Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Iroquois constitution and u.s. constitution comparisons
Essay on the cherokee tribe
The cherokee removal summary
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Reading through Document A: Cherokee Constitution of 1827, it is evidently an almost exact copy of the United States’s preamble. Both nations want to establish justice throughout the community. This shows that the Cherokee nation wants to keep order in the community, allowing the nation to grow as a whole. Previously learnt knowledge shows that without justice havoc would wreck, destroying the nation. In addition, the Cherokee believe in the common welfare of the people. From this we can infer that Cherokee want to have a growing economy. On the contrary, the Cherokee nation’s government is based that religion will help make them a prosperous government. This means that religion was a key aspect of life in the Cherokee nation. Similarly, both
nations want to promote the common welfare of the people and keep order in the community. This will allow for a growing economy, which then leads to a growing nation. Altogether, both the Cherokee nation and United States have similar values of justice and common welfare, while the Cherokee nation believes that religion should be a key aspect in the government. However, President Jackson begs to differ and believes that the Cherokee should be relocated, even if they have similar values.
The article “The Founding Indian Fathers” by Jack Weatherford is about how the Indians contributed to the American Government and how we went off the Indians system. We see how they had a council of each of the separate nations just how we do now. We also followed how one person wasn’t allowed to hold one position and hold another so they wouldn’t be so powerful. Another thing was that in their meetings there were no interruptions when someone was speaking. The caucus was another thing that was copied. One thing that I learned was that the Chiefs of the Indians had nothing to do with the government he was to perform rituals and other ceremonies. I think the authors main point was to show how the American government derived from that of the
In the essay, “The Trail of Tears” by author Dee Brown explains that the Cherokees isn’t Native Americans that evaporate effectively from their tribal land, but the enormous measure of sympathy supported on their side that was abnormal. The Cherokees process towards culture also the treachery of both states and incorporated governments of the declaration and promises that contrived to the Cherokee nation. Dee Brown wraps up that the Cherokees had lost Kentucky and Tennessee, but a man who once consider their buddy named Andrew Jackson had begged the Cherokees to move to Mississippi but the bad part is the Indians and white settlers never get along together even if the government wanted to take care of them from harassment it shall be incapable to do that. The Cherokee families moved to the West, but the tribes were together and denied to give up more land but Jackson was running for President if the Georgians elects him as President he agreed that he should give his own support to open up the Cherokee lands for establishment.
The Chickasaw people made of decently well compared to some of the other Native American tribes that were moved to the West. They had foresight into what was going to take place and they were able to negotiate the sale of their land off for decent sums of money and they actually could afford to pay for the removal to areas west of the Mississippi. Even with saying that many Chickasaw Natives died on the perilous exodus that was their Trail of Tears. The Chickasaw quickly ran into troubles and death as their journey progressed as even having sums of money cannot protect you from the hardships of the land and travel. They did however control when they departed for the areas in the West though due to their possession of money. They chose
They learned to be humble and obedient by doing jobs nobody else wanted to do like digging canals, and sweeping the temples. Religion The Cherokee religion was polytheistic (meaning many gods). They had a god for pretty much anything you can think of. Their main god was the god of the sun. Their philosophy was be good to the earth and it will be good to you.
Democracy can be traced back before the coming of Christ. Throughout Greece during the sixth century democracy was in its earliest stages and as the millenniums would pass the power of government by the people would show distinct alterations. This is evident when analyzing The Cherokee Nation and the Trail of Tears by Theda Perdue and Michael D. Green. These authors illustrate how the U.S government adjusts policies from that of assimilating the Native American Indians to that of removing them from their homelands and forcibly causing the Cherokee nation to relocate themselves west of the Mississippi. In further depth Perdue and Green portray though vivid description how the government would show disloyalty and how that caused division between the tribal members of the Cherokee people. This endeavor of travel and animosity of the Indians would become known as the Trail of Tears.
In The Cherokee Removal, Perdue and Green show the trials that the Cherokee faced in the years from 1700 to 1840. This book shows how the Americans tried to remove these Indians from the southeastern part of the United States. The Cherokees tried to overcome the attempts of removal, but finally in 1838, they were removed from the area.
This first document is written by a white American who sympathizes greatly with the Cherokees. This document is comprised of excerpts from the journal of the Reverend Daniel Sabine Butrick. He is one of many missionaries who support Cherokee rights and feel very sorry for what the Cherokee people have to go through.
Prior to 1830 the Cherokee people in the Southern states were land and business owners, many owned plantations and kept slaves to work the land, others were hunters and fishermen who ran businesses and blended in well with their white neighbors, but after Andrew Jackson took office as President, the government adopted a strict policy of Indian removal, which Jackson aggressively pursued by eliminating native American land titles and relocating American Indians west of the Mississippi. That same year, Congress passed the Indian R...
