Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How using different sign languages in a classroom affects the learning of learners with hearing impairment
Primate communication and humans
How using different sign languages in a classroom affects the learning of learners with hearing impairment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How using different sign languages in a classroom affects the learning of learners with hearing impairment
Chimpanzees' Ability to Use Language in a Rudimentary Way Many researchers wonder if chimpanzees are really able to use language in a rudimentary way, or if it is just created by operant conditioning. Psychologists realized, as far back as 60 years ago, that chimps would never be able to learn spoken language. They do not have the specialized tongue, lips, teeth, facial muscles, and palate that humans do to make the vast array of speech sounds that humans do. Researchers have instead tried to teach chimps some visual form of language. An example is Beatrice and Allen Gardner's experiment with American Sign Language (ASL). They started their research with a one-year-old chimp named Washoe, whom they raised like a child. The Gardners and their researchers signed to Washoe and one another just like deaf parents might do. Whenever Washoe signed correctly, she was rewarded. Because Washoe was raised amongst her caretakers, she had a lot of practice signing throughout her daily life. After four years of training, she had acquired about 160 signs. The Gardners saw many similarities between Washoe's progress and that of a young child learning spoken language. Once she had learned a certain sign, she appropriately generalized its use to other objects or activities. For example, when she learned the sign for "more" to ask for more tickling, she used it to ask for more food or more play. Many of her mistakes seemed similar to ones children would make. After she had learned eight or so signs, she started using them in combinations, such as "more sweet;" later, she combined three or more signs to make statements or commands. By the age of five, the Gardners thought that her language resembled a three-year-old child's. ... ... middle of paper ... ...we should not expect chimps and human children to be cognitively equal. Children have an innate ability to learn language easily and chimps do not; chimps can only do this after long, repetitive training. There are also definite limits to the types of things that a chimp can use language to communicate about. Other animals do not have the capability to communicate the complicated thoughts that humans do. Even though other animals may have some ability to learn basic features of language, the complex and diverse use of language seems to belong strictly to humans. Bibliography: Douglas J. Gelb, M.D. (1995). Introduction to Clinical Neurology. Newton, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann. Gary G. Matthews (1997). Neurobiology-Molecules, Cells, and Systems. Malden, MA: Blackwell Science. William R. Klemm (1996). Understanding Neuroscience. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
Chimpanzees are a lot like humans in their behaviours. They are extremely smart since they are able to make and use tools and weapons. The female mothers are very affectionate and protective over the young and the rest of their family. The young chimps are also very dependant on their mother for necessities such as food, shelter and warmth.
There are contrasts in tool kits used by different groups of chimpanzees, which seem to be a result of the environment in which they live as well as information that is shared by the group. For example, in 1973 it was reported that chimpanzees in Gombe did not use hammer stones, but those of Cape Palmas did. We will explore the tool use of Chimpanzees from the wild, including Gombe, Tai National Forest, and the Congo Basin---and contrast those with Chimpanzees in captivity in locations of Zoo’s both in the United States and abroad.
All primates have the same sensation and are capable of receiving excessive amounts of information. All senses, sight, smell, taste, hearing, and touch are essential to the development, survival, and overall well-being of living primates. It is fascinating how non-human primates, without language, can communicate in the same ways as human primates, with language. Non-human primates and human primates are highly developed mammals that possess many of the same communicative characteristics, but still differ greatly. Non-human primates fit into the category of not having language, but being able to communicate.
“Tool use is rare in animals, and the chimpanzees stand out as the most proficient tool users besides humans” (Boesh, Boesch-Achermann18). Some debate has taken place between researchers regarding how these chimpanzees learn to use these tools and whether or not there is a difference between wild chimps and captive chimp’s tool use. Some theories say that chimps do not actively teach or are taught, but rather learn by observation, trial, and error; as stated in the article Thinking Like a Chimpanzee by Jon Cohen. This article also suggests that some reaserchers do believe that chimps do poses the capability to be taught and understand what they are learning.
Chimpanzees portray their emotions through a number of facial expressions and mannerisms. Just like humans, they undergo mood swings, jealous rages, and laughter. For instance, Goodall observed during her research that a male gorilla “would threaten [me] with an upward and backward movement jerk of his head…” Some of their emotions are easy to read, while at other times we have to look at multiple places on their faces to understand their feelings. A chimpanzee also uses its facial expressions and sounds to communicate with each other, such as hoots and yells.
The debate about whether or not apes can learn human language has been going on for many years. There is an overwhelming amount of research on the subject to support both sides. It should be understood however, that learning and understanding human language is not the same as speaking the language. Apes are unable to physically speak human language for several reasons. As noted on the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics website, “Unlike humans, apes lack the anatomical pre-requisites for verbal language production. The organs within the vocal tract, such as larynx muscles and vocal cords, cannot be moved as freely and coordinated as in humans, especially not at a comparable speed” (Bangle, “Questions and Answers”). With that said, I believe the research I found strongly supports that apes do have the capacity for learning and understanding human language. There have been numerous studies conducted in which apes have been taught to communicate using sign language. In the 1960’s a female chimpanzee named Washoe was taught the American Sign Language. Washoe was raised by researchers Allen and Beatrix Gardner and is believed to be the first chimpanzee to learn aspects of human language. The Gardners established Project Washoe to teach the chimpanzee American Sign Language. The National Geographic News reported that “For Washoe to be considered "reliable"
...rain, wrist, shoulder, etc. Chimpanzees are highly intelligent where they know how to use tools for food and other purposes. They are also capable of having reasoned thoughts where they can use their memory and process information. Not only can they learn the American Sign Language, they also have a concept of self where they can recognize themselves in mirrors (something most animals can't do). Many people get caught up in the difference between animals and humans, but these animals should be given certain rights. For example, they deserve the right to freedom from suffering and abuse. Humans are primates just as chimpanzees are; just because they can't communicate in the same way we do, that doesn't mean they should be held prisoner against their will, or get tested on without having a say in that. I believe all animals have a right to a blissful, fulfilling life.
