An American poet once said, “Childhood is not from birth to a certain age and at a certain age. The child is grown, and puts away childish things. Childhood is the kingdom where nobody dies” (Millay 13 Sept. 2014). Childhood is surely a mystery and it is meant to be that way. Parents and guardian always face the conflict of teaching adolescents to ‘grow up’ or become more ‘mature’, but confrontation may not be always be the best choice as we will find out soon. The re-occurring theme, confrontation changes perception, is often misinterpreted or overlooked because society believes confronting is always a good thing. This theme is portrayed in the short story, The Fall of the City, by Alden Nowlan through the character Teddy. Firstly, ridicules …show more content…
can lead one to feel doubtful and insecure; hence, changing their point of view of how to be. Secondly, oppressive guardians leave children feeling restricted and inside the box; therefore, they do not have an open mind of how to act. Finally, lonely children without true mother or father like figures are more vulnerable to society’s perception of how to be. Ridicules may just feel like sarcasm, but it is just an alternate to putting people down and making them feel obscure. The character that best fits the role of the antagonist who is prominently cruel toward Teddy is the uncle. For example, the uncle mocks Teddy for daydreaming at the dinner table, “Half the time, he doesn’t know whether he’s living on Earth or Mars”. This may just seem like a joke, but constant ridicules of one person will make them feel depressed and irritated. As the story unravels, the uncle continues to tease and laugh at Teddy. For instance, the uncle visits the attic and says, “You’d never believe it, but that great lummox has been playing with paper dolls!” This is very insulting, but the truth is revealed by the uncle’s word choice. The word ‘lummox’ means a clumsy or stupid person; hence, very disrespectful and teasing. Furthermore, he mocks Teddy again by mentioning, “Paper dolls and doll houses. And eleven-year-old boy...The next thing we know, you’ll be wanting us put skirts on you!” This is sexist and also prejudice; dolls are not restricted to only girls, but this is a common stereotype portrayed in society. The uncle is ignorant and is portraying that dolls are for girls and boys should not play with them. At this point, Teddy would have taken into consideration everything the uncle told him; hence, making him re-think himself. Teddy may now feel that dolls are for girls and he is too old for these childish things, but this is the type of confrontation that children should not be exposed to. Strict guardians leave children feeling trapped and locked up; thus, they do not have a freedom of speech or an open mind of how to be.
Throughout the story, the aunt and uncle give poor Teddy a difficult time. Subsequently, the aunt and uncle are very punctual and criticize Teddy every time he does anything. They never let him alone and that is why he is always lonely and depressed. For example, the aunt exclaims, “come down this minute and get ready for supper! How many times do I have to call you…and be quick about it!” Next, Teddy says “huh” and the aunt disturbs him by saying, “Don’t say ‘huh’ when you answer me…he’d better smarten up if he know what’s good for him.” It is evident that the aunt is very bossy and always nags (to annoy by persistent faultfinding, complaints, or demands), so this is why there is a social barrier between them. In addition, when she calls Teddy, the narration of how Teddy reacts is ‘he sighed’. This is important because it proves that Teddy does not like being engaged with his family and it only brings disappointment. Equally important, there is a sense of fear present between Teddy and his guardians. To illustrate, we can imagine him talking with his aunt before dinner. The narration is “Yes ma’am,” he enunciated carefully. This shows that teddy is scared and does not want to make mistakes. Children that don’t feel loved or comfortable in their homes are usually lonely and filled with fear. To conquer this, they do as they are told and …show more content…
have no opinion; hence, confrontation causes extra pressure and strain. Families come in all sizes and races, but how about a single 11 year old boy without his actual parents?
Lonely children without true mother and father figures are more vulnerable to society’s perception of how to be. True parents love and treat their children with respect, so they can be there best. When there is an imbalance, children may feel isolated or lonesome. For example, there is no one there to stand up and help Teddy. For instance, when teddy tried to defend his kingdom, the uncle told him “Look here mister; I don’t like your tone of voice. Have you been up to some of your monkey-shines up there?” As the only child, no one can support his point of view and he feels surrounded with negativity. In addition, when Teddy yells, “They ain’t paper dolls, I told you!” The uncle shows his power and replies, “Don’t get saucy now mister.” It is indisputable that Teddy feels powerless and hatred and this is evident through his reflection. The narration illustrates “And he could never explain; they would never let him explain. In brief, it is clear that without Teddy’s real parents, he feels like an outcast and the confrontation just made it more terrible for the young
boy Confronting always changes one’s point of view, but confrontation may seem like a man best friend, but it can be a child’s worst nightmare. Firstly, ridicules can lead one to feel doubtful. Secondly, stern guardians leave children feeling restricted. Lastly, children without true parent figures are more vulnerable to society’s opinion of how to be. The real question is how did this effect Teddy? As the story untangles, Teddy is continuously influenced by his aunt and uncle in a negative matter which ends in the destruction of his kingdom. “The city was as he had left it. Yet everything had changed. Always before when he had come here, his flesh had tingled, his eyes had shone with excitement… He bent and seized the cardboard palace. Gritting his teeth and grunting, he tore at its walls. The corrugate board was sturdy: he was crying by the time he finished tearing it to shreds. Words are strong enough to paint an image and this description is clear that Teddy feels crushed and abandoned. In brief, “There is a garden in every childhood, an enchanted place where colors are brighter, the air softer, and the morning more fragrant than ever again.”(Elizabeth 13 Sept. 2014).In respect to Teddy, his imaginary kingdom in the attic between Upalia and Denova was non-existent anymore. In conclusion, childhood is a very unique and special part of each person’s life and the wrong types of confrontations could lead to mistakes that one can never take back!
