Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Short note on Walt Whitman
Short note on Walt Whitman
Achievements of Walt Whitman
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Introduction
The purpose of this psychological autopsy is to expand upon the knowledge regarding the University of Texas, Austin Clocktower shooting by Charles J. Whitman. This examination aims to elaborate upon the details surrounding Charles J. Whitman’s shooting at the University of Texas, Austin and Whitman’s possible psychopathology. There are certain limitations regarding the examination of the incident. One limitation of the psychological autopsy is the amount of time that has passed since the shooting which occurred on August 1st, 1966. Due to the excessive amount of time following the event, certain avenues of inquiry cannot be explored. Interviews with Charles J. Whitman’s relatives cannot be conducted because many of Whitman’s family
…show more content…
members are deceased. Interviews with Whitman’s close friends and associates also cannot be conducted. Another limitation of the study is regarding the unfortunate damage to Whitman’s brain which resulted from fatal gunshot wounds (Governor’s Committee, 1966). The damaged areas of the brain may have potentially revealed information relevant to the case. The psychological autopsy was completed by Patrick A. Foo of California State University, Fresno. Acknowledgement and gratitude is owed to Dr. Candice Skrapec of California State University, Fresno for the referral of this case. Identifying Information The decedent, Charles Joseph Whitman, was a 25-year-old white male whom resided at 906 Jewell Street Austin, Texas with his wife, Kathryn Whitman (Lavergne, 1997). Charles J. Whitman was born to Charles A. Whitman and Margaret Whitman on June 24th, 1941 (Lavergne, 1997). Charles had two younger siblings, John Michael Whitman and Patrick Whitman. Charles and his family identified religiously as Roman Catholic and were devout members of their faith (Lavergne, 1997). Presenting Problem Prior to the shooting at the University of Texas, Austin Clocktower, Charles J. Whitman murdered both his mother and wife (Governor’s Committee, 1966; Lavergne, 1997). Whitman’s series of mass murder began when Charles killed his mother, Margaret Whitman (Lavergne, 1997). Charles killed his mother with a fatal gunshot wound to the head and stab wound to the chest. (Governor’s Committee, 1966; Lavergne, 1997). Shortly following the murder of his mother, Charles penned a note claiming that the murder was motivated primarily by love and a desire for revenge (Lavergne, 1997). According to the note, Charles killed his mother because he wished to relieve her of the pain and suffering she experienced from her abuse ex-husband, Charles A. Whitman (Lavergne, 1997). According to Lavergne (1997), Charles attempted to damage his father by identifying him as the motivation for his actions. Following the murder of his mother, Charles returned to his home at 906 Jewell Street and murdered his wife, Kathryn Whitman (Lavergne, 1997).
Whitman’s wife was fatally stabbed multiple times in the chest (Governor’s Committee, 1966). After murdering his mother and wife, Whitman journeyed to the 28th floor of the Clocktower with a footlocker containing an arsenal of weapons, 700 rounds of ammunition, and other items (Governor’s Committee, 1966; Dietz, 1986). According to Psychiatrist Park Dietz (1986), Charles J. Whitman is an archetypal example of a “pseudo-commando”. “Pseudo-commandos” are mass murderers who carefully plan their actions and exhibit an obsession with firearms (Dietz, 1986). On the 28th floor, Whitman murdered receptionist Edna Townley with blunt force trauma to the back of the head. Whitman then killed Mark Gabour and Margarite Lamport on stairwell between the 27th and 28th floors of the Clocktower. Whitman then fired down from the Clocktower onto unsuspecting members of the public. During Whitman’s rampage, civilians and police officers returned fire after slowly coming to the realization that there was a sniper (Lavergne, …show more content…
1997). Whitman was killed by Austin police officers Houston McCoy and Ramiro Martinez (Lavergne, 1997). Officer McCoy fired two shotgun shells into Whitman’s head, killing him (Lavergne, 1997). Following Whitman’s death, officer Martinez fired a third shotgun shell into Whitman’s left arm and chest (Lavergne, 1997). Civilians and police officers ceased firing upon the Clocktower following the announcement of Whitman’s death. Shortly after Whitman’s death, the wounded were treated, and the deceased were moved. Whitman’s corpse was transported to Cook’s Funeral Home (Lavergne, 1997). In total, Charles J. Whitman killed 16 people and injured 32 others (Governor’s Committee, 1966). Victimology Charles’ mother, Margaret Whitman, was killed by a fatal gunshot wound to the head and stab wound to the chest (Governor’s Committee, 1966; Lavergne, 1997). Kathryn Whitman, Charles Whitman’s wife, was killed after being fatally stabbed in the chest (Governor’s Committee, 1966). Edna Townley was employed as a receptionist on the 28th floor of the Clocktower at the University of Texas, Austin (Lavergne, 