It has been proven that non-human primates such as apes and chimpanzees can learn the behaviors of language and chores. Several experimental chimps and apes are trained to grasp our language and produce it by signing and perform daily chores like sweeping and tidying up. Both Nim and Koko were taught by their trainers to gain the knowledge to communicate through sign language. Although, both of these non-human primates embraced language skills at an early age, the ape in Kafka's story educated himself during the middle of his life. All three of them were able to observe and still maintain the knowledge of human-like behavior. Nim and Koko's trainers interacted with them and that could be a reason to why they learned. Neither of them were ever tempted to run away from the care of their trainers. Throughout their human interactions, they did not lose the connection they have with their animal side, unlike the fictional ape in Kafka's story. The research gathered from Herbert Terrace and Francine Patterson showed the world just how quickly non-human primates could learn and uphold a conversation, similar to humans'. The willingness of both the animals confirm that they are prone to change directions from their normal behavior. Maybe it was the constant affection and treats that non-human primates enjoyed that made them be subjective to learn the human
"I knew that some of our chimpanzees, so gentle for the most part, could on
It is also known that the two species do not reproduce and raise their young in the same way. In chimpanzee society, infanticide is common. Infanticide is “the killing of offspring unrelated to a male chimpanzee” (Parish, Wrangham). However, because bonobos are so sexually active with almost all members of their tribe, clear lines of paternity become blurred. Without paternity, infanticide is eliminated. This is “a huge evolutionary advantage for female bonobos, because more of their offspring will survive” (Parish, Wrangham). Bonobo young are raised in much more of a group setting than chimpanzees. The strong bond between bonobo females allows for them to share responsibilities for raising offspring with the whole group. In chimpanzee societies, females “disperse into the forest with their infants to find enough food to eat” and do not spend large amounts of time with other females (Parish,
The pair used various tests and procedures to see if chimpanzees were able to discriminate between humans who could and who couldn’t see them. The chimpanzees were placed in a scenario in which there would be a human facing them and a human with their back to the chimpanzee; the chimpanzees were more generally found to gesture towards the human facing it to grab their attention. Further tests found that chimpanzees didn’t act differently in further test conditions, even when the human’s vision was limited; for example, a bucket over the human’s head or their eyes being closed, whilst still facing the chimpanzee. (Povinelli and Eddy 1996) The pair concluded that chimpanzees showed little evidence in understanding visual concepts but showed that they can respond to ‘behavioural cues’ such as whether the human was facing towards or away from the chimpanzee in order to ‘select the human who is more likely to give them food’ (Hewson et al, 2016) but do not have ToM as they do not understand seeing as a mental state. More evidence suggests that chimpanzees understanding of mental states comes from the ‘food competition paradigm’ – ‘in chimpanzee’s natural environments, they are often in competition for food so it is suggested that the chimpanzees are showing a more natural behaviour
According to Chomsky the children have a sort of natural and innate predisposition for acquiring the language and they own this ability from when they are born. This peculiarity distinguishes us and them from the other animals. Children do not copy the language they hear, but they learn a repertoire of infinite sentences.
"[H]uman knowledge is organized de facto by linguistic competence through language performance, and our exploration of reality is always mediated by language" (Danchin 29). Most higher vertebrates possess ‘intuitive knowledge’ which occurs as the result of slow evolution of species. However, the ability to create knowledge through language is unique to humans. According to Benjamin Whorf, "language…. is not merely a reproducing instrument from voicing ideas but rather is itself the shaper of ideas…. We dissect nature along lines laid down by language" (Joseph 249). In addition, the development and acquisition of language seems to be related to "complex sequential processing, and the ability to form concepts and to classify a single stimulus in a multiple manner" (Joseph 178). Antione Danchin suggests that the knowledge we create through language allows us distinguish ourselves from the rest of the world to produce models of reality, which become more and more adequate due to the "self-referent loop" which enables us to understand ourselves as objects under study. This "path from subject to object," which is common to all humans, Danchin claims, suggests the existence of a universal feature of language (29).
Imitation is involved to some extent, of course, but the early words and sentences that children produce show that they are not simply imitating adult speech. Since there is an infinite number of potential sentences implied, children’s complex and creative utterances cannot be explained by a passive response to the language of the environment. In addition, imitation cannot account for common child language mistakes, which are highly unlikely to be failed imitations of what adults would say (Cattell, 2000).
Children’s acquisition of language has long been considered one of the uniquely defining characteristics of human behaviour.