Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gandhi ji salt march essay
Civil rights movement and civil disobedience
Civil disobedience in general word
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
When one disobeys the law, there is naturally a consequence. What happens when people break the law because they consider it unjust? This is civil disobedience and it is questioned to be positively or negatively impacting our society. I believe this is positively impacting our society because it encourages Americans to exercise their freedoms. I believe that civil disobedience is also at times the only way to bring attention to a problem that needs resolution. According to the First Amendment of the United States, Americans have the freedom to protest. If one were to look at America today, he or she can easily find examples of civil disobedience. Currently there are many protests and riots about President Donald Trump's inauguration. These …show more content…
There have been times in the past where problems have occurred but no one does anything about it because it is not well known. An example of this is Gandhi's Salt March. Gandhi was a philosophical teacher and leader who “helped India regain independence and inspired movement for civil rights and freedom across the world” (Gandhi). The Salt March was “an act of civil disobedience led by Mohandas Gandhi” to protest the unfair ruling Britain had over India (Salt March). Britain forced India buy heavily taxed salt from the British and forbid them to collect or sell their own. The Indians believed this was wrong but since they were a poor and suffering country, this issue was going unnoticed by the world and they were helpless. Mohandas Gandhi agreed the overtaxing was unfair and caused the Indians a great deal of suffering. Gandhi set out to the Arabian Sea with dozens of followers on March 12, 1930 “to defy [Britain’s] policy” (Salt March). This issue was finally noticed when “recorded by American journalist Webb Miller [and it] prompted an international outcry against British policy in India” (Salt March). Years later, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was “heavily influenced” by Gandhi’s “use of nonviolent civil disobedience” (Honoring Martin Luther King, Jr: Five Examples of Nonviolent, Civil Disobedience Worldwide). Civil disobedience brings attention to problems and leads to solutions. It also has a long lasting effect not only during that time, but also in the
When a citizen abides by the social contract, they initially agree to enter and be a participant of a civil society. The contract essentially binds people into a community that exists for mutual preservation. When a person wants to be a member of civil society, they sacrifice the physical freedom of being able to do whatever they please, but they gain the civil freedom of being able to think and act rationally and morally. Citizens have what is called prima facie obligation to obey the laws of a relatively just state. A prima facie duty is an obligation that we should try to satisfy but that can be overridden on occasion by another, stronger duty. When it comes to prima facie duty, this duty can be outweighed by a higher order obligation or
“No radical change on the plane of history is possible without crime,” This quote from Hermann Keyserling is just one of many statements that help describe the meaning and true raw power of Civil Disobedience. Civil disobedience as defined by Merriam Webster is the “refusal to obey governmental demands or commands especially as a nonviolent and usually collective means of forcing concessions from the government”. The most promising and understandable of the definitions of Civil Disobedience would be that given to us by Gandhi from India “Compassion in the form of respectful disagreement”. Even the Veterans Fast for Life from here in the United States must agree when saying, “when leaders act contrary to conscience, we must act contrary to leaders.” To understand why civil disobedience is so important in our lives you must first look into your heart and realize that the integrity of mankind has no need of rules.
Civil Disobedience, as stated in the prompt, is the act of opposing a law one considers unjust and peacefully disobeying it while accepting the consequences. Many people believe this has a negative impact on the free society because they believe civil disobedience can be dangerous or harmful. Civil disobedience does not negatively affect the free society in a dangerous manner because it is peaceful and once it becomes harmful to the free society then it is not civil disobedience. Thoreau believed civil disobedience is an effective way of changing laws that are unjust or changing things that as a society and to the people does not seem correct. This peaceful act of resistance positively impacts a free society. Some examples are Muhammad Ali peacefully denying the draft and getting arrested. These men believed that what they saw was wrong and they did something about it but they did it peacefully.
Likewise, violent protests raise awareness in a negative and oftentimes irrational light. Following the tragic shooting of Michael Brown in the fall of 2014***, countless riots shed light on a new twist on a century-old issue; race in America. The man shot was an African-American, unarmed, young adult. He was shot by a white police officer who believed the young man to be a threat to his safety. His death became the catalyst for the modern Black Lives Matter movement’s stance on equality in American justice systems. While the movement places an emphasis on a need for change, much like Martin Luther King did in the 1960’s, the mass riots from Ferguson, Missouri to Baltimore, Maryland contradict civil disobedience. The riots caused hundreds of vandalisms, countless injuries of police officers in both cities, and created fear for the movement. Awareness for the issues were raised because of this movement, but the violent initial spark of it derailed the solid proof of the need for change. This further proves the necessity that civil disobedience is on a free society; peaceable expression of views has a heavier weight when it comes to altering the course of a
Henry David Thoreau, a philosopher and creative artist as well as an anti slavery activist, wrote his short story “From Resistance to Civil Disobedience”. In this story he’s arrested for not paying his state taxes. At the time the state was engaged in the Mexican-American War that was not only fought over boundaries expanding slavery but was also enacted by President Polk under his own decision. Thoreau thought the war was too aggressive and without just reason.
