Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Causes and consequences of the first crusade
Causes and consequences of the first crusade
Crusade middle ages agurment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Causes and consequences of the first crusade
In the 11th century, Christianity underwent many changes. The church split in 1054, after many years of lack of communication between the east and west. The church also had many problems on its own, where power-hungry, greedy popes and bishops ruled the church. This continued in 1095, when Pope Urban II preached the First Crusade to aid emperor Alexius and the Byzantines against the Turks. This was a call from God to aid the Christian Byzantines against the “enemies of Christ”--those who were not Christian and were living in the Holy Land--but in reality, was only a move for power. The Crusades were caused primarily by the desire for political and economic gain.
The Crusades were called for by Pope Urban II, who ultimately wanted more power
…show more content…
in the church. He was not the only one with this idea. Between 1073 and 1085 CE, Pope Gregory VII also tried to gain more power for the clergy. He wanted the Catholic Church to always have rule over secular rulers, and likewise, “...urged Christian princes to reclaim lands from Muslims in Spain” (Historical Background). However, the church already had a fair share of power over the people. For many, the idea of God, Heaven and Hell was all they knew. If one followed God’s word--who apparently spoke through the pope--one would be able to go to Heaven, and live eternity happily. On the contrary, if one defied God’s word, they would go to Hell, where they would spend eternity being tortured in various ways. Because of this, many people would follow any sort of instruction from a high-ranking member of the clergy, and took the idea of excommunication--a form of punishment from the church--very seriously, and gave the church the power to make rulers do whatever the church wanted them to. Thus, the idea of the church being number one for decisions in laws was already in many members of the clergy’s heads, so when Urban II called for the First Crusade to get more land, many members thought this was a good idea. This greed for power and dominance continued when Pope Urban II told crusaders to “take the cross”.
In his speech, to get more people riled up, the pope straight up lied. Urban told the listeners of his speech that the Muslims in Jerusalem attacked, killed and tortured the Christian pilgrims. In reality, the only Christians that were killed were the Byzantines, whom the Muslim Turks were fighting against. The pilgrim Christians in Jerusalem were only harassed. The point of this lie was to get more people riled up against the “enemy”, the Muslims. And that it did--the people became riled to take back their Holy Land. On their way to the city, the Crusaders did many bad things that they did not have to if they were just going for “God”. In around Central Europe, during their journey, some of the leaders of the crusading realized that if they were getting rid of the “pagans” in their holy land, why not rid the ones in their backyard? According to Solomon ben Samson, “...they said to one another: ‘Look now...here, in our midst, are the Jews….Let us...exterminate them from among the nations so that the name of Israel will no longer be remembered”. These Crusaders attacked synagogues and Jews across Central Europe, forever shaping the disease of anti-Semitism. Furthermore, the Christian crusaders broke Byzantine emperor Alexius’ promise: something that would not have happened if they were only coming to the area for God. Alexius made them swear that if he were to help the …show more content…
crusaders take Jerusalem, they would have to give any conquered land to the Byzantine Empire. The crusaders agreed; they would give the emperor the land. But this promise was made to be broken. After the crusaders took over some the cities in the area, like Edessa, on their way to Jerusalem, the crusaders did not give it to the emperor; they kept it for themselves. If the crusaders had truly come for God, they would not have done those terrible things and kept the land for themselves. The greed continues when they get closer to Jerusalem. There were many instances of greed, but one in particular was the story of Baldwin. When Baldwin was on his pilgrimage to Jerusalem, his wife--who was very rich--died. Without her, Baldwin had no access to her wealth, which meant that now, without her, he became poor. In an attempt to get his wealth back, Baldwin looked for a city that he could make wealth off of, and found the Christian city of Edessa. At the same time, the citizens of Edessa were very tired of being constantly attacked by Turkish Muslims, as they were under Christian rule. So when they heard that Baldwin was on his way, the citizens welcomed him with open arms. When he arrived, after being welcomed, Thoros, the city’s heirless ruler, told Baldwin he wanted him to defend the city. Baldwin said he would, but to one condition: he would be the city’s next ruler after Thoros’ death. Thoros agreed, and adopted Baldwin as his son so their deal would be official. However, Thoros did not know that Baldwin was playing him; once he was adopted, Baldwin worked with some traitors to assassinate his new dad. This style of conquering and becoming leaders became part of the crusaders’ calling card, along with “[t]reachery following by massacure...” (The Crusades , Crescent and the Cross). The worst of this was in Ma’arrat al-Numan, where the crusaders stayed for a month and four days. First, they sent an interpreter to tell the residents that if they put their wives, children, and goods in a castle, the crusaders would spare those people’s lives. Going with trend, however, this promise was broken; by dawn the next day, every citizen in the town was dead. The crusaders looted and pillaged everything. This only got worse, when, at a point, some of the crusaders started to eat the corpses of the inhabitants. While this could have been because they started to become either crazy or extremely hungry, chances are the crusaders did this to prove yet again that they were the superior people. Their greed for power went to the point where they even ate the corpses of the thousands that they killed. Following this, the penises became much more for greed.
