Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Consumerism in America
Consumerism and its effect on society
Effects of consumerism on our economy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
America’s current standard of living is going to cause our demise. Consumerism is a problem throughout Americans culture since mass production began in the late nineteenth century. The obsession with consumerism has led to mindless wastes of resources, a diseased society and economic instability. Rick Wolff, a professor of economics at University of Massachusetts, states “economics of capitalism spread consumerism—now uncontrolled, ecologically harmful, and fiscally disastrous—throughout the United States”. Wolff’s viewpoint on consumerism aligns with mine. Believing that an economy based on promoting endless consumption is volatile and unsustainable. Consumerism can be analyzed and seen to be embedded by corporations and politicians.
Mass
…show more content…
consumption and arguably the start of consumerism could easily be seen by the early nineteenth century. American historian Morris Berman explains in his book Why America Failed: The Roots of Imperial Decline, “During 1800-50 the GNP increased sevenfold, and by 1860 the basic outlines of the modern American economy were already visible: mass consumption, mass production, and capital-intensive agriculture” (16). People quickly took advantage of this as many companies and businesses opened and America became the country to fulfil desires. Consumerism was embedded more in our society when Wolff explains in his view point that “dominant social groups reinforced consumption as the goal of work and the measure of personal worth”. The way they did this was increase wages of their workers, encouraging harder work, and more borrowing to buy more (Wolff). Major economic events in the past will show how this way of living and the dependence of consumerism on our economy need to change. Wolff ideology shows its worth even in today’s society as spending is the main pursuit of everyone’s life especially with the introduction of new technologies. Today’s issues are much of the same but with intervention from the government to help build consumerism and capitalist ploys to increase spending on their products. Today consumer confidence still is low and if at any point spending stops the economy crashes. To keep up with the consumption needed, in 2009 Obama came up with an Economic Stimulus Package, which main purpose was to increase the amount of money in the consumers pocket and promote spending to restore economic growth (Amadeo). The government dumping money we don’t have into the economy to save it shows how sensitive and dependent it is on spending. In the long run endless spending on products will waste resources that are limited. Hillary Mayell, from National Geographic News, explains in the report State of the World 2004, “the devastation toll on the Earth’s water supplies, natural resources, and ecosystems exacted by a plethora of disposable cameras, plastic garbage bags, and other cheaply made goods with built in product-obsolescence, and cheaply made manufactured goods that lead to a ‘throw away’ mentality”. This is a simple ploy that companies do on purpose to ensure you buy more products of theirs. Other ways they do this is technological obsolesce like coming out with new phones that essentially do the same as the previous version. All these tricks from capitalist’s further wastes essential resources just to increase consumerism and we always fall for it. Many don’t see any issue with consumerism. It shows that the more we spend as a society the better the economy does. It’s true that is how economy grows but we are trained to borrow money to keep spending and when we can’t afford to pay that money back is when a downward spiral occurs. Both of the major depressions in our history were specifically caused by over borrowing and over consuming. As seen in the most recent recession job rates plummeted and that effected everyone. Other issues with consumerism becomes the wastefulness of limited resources. Purposely making products that are not meant to last is an unnecessary way of using resources. The only way to combat consumerism is to simply consume less. Only buy what is needed and don’t indulge into the tricks companies make to convince you to spend more. Don’t upgrade your phone ever chance you get. Make things last longer than they are meant too. If we continue down the same path we will eventually find ourselves into another depression that we can’t afford and soon America won’t be as great as it has always been. One of the main reasons for consumerism being such an issue is argued by American historian Morris Berman.
He explains the civil war being the historic event that turned America to expand further into the consumerist economy. Although it was labeled a war to combat slavery Berman explains, “prior to the Emancipation Proclamation, the North had proposed no change in the status of the Negro as a result of the war”. Making Berman labeling it as a war “between two conflicting economies” (Why American Failed 121). This could arguable be the expansion of the industrial north of mass production causing a ripple effect to mass consumption. The south was focused more on agriculture and exportation of goods, although it was at the cost of slavery at the time. The expansion of consumerism in American history led to its deadliest war with over six hundred thousand deaths. This shows the power of industries and corporations on political decision making. The north won the war and expansion of consumerism …show more content…
emerged. Another reason of consumerism is that it is necessary to our capitalism type of market. In order for capitalist to make money in the free market it is to promote spending on their products. This embedding of consumerism took capitalists many years to accomplish and while they were doing this they continually increased wages. In the viewpoint Capitalist Promote Consumerism, Wolff explains that real wages haven’t raised since the 1970’s and the reason being is because US citizens are still buying the goods provided. Wolff explains, “When that no longer pays, they will redirect shipments to the rest of the world market”. Corporations successfully changed our dominant culture to spending more on products without increasing our wages. According to economist Mark Weisbrot consumption is approximately 70 percent of the economy. Meaning at any point consumers stop spending the economy is at risk to recession and corporations are at risk of massive losses. This is why corporations have spent over one hundred years of advertisements to convince our society to never stop spending. The last cause of consumerism explained is going to be corporation’s use of planned and perceived obsolescence.