Natives were forcefully removed from their land in the 1800’s by America. In the 1820’s and 30’s Georgia issued a campaign to remove the Cherokees from their land. The Cherokee Indians were one of the largest tribes in America at the time. Originally the Cherokee’s were settled near the great lakes, but overtime they moved to the eastern portion of North America. After being threatened by American expansion, Cherokee leaders re-organized their government and adopted a constitution written by a convention, led by Chief John Ross (Cherokee Removal). In 1828 gold was discovered in their land. This made the Cherokee’s land even more desirable. During the spring and winter of 1838- 1839, 20,000 Cherokees were removed and began their journey to Oklahoma. Even if natives wished to assimilate into America, by law they were neither citizens nor could they hold property in the state they were in. Principal Chief, John Ross and Major Ridge were leaders of the Cherokee Nation. The Eastern band of Cherokee Indians lost many due to smallpox. It was a year later that a Treaty was signed for cession of Cherokee land in Texas. A small number of Cherokee Indians assimilated into Florida, in o...
There has always been a big debate on whether the Cherokee Indians should have or should not have been removed from the land they resided on. Although the common consensus of the whites was for removal, and for the Cherokees it was against removal, there were some individuals on each side that disagreed with their groups’ decision. The Cherokee Indians should have been removed from their homeland because the Cherokees would not have been able to survive on their own with the way they were living, they would not have been able to exist amidst a white population, and if they were removed, the whites would have helped them create a new and prosperous civilization.
The tragedy of the Cherokee nation has haunted the legacy of Andrew Jackson"'"s Presidency. The events that transpired after the implementation of his Indian policy are indeed heinous and continually pose questions of morality for all generations. Ancient Native American tribes were forced from their ancestral homes in an effort to increase the aggressive expansion of white settlers during the early years of the United States. The most notable removal came after the Indian Removal Act of 1830. The Cherokee, whose journey was known as the '"'Trail of Tears'"', and the four other civilized tribes, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek and Seminole, were forced to emigrate to lands west of the Mississippi River, to what is now day Oklahoma, against their will. During the journey westward, over 60,000 Indians were forced from their homelands. Approximately 4000 Cherokee Indians perished during the journey due to famine, disease, and negligence. The Cherokees to traveled a vast distance under force during the arduous winter of 1838-1839.# This is one of the saddest events in American history, yet we must not forget this tragedy.
Unconcerned about the legitimacy of their actions, European colonisers took lands unjustifiably from indigenous people and put original inhabitants who had lived on the land for centuries in misery. The United States also shared similarities in dealing with native people like its distant friends in Europe. Besides the cession of vast lands, the federal government of the United States showed no pity, nor repentance for the poor Cherokee people. Theda Perdue, the author of “Cherokee Women and Trail of Tears,” unfolds the scroll of history of Cherokee nation’s resistance against the United States by analyzing the character of women in the society, criticizes that American government traumatized Cherokee nation and devastated the social order of
Covering an estimated 2,200 miles, the Cherokee tribes currently inhabiting the Southeastern United States were forcibly evacuated to modern day Oklahoma in the Western part of the country. The Cherokee Removal Orders is a document that was presented by Major General Scott of the United States’ Army in 1838. An order to for the phase of forced removal of all Cherokee people for additional white settlement began the projected 7,000 soldiers to march with them to ensure the migration. All of General Scott’s staff received this information as direction for their next moves with the continuous issue that had been going on for a few years. The previous two had given the Cherokee Indians the opportunity to leave voluntarily, but only about 500 actually
Although removal of the Cherokee Nations was strongly detested by the Native Americans at the time, this was probably the best bet for the survival of the Natives culture and them as a whole. It is very obvious after reading Perdue and Greens book that the state of Georgia would not stop working until they gained the Natives land for themselves. Georgia began by creating laws for the natives to follow that destroyed any form of independence they had as a sovereign Cherokee nation. One example would be the laws created in December of 1829 and 1830 (GSA, 76). These laws were created by the Georgia State Assembly to hurt the Cherokees and limit their abilities and rights. These laws told them that any law, ordinances, orders and regulations would become null and the
According to a newspaper article written by a Cherokee author on August 21, 1839 in Georgia to inform the Cherokee and the U.S government what problems they would face if their tribe moved west, “...if we are compelled to leave our country, [then] we see nothing but ruin before us...the greater part of the region is badly supplied with wood and water; and no Indian tribe can live as agriculturalists [farmers] without these articles” (Source Document 2). This shows that the land which the U.S government have offered to the Cherokee doesn’t have a good supply of wood and water, which the Cherokees need to live as farmers. If they can’t live as farmers, that means there would be less crops, which leads to less food, thus making it hard for the Cherokee to survive. The Cherokee shouldn’t make their lives harder by moving when their original territory already has rich farmland. In summary, the Cherokee should’ve resisted because their original land already had what the Cherokees need to live as