When the crusaders reached Jerusalem, they yet again wreaked havoc for power. An unknown source from the First Crusade said that, “...[the Crusaders] seized a great number of men and women, and killed whom they wished...soon the crusaders ran throughout the city, seizing gold, silver, horses, mules, and houses full of al[l] kinds of goods”. Fulk of Charles--another knight fighting in Jerusalem in the First Crusade--stated something similar to this. He said, “[o]ur squires and poorer footmen discovered a trick of the Saracens...they could find byzants in the stomachs and intestines of the dead Saracens, who had swallowed them….after several days, they burned a great heap of bodies, that they might more easily get the precious metal from the ashes”. The crusaders even took “...whatever they could find…” from the houses they entered, and “[t]hus many poor men became rich” (Fulcher). If these men had come for God, they would have not seized anything in sight. They would have not killed everyone, regardless of the their genders or faiths. This crusade was not called for God; it was called for money, power, and
land.
Urban said, “in all these seven battles, by the aid of the Lord God, we conquered and most assuredly killed an innumerable host of them. In those battles, indeed, and in very many attacks made upon the city, many of our brethren and followers were killed and their souls were borne to the joys of paradise.” Urban promised forgiveness of all wrongdoings and basically a free ticket to paradise only to fight and dye in the crusade. Promises like this from Count Stephen and Urban was intended to persuade warriors that fighting against the corrupt and evil Turks to recover Jerusalem was the best thing they could do for
Foss explains, “What Urban needed was an enterprise, clearly virtuous in serving the ends of Christiandome… in these moments of reflection, the popes mind turned towards Jerusalem.” Urban II reflects back on the first taking of the Holy City after the defeat of the Byzantine Empire in 1071, and begins to question what his people know about the Turkish race and really the ideology of Islamic thought. Foss goes on to examine the ignorance of westerners and needed to be “reminded [by the pope] of the infamous heathens, their cruelty and hatred of Christians,” hoping this would justify the first Holy Crusade. However, Foss identifies the creativity of the Pope’s language to persuade the knights and army of the people to embark on the Holy Crusade based on the Muslims cruel actions turned onto their fellow Christians. Claiming the Muslims “Killed captives by torture…poor captives were whipped…and others were bound to the post and used as a target for arrows.” Foss examines the Popes words as an effective effort of persuasion in creating an army of crusaders to help clean “…Holy places, which are now treated with ignominy and polluted with Filthiness” and any sacrifice in Jerusalem is a “promise of a spiritual reward… and death for
Historian Arnold J. Toynbee said, “Sooner of later, man has always had to decide whether he worships his own power or the power of God.” In regards to the Crusades, the popes in charge chose to worship their own power – yet they got thousands of Europeans to worship the power of God. The Crusades were a series of campaigns in which Europeans tried to take the Holy Land from the Muslims. Pope Urban II headed the First Crusade, which lasted from 1096 to 1099, after he received a request for military aid from Alexios I. Alexios I was the Byzantine ruler, and his empire was facing attacks from the Seljuk Turks. The Crusades soon overtook all aspects of European society, as the promise of salvation and wealth was too great to pass up. 31 years later,
Contrary to many commonly held notions about the first crusade, in his book, The First Crusade and the Idea of Crusading, Jonathan Riley-Smith sets out to explain how the idea of crusading thought evolved in the first crusade. In his book, Riley-Smith sets out five main arguments to show how these ideas of crusading evolved. Firstly, he argues that Pope Urban’s original message was conventional, secondly that a more positive reaction was drawn from the laity (due to the ideas surrounding Jerusalem), thirdly, that the original message of crusading had changed because of the horrible experiences of the first crusaders, fourth, that due to these experiences the crusaders developed their own concept of what a crusade was, and lastly, that these ideas were refined by (religious) writers and turned into an acceptable form of theology. Riley-Smith makes excellent points about the crusade; however, before one can delve directly into his argument, one must first understand the background surrounding the rise of the first crusade.
