Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Mesopotamia questions and answers
Mesopotamia pre-history history
Mesopotamia pre-history history
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
LIFE IN ANCIENT MESOPOTAMIA William R Madden Western Civilization Through 1500 September 04, 2017 The Code of Hammurabi The Code of Hammurabi was a collection of 282 ancient Mesopotamian laws which were recorded on a pillar shaped stone called a stele . Hammurabi’s code was a system for the administration of punishment with the severity of punishment partially determined by the social class of an offender — A noble would be sentenced less harshly than a commoner or slave . In the codes introduction, the Babylonian deities charged Hammurabi with maintaining justice within his lands, which is illustrated by: “When Marduk sent me to rule over men, to give the protection of right to the land, I did right and righteousness in . …show more content…
. . , and brought about the well-being of the oppressed .” Punishment within the code is quite brutal when compared to modern justice, with many of the laws calling for the offender to be sentenced to death .
In addition to brutality, the rules are often non-sensible as can be seen with law number two — A defendant’s guilt is determined by a plunge into the river, if the accused dies, the accuser may claim the defendant’s possessions. If the accused lives, the accuser is put to death . Many laws within Hammurabi’s code regulate elements of commerce, law 268, 269, and 270, for example: • “268. If any one hire an ox for threshing, the amount of the hire is twenty ka of corn .” • “269. If he hire an ass for threshing, the hire is twenty ka of corn .” • “270. If he hire a young animal for threshing, the hire is ten ka of corn .” Hammurabi’s code also governs social conduct, with a notable number of rules pertaining to women. Law number 128 states: “128. If a man take a woman to wife, but have no intercourse with her, this woman is no wife to him .” The Code of Hammurabi concludes with an epilogue that restates Hammurabi’s right-to-rule by theological justification . Marduk, the most prominent Babylonian god, is cited as entrusting Hammurabi with governing in Marduk’s name, numerous lesser deities are also named in support of the authority of Hammurabi’s code …show more content…
. Parallels between Hammurabi’s code and the American justice system can be drawn. While America does maintain a separation of church and state, American law evolved from English law where the English king claimed a God given right of rulership. This is still evident when those involved in American court cases are required to pledge the Bible oath. Athahasis and The Great Flood Written in the 17th century B.C.E. Atrahasis was an epic account of a great flood in Babylonia . Lower gods were tasked with constructing the water-ways and other natural features around Mesopotamia, they complained about the work and the elder god Ea created humans to do the work instead . The humans annoyed the gods after some time and the god Enlil decided to get rid of the nuisance by drowning the land . Atrahasis is warned in a dream by the god Enki to build an Ark, which he does, and Atrahasis and everyone on board survives the flood . Atrahasis bears similarity to the biblical story (which was written after Atrahsis) involving a fellow named Noah. I am unclear whether the bible borrowed from Atrahasis or completely ripped the story off. In addition, I wonder if the Bible borrowed/stole anything else? The Epic of Gilgamesh, which is discussed later, may also be based on Atrahasis. Mesopotamian Composition A young Sumerian schoolboy is punished after having trouble mastering lessons . The boy invites his teacher home for dinner to meet with his father and to discuss lessons . During dinner, the teacher changes his opinion of the boy’s school performance over dinner, drinks, and gifts . The story of the schoolboy, written around 2000 B.C.E. is a rare glimpse into Mesopotamian life . We can see that some aspects of life have not changed all that much over the course of thousands of years. While (most) modern day students do not have the threat of caning hanging over them, the anxiety the boy must have felt over his studies is still relatable. We can also see that brown-nosing was alive and well in the ancient world. The Great Flood: The Epic of Gilgamesh vs the Genesis Account The Epic of Gilgamesh is a tale of the legendary king of Uruk and his quest for immortality . The story resembles Atrahasis, but features a different protagonist. Ut-Napishtim, a human, is warned of an impending flood by the god Ea and instructed to build a large ark to survive the coming flood . The Epic of Gilgamesh, like Atrahasis, shares commonality with the Bible’s story of Noah and the Ark: • Ea decides to destroy humanity due to their wickedness; • Ut-Napishtim dreams that Ea warns him of the flood; • Ut-Napishtim builds an Ark; • A great rain covers the earth past the mountain tops . Ut-Napishtim survives the flood and becomes immortal thereafter .
