Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Abnormal psychology in films
Psychological aspects of movies
Psychopaths and mental disorders
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Abnormal psychology in films
Alex from Clockwork Orange tried to rape a woman l Unpredictable and emotionally unstable
Most of the psychopaths are also depicted as unpredictable and emotionally unstable.
Nobody can tell when he is going to kill, lie, rape, or laugh. Sometimes, it becomes even difficult to tell when they are likely to commit suicide. To many psychopaths, being unpredictable is a source of power. It also helped them to enhance their manipulative skills. For example, they can tell a lie and make sure that people believe it but actually they are planning something different.
This prevents people from stopping them on their tracks because they only find out after a crime has been committed. According to Robert Genter, the artistic use of suspense makes a movie
…show more content…
l No sense of nervousness or psychoneurotic manifestations
According to doctor Harvey M. Cleckley, what makes psychopaths unique in most cases is their little or no sense of nervousness or psychoneurotic manifestations. In other words, psychopathic characters tend to withdraw from their immediate environments whenever they feel threatened (Genter 155). For example, after committing murder, psychopath’s may display a unique coolness that investigators may mistake for innocence. They many not show any kind of nervousness even if the situation is compelling. For example, psychopathic characters as Alex in the Clockwork Orange is not bothered even when he realizes that some of the women he raped died of shock. He maintains a unique comfort in the prison cells that causing some people believe that he is innocent. Lack of conscience among psychopaths is always driven by the belief that bad men are capable of doing what good men only dream. Therefore, they would rather live their dreams even if it makes other people suffer so much pain. l Poor in judgment and learning from experience
According to doctor Harvey M. Cleckley, the general depiction of
…show more content…
However, they rarely think about the negative consequences of
9
their actions. For example, in Clockwork Orange, Alex realizes that the reason why he has been arrested is that one of the women he raped has died, but before the police told him that, he didn’t notice that at all. In other words, he was not thinking at all about the negative consequences of his actions. He was not bothered about being arrested until he was incarcerated. Even Norman
Bates rarely thinks about the consequences of his actions. Perhaps, the only time he was bothered was when he realized that he had killed his mother. He could not bear the guilt and he had to exhume the body. However, even after exhuming the body and preserving it, he still continued to make conversations with her. It was such conversations that Marion Crane heard and though that
Norman’s mother was still alive. He did not realize that having the body in the house was evidence for the police or any investigating officer to realize his crimes. The inability to make good judgments is one of the reasons why many psychopaths are taken to psychiatric therapies if their actions are against laws. l Alienation from the
The introduction of the book introduces Dr. Robert Hare’s research on psychopaths. He and two graduate students wrote a paper detailing an experiment they preformed on a group of random adult males. They recorded the brain waves of the group doing a simple language activity.
Hitcock states, "Every maker of mystery movies aims at getting the audience on the edge of their seats. The ingredient to keep them there is called "suspense." Producers cry for it, writers cry in agony to get it, and actors cry for joy when they do get it. I've often been asked
An example of this is a man and his wife are arguing; he becomes enraged and murders his wife in the heat of the disagreement. This man has a clean record; he has never committed a murder or crime of any kind before “Statistical trends would project that he won’t murder again” (Samenow 2). This man is not a “monster,” psychopath, or a freak of nature; he is a normal person who reacts in an entirely wrong way to a hostile and stressful situation. He knew what he was doing was wrong, but he rationalized the crime with his emotions and feelings rather than his morals. The “Evil is in all of us, really, but it’s how it’s expressed” that separates criminals and law abiding citizens (Prattini).
Psychopaths come in big and small packages with many different forms of personalities. Most of the time these psychopaths pop up in the middle of the darkness when people are least expecting it, like at Columbine. There are many types like Eric and Dylan, who hide their emotions. Then, there are people who are open to their craziness and enjoy their lives as a psychopath, like Hannibal Lector or Norman Bates. Always remember, never judge a book by its
However, Glenn and Raine (2014) argue that the emotional deficits characteristic of psychopaths diminish their rational capacity, making them unable to be held accountable for the rash and harmful decisions. Additionally, psychopaths may display knowledge of right and wrong, however their understanding is substantially compromised (Maibom 2005). Therefore, because they cannot understand moral emotions, moral transgressions fail to motivate them and they cannot be held morally responsible for their actions. They treat moral transgressions as equal to conventional transgressions (Levy 2008); to them, they are merely breaking the rules. And although breaking the rules begets consequences, a short attention span prevents psychopaths from anticipating consequences. Nevertheless, say, for example, a psychopath on a different portion of the spectrum is aware of the consequences. In this case, they would be still be indifferent because their feelings of grandeur lead them to believe that they are removed from punishment (Gao, Glenn, Schug, Yang, Raine 2009). For these reasons, many argue that psychopaths should not be held responsible for their behaviors.