The First Crusade was a widely appealing armed pilgrimage, and mobilized a vast conquering force at a time when the Christian Church was moving towards centralization and greater political influence in Europe. The Church gained a wider audience more accepting of its leadership, benefitted economically, and developed its own militarily force. These outcomes, along with the Church’s documented ambition to expand and its reversal of prior teachings, support the idea that the First Crusade was a deliberate political maneuver, intended to to expand and consolidate the authority of the
... rest were took in a slavery. Crusaders were killing everyone they could see, it didn't matter if a person was Muslim, Jewish or Christian. All the squares of the city of Antioch were full of dead bodies.
During The First Crusade peasants and knights alike fought for God and glory travelling east towards Jerusalem. In 1099 Christian forces reached Jerusalem and prepared for recapture. The western crusaders attacked the city and gained control of it. During the capture of Jerusalem, the crusading forces massacred not only Muslims, but Jews and even other Christians. Men women and children alike, no one was safe from these crusaders who did what they wanted. They butchered Jerusalem’s inhabitants in the streets, without care of what God might think (which is ironic considering this w...
This was enough to convince about 60,000 Europeans, many of them peasants to start on the First Crusade to the Holy Land ("THE CRUSADES TO THE HOLY LAND”). Many of the soldiers who went on the Crusades also hoped to acquire land and riches and return a war hero. This was the first time the Catholic Church had seen penitential warfare- “warfare in the service and defense of the Church for the ‘remission of your sins’”("THE CRUSADES TO THE HOLY LAND”). The whole mentality of the Crusades was to destroy any other beliefs including paganism and Judaism, which lead to all kinds of violence and persecution, with Jews becoming a common target, even entire Jewish communities were slaughtered ("How Christianity Rose to Dominate Europe."). Even the Christians were not safe, as many were killed in settlements along the way. Pope Urban was the one who brought out this idea that it was okay to kill non-Christians, and, even beyond that, IF you went to the Holy Land on a Crusade, you received a free ticket to heaven even if you died there. Does this sound a little bit familiar? Perhaps a little like those who truly believe that they’re gaining salvation by blowing up a group of innocent people along with themselves? Or flying a plane full of passengers into building full of people? Well, the First Crusaders marched to Jerusalem leaving death and
The emperor of the Byzantine Emperor was upset with Turks encroaching on his empire. He went to the Pope Urban II and complained. He made up atrocities about the Turks. In 1096, The Pope Urban II promoted the Crusade to reclaim the Holy Land from the barbaric Turks. These crusades lasted till the 13th century. In the process, Jews were persecuted and lots of looting took place. Many countries took interest in the Crusades because they were ready for travel and adventure. They wanted to expand trade with the Middle and Far East and so the Crusades gave them a chance to open up trade routes with those countries. They used Christianity to justify the Crusades. In reality, they wanted to expand trade and gain more territorial land.
