Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Old cigarette advertisements essay
Old cigarette advertisements essay
Tobacco advertisements through the years
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Old cigarette advertisements essay
In the middle of the twentieth century, mostly during the 1950’s and the 1960’s, smoking was more prevalent and smoking advertisements were more common as well. In the 1950’s, people didn’t know that smoking caused lung cancer and various deadly diseases. One technique that cigarette advertisements in the 1950s advertised their product was to use the doctor as a spokesperson and say their cigarette was the “doctor’s preference.” Doctors (the image of health) could be associated with cigarettes because people did not consider cigarettes unhealthy. One example of a cigarette company that used this advertising technique in the 1950’s was Camel. Camel’s advertisement’s use of the doctor as a spokesperson and doctor preference, choice of images, simple English, weasel words, an analogy, parallelism, and the needs it claims to satisfy help promote the product as a “healthy” cigarette.
Camel’s advertisement aims to sell their product to people who currently smoke, but are not currently smoking Camels cigarettes. However, the advertisement also appeals to nonsmokers who are interested in smoking. However, the ad does not appeal to nonsmokers who are uninterested in smoking because there is nothing in Camel’s advertisement that promotes smoking in general, it says that Camels cigarettes are preferred by doctors. The target audience is older children and adults (whoever smokes). There is no price listed on the advertisement so it appeals any income level. This advertisement aims at both genders because the ad contains a picture of a male smoking and a female smoking. The ad targets white people more than other demographics because both people pictured are white. All education levels are in the target audience because the ad does not ap...
... middle of paper ...
...Doctors promote healthy habits and in this ad the doctor is promoting Camels cigarettes. Therefore, the ad is associating their cigarette with health even though the advertisement doesn’t say that the cigarette is healthy.
Overall, Camel’s advertisement is very effective at selling its product. The colors in the ad stand out and the images of people smiling promote a better product. Using the fact that “more doctors smoke Camels than any other cigarette brand” is the ads most effective advertising technique because people look up to the doctor. The language that describes the doctor helps promote the doctor and since the doctor is promoting the product, it helps promote the product. Since the target audience is smokers or people considering starting to smoke who trust in doctors, the ad Camels produced is effective at reaching the audience they wanted to reach.
The mild, pleasurable, good taste of Camel (advertising appeal) causes doctors who live a busy life to select them to smoke during their short, infrequent break opportunities (lifestyle).
The first point is the advertisement has an effective pathos. The picture describes the emotions on people who are smoking. It shows a man who is dying from smoking, which has a bad health. The picture will keep the person think about the emotions or feeling for the people who smoke. The advertisement shows that smoking will lead to many diseases
Many people may think that creating a success advertisement is easy. That you can simply throw compelling facts and bright colors at an audience and it will grab their attention compelling them to buy your product. However, this is not this case. The advertisement needs to reach the viewer on multiple levels. A vintage Camel cigarette advertisement from 1946 does just that. It is a great representation of the complexity of creating a successful campaign.
Common sense seems to dictate that commercials just advertise products. But in reality, advertising is a multi-headed beast that targets specific genders, races, ages, etc. In “Men’s Men & Women’s Women”, author Steve Craig focuses on one head of the beast: gender. Craig suggests that, “Advertisers . . . portray different images to men and women in order to exploit the different deep seated motivations and anxieties connected to gender identity.” In other words, advertisers manipulate consumers’ fantasies to sell their product. In this essay, I will be analyzing four different commercials that focuses on appealing to specific genders.
positive and healthful image. This is where beautiful men and women would be seen socializing
This disturbing anti-smoking advertisement just makes a smoker want to rewind the last 5 years of their life and toss that white stick offered right out the window. It shows a self-rolled cigarette unravelled showing the “inside” of a smoker’s body. Along the top states, “Every cigarette rots you from the inside out.” And across the bottom it displays “Search ‘Smokefree’ for free quitting support.” The background looks like it would be the top of a picnic table. Tobacco shavings are scattered around the opened cigarette of rotting human insides. This gruesome ad is from Public Health England (PHE) a health awareness agency stationed in England. This advertisement portrays rhetorical appeals with vivid rotting human
Tobacco companies have relied on the media to lure children. They quickly realized that ‘the company that dominates is that which most effectively targets young”(Imperial Tobacco document.) To counteract the idea of disease and other negative aspects of tobacco, the industry used imagery in the media such as natural settings and healthy actors doing active things. This helps them to insinuate that smoking leads to success, romance, sophistication and other advancements in their lifestyle, which was easily imprinted in the minds of children. A document found among Imperial tobacco files described their priority: “…having our imagery reach those non-reading young people who frequent malls should be our chief goal.”(1.170) Unaware of how important the under 18 market was to the industry, the government could only attempt to lengthen the distance between schools and billboards because they’re ineffective attempts were ignored by the large corporations. With many billboards concentrated in small areas it put the idea in children’s minds that smoking was socially acceptable and that t...