Meaning corporations purposely make products that won’t last or will be otherwise social unacceptable to own in the near future. This is all a trick to cause the consumer to buy more of a product and spend more money. According to Annie Leonard, author of The Story of Stuff, “[designers] discussed how fast they can make stuff break and still leave the consumer with enough faith in the product to go buy another one” (11). This fuels consumption further than necessary and most importantly at an alarmingly wasteful way. Nothing shows more obsolescence than the technology market with computers and phones. Giles Salde wrote an award winning book about technology obsolescence and explains “a century of advertising has conditioned us to want more, better, and faster from any consumer good we purchase, in 2004 about 315 million working PCs were retired in North America” (Planned Obsolescence viewpoint). This shows the affect caused by corporations to increase profits at the cost of resources. They use new software and products being incompatible with previous versions of electronics to force consumers to buy more. You see this commonly with televisions, gaming systems, computers, and many other electronic
devices. One of the main objections could be that people simply only consume so much because it makes them happier. Leonard explains that polls prove that since the 1950’s national happiness has steadily declined in correlation with our most consuming years directly after World War II. It is believed that as we consume more we work more. As we work more we have less quality time doing the things that truly make us happy like family and friends (Page 12-13). Essentially the more we consume the worse off we are as a society. The only people it’s truly benefiting are the one percenters. Corporations and investors that represent the richest people in the world as everyone else continues to accrue debt and struggle to meet society’s needs for a happy life. Making the most important cause of consumerism rooted back to the civil war when it was able to expand as the dominant economy. If the south won the war the expansion of a different economy could have emerged. The ripple effect of mass production required mass consumption. Further analysis shows that is when advertisements became most popular to convince society to consume products. Corporations realized simply consuming the products they made wasn’t going to grow them the amounts they wanted. To combat this issue they started making products to purposely become obsolete. All of these issues are reasons today why consumption is so high. Most of the causes of consumerism are a part of history and can never be changed. We can’t turn back history and stop a civil war; nor can we plead to corporations to stop making faulty products. The one thing we can change is our culture and society. As the consumers we can change. We can change the way we consume and what we consume. The last president to combat corporations and consumerism was President Carter who told Americans that we need to adapt to a “plain style” of living and stop buying into happiness self-worth comes from consumption. President Carter continued his term living this exact way by limiting spending and encouraging smarter ways of using energy by even installing solar panels to run the white house (Why America Failed 35-39). In order to better and sustain our lives major reform. The only way to combat consumerism as a problem is for all of us to be mindful and demand change. Remember this the next time you decide to upgrade to the next version of your phone.
Michael F. Holt, in his article The Political Divisions That Contributed to Civil War, argued the American Civil War was caused by the breakdown of the two-party political system, which generated a local loss of faith in the entire political system, justifying the creation of a new political system in the South. It was the agency of individuals attempting to solve their political grievances. While Bruce Levine, in his article The Economic Divisions That Contributed to Civil War, maintained unresolvable economic divisions between North and South made the Civil War inevitable, as the two different economies could not indefinitely coexist. While the conflicting economies of the North and the South played a major role in fashioning the war,
In his work, “Overselling capitalism,” Benjamin Barber speaks on capitalism’s shift from filling the needs of the consumer, to creating needs. He tells how it has become easier for people to borrow money, so that they no longer get as much satisfaction from affording necessities. He says capitalism can be good when both sides benefit, but it has overgrown and must continue creating needs, even though the only people who can afford these needs don’t have any. According to Barber, people are still working hard, but them and their children are becoming seduced by unneeded shopping. He states that people are becoming more needy, and losing discipline in their lifestyle. Additionally capitalism must encourage easy and addicting shopping to
The economies of the North and South were vastly different leading up to the Civil War. Money was equivalent to power in both regions. For the North, the economy was based on industry as they were more modern and self-aware. They realized that industrialization was progress and it could help rid the country of slave labor as it was wrong. The North’s population had a class system but citizens could move within the system, provided they made the money that would allow them to move up in class. The class system was not as rigid as it was in the South. By comparison, the South wanted to hold on to its economic policy. In doing so, the practice of slavery kept the social order firmly in place. The economic factors, social issues and a growing animosity between the two regions helped to induce the Civil War.
Bruce Levine, on the other hand, points to economics as the main reason for the Civil War. He points to two different economies between the North and South which had greatly different needs.
Before civil war broke out, several parts of history foreshadowed the growing divide between the northern and southern areas of the United States. One being, differences in culture and lifestyle. The south’s economy predominately based itself off of agriculture; specifically the growing of tobacco, corn, and cotton. The big southern plantations, owned by several white elitist men, used slavery to operate, another major cause for civil war. The northern economy thrived off of manufacturing and big industrial business. Northern politicians and elite class members supported tariffs and the use of training large armies. As the divide grew, tempers and attitudes flared, as d...