Teddy is a character that understood how important his imagination is, but is too young to put this understanding into words. Teddy’s ambition and imagination is being ruined by his aunt and uncle so that he becomes like them. His imagination, which is the key to his future in society, is now reformed. Clearly, life has never been easy for anyone in this world. Instead, it is filled with plenty of obstacles. Children are known as the future generation, but there will be no future when adults allow them to become corrupt. It is important to not allow what adults think is normal to affect the ever-growing minds of children, for, they will only be influenced and become violent, unimaginative, fearful
However The great majority of parents are often cryptic in these necessary lessons while still others try to build a protective shield around their children. Do they really believe this is to the benefit of our youth? It is understandable to want to protect children from unnecessary evils, but sometimes in constructing walls around their worldly vision they are in all actuality cutting their children off from reality. It is so much healthier and helpful to confront these issues head-on, rather than trying to skirt around them. & Juliet" by the students, such avoidance of the matter at hand will often prove more harmful in the development of young minds. Through the various misconceptions of the children in her short story, "The Brother in Vietnam," Maxine Hong Kingston allows her readers to see just how necessary truth is to the vulnerable minds of our youth.
In John Connolly’s novel, The Book of Lost Things, he writes, “for in every adult there dwells the child that was, and in every child there lies the adult that will be”. Does one’s childhood truly have an effect on the person one someday becomes? In Jeannette Walls’ memoir The Glass Castle and Khaled Hosseini’s novel The Kite Runner, this question is tackled through the recounting of Jeannette and Amir’s childhoods from the perspectives of their older, more developed selves. In the novels, an emphasis is placed on the dynamics of the relationships Jeannette and Amir have with their fathers while growing up, and the effects that these relations have on the people they each become. The environment to which they are both exposed as children is also described, and proves to have an influence on the characteristics of Jeannette and Amir’s adult personalities. Finally, through the journeys of other people in Jeannette and Amir’s lives, it is demonstrated that the sustainment of traumatic experiences as a child also has a large influence on the development of one’s character while become an adult. Therefore, through the analysis of the effects of these factors on various characters’ development, it is proven that the experiences and realities that one endures as a child ultimately shape one’s identity in the future.
He has endured and overcame many fears and struggles, but during this section, we truly acquire an insight of what the little boy is actually like – his thoughts, his opinions, his personality. Contrary to his surroundings, the little boy is vibrant and almost the only lively thing around. I love him! He is awfully appalled by the “bad guys” and shockingly sympathetic toward dead people. For example, when the father raided a house and found food, the little boy suggested that they should thank them because even though they’re dead or gone, without them, the little boy and father would starve. My heart goes out to him because he is enduring things little boys should never go through, even if this novel is just a fictional
After he uncovers Teddy’s paper world, the uncle reacts in a manner of ignorance and derision, mocking him for his decision to occupy himself with paper dolls. The uncle dubs Teddy as a “great big lummox … playing with paper dolls”, insulting Teddy for his hobbies with a tone of amusement and hysteria. In spite of Teddy’s agitation, the uncle prefers to make a mockery out of Teddy rather than accepting his unique hobbies, suggesting the uncle’s belief that Teddy’s activities are unfitting of someone of his age. In addition, Teddy’s uncle further aggravates Teddy by continuously ridiculing him, leading him to eventually destroy his treasured paper world. Despite Teddy’s attempts at validating the reality of his paper dolls, the uncle “burst into laughter, his cheeks the colour of a tomato.” Teddy’s uncle persistence in mocking Teddy implies his disapproval of Teddy’s world, believing that his world is ludicrous and absurd for someone of his age to be occupied with. The sustained laughter of Teddy’s uncle is explicit and deliberate, intended to warn Teddy against his immature hobby, an evident symbol of society’s expectation of
The author clearly shows how his childhood effected his adulthood, making in a living example of what he is writing about allowing the audience to more easily trust what he is writing about. Instead of using factually evidence from other dysfunctional family incidences, the author decides to make it more personal, by using his own life and comparing family ideas of the past to the present.