There is little to no mention of any statistics that might show when, and thereby, why, cigarette smoking gained popularity. The author also fails to provide cultural context in many areas. Alleged masculine values in America are presented as fact, when there is no evidence, aside from the author’s word, that this is true. The arguments would be much stronger had the author successfully differentiated between correlation and causation. At times, the article is unbalanced, such as the argument surrounding post-World War Two advertising. Within the article, it is unproven that there was a spike in cigarette smoking in men. It was also unproven that the advertisements had an effect. The article ignores the possibility that the increase in smoking among men was merely a consequence of reaching a few opinion leaders. As cigarettes are such an addictive product, simple curiosity in the privacy of one’s home may have turned some men into smokers.
Laird, Pamela, “Consuming Smoke: Cigarettes in American Culture.” University of Colorado at Denver. Author of Advertising Progress: American Business and the Rise of Consumer Marketing. 1998
Over the last 50 years, smoking and the public image of smoking has changed dramatically. Americans have learned the harmful effects of smoking and have put a heavy disdain on the use of it. The number of new smokers has drastically dropped over the years and many that had previously smoked have stopped. Some have turned to electronic cigarettes as a safer way to intake nicotine. Over the years, smoking advertisements have changed drastically. Nowadays, tobacco advertisements are virtually non-existent in our society, but when they were abundant they depicted smoking as a cool and sophisticated activity. Today, smoking advertisements are shown by electronic cigarette companies. These companies emphasize the healthier lifestyle these products
The intended target audience has varied a lot the past century. Cigarette use within the United States military increased significantly during their entrance into World War l, in 1918, because several tobacco companies began targeting military personnel because soldiers used cigarettes as a physiological escape from the horrors of their daily lives. However, women were also especially targeted during the years of war in America, as most consumer goods were aimed at women since the majority of men were at war. To begin with, women were portrayed in cigarette ads as non-smoking admirers of smoking men, however, by 1927 cigarette adverts with women smokers began to appear in women’s magazines. In the years that came, brands such as Marlboro, continued to attract the female audience into buying cigarettes by using slogans like ‘’Mild as May’’ and altering the product by printing red filters to hide lipstick stains, which they called ‘’Beauty Tips to Keep the Paper from Your Lips’’ and attracted a lot of women, despite the fact that woman smokers were not socially accepted yet. The Marlboro cigarette brand, which was essentially launched as a woman’s cigarette, continually launched advertisement campaigns in order to keep attracting them to their products. Cigarette companies persuaded their audience through beauty themes, by implying they would look great as a result of weight-loss by choosing to smoke cigarettes instead of eating and by using toddlers in adverts to attract attention in the female region through motherhood. An example of this is Appendix 2, from a collection of cigarette advertisements from the time (1951), shows a baby saying, ‘’Before you scold me, Mom… maybe you’d better light up a Marlboro,‘’ this makes w...
...t that it claims smoking is good for you. However because of its positive tone of words such as “I” “my” make the opinion created in the audiences, minds as something persuasive and to rely on. Whereas, Advert two is not bias, however, it is a fact that “smoking kills”. This strengthens the argument, and the use of impersonal tone and “Alghanim” seems factual and helps persuade the reader that smoking kills. The word “kills” represents the experience of death, entrapment.
A Comparison of Two Advertisements Introduction Advertising and media are part of everybody’s everyday life, with or without them realizing. Each day we see adverts on the television showing us new lifestyles that look glamorous, we hear adverts on the radio, we see slogans emblazoned on people’s clothes, on the side of buses, on billboards, everywhere!! Big companies know that they need to make their product appeal to as many ‘niche markets’ as possible and they do this by ‘audience segmentation’. This is when companies make an advert so that it would appeal to one type of person, and then another advert for the same product but for a different type of person. Although it is hard to know exactly when there target audience will be watching, companies will spend lots of money researching.
One way that the tobacco industry can be more ethical is changing their advertising strategy. I believe that today’s advertising strategy is very misleading about cigarettes. Examples of this unethical advertising is in Argentina, here 20 percent of television advertising is spent on smoking commercials, as well as in countries in and around Africa there are billboards that depict a man in a business suit stepping out of a black Mercedes as a chauffeur holds the door. This displays that cigarettes make people classy and sophisticated, making cigarettes look not only harmless but stylish. Another good example of unethical depiction on cigarettes is in Nigeria; here they promote a cigarette for graduates, with a picture of a university and a student in a cap and gown. As if this wasn’t a misleading visual they add a slogan that says, "A very important cigarette for very important people." These ads and slogan are ...
Should tobacco and alcohol advertising be allowed on television? The ban on advertising tobacco is already in affect, however, alcohol is another harmful substance. Should liquor be allowed to be advertised, if tobacco can not advertise their product? The ban on advertising tobacco products on television and radio, was passed through legislation in 1970 by Richard Nixon. This argument like others out there has two sides, one side in favor these advertisements and the other against these advertisements. Since both of these substances are highly addictive and costly. Would we like to see these advertisements continued? Are these advertisements the hazard they are communicated to be? Through the research of these two important sides, this essay will explore which side has a stronger stance on the topic.