1997). Townley was brutally attacked and suffered from blunt force trauma to the head and a gunshot wound. Townley died at Seton Hospital (Lavergne, 1997). Margarite Lamport and her nephew, Mark Gabour, were fatally shot with a shotgun by Whitman on the stairwell between the 27th and 28th floors of the Clocktower (Lavergne, 1997). Margarite Lamport was fatally shot in the chest and Mark Gabour was fatally shot in the head (Lavergne, 1997). Claire Wilson’s unborn baby was fatally shot in the head and Wilson’s boyfriend, Thomas Eckman, was fatally shot in the neck Whitman (Lavergne, 1997). Both Eckman and Wilson’s unborn child were killed instantly (Lavergne, 1997). Former University of Texas, Austin student, David Gunby, died November 12th, 2001 after stopping dialysis treatment (McLellan, 2001). After being shot in the abdomen, bullet fragments heavily damaged Gunby’s remaining kidney (Lavergne, 1997; McLellan, 2001).Dr. Robert Boyer was visiting professor at the University of Texas, Austin. Dr. Boyer was fatally shot in the lower back (Lavergne, 1997). Thomas Ashton, a Peace Corps trainee from California, was fatally shot in chest. Ashton was pronounced dead at Brackenridge Hospital shortly after being shot (Lavergne, 1997). Seventeen-year-old high school student, Karen Griffith, was shot in the chest, heavily damaging her lungs. Griffith succumbed to her wounds at Brackenridge Hospital a week after her shooting (Lavergne, 1997). Veteran and University of Texas, Austin student, Thomas Karr, was shot in lower back. Karr died during surgery at Brackenridge Hospital (Lavergne, 1997). Police officer Billy Speed was fatally shot in the right shoulder. The bullet moved from Speed’s right shoulder and into his chest, mortally wounding him (Lavergne, 1997). Officer Speed was announced dead at Brackenridge Hospital (Lavergne, 1997). Navy veteran and doctorate student Harry Walchuk died after being fatally shot in the chest (Lavergne, 1997). Couple Paul Sonntag and Claudia Rutt were shot while hiding behind a construction barricade (Lavergne, 1997). Paul Sonntag was instantly killed after being shot in the head (Lavergne, 1997). Claudia Rutt was shot in the chest and later died at Brackenridge Hospital (Lavergne, 1997). Electrician Roy Dell Schmidt was mortally wounded after being shot in the abdomen. Schmidt was announced dead after arriving at Brackenridge Hospital (Lavergne, 1997). Past history of offender: historical background of decedent Relationship Assessment Charles J. Whitman and Katheryn Leissner began dating in February, 1962 and were married on August 7th, 1962 (Governor’s Committee, 1966). According to Lavergne (1997), Katheryn was scared of Charles, who was extremely temperamental. According to Lavergne (1997), Charles physically assaulted Katheryn on two separate occasions and verbally criticized her (Lavergne, 1997). According to Lavergne (1997), friends and close associates did not that the Whitman’s had relationship difficulties. Charles cared deeply for Katheryn but behaved inconsistently towards her (Governor’s Committee, 1966). Use of Drugs Whitman used the amphetamine, Dexedrine, to increase his focus and to aid him in the completion of his coursework (Governor’s Committee, 1966; Lavergne, 1997). According to Lavergne (1997), the side effects of Dexedrine include mood changes and increased anxiety. According to Lavergne (1997), a container containing several Dexedrine tablets was found on Whitman’s corpse. Toxicology reports showed no evidence of acute or chronic drug toxicity although, neither Whitman’s urine or stomach contents were tested because his body had already been embalmed at the time of the autopsy (Governor’s Committee, 1966; Lavergne, 1997). Psychosocial stressors and Mood Whitman was subject to immense stress which greatly affected his mood and temperament. Whitman apathetically approached his coursework and became self-deprecating his writings (Lavergne, 1997). Whitman was disheartened by the belief that he would never surpass his father in terms of wealth and began to despise his father for this reason. Charles’ obsession with financial independence caused significant pressure and assisted in the development of Whitman’s severe depression (Lavergne, 1997). According to Lavergne (1997), Whitman’s excessive course load and poor academic performance also caused immense stress and negatively affected his mood. Medical history According to the Governor’s Committee (1966), Whitman had an appendectomy at age 16. After enlisting in the Marine Corps, test results indicated no physical abnormalities or abnormal results (Governor’s Committee, 1966). While in the Marine Corps, Whitman and Larry Page were involved in a jeep accident (Governor’s Committee, 1966; Lavergne, 1997). After the accident, Whitman became unconscious for several hours and was hospitalized for a period of several days (Governor’s Committee, 1966; Lavergne, 1997). On October 7th, 1964, Whitman was attacked be several marines and required medical assistance for headaches (Lavergne, 1997). Whitman frequently complained about headaches and other physical ailments (Governor’s Committee, 1996). Military history According to the Governor’s Committee (1966), Charles J.
Whitman joined the Marine Corps after the passing of his 18th birthday. As a Marine, Whitman excelled in his training and was awarded the “sharp shooter” designation for demonstrating proficiency at long-range shooting (Lavergne, 1997). In September, 1961, Whitman was awarded the prestigious Naval Enlisted Science Education Program (NESEP) scholarship to study at the University of Texas, Austin (Governor’s Committee, 1966). Whitman’s scholarship in the NESEP program was repealed in February, 1963, and Whitman returned to the Marine Corps (Governor’s Committee, 1966). In July, 1963, Charles received the rank of Lance Corporal, but his rank was reduced to Private on February 7th, 1964, for illegally loaning money to fellow Marines (Governor’s Committee, 1966). Whitman was forced to serve 90 days of harm labor as a result of his court martial (Governor’s Committee, 1966; Lavergne, 1997). Charles J. Whitman was honorably discharge on December 4th, 1964 (Lavergne,
1997).
On August 01st, 1966 on the campus of the University of Texas at Austin, many families lost their loved ones to the actions of Charles Whitman, a lone gunman who was only 25 years old at the time; Whitman climbed the campus tower, and with three rifles, two pistols, and a sawed-off shotgun, he shot forty-three people, (thirteen of whom died,) in just under ninety-six minutes. This historic tragic event became known as the UT Tower Shooting.
Therefore, Whitman was possibly experiencing a fundamental change in his emotions and personality due to the tumor. Though Whitman did not survive, his case still poses questions as to whether or not he should be held accountable for his actions; moreover, should Whitman have received the maximum punishment for the murder he committed? Charles Whitman may not have had control over the feelings of “rage and irrational thoughts” (2011) he was experiencing; however, the precision of the attack indicates he was well aware of the actions he was committing. Gary M. Lavergne (2006) discusses the possibility that Whitman knew exactly what he was going to do and that a considerable amount of planning went into it.
The life of Perry Smith was saturated with abuse, turmoil, and a lack of compassion. His father often took advantage of their mother and subjected her to violent outbursts of yelling and physical as well as verbal assault. Seeing this behavior every day, Smith recognized it as a normal way of life and developed a hardened attitude towards violence. These experiences consumed him in a deeply troubled psychological state of mind affecting his social behavior, essentially making him a recluse to the outside world. He had a hard time developing close relationships with other people, causing him to lack common empathy and making it easier for him to blindly rampage in a murderous spree. Seeing so much violence as a child, he lost a value for human life. This simple fact is a direct outcome of his upbringing which ultimately led to his decision to slaughter the Clutter family on that fateful night in Kansas. As an opposite viewpoint, nature would correspond to a psychological disorder or mental illness. In some cases, nature can be the driving force behind a person’s lack of control over their actions. However, these factors are not often present in people who are convicted of murder. It is more reasonable that the experiences a person undergoes throughout their lifetime shapes their personality and behavior while
In this paper I will discuss the biological, psychological and social upbringing of John Lee Malvo and how these factors contributed to the making of a serial killer known as the DC Sniper.
John Allen Muhammad and Lee Boyd Malvo are two murderers that are known as the Beltway Sniper. Muhammad and Malvo killings are known to be random, which categorizes their killings as a killing spree. During the duration of their killing spree, they caused major panic throughout the United States. This notorious shootings that terrorized the United States took place in 2002. The shootings ended up taking the lives of 10 individuals and injuring 3 others (Blades, 2005, para.1). The shooting at the time it took place is considered unique because their weapon of choice to carry out their plan was a sniper rifle. What is unique about this case is that investigators and criminal theorist
In "I, Too," Langston Hughes is obviously in conversation with the earlier poem, Walt Whitman 's "I Hear America Singing." Both poems explore the idea of American identity -- who and what is an American? What characterizes the people of this nation? The two poets, however, reach somewhat different conclusions in response to these questions.
