Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Oil industry effect on the environment
Social corporate responsibility
Social corporate responsibility
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Oil industry effect on the environment
1. Introduction: In recent year, fighting climate change is a one of pivotal issues which require an interference from variety aspect in society, not merely a responsibility of government but also mandate of businesses. To defend a substanable growth of the business, taking care of stakeholder’s right should be paid attention, especially energy companies which directly integrate with government, community and environmental issue. A corporation is likely to obtain several perquisites throughout treats in a socially responsible manner, among them: the elevation of financial achievement and the mitigation of operating costs; the enrichment of the organization image and reputation; the upgrade of customer loyalty and sale (cited in Ciliberty, Baden and Harwood, 2011). BP is a global oil and gas company, supplying its clients with fuel for transportation, power for heat and light, retail services and petrochemicals products for everyday items (BP.com website). They have approximately 79 700 employees, reach over 80 countries in 2010 and revenue of BP corporation in 2010 is 297,107 million dollars (BP annual report, 2010) and each share of BP costs about 41,92 dollar ( Nasdaq.com website, 2011). They are a one of leader international company in global oil and gas industry, hence, these activities associate with environmental matter always are paid attention. Each year, they spend more than 1 billion dollars on alternative energy development (BP annual report, 2010). However, the expansion of BP operation in 2010 had lead to extremely awful consequence for nature which is an oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. This event cause the death of 11 workers, injured of 17 others and lost of over 3 billions dollar to deal with it (ibid). In t... ... middle of paper ... ... but also their reputation in the long-term and the trust of communities where they are operating. Therefore, the effectiveness of protecting environments will assists the operation increase their value, obtain the trust of market and tend to the sustainable development for both corporation and community. On the other hand, the responsibitility of protecting environment not only impose on the business but also is a duty of the government. The expansion of business units make the increase of competition within these industry and the company need to reform their technology and minimize the cost of product, hence, it lead to cut down environment budget. Therefore, the goverment must to build up the restricted rule to business operation in order to observe and guarantee the right and the duty of the business as well as enhance the living standard of their citizen.
Windsor, D. (2001). The future of corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 9 (3): 225-256.
After a thorough examination into BP’s numerous strategies, further analysis into the company’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) provides an overall performance level regarding the outcomes of their CSR and sustainability goals. Drag and Zimnol (2014) stipulated a SWOT analysis can provide structure to the internal and external factors affecting the company’s current and future outlooks. Additionally, a SWOT analysis can generate context regarding the company’s current relationship with the environment, which can portray the ways to both reduce environmental impact and regenerate damaged communities (Drag & Zimnol, 2014). Therefore, evidence suggests that although BP displays admirable strengths capable of maintaining
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is a word that is bandied about with really little regard as to what the full implications actually are. Consider a few thoughts: What exactly is a corporation’s responsibility? Who are the arbiters of CSR for corporations? What does it cost to “rein in” corporations? Why are some companies held to a different standard than others?
At the four year mark of the Deep Water Horizon accident in the Gulf of Mexico, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) allows British Petroleum (BP) to drill for oil in the gulf once again. Many consumer advocate groups, chiefly Public Citizens, have voiced concerns over this decision. The lack of corporate accountability and oversight makes this decision seem unethical to these advocates groups. However, the company agrees to follow the agency’s ethic and safety procedure given the new leases. Yet, a series of accidents on its infrastructure makes reform seem doubtful for the company.
The problem with pollution prevention is that it requires people to understand more than the intimate details of the production process; they must also understand the technical possibilities. Many corporations have environmental managers, which are generally responsible for helping corporations comply with the law. According to the case study, the work of environmental managers often expose them to many pollution prevention solutions, but they often have trouble getting access to production areas. Production often sees Environmental Managers as "the compliance police".
The BP distain for truth and costly crusades cause issues that left an unsettling picture of the organizations concerning the safety consciousness of the company. BP has a long history for being unreliable, when it comes to the safety of others. They pushed the envelope beyond good sense to maintain profit margin and not good health. As a person born and raised on the gulf coast of Alabama, I have firsthand knowledge many members are still disgusted with their attitude towards the environment. In my eye’s no, not to those who were affected. Even with a new attitude, new slogan and CEO. BP is still ran by the same people who lead us to the oil disaster.
It will be advantageous for the company if they can project themselves as responsible corporate citizen and an environment friendly company. Social enrichment schemes, recycling schemes and educational funds can be initiated to cater to this cause and long term goal.
Over the past 200 years, mankind discovered the fossil fuels and they used this source to produce hug energy. This affects the environment in many negative ways and caused many issues worldwide such as urban air pollution and acid rain, oil spills and the high temperature of earth. Saudi Arabia has the biggest oil reserves in the world by 19.66% (the world factbook, 2011) and the second oil producer country in the world with roughly 10.121 million barrels a day – which account for 12% of the total world production of oil in 2010 (Fontinelle,2011). Moreover, the country relies heavily on oil industry. And the most successful companies in the country are thus whose work in oil industry such as ARAMCO Company. The reason behind this success is because most of these companies get financial support and attention from the Saudi government and sometimes the government owes these companies. Because of the massive reserve of oil and the high income that generated from oil, the country has less attention to seek for other sources of clean energy such as solar energy and wind energy which leads to the increase of air pollution in the country. However, oil is expected to last in the next 50 to 100 years (Hubbert, 1956). Furthermore, the International organizations have made many decisions to protect the environment and environmental resource such as Kyoto Protocol which decided to raise the use of solar energy to 50%of the total global energy use by 2020 (UNFCCC ,2005 ). Recently, these issues lead the Saudi government to realize problems, such as air pollutions, and start to invest in clean energy area but not as expected. These days many people in Saudi Arabia argue the uses of clean energy and replace with the fossil fuels. And they d...
It will give the definition of the phrase and identify some of the global factors that require corporate social responsibility. The importance of companies establishing corporate social responsibility projects and the impact they have on society will be discussed. The two companies that will compared are Amazon and Exxon. These businesses are both very similar in their notoriety as well as their success but much different in the aspect of social responsibility. Study of Exxon
While the concept of an individual having responsibility is commonly recognized, modern views have lead to the emerging issue of corporate responsibility. Business Directory.com defines corporate social responsibility as, “A company’s sense of responsibility towards the community and environment (both ecological and social) in which it operates. Companies express this citizenship (1) through their waste and pollution reduction processes, (2) by contributing educational and social programs, and (3) by earning adequate returns on the employed resources.” But such a concept has been much disputed since at least the 1970’s.
There are now several concepts of CSR and its definition, along with the meaning across corporations. In my opinion, and according with our textbook in page 11. CSR is about a particular set of business and strategies that deal with social issues. In addition, we can clearly perceive that CSRs application along corporations has increase in the past decade due to the several local, and international regulations in order to enforce business to act responsible.
Business organizations regularly run into demands from various stakeholders groups when conducting day-to-day business. These demands are generated from employees, customers, suppliers, community groups, governments, and shareholders. Thus, according to Goodpaster, any person or group of people that can shape or can be shaped by attainment of the objectives by an organization is considered a stakeholder. Most business organizations recognize and understand their responsibilities to these groups and endeavor to honor and fulfill them. These responsibilities are often communicated to the public by a statement of principles or beliefs. For many business organizations, corporate social responsibility (CSR) has become an essential and integral part of their business. Thus, this paper discusses the two CSR views: the classical view and the stakeholder view. Furthermore, I believe that the stakeholder view has brought ethical concerns to the forefront of businesses, and an argument shall be made that businesses would improve both socially and economically if CSR, guided by God’s love, was integrated into their strategic planning.
The importance of Environmental Analysis lies in its usefulness for evaluating the present strategy, setting strategic objectives, and formulating strategies. The political environment can affect organizations. Political components influence buyer certainty and purchaser and business spending. Stability of the political environment is essential for organizations to enter new markets.
Because of this the government has been put into a major predicament. They have, and must continue to create laws, to protect the environment. However they cannot simply place unrealistic restrictions and limitations onto the major polluters; that are the manufacturing companies. These manufacturers emit large quantities of waste and greenhouse gases. However that is the cost of today’s society. The world needs certain commodities to function properly; like paper products, gasoline, oil and other petroleum by-products, as well as many other products that; whether we like it or not, are harmful to the environment, to make and use.
Environmental factors cater for the protection of the environment. A business must carefully be able to look at its surroundings to see for benefits and ensure that its daily production does not interfere with society.