Child Pornography And Child Sexual Abuse

1492 Words3 Pages

Social Policies
The majority of policies created are seen as long-term efforts though “Judicial statutes and evidentiary proceedings are subject to change on a regular basis so social service workers should also maintain an affiliation with professional organizations that focus directly on perpetrator treatment programs; Association of Sex Offender Management and the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers” (Ferrera, 2002). Again, child pornography has a relationship to child abuse and child sexual abuse, so laws and treatments may be connected as well, though child pornography does have it laws and services solely for its purpose.
Current Laws
Some laws can go back to the 1900’s and are still going forward today. For example, “Congress has focused their attention on the scope of Child Pornography for 30 years” (US Department of Justice, 2015). This attention reflects on the United States Code Title 18 §2251-2260 (18 U.S.C.)” and the Public Law 112-206; Child Protection Act, which was a reauthorization on December 7, 2012, provided in addition to Title 18 (United States Sentencing Commission, 2009) (United States, 2012). 18 U.S.C § 2251-2260 are as follows:
• 18 U.S.C § 2251- Sexual Exploitation of Children
• 18 U.S.C § 2251A- Selling and Buying of Children
• 18 U.S.C § 2252- Certain activities relating to material involving the sexual exploitation of minors (Possession, distribution, and receipt of child pornography)
• 18 U.S.C § 225A- certain activities relating to material constituting or containing child pornography
• 18 U.S.C § 2256- Definitions
• 18 U.S.C § 2260- Production of sexually explicit depictions of a minor for importation into the United States
(US Department of Justice, 2015)
The codes are a part of ...

... middle of paper ...

...tudies and research, there aren’t many programs and sevices that can reflect to casual theories.
Effectiveness of Social Policies
As early as the 1900’s judicial or legislative policies have been modified in many ways and many times. Though h the definitions of the problem has not entirely changed, the laws and Protection Acts did. For Example, victimized children were protected by the First Amendment for a brief moment, but in 2002, while the US Supreme Court considered two provisions of the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996, it was then dropped because it was “overbroad and unconstitutional under the First Amendment” (Reinhart, 2002). Luckily, the United States Code Title 18 covered the problem. The Child Protection Act and the is also re-modified continuously (US Department of Justice, 2016).
EVALUATIONS
Costs and Benefits
Recommendations

Conclusion

Open Document