On February 14, 2008, Steven Kazmierczak took less than two minutes to open fire on a lecture hall at Northern Illinois University, killing five, injuring eighteen, and finally taking his own life. Although he had a history of mental illness, Kazmierczak had been given the Dean’s Award, the highest honor an undergraduate of NIU can receive, attended graduate school at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, and sought counseling for his mental illness. From the outside, it appeared that he had taken control of his life, described as “being so nice he must be a mass murderer” by faculty members at NIU. To say the least, his killing spree and subsequent suicide came as a shock to those who knew him, and it is difficult
Out of all the great authors and poets we have studied this semester I have chosen the three that I personally enjoyed reading the most; Nathaniel Hawthorne, Edgar Allen Poe, and Walt Whitman. These three Writers stand out above the rest for each has contributed substantially to bringing forth a newly earned respect for American Writers of Literature. Up until this point in time most literature had come from European writers. Hawthorne, Poe and Whitman brought not only great works of art to our newly formed nation, but also to the world in general.
At approximately 12:30 p.m. on November 22nd, 1963 the world was shockingly stunned by a horrific incident that has forever changed the view of the events that occurred during this day. While our President was riding a convertible motorcade down Elm Street in Dealey Plaza, Texas he was abruptly struck by two penetrating bullets in the upper back and head. Our 35th President of the United States of America had been fatally assassinated by Lee Harvey Oswald, a sniper from the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository Building. However, did Lee Harvey Oswald, a crazy lunatic act alone in the assassination of President Kennedy. Both first – hand knowledge and visual evidence allows people to re – examine the events of this day and prove that there were other gunmen involved in the bombardment of our youngest elected president.
Crimelibrary.com, (2014). The Mystery of Howard Hughes — Psychological Autopsy helps us understand controversial deaths — Crime Library. [online] Available at: http://www.crimelibrary.com/criminal_mind/forensics/psych_autopsy/4.html [Accessed 5 May. 2014].
Walt Whitman's "Song of Myself" is a vision of the American spirit, a vision of Whitman himself. It is his cry for democracy, giving each of us a voice through his poetry. Each of us has a voice and desires, and this is Whitman's representation of our voices, the voice of America. America, the great melting pot, was founded for freedom and democracy, and this poem is his way of re-instilling these lost American ideals. In this passage from "Song of Myself" Whitman speaks through his fellow man and speaks for his fellow man when his voice is not socially acceptable to be heard.
"Zora Neale Hurston is Born." history.com. A&E Television Networks, 7 Jan. 2016. Web. 12 Jan.
Love is the greatest gift that God has bestowed upon mankind. Defining love is different for every culture, race, and religion. Walt Whitman’s love is ever changing for anyone who tries to love him or understand his work. Love can be broken down into a multitude of emotions, and feelings towards someone or some object. In order to find love that is searched for, preparations must be made to allow the full experience of Whoever You Are Holding Me Now in Hand by Walt Whitman to be pious. Walt Whitman’s poem is devoted to the fullness of love, and a description of fantasy and reality. A journey to find love starts with knowledge that both participants are willing, and able to consummate their love in judgment under God. Time is the greatest accomplice to justify the energy and sacrifice needed to start developing the ingredients needed for love to grow. Each stanza is a new ingredient to add to the next stanza. Over time, this addition of each stanza will eventually lead to a conclusion. A conclusion that love is ever changing, and people must either change along with love or never know the miracle of love.
My firm belief is that Mr. Whitman will most likely fit into the psychotic mass killer typology. I was at first thinking of Ms. Whitman fitting the typology school shooters, but a school shooters motivation for the mass killings are hatred for school, hatred for other students or ethnic groups, Mr. Whitman didn't have that kind of motivation. Mr. Whitman´s motivation for the mass killing according to him was the thoughts he had in his head, and he couldn't stop himself from killing. This kind of motivation sounds more like a psychotic mass killer rather than a school shooter. I believe that Mr. Whitman´s motivation sounds to me more like he has some type of psychotic condition. Mr. Whitman doesn't state anything abut hearing
On November 29th 1847, in Waiilatpu Washington a tragedy occurred: The murder of 14 missionaries; including the Whitmans' at the hand of the Cayuse Indians.