...parents were much more successful in the working world encouraged him to complete many daily activities such as choir and piano lessons. His parents engaged him in conversations that promoted reasoning and negotiation and they showed interest in his daily life. Harold’s mother joked around with the children, simply asking them questions about television, but never engaged them in conversations that drew them out. She wasn’t aware of Harold’s education habits and was oblivious to his dropping grades because of his missing assignments. Instead of telling one of the children to seek help for a bullying problem she told them to simply beat up the child that was bothering them until they stopped. Alex’s parents on the other hand were very involved in his schooling and in turn he scored very well in his classes. Like Lareau suspected, growing up
In the first place, despite the creativity and imagination of Teddy, he is harshly criticized by his uncle and aunt who do not know what he is thinking in his mind. Therefore, they do not understand him thoroughly. Teddy’s dominant character trait is shown in his handiwork of the world he has created: “The streets and alleys were full of nobles, peasants and soldiers, their two dimensional bodies scissored from paper, their faces and clothing down in crayons and lead pencils”. (Nowlan 41) Indeed, Teddy is very creative. He is able to build a paper-made kingdom, in which are present people of various social cl...
... growth where a child is forced to start looking for solutions for everything that is wrong instead of simply being a child. This analysis prove that children have their own way of seeing things and interpreting them. Their defense mechanisms allow them to live through hard and difficult times by creating jokes and games out of the real situation. This enables then to escape the difficulties of the real world.
‘Some idea of a child or childhood motivates writers and determines both the form and content of what they write.’ -- Hunt The above statement is incomplete, as Hunt not only states that the writer has an idea of a child but in the concluding part, he states that the reader also has their own assumptions and perceptions of a child and childhood. Therefore, in order to consider Hunt’s statement, this essay will look at the different ideologies surrounding the concept of a child and childhood, the form and content in which writers inform the reader about their ideas of childhood concluding with what the selected set books state about childhood in particular gender. The set books used are Voices In The Park by Browne, Mortal Engines by Reeve and Little Women by Alcott to illustrate different formats, authorial craft and concepts about childhood. For clarity, the page numbers used in Voices In The Park are ordinal (1-30) starting at Voice 1.
The story provides many sources for the boy's animosity. Beginning with his home and overall environment, and reaching all the way to the adults that surround him. However, it is clear that all of these causes of the boy's isolation have something in common, he has control over none of these factors. While many of these circumstances no one can expect to have control over, it is the culmination of all these elements that lead to the boy’s undeniable feeling of lack of control.
Holt, J. (2013). Escape from childhood. In J. Noll (Ed.), Taking Sides: clashing views on
There are proponents of the debate that childhood is disappearing which will be discussed in this section which include Postman (1983), Elkind (1981) and Palmer (2006). In considering these points of view which are mostly American, one must firstly set in context what is meant by the disappearance or erosion of childhood. This key debate centres on Postman (1983) who wrote “The disappearance of childhood” which is a contentious book about how childhood as a social category which is separate from adulthood is eroding. He defines a point where childhood came into existence, which was treated as a special phase in the middle ages based on the work of Aries in his book “Centuries of childhood” (1962, cited in Postman 1983). According to Postman, a major influence on how childhood was perceived differently to adulthood was the invention of the printing press and literacy in the mid sixteenth century. That is to say children had to learn to read before the secrets of adulthood in particular sex and violence was available...
Abstract In this essay, I intend to explain how everyday lives challenge the construction of childhood as a time of innocence. In the main part of my assignment, I will explain the idea of innocence, which started with Romantic discourse of childhood and how it shaped our view of childhood. I will also look at two contradictory ideas of childhood innocence and guilt in Blake’s poems and extract from Mayhew’s book. Next, I will compare the images of innocence in TV adverts and Barnardo’s posters. After that, I will look at the representation of childhood innocence in sexuality and criminality, and the roles the age and the gender play in portraying children as innocent or guilty. I will include some cross-cultural and contemporary descriptions on the key topics. At the end of my assignment, I will summarize the main points of the arguments.
In the poem, “The Chimney Sweeper” by William Blake, the author attempts to educate the reader about the horrors experienced by young children who are forced into labor at an early age cleaning chimneys for the wealthy. The poem begins with a young boy who has lost his mother but has no time to properly grieve because his father has sold him into a life of filth and despair. The child weeps not only for the loss of his mother and father’s betrayal, but also for the loss of his childhood and innocence. Blake uses poetry in an attempt to provoke outrage over the inhumane and dangerous practice of exploiting children and attempts to shine a light on the plight of the children by appealing to the reader’s conscience in order to free the children from their nightmare existence. Right away in the first lines of the poem we learn through the child narrator that his life is about to change dramatically for the worse.