Chris Crowe's Mississippi Trial

494 Words1 Page

Bode Helman Ms. Liberty English 9 30 April 2024. Mississippi Trial, 1955 - SAP. Differences in racial beliefs can drive wedges throughout the country, and even in families. Chris Crowe’s novel, Mississippi Trial, 1955, shows readers how conflicts in history can influence a positive change while damaging families in the process. The novel explains how everyone should have their own voice and opinions, while also listening to the voices around them. Most children rarely ever listen to parents advice, and the same can be said about parents rarely ever listening to their children. An example of this is when Harlan and Hiram were arguing and Harlan said, “Well, you’re going to find out that I know some things you don’t. Greenwood’s not going to be what you …show more content…

However, after seeing racism near its peak in Mississippi with the trial, Hiram learned to understand his father’s beliefs and even take them as his own. Most problems, however, seem to never go away. One is the relationship between Hiram and his Grampa. At first they seemed alright, but after differences in their beliefs relating to black people and their rights/equality, they too started to have a wedge driven between them. At the end of the book, after fighting with his Grampa, Hiram stated, “We were mad at each other, so we didn’t talk much for the rest of the meal, and. I was itching to get out of there,” (Crowe 196). The difference in morals and beliefs fueled the conflict to a point where neither Hiram nor Grampa wanted to talk to each other. Furthermore, Hiram also implied that he wanted to get away from his Grampa, from the trial, and from Mississippi, to be back home with his family. Hiram was not the only one with family-related conflicts. There was a huge conflict between Grampa, Earl, and Harlan. As Harlan got older, he started to have a mind and voice of his own. Earl tried to force his own beliefs, one of which is the

Open Document