...res of the psychopaths and gives the reader various examples of these individuals playing out these characteristics in everyday life. A widely used checklist is provided so the reader can get a wide spanning view of what is accounted for when scoring a psychopath. This form of research is very important within the deceitfulness of this population; it allows the professional to ignore their words and examine their actions. Hare made it clear that it is not uncommon for there to be an emotional and verbal disconnect from their actions. With virtually no emotional functioning psychopaths feel no remorse for the offenses that they commit and it is very important that we work towards using the opportunities we have to study and assist these populations; not only for them but for ourselves.
These character traits allow the psychopath to commit his atrocious acts. However, because the psychopath is rendered incapable of moral reasoning, the criminal legal system has a problem in justifying the punishment of one, as psychopathy intervenes with the person’s ability to be a normally functioning adult. Currently, psychopathy is not recognized as a mental illness by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV-TR. Most psychopaths end up being diagnosed with ASPD, or Antisocial Personality
Psychopaths literally feel nothing when it comes to violence or fear. Levy studies show that the emotional sectors of the brain are damaged. This makes them dangerous. They can not see that something is hurting or they are hurting someone.
Psychopaths are different than their common criminal counterparts because they live a parasitic lifestyle, are often charming, apathetic, and may have average to above average intelligence. Psychopaths, or predators, usually impress others as friendly, outgoing, likeable, and alert. They appear to be well educated and knowledgeable. Predators can be verbally skillful and can talk themselves out of trouble. Psychopaths exhibit arrogance and are selfish, self-centered, and self-motivated to secure their own self-interests (DeLisi, 2009). Psychopaths, like life-course persistent offenders, start offending at a young age as persistent and versatile
According to Cleckley, psychopaths normally show anxiety and do not feel guilt once they have committed a crime. Cleckley states, “The crimes of psychopaths are usually stone-cold, remorseless killings for no apparent reason. They cold-bloodedly take what they want and do as they please without the slightest sense of guilt or regret” (Cleckley). Psychopaths lack the ability to feel remorse and empathy. They feed themselves with the suffering of their victims. Sometimes, they collect certain things from their victims and keep them as trophies. In addition, psychopaths are calculated predators. Once they have picked a victim, they will take days or even weeks to plan out the attack.
J. Eysenck based his theory of psychopathy on the three dimensional model of personality. “There are certain major personality variables, independent of each other; that these are in great measure genetically determined...” (Eysenck & Eysenck, 1978, p.198) Eysenck regarded the three dimensions as Extraversion (E), Neuroticism (N), and Psychoticism (P). Psychopaths were expected to be defined by high E, high N, and high P. A high N meant that one would overreact to stimuli overtly. A high E meant one craved excitement and change, tending to be aggressive and unreliable. Meanwhile, a high P implied they were solitary, uncaring of other people, insensitive, sensation-seeking, liking odd things, foolhardy, and enjoyment from other people’s discomfort. (Eysenck, 1977, p.58) Eysenck believed that psychopaths “because of their hereditarily based characteristically low level of cortical arousal, condition poorly to environmental contingencies.” Without conditioned moral and social responses, the psychopath behaves in ways that do not follow society’s laws and rules. (Doren,
The entire book is told from the view of Robert D. Hare, PhD., a psychologist and researcher of psychopathy. Hare decided to write this book to shed light on the many psychopaths that live among all of us from day to day. Hare does this by using evidence from case studies, stories told to him, and the private meetings he had with the psychopaths that he has met along the way. Hare’s account was an excellent read because he was very modest, even admitting to being fooled by some of the psychopaths he encountered, which made him seem more like a real person. The mind of a psychopath is still far from being explained, however Hare feels the best way to figure out a psychopath operates is to stop them before they are able to cause any damage. Doing so, victims would not be harmed; mentally and physically, saving tax payers money due to court costs, rehabilitation and parole programs that simply don’t work.
Scott, Shirley L. "What Makes Serial Killers Tick?" Psychopaths? —. N.p., n.d. Web. 25 Mar. 2014.
Depictions of psychopaths today have become exaggerated based off of what you see in movies and films. The psychopaths in movies are believed to be dangerous or have an anti-social personality disorder. Not all psychopaths can be defined in that manner. Psychopaths are identified as people who are emotionally unstable. They are ultimately suffering from a chronic mental disorder with abnormal or violent social behavior. There have been studies ultimately wondering if a psychopath is born, or is it raised? Genetics and environment combine to produce conditions that create psychopathology. By paying attention to environmental variables we can potentially reduce the amount of people who become dangerous psychopaths.
New studies reveal that psychopaths not only understand right from wrong, but can justify their morally inappropriate actions regardless of the consequences. Psychology experts Maaike Cima, Marc Hauser and Franca Tonnaer devised a hypothesis that could potentially render previous preconceptions about psychopathy moot: