Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Emergence of standard english between 15th and 17th centuries
Chaucer's characterization
Chaucer's prologue
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Cheeky Chaucer “An Analysis of Chaucer's Characters” Chaucer's Prologue is an introduction to the characters that he will soon be talking about in his short stories. It was written to combat the Italian Buchartio, and write his own version to achieve fame. The reason that the Italian version became so popular is because of how it was written in the Italian of the street people, in other words, it could be understood by the whole of Italy, not just the rich. Chaucer wanted to do the same thing, but came to halt when he was deciding what language to write it in, he thought of Russian and other languages, but soon decided on English. This is extremely important because it is the first time that English has ever been written down, usually it is just a spoken language with no written form. This is why it was so important to the English language that he wrote it specifically in English. Giving the language a written form, sort of. It was a mixture of German of the east and native language from the Anglo Saxons. It is difficult to read, because this is the first time English has been written down, so there wasn’t any set way to spell words, and they were spelled how they sounded phonetically.”Whan that Aprill with his shoures soote The droghte of March Hath Perced to the roote, And bathed every veyne in swich liquor” (Page 97 Lines 1-3). Typically, this meant that the same word was spelled fifty different ways throughout the entire Prologue. Though it is hard to read it is still an excellent story, and has very depth in its characters, which are fully developed and give further detail into the story and make it one of the best stories in English there is today. Initially, my first favorite character in Chaucer’s Prologue was... ... middle of paper ... ...that when that song was sung he’d have to preach and tune his honey-tongue And (well he could) win silver from the crowd”(Page 690-696 & 731-733) this is exactly how people are today only doing things for themselves, not for the others around them. This is one of the things that Chaucer stresses throughout his stories, that greed and other selfish acts only will lead to the destruction of humankind. Characters from Chaucer’s Prologue are very well developed and full fledged characters, he goes very far into the depth of the character which only enhances his story, making it one of the highest regarded in the English language. Whether it be the characters, of the Pardoner, the Nun, or the rich Monk, it all expresses things of people that need to be changed in society, which I agree wholeheartedly with. Works Cited Prentice Hall Literature Vol. 1 Page 90-120
In “The Pardoner’s Tale,” Geoffrey Chaucer masterfully frames an informal homily. Through the use of verbal and situational irony, Chaucer is able to accentuate the moral characteristics of the Pardoner. The essence of the story is exemplified by the blatant discrepancy between the character of the storyteller and the message of his story. By analyzing this contrast, the reader can place himself in the mind of the Pardoner in order to account for his psychology.
The Pardoner’s Prologue/Tale begins with a sort of introduction, hence the title “Prologue”. It is here that we learn of the reaction that the Host gives after hearing the Physician’s Tale previously. The Host seems to be so shocked at the death of the young Roman girl in the tale that he asks the Pardoner to tell the group a merrier, more farcical tale. After some time, the Pardoner is ready to present his tale, including both moral interjection and a merrier tone. The Pardoner begins by describing a group of young Flemish people who spend their time drinking and indulging themselves in all forms of excess. He continues to tell the tale, in which the people eventually end up drinking posioned wine and all die. As is, there are more details in the tale that we did not go over there are some key elements that help us to better understand the Pardoner upon hearing his tale. First of all, we know from The General Prologue that the Pardoner is just as bad or corrupt as others in his “profession”. However, after hearing his tale it is quite shocking about his frankness about his own hypocrisy. We know that he bluntly accuses himself of fraud, avarice, and gluttony all things that he preaches against throughout this tale. It is in lines, 432-433 that the Pardoner states, “But that is nat my principal entente;/ I preche nothyng but for coveitise.” It is here that we truly begin to learn that The Pardoner’s Tale is merely an example of a story that is often used by preachers to emphasize a moral point to their audience. That is why, this tale in particular helps to comprehend Chaucer’s own opinions, and how he used satire to display
...irony, the corruption he believes can be found in the Church, pointing at its common tendency in this time to take advantage of the people through its power. He also shows through the Pardoner that perhaps immoral people cannot guide people to morality, through subtle lines such as “For though myself be a ful vicious man,/ A moral tale yit I you telle can” (GP 171-172). Through Chaucer’s portrayal of the Pardoner in this tale, the audience is able to see that the Pardoner is a self-absorbed, greedy man that mirrors what the author thinks of the Church, and that the Pardoner is the exact opposite of what he preaches, which also points towards the supposed corruption of the Church. The irony found throughout this work serves the important purpose of bringing attention to the dishonesty and fraud Chaucer believes can be found in the Roman Catholic Church at this time.
...l, each tale within Chaucer’s Canterbury Tale relates to satire, in which he is intending to reach is audience. To begin, in the general prologue there are many examples, of satire that are displayed. Secondly, the Pardoners tale also has excess amounts of irony and satire in it. Lastly, the Wife of Baths prologue is the one that most people get offended by. Satire can be used in a good way or a bad way, it just depends on how you apply it. In the way that Chaucer applied it he wanted to make a lot of people mad and he accomplished just that. All in all, Chaucer did an excellent job when it came to using satire to reach his intended audience. Chaucer’s General Prologue is a masterpiece of satire due in large part to his frequent and often viciously funny use of verbal irony. Henry Kewt says here, that he is the king of irony, when it comes to The Canterbury Tale.
The monk receives some scathing sarcasm in Chaucer’s judgment of his new world ways and the garments he wears “With fur of grey, the finest in the land; Also, to fasten hood beneath his chin, He had of good wrought gold a curious pin: A love-knot in the larger end there was.” (194-197, Chaucer). The Friar is described as being full of gossip and willing to accept money to absolve sins, quite the opposite of what a servant of God should be like. Chaucer further describes the friar as being a frequenter of bars and intimate in his knowledge of bar maids and nobles alike. The friar seems to be the character that Chaucer dislikes the most, he describes him as everything he should not be based on his profession. The Pardoner as well seems to draw special attention from Chaucer who describes him as a man selling falsities in the hopes of turning a profit “But with these relics, when he came upon Some simple parson, then this paragon In that one day more money stood to gain Than the poor dupe in two months could attain.” (703-706, Chaucer). Chaucer’s description of the pardoner paints the image of a somewhat “sleazy” individual “This pardoner had hair as yellow as wax, But lank it hung as does a strike of flax; In wisps hung down such locks as he 'd on head, And with them he his shoulders overspread; But thin they dropped, and stringy, one by one.” (677-681,
...ck to be caused by greed, lust, natural habit of testing something out, and all other human nature shown in the tales. Chaucer used the tales to symbolize the natural behaviors that people have that is similar within all people. Some tales were used to symbolize love over relationships and some were even to hide Chaucer’s true thoughts as if it were the ‘character’s’ ideas. Using the different perspectives of each character, Chaucer was able to show the readers all the kinds of corruptions that can occur with the natural habits. He wanted to regenerate the ideas of using Middle English within writing and show his new style of using allegory to express the nature of humans. Again, using different character’s to lead a tale was another way for Chaucer to reveal his beliefs. He wrote about similar traits that people have that can lead to bad behaviors and corruptions.
The Prologue to The Canterbury Tales is a masterpiece of satire due to the frequent use of verbal irony and insults towards the characters and their roles in society. A major source of Irony is Chaucer’s representation of the Church. He uses the Prioress, the Monk and the Friar, who are all supposed to be holy virtuous people to represent the Church. In his writing he suggests that they are actually corrupt, break their vows and in no way model the “holiness” of Christianity.
One of the conclusions that can form from the prologue is the higher the intellect one holds, the more capable they are to exploit someone beneath them. This mentality allows opportunities for those with a lack of moral to step in and control the community. Chaucer displays that the Parson is straightforward about the motivation for his behaviour, as he believes he must be a level of excellence that his parishioners should aspire to be "if gold rust, what shal iren do?" (502). From this, it is perceived that Chaucer has an intense amount of respect for him. The Parson is an important figure in the prologue because without his love and compassion, we would only have corrupted characters such as the Pardoner and the Friar; who give the reader a fallacious perspective of what those of religious status should be. Contrasting the comfortable lives other characters choose to hold, the Parson puts his personal comfort second and stays close to his parishioners in order to serve them to the highest quality he can
First off, The General Prologue is all about introducing the characters who tell the tales on the way to Canterbury. There are twenty some characters who tell stories, but of those, only two we can read about because of the content. Even though The General Prologue is mainly introducing of the characters, Chaucer still finds a way to use satire. One of the characters he explains is the Friar. The Friar is a priest for the church; he is supposed to be a role model for the people of England, but he is the opposite. “There was a Friar, a wanton one and merry a limiter, a very festive fellow. In all Four Orders there was none so mellow, so glib with gallant phrase and well turned speech. He’d fixed up many a marriage, giving each of his young women what he could afford her.” Even though he was a high and mighty priest, he would go out and get young girls pregnant ...
In The General Prologue, Chaucer’s narrator depicts a number of pilgrimages who represent different estates: the chivalrous and righteous Knight, the fashionable young Squire in the military estate; the graceful and merciful Prioresse, the rich Monk who breaks down the tradition, the slick Friar in the clergy estate; the indebted Merchant, the knowledgeable Clerk in the professional estate. That group of people reflects the contemporary situation of the whole English society. Chaucer uses irony as a primarily rhetorical device to reveal the corruption of those people. Squire, Prioresse and Clerk are three typical figures in the poem.
One reason why he would add a talk show host, is because many times they make things up just to cause controversy. A lot of the hosts speak in a really fast manner, and try to be comical, even though they know they are hurting people’s feelings and leaving an impression stating that their views may not be verifiable. They continually want to get the people to commit their attention so that their viewers will increase. Chaucer would more than likely criticize them because they are dishonest about more topics than people will ever realize. Talk show hosts dress in a very formal way a majority of the time. They wear either business dresses, or a nice button up shirt. You could infer that they dress like they are very wealthy people. Chaucer would be very indignant at how they make people believe things that aren’t actually true. That hints to why he would probably write about them being
Geoffrey Chaucer was a on a mission when he wrote The Canterbury Tales. That mission was to create a satire that attacked three major institutions. Raphel displays, “Medieval society was divided into three estates: the Church (those who prayed), the Nobility (those who fought), and the Patriarchy. The General Prologue to The Canterbury Tales is an estates satire.” Chaucer wanted to shed light on the institutions that were taking advantage of the everyday man. Chaucer does this by making up tales about certain people that she light to the undercover world of the institutions. In The Canterbury Tales, Chaucer uses satire to attack the Church, the Patriarchy, and the Nobility.
Geoffrey Chaucer is renowned as one of the most prominent and innovative writers in the history of the English language. He was born in London to a thriving merchant family, gaining an opportunity for education in elite schools. Chaucer learned French, the language of wine trade, while working for his father; whom served him to explore and pursue his love of poetry from a young age (Bleiberg). Over the course of his maturity, he developed remarkable skills to write his own first poems in French. With his family connections within the royal court, Chaucer served under the royal service, while obtaining valuable knowledge by relentlessly reading and analyzing Italian literature and by immersing himself into French poetry (Hacht 2). Geoffrey Chaucer is a monumental writer whose compositions have contributed to evolution of the English Language and Literature by altering society’s view and dependence of the language, by transforming the English dialect and versification into a treasured vernacular, by exposing contemporary life through his poetry, and by the employment of his personality and sense of humor in his works.
...s a dictionary of 14th century English peopleIn this majestic piece of Literature, Chaucer uses physiognomy and striating to express his suggestion, dislike and admiration to the Church. He thinks Church has been polluted by people’s own greed and lost its original faith. He doesn’t like the Churchmen because they are nothing like their spiritual leader Jesus and don’t practice their religion in life. But he admires how people are well-educated in Church though these educations don’t do much in building of their moral standards. Today, more people think that indeed Canterbury Tale is a historical critique against the society during Chaucer’s time. But no matter how people define it, its sparkling dialogue, acute rendering of characters, warm humor and sympathetic understanding of Church, society and human nature will always shine in the universe of literature.
The Canterbury Tales is a great contemplation of stories, that display humorous and ironic examples of medieval life, which imitate moral and ethical problems in history and even those presented today. Chaucer owed a great deal to the authors who produced these works before his time. Chaucer tweaked their materials, gave them new meanings and revealed unscathed truths, thus providing fresh ideas to his readers. Chaucer's main goal for these tales was to create settings in which people can relate, to portray lessons and the irony of human existence.