist theory “The colonies were used as places to invest surplus capital and sell goods from the colonizing countries and as sources of cheap raw materials and cheap labor.”(P165) Therefore, the investors will always get high benefits from their investment; however, the raw materials will get low prices for it. Hence, still Latin American countries face various problems due to the excessive use of natural resources and due to late from the Europeans
Colombia is one of the oldest democracies in Latin America with solid functioning institutions, progressive laws, an active civil society, and one of the most ecologically diverse countries in the world. Economically speaking, Colombia has had a surprisingly turnaround over the past decade due to the confidence and business opportunities that the investors have found in its emerging market. However, the improvements made in the economy are not sufficient to ensure sustainable economic development. On May 15, 2012, the U.S.-Colombia Free Trade Agreement (FTA) went into effect, and after almost two years its effects have had a negative impact in Colombia’s economy, mainly in its agricultural sector, which constitutes 11.5% of the country’s GDP (Cámara Colombo Coreana). The farmers complain that cheap imports from the United States are hurting their sector leaving some of them almost in bankruptcy. During August and September 2013, the country was in a nationwide strike against the Free Trade Agreement, which had different areas of the country paralyzed specially in Bogota, the capital city.
Kamola, Isaac A. "The Global Coffee Economy And The Production Of Genocide In Rwanda." Third World Quarterly 28.3 (2007): 571-592. Academic Search Premier. Web. 22 Sept. 2013.
Fair Trade coffee truly presents a difficult dilemma: through attempts to help farmers it sometimes backfires in certain areas and ends up hindering instead. Rules for the guaranteed market, guaranteed price floor, and opposition of child labor all originate from good-hearted desires to improve the lives of coffee farmers. Unfortunately, the situation many coffee farmers face cannot be so easily solved. The process of moving Fair Trade to the next level of functionality may not come quickly: it may take years, even decades. But that does not matter; rather, it matters much more that we ensure that the issues are addressed and thought over rather than simply swept under the carpet with the National Debt. With care and creativity Fair Trade can grow if we simply put forth the effort required to help it do so.
The movement particularly emphasizes on exports from developing countries to developed countries, with products such as handicrafts, coffee, cocoa, sugar, tea, bananas, honey, cotton, wine, fresh fruit, chocolate, flowers and gold. Moreover, coffee is one of the most widely traded goods in the world. For many developing countries, coffee trade is an important source of income. Producers can provide a better trading and improve terms of trade. Moreover, this allows producers to improve workers’ living environment and future life in general (De Pelsmacker, Driessen and Rayp, 2005).
In this essay, I will conduct an economic analysis of the coffee bean market to explain how the short and long run affects price fluctuations, and whether or not government intervention should be used to stabilise prices to benefit the growers. The assumption of demand and supply is that as demand is increased, supply will need to increase to maintain the market equilibrium. Arguably the consumer has very little influence on the levels at which demand and supply operate at, though this is contested due to the fact that a product cannot be sold unless it is demanded(desired) by a consumer. Although increasing and/or decreasing either the demand or supply of a product creates a new market equilibrium, it is usually short lived and we expect
Besides the high demand and cost for gasoline these days, coffee is considered the second most traded commodity on worldwide markets next to oil. "Coffee is grown in more than 50 countries in a band around the equator and provides a living for more than 20 million farmers. Altogether, up to 100 million people worldwide are involved in the growing, processing, trading and retailing of the product" (Spilling the Beans , ). In 2001, coffee farmers and plantations produced over 15 billion pounds of coffee while the world market only bought 13 billion pounds. The overproduction in the coffee industry is not a usual thing and is one of the major reasons why prices vary throughout the industry.
Prebisch, formerly the head of the Central Bank of Argentina, saw the world as two distinct areas: a center of economic power in Europe and the United States and a periphery of weaker countries in Latin America, Africa, and Asia. Prebisch concluded that Latin America’s underdevelopment was because of its importance on primary exports. The periphery was underdeveloped because it needed to create more sustenance and raw materials for export in order to import a specific amount of industrial imports. Andre Gunder Frank expressed that external monopoly resulted in the foreign expropriation, and thus local unavailability, of a significant part of the actual economic surplus produced in Latin America. Therefore, the region was actively underdeveloped by not generating at its potential and losing its surplus to Europe and North America. Peripheral countries were kept from accomplishing development because they sold their products at prices below their value, while rich countries sold products at prices above their value (Peet and Hartwick pp. 188 -199). Thus, in contrast to modernization theory, which emphasized the benefits of free trade, foreign investment, and foreign aid, these theorists argued that free trade and international market
Two common products that are Fair Trade Certified are Cocoa and Coffee, each of which contains problems that producers face but gain benefits from Fair Trade. Fairtrade International states that cocoa is grown in tropical regions of more than 30 developing countries, such as West Africa and Latin America, providing an estimate of 14 million people with livelihood. Fair Trade Standards for cocoa includes no forced labor of any kind - including child labor and environmental standards restricts the use of chemicals and encourage sustainability. A problem cocoa producers face is the lack of access to markets and financing. Since cocoa is a seasonal crop, producers need loans to meet the needs for planting and cultivating their crop. With this in mind,...
When comes to Economic aspect, coffee is the second most traded product in the world after petroleum. As the country’s economy is dependent on agriculture, which accounts for about 45 percent of the GDP, 90 percent of exports and 80 percent of total employment, coffee is one of the most important commodities to the Ethiopian economy. It has always been the country’s most important cash crop and largest export commodity. (Zelalem Tesera p