Gilgamesh later endeavors to find Ut-Napishtim hoping to gain the knowledge of immortality for himself — but fails . Genesis says: “I am going to put an end to all people, for the earth is filled with violence because of them .” The Epic of Gilgamesh and Genesis both have a God or Gods who are upset with their human creations and elect to kill them all by flooding. Both cultures must have experienced a huge flood and made nearly identical stories about that event, or one of the storytellers is appropriating the story. Assyrian & Persian Governance of Babylonia Assyrian rulers were brutal in conducting warfare . Assyrian troops damaged infrastructure, interfered with food production, and were cruel to prisoners . The Assyrian king Ashurbanipal during the capture of Babylon smashed prisoners underneath the statues of Babylonian gods, then fed the remains to animals . As a counter to Assyrian rule, the Persian king Cyrus took a far gentler approach when he conquered Babylon . Cyrus disallowed looting or mistreatment of the populace and restored damaged buildings in the city
. The differences between Assyrian and Persian rule could not be more different. Assyrians terrorized their opponents into submission, while king Cyrus of Persia was kinder and more inclusive. Persia would expand into a large and well-remembered empire. Cyrus’s approach seems superior given the historical results. Bibliography King, L.W. The Code of Hammurabi. (Paulo J. S. Pereira, MMXI, licensed under creative commons), 6-30, http://www.general-intelligence.com/library/hr.pdf. Kramer, Samuel Noah. Schooldays: A Sumerian Composition Relating to The Education of a Scribe. (University Museum, University of Pennsylvania), 199. Livius.org. The Epic of Atraḥasis. (Livius.org, 1995-2017), http://www.livius.org/sources/content/anet/104-106-the-epic-of-atrahasis/. Mark, Joshua J. The Eternal Life of Gilgamesh. (Ancient History Encyclopedia October 13, 2010), http://www.ancient.eu/article/192/. Spielvogel, Jackson J. Western civilization. (Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning, 2015),10.
Ancient laws were brutal. Babylonian laws, like Hammurabi's Code, included physical torture and death as punishments. The rule behind these punishments was "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth."Hammurabi was the name of the king in the city-state of Babylon who ruled for nearly 4,000 years ago.This code was a set of 282 laws that maintained order. Hammurabi's Code was unjust because accidents were punished, punishments for intentional damage was extreme, and it focused on revenge instead of preventing future crime.
The laws gave men more freedom over their lives, unlike women. Lastly, if a woman killed another woman, her daughter would be put to death! However, if a man killed another man, he would be killed. The person who killed someone should have been put to death, because the kids were innocent. Overall, women were considered their “husband’s property,” and they were not considered a true wife until they had kids. The Hammurabi Code allowed more freedom for men.
Hammurabi was the sixth king of the first Amorite dynasty of Babylon. He supposedly ruled from 1792-1750 BC. During his rule, he wrote a code of law, which was the first to be translated from cuneiform. The code was written on several stone tablets so that all people could see them. It had a prologue, an epilogue, and 282 articles, and included rights for women, even though they didn’t have as many rights as men did.
Though Darius died in the year after the revolt, Xerxes repressed the Egypt revolt in 486BC “year after Darius’ death, he sent an army against the Egyptian rebels and decisively crushed them” (Herodotus). Although this caused Xerxes to become unpopular in Egypt, the Egyptians were submissive and displayed loyalty to Xerxes “twenty-five years of tranquillity followed… Egyptians were submissive subjects of the Persian crown, and even showed remarkable courage and skill in the Persian military expeditions” (George Rawlinson). However, Xerxes had to punish Babylon revolted twice. This indicated to historians that the Xerxes wasn’t successful in punishing the Babylonians the first time they revolted. Babylon has been severely punished “Babylon had revolted and that the satrap Zopyrus had been killed… Babylon was terribly punished. The splendid city fortifications… were demolished... Esagila with its towering ziggurat was torn down, as were the other temples… statue of Bel Marduk… of solid gold, was carried off and melted down… priest of Esagila who protested the sacrilege was killed… estates of the merchant princes and citizens were confiscated and granted to Persians… Syria was detached from Babylon and made a fully independent satrapy. Babylonia itself lost its identity through incorporation with Assyria and was henceforth ferociously taxed"
One of the most important aspects of any society is the ruling system. A society simply could not function without any sort of rules or regulations. With the tremendous growth of Babylonian society came the need for law systems. Perhaps one of the most well known law systems was Babylonian ruler Hammurabi’s compilation of Mesopotamian laws known as Hammurabi 's Code. Hammurabi 's Code contained laws pertaining to trade, marriage, property, crime, social class, and more (Judge and Langdon, 25). So much can be learned about early societies through this famous artifact. Although these laws may have been accepted by the Babylonian citizens at the time, it is now clear to see that the code was extremely unjust. Hammurabi 's Code uncovers the social
The form of the Code of Hammurabi is significant in the way that it is written. The simple language used to write the Code allowed the average member of Babylonian society to understand the expectations placed on them. Each of 282 laws was written separately with specific examples of indiscretions that were illegal, and the precise form of punishment that would occur. The Code also sets guidelines for the fees that were paid to doctors, veterinarians, shipbuilders, ferryboat operators, and to the owners of rented livestock.