...n his volunteer-troops, rather than an “exceptionally well drilled and experienced army.” The Civil War required a “quickly improvised…realistic standard for mid-nineteenth century America.” Which, as Griffith points out, they either did “ineffectively or reverted to outdated tactics disastrously.” The developments of technology certainly had a very large role in the way the war was fought but what truly caused the shift from Napoleonic to modern warfare was the fact that America was not Europe and the battle was for a cause much more powerful than land acquisition and discourse with another nation, but rather ideological dissonance within. Both authors analyzed how the United States’ differed from the countries across the Atlantic in order to provide some explanation regarding the nature of the Civil War and why it took so many lives before it came to an end.
A large part of this problem is that many Americans buy into the ploys of capitalism, sacrificing happiness for material gain. “Americans have voluntarily created, and voluntarily maintained, a society which increasingly frustrates and aggravates” them (8). Society’s uncontrolled development results in an artificial sense of scarcity which ensures “a steady flow of output” (78).
Slave labor, which turned the wheels on the vast plantations growing tobacco and cotton, created an entirely different socioeconomic climate then the one found in the North. The inherent conflict between the progressive, industrialized, urbane North and the plantation lifestyle, made possible by cotton, tobacco and slave labor, ultimately revealed a nation sharply divided along socioeconomic lines. The Civil War or "the war between the states", was the inevitable outcome of a developing nation uncertain as to whether it should remain progressive and industrialized or genteel and slowmoving. Unquestionably, the tobacco economy of the South as well as its cotton products were of vast importance to the entire nation.
The South’s economy following the Civil War was completely and utterly destroyed. It faced a great number of obstacles during Recostruction. Some of these effects are still being felt by the modern-day south. The economy was so incapable of improvement that the south is still the poorest region of the United States to his day.
The Civil War has been viewed as the unavoidable eruption of a conflict that had been simmering for decades between the industrial North and the agricultural South. Roark et al. (p. 507) speak of the two regions’ respective “labor systems,” which in the eyes of both contemporaries were the most salient evidence of two irreconcilable worldviews. Yet the economies of the two regions were complementary to some extent, in terms of the exchange of goods and capital; the Civil War did not arise because of economic competition between the North and South over markets, for instance. The collision course that led to the Civil War did not have its basis in pure economics as much as in the perceptions of Northerners and Southerners of the economies of the respective regions in political and social terms. The first lens for this was what I call the nation’s ‘charter’—the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, the documents spelling out the nation’s core ideology. Despite their inconsistencies, they provided a standard against which the treatment and experience of any or all groups of people residing within the United States could be evaluated (Native Americans, however, did not count). Secondly, these documents had installed a form of government that to a significant degree promised representation of each individual citizen. It was understood that this only possible through aggregation, and so population would be a major source of political power in the United States. This is where economics intersected with politics: the economic system of the North encouraged (albeit for the purposes of exploitation) immigration, whereas that of the South did not. Another layer of the influence of economics in politics was that the prosperity of ...
During the Civil War the people ate many different foods from today. A lot of the meals the soldiers ate were cooked over a fire and put in a put. They ate most of their meals like this because they had to camp out and the only way to cook their warm meal was over the fire. Some of the foods they ate consist of meats such as beef or bacon soaked with potassium nitrate. Both Union fare and Confederate fare ate beef and bacon, but only the union fare ate pork.
Personally, I believe the Civil War was fought due to land lust and greed and the differing ideology the Northern and Southern states had in regards to this. Additionally, each time we acquired new land mass throughout early American history violence ensued at the cost of some entity (Schultz, 2009). Consider the Indians, England, and Mexico as recipients of hostile land acquisition; consequently, during the Civil War area, America was fighting itself over land due to man’s greed. The Civil War was caused by political differences, social differences, and economic differences between Northern and Southern states. Additionally, these dividing issues were not entirely new notions just prior to the war, but rather issues that were generally ignored
There have been numerous subjects of living in a contemporary society of consumers. These subjects mostly relevant to accumulation of goods by consumers, and its negative effects against sustainability. Sustainability covers all of the vital subjects of problems of contemporary society. To illustrate, climate change, global warming, dispute among countries, and consumerism. There are many solutions for preventing catastrophes of these issues, but one of them is related to this century, which is relation between consumerism and socio-economy. While it has been argued that consumerism has some advantages, it is harmful because it leads to people living a lonely lifestyle, it results in chronic economic crises, and individuals might be victim of capitalist lifestle that promotes sheer greed.
The electronic junkyard as yahoo news quite nicely framed it, has an exotic display of millions and millions of electronics and electronic parts (dubbed “e-waste”), some recyclable others junk. The recent surge of electronics has people bewildered on the newest craze or the newest design of the iPhone. Even though technologically, we, the small number of people who have some experience and comprehension of electronics understand that these new “craze” products have nearly similar technical hardware then their predecessor versions. Hence it is irrational (even as the name suggests, “craze”) to purchase the newer models. This so-called eradication (so the consumers think) of these old electronics and purchase of newer models are all due to human vanity or in many cases greed. It is almost impossible for these masses to subdue their greed and vanity and instead, rely on almost perfectly functioning “older” electronics.
“One hundred and thirty-thousand computers are thrown out every day in the U.S., and over one hundred million cell phones every year” (CBS News). We live in a materialistic society where more is good and the newer the better. In our fast paced lives companies used this to their advantage to continual bring out newer upd...