Civil disobedience is the refusal to obey civil laws in an effort to induce change in governmental policy or legislation, characterized by the use of passive resistance or other nonviolent means. The use of nonviolence runs throughout history however the fusion of organized mass struggle and nonviolence is relatively new.
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. received a Nobel Prize and was honored by the President of the United States for his contributions to society. On the other hand, he was prosecuted, convicted, incarcerated, and had his sentence reaffirmed by the Supreme Court. These explanations seem rather contradictory. If what he did was noble, why was he jailed for his actions? When we take into account these manifestations of the government's attitude towards Martin Luther King, we can safely make the assumption that the government is not always justified in the laws that it creates. Our government's original purpose was to keep order and ensure freedom to its people. As history has shown us, as in the case of African Americans, the government will expand its role and take away liberties of the few. The individual is justified in acting out in civil disobedience when the government restricts the liberties of the individual.
Civil disobedience has been around for a long time. In Bible times Christians would disobey laws that would go against their beliefs, such as the law that they couldn’t preach. (Acts 4) Christians still disobey laws in many countries that do not let them practice their faith, some end up in jail or killed.
The use of civil disobedience is a respectable way of protesting a governments rule. When someone believes that they are being forced into following unjust laws they should stand up for what they believe in no matter the consequences because it is not just one individual they are protesting for they are protesting for the well-being of a nation. Thoreau says ?to resist, the government, when its tyranny or its inefficiency are great and unendurable.? People should only let wrong and right be governed by what they believe not the people of the majority. The public should always stand for what is right, stand when they think a government is wrong, and trust in their moral beliefs.
The prompt defines civil disobedience as “the act of opposing a law one considers unjust and peacefully disobeying it while accepting the consequences.” One can see from this definition that civil disobedience only opposes “unjust” laws. What then, is an unjust law? In his Letter from a Birmingham Jail, Martin Luther King Jr. recognized that an unjust law is one that infringes upon natural rights: “A just law is a man made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law. To put it in the terms of St. Thomas Aquinas: An unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal law and natural law.” Since unjust laws infringe upon natural rights, and since civil disobedience opposes unjust laws, civil disobedience promotes governmental protection of natural
The free society that is America was founded on the idea that the government can be wrong, and requires people to unite against it in order to fix their government's mistake. Many people believe that civil disobedience is just an excuse to break the laws, but sometimes laws must be broken in order to show people how wrong they really are. People that have committed civil disobedience helped show our country how foolish it was being.
In today's society, laws are what keep society standing. But what happens when these laws are unjust? Do we follow these laws and hope for the best? No we fight and protest against these laws. History has shown us that anytime there are unjust laws or government the people will fight back; just as Martin Luther King Jr advocated for black Americans. Civil Disobedience has happened during women's rights movements and additionally happened during black rights movements. Civil disobedience is a staple of change.
Civil disobedience is an act of opposing a law one might consider unfair so it’s peacefully disobeyed while accepting the consequences. If there is a way to protest in a way without causing any violent disturbance to the society then why do people avoid using it? Is it because it takes a long time to get the point across or is it because the government won’t care? Great figures like Martin Luther King Jr., Susan B. Anthony, Mohandas Gandhi, and Nelson Mandela have used this tactic and impacted the society greatly. They brought justice and equality for the people that were treated unethically even though it required time. Their point got across effectively without any use violence and has impacted the society for the greater good. Therefore, peaceful resistance to laws can positively impact a free society by allowing it to change the errors of the law, however others might say otherwise.
“Disobedience is the true foundation of liberty. The obedient must be slaves,” as stated by Henry David Thoreau. Civil disobedience has been going on for numerous of years. It has impacted America in many different ways. This has all been through the people. Some of the ways it impacted people are through voting, public humiliation, and just and unjust laws. So therefore, this can cause a lot of problems.
From the ancient kings of Greece to our modern democracy, order has consistently been maintained by means of laws. To incentivize compliance and to reduce violence within a society, these laws are enforced through penalties according to the crimes committed. However, an individual is not only tasked to abide by these laws but also to preserve justice and condemn unjust laws that contradict the laws of a higher power. To address this conflict between moral and government-made laws, we are compelled to civil disobedience in the case of unjust laws.