Throughout the world, people consider The Code of Hammurabi one of the most important codes of law ever recorded in the history of the world based on what it tells us about the history of early Babylon. The code gives people a way to see not only how the society of Babylon developed early on but also how other civilizations were developing complex societies, which were similar to the Babylonians. However, the code also shows us how the role of written documents and writing is effectively portrayed in Hammurabi’s laws. This is effectively observed by analyzing what types of documents the code provides evidence for, what are situations and reasons in which Babylonians used writing, and if writing is the only acceptable form of proof. The Code of Hammurabi is one of the most important codes ever recorded because it shows us evidence of early principles of justice, which provide proof for early legal documentation; gives us observable, physical proof of the Babylonian beliefs for future people to witness; and shows us how written works are the only acceptable form of proof because of the historical accuracy of the work.
We as people have always searched for a code of morals and conduct. It is what has held empires, nations, and families from falling into chaos. This is what the code of Hammurabi and the law of Moses instituted in maintaining order. Both laws have a strong foundation and way of promoting justice that rivals many systems today in regards to effectiveness. Many of the laws given were later used in future governments. There are many similarities and differences between these documents, and this analysis will share some of the those. These two documents provide rich resources and were made for two specific peoples because of women’s rights found in the code, the consequences of actions when violating code, and the vision of the laws created.
In the ancient times Babylonian king, Hammurabi, formed his code of laws, in the year 1750 BC. The code of Hammurabi consisted of 282 laws that were engraved in stone; this made the King believe the laws came directly from the sun god. Unlike earlier laws the code was written in Akkadian language, which was the common language of Babylon. The purpose of the code was to use governmental authority to make common bonds among the people of the Babylonian society.
As a man destroying the eye of a lower rank man or a slave was punished only by a fine and a man slapping a man of a higher class was punished by “ sixty blows with an ox-whip in public” according to the 202nd law. Also, women, although granted rights to land and divorce were punished more severely also. In most laws, their sexualities were sacrificed to ensure the legitimacy of their children. For example, men were allowed to have extramarital relationships with servants and slaves but philandering women were bound and thrown into the Euphrates along with her lover (unless her husband pardons her). The second law of Hammurabi states that an accused man could prove his innocence by jumping into the Euphrates. If he survived he was proven innocent by the gods and the accuser would be put to death. If the man died in the sacred river the accuser would come to own the dead man’s land. In other words, being a rich man who was also a swell swimmer during Hammurabi’s rule was quite
Reading through Hammurabi’s Code, one will realize that laws should always be about sustaining and upholding justice rather than executing and propagating acts of revenge. From a personal stance, the Code, inscribed by one of the most eminent ancient Mesopotamian kings, evokes a compelling sense of the concept of justice rather than equal retaliation. On one hand, there exists the element of natural strictness in the Hammurabi’s Law Code. But on the other, the laws were disciplinary measures designed fundamentally to align the common man with the precepts of justices. For instance, the first three directives in Hammurabi’s Code as outlined by Horne, Johns, and King are simply provisions for protecting
Hammurabi’s Code is 282 laws. These laws were very specific and important. Some of laws could not be implemented into everyday life in 2014, but back then these were very well
The Hammurabi Code is a set of laws and regulations created by the Babylonian King Hammurabi near the end of his reign in estimatedly 1750 B.C. King Hammurabi saw that with his growing empire there was a need for justice, so he set into place two hundred and eighty two laws and regulations for his people that people can still recognized today. For example, the saying “an eye for an eye” is apart of the Hammurabi Code. This code is one of the most complete forms of written laws from the time period but is not the first documented set of laws as contradictory to popular belief. The first documented set of laws are tablets from the ancient city of Ebla which is in modern day Syria and are estimately six hundred years older than the Hammurabi Code. The “code is also one of the earliest examples of the idea of the accused being considered
The set of laws is called the Code of Hammurabi. When Hammurabi was ruling in Babylon many rules were in order. But, they were not written down. Therefore the need to codify the laws came about, so all of the laws were inscribed on stone tablets to be able to implement order over his people. The code itself was in three sections; first an introduction where Hammurabi proclaims that he is the divine ruler from the order of the gods. Next was the section of 282 explanations of different complications or crimes that could happen in his society. They covered many problems in civil law such as marriage, and in criminal law such as robbery and murder. A famous piece of Hammurabi’s code of law was the “eye for an eye” saying. This meant that if a person were to commit a crime against an individual then what ever was done would have to be reciprocated on the initial crime doer. Many sections for different if then clauses, meaning that if a certain deed was done then this would be the penalty. There were also job specialized laws such as laws 42-56 that pertained specifically to farmers. This law code also was ahead of its time in how it gave some rights to women in a highly patriarchal society. But, even though it paved the way for women the law code did in some sections separate the from men. “If a tavern-keeper (feminine) does not accept corn according to gross weight in
The code of Hammurabi was one of the most important documents in Babylon history. It was adopted from many Sumerian customs that had been around for a while before the Babylonians. Though many of the Laws were adopted from Sumeria they were published by Hammurabi and thus known as the code of Hammurabi. This code had four main parts to it. They were: Civil Laws, Commercial Laws, Penal Laws, and the Law of procedures.