The Crusades were the first tactical mission by Western Christianity in order to recapture the Muslim conquered Holy Lands. Several people have been accredited with the launch of the crusades including Peter the Hermit however it is now understood that this responsibility rested primarily with Pope Urban II . The main goal of the Crusades was the results of an appeal from Alexius II, who had pleaded for Western Volunteers help with the prevention of any further invasions. The Pope’s actions are viewed as him answering the pleas of help of another in need, fulfilling his Christian right. However, from reading the documents it is apparent that Pope Urban had ulterior motives for encouraging engagement in the war against the Turks. The documents and supporting arguments now highlight that the Pope not only sought to recruit soldiers to help but also to challenge those who had harmed the Christians community and annihilate the Muslims. He put forth the idea that failure to recapture this lands would anger God and that by participating, God would redeem them of their previous sins.in a time of deep devoutness, it is clear this would have been a huge enticement for men to engage in the battle. Whether his motives were clear or not to his people, Pope Urban’s speeches claiming that “Deus vult!” (God wills it) encouraged many Christians to participate and take the cross.
Throughout the duration of the crusades real motivations shone though on behalf of the Crusaders. Not only did they lack a religious purpose for fighting, but they made the Muslim’s lives complicated and valueless. They were power hungry, land coveting people who fought with non Christian ideals and Morales. It should be clear to anyone and everyone that the prime motivation behind the Crusader’s fighting was power and land which would eventually lead to wealth.
Among some of the largest conflicts in the world stand the Crusades; a brutal conflict that lasted over 200 years and was debatably one of the largest armed religious conflicts in the history of humankind. Since this is so clearly an event of importance, historians have searched vigorously for the true answer as to why the crusades began. Ultimately, because of accusatory views on both the sides of the Christians and of the Muslims, the two groups grew in such hatred of each other that they began to act in deep discrimination of each other. Moreover, Christian motives seemed to be driven mostly by the capture of Jerusalem, the dark ages of Europe and the common-folks desperation for land, wealth, and a spot in heaven. What seems to be continually
How could the Christian church, which bases itself off kindness and peace, allow the Crusades to happen? The religion known to be loving of all was the cause of the most catastrophic occurrence in the late eleventh and late thirteenth centuries because of misconceptions and avarice of the pope. Of all of the religious wars fought, this was the one with the highest level of ridiculousness. Members of the church fought for all of the wrong reasons and the outcome was poor because of it. Even though the Crusades were justified by the false philosophies of both parties, they were overall beneficial economically. Before one can analyze the thoughts of the people, he or she must know what came about to make them think like this.
A main cause of the Crusades was the treatment of Christian pilgrims. They were robbed, beaten, and then sold. The main group of Turks, the Seljuk Turks, were threatening and growing in power. The Byzantine Emperor, Alexus I, began to become worried and sent out an urgent plea to Pope Urban II, in Rome. He requested for Christian knights to help him fight the Turks. Pope Urban II did agree to his appeal although Byzantine Emperors and Roman Popes were longtime rivals. He also did agree with Alexus I, in fearing that the Turks were expanding. Pope Urban encouraged French and German Bishops and Nobles to also take part in this. “ An accused race has violently invaded the lands of those Christians and had depopulated them by pillage and fire.” This is when Pope Urban II called for a crusade to free the Holy Land. Urban did agree to this having some of his own motives in mind. He was hoping his power would grow in ...
In order for the crusades to begin, the Christians needed to gather an army to travel and fight the forces of Muslims. With all the power being held by monarchies at this time, the church needed to be cleaver in order to gain troops to put their lives on the line. To gain the support of these warriors and dedication of men, Pope Urban II (1088-1099) challenged those morals of men by telling them to grab their weapons and join the holy war to recover the land of Jerusalem. It was not the challenge that convinced men to take part in this war. The promise of “immediate remission of sins” attracted the men to stand up for their religion and beliefs while at the same time, promising them a trip to heaven when life comes to an end. With this statement, men instantly prepared for battle which in a very short period of time gave the church power which has been held by the monarchies. Men of rich and poor prepared for battle, some wearing ...