Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on history of charlemagne
The two lives of charlemagne review
Essay on history of charlemagne
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on history of charlemagne
Charlemagne, called Charles the Great and Charles I, was a lord of France, as well as a summoning authentic figure. Charlemagne is believed to have been conceived at some point around the year 742.He became King of the Franks in 768 . Charlemagne's father, King Pepin (the short), formally put an end to the Merovingian line of rulers to get King of the Franks, and willed that Francia be isolated between both Charlemagne and his sibling Carloman upon his passing in 768. The partitioned guideline was fleeting. When Charlemagne was chosen King of the Franks, his nation had officially involved the larger part of France, the majority of the Netherlands, and Belgium, a large portion of Switzerland, and a sizeable share of Germany.
This is how Charlemagne was described by his biographer Einhard: „Charles was large and strong, and of lofty stature, though not disproportionately tall (his height is well known to have been seven times the length of his foot); the upper part of his head was round, his eyes very large and animated, nose a little long, hair fair, and face laughing and merry. Thus his appearance was always stately and dignified, whether he was standing or sitting; although his neck was thick and somewhat short, and his belly rather prominent; but the symmetry of the rest of his body concealed these defects. His gait was firm, his whole carriage manly, and his voice clear, but not as strong as his size led one to expect. In the following chapter he describes his style of clothing: „He used to wear the national, that is to say, the Frank, dress-next his skin a linen shirt and linen breeches, and above these a tunic fringed with silk […] he protected his shoulders and chest in winter by a close-fitting coat of otter or marten sk...
... middle of paper ...
...n, Charlemagne otherwise called Karl and Charles the Great, was a medieval ruler who controlled much of Western Europe. Charlemagne became the king of Franks, a Germanic tribe in present-day Belgium, France, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and western Germany. He left determined to unite all Germanic people groups into one kingdom, and believer his subjects to Christianity. A gifted military strategist, he used much of his rule occupied with warfare keeping in mind the end goal to perform his objectives. Pope Leo III delegated Charlemagne head of the Romans. In this part, he supported the Carolingian Renaissance, a social and erudite restoration in Europe. When he passed on, Charlemagne's domain included much of Western Europe, and he had likewise guaranteed the survival of Christianity in the West. Today, Charlemagne is alluded to by a few as the father of Europe.
The collection Two Lives of Charlemagne contains two different biographies of Charlemagne who was a king of the Franks and a christian emperor of the West in the 8th century. The first biographical account was written by his courtier Einhard who knew him personally and well. On the other hand, the second account was penned by Notker the Stammerer was born twenty-five years after the king’s death. Even though these two versions indicate the same king’s life, there were many differences between the two. Einhard’s writing focused on the emperor’s official life and his military campaign. However, Notker provided more of a perspective about the king’s legacy and seemed more hyperbolic as well as mythical. This paper will compare and contrast the
In the Frankish empire, there were numerous different cultures which inhabited it. A cultural dividing line can be draw down the Rhine River. On the left bank of the Rhine, you had the lands of Christian, Romanised Gaul, while on the right bank of the Rhine resided pagan Germania.* Culturally, linguistically and religiously, these two cultures could not have been more different from each other. In Gaul, the people had become Romanised and Christianised over the centuries by their roman overlords. Gaul was also heavily settled by the Franks, since they were feodrati for Rome. When the Western Roman Empire fell, it was easy for the Franks to move in and assume control over the territory. With the Franks conversion to Christianity in 496 The Franks were able to mix well with the Gallo-Roman land owners and peasants, leading Gaul to slowly transform itself into Francia.* The coronation of Charlemagne further enhanced his authority over his Gallic dominions by linking himself with the old Western Roman Empire.* This allowed him to be seen as a legitimate successor to the emperors of old, instead of a chieftain of a conquering
Charlemagne is a man of good character in both works. He is a man that is considerate of supporting the poor and is generous of giving
The most famous work about Charlemagne is a book entitled The Two Lives of Charlemagne which consists of two separate biographies published into one book and tells the story of Charlemagne's life as two different people experienced it. Apart from this, there are many other places you can turn to learn more about the life of the king of the Franks, including letters, capitularies, inventories, annals, and more. However, each of these sources seem to paint a different picture of Charlemagne. In one, he seems to be a very average guy; in another, a mythical being, almost god-like; and a strong and firm political leader in yet another. It is because of this of this that we will never really know exactly who Charlemagne was or what he was like, but we do have an idea of what he did and how he lived thanks to those who decided to preserve it.
Einhard, in his The Life of Charlemagne, makes clear the fundamental integration of politics and religion during the reign of his king. Throughout his life, Charles the Great endeavored to acquire and use religious power to his desired ends. But, if Charlemagne was the premiere monarch of the western world, why was religious sanction and influence necessary to achieve his goals? In an age when military power was the primary means of expanding one's empire, why did the most powerful military force in Europe go to such great lengths to ensure a benevolent relationship with the church? One possibility may be found in the tremendous social and political influence of Rome and her papacy upon the whole of the continent. Rather than a force to be opposed, Charlemagne viewed the church as a potential source of political power to be gained through negotiation and alliance. The relationship was one of great symbiosis, and both componants not only survived but prospered to eventually dominate western Europe. For the King of the Franks, the church provided the means to accomplish the expansion and reformation of his empire. For the Holy Roman Church, Charles provided protection from invaders and new possibilities for missionary work.
The two lives of Charlemagne as told by Einhard and Notker are two medieval sources about the accounts of the life Charlemagne. Modern sources by Matthew Innes and Rosamond Mckitterick discuss how history was recorded during the medieval period and how it was suppose to be viewed in the early ages. Observing each of these sources helps get an understanding of how the writing of history is important in recorded history and how it affected how the history of Charlemagne was recorded.
Charlemagne’s father, Pepin, died of dropsy on 24 September, 768 and left his two sons, Charlemagne and Carloman, with William, the Duke of Aquitania. After Pepin died, the whole kingdom was divided evenly between the two sons. It was split in such a way that Charlemagne would govern the part that belonged ...
Charlemagne Charlemagne, also known as Charles the Great, became the undisputed ruler of Western Europe, “By the sword and the cross.” (Compton’s 346) As Western Europe was deteriorating Charlemagne was crowned the privilege of being joint king of the Franks in 768 A.D. People of Western Europe, excluding the church followers, had all but forgotten the great gifts of education and arts that they had possessed at one time. Charlemagne solidly defeated barbarians and kings in identical fashion during his reign. Using the re-establishment of education and order, Charlemagne was able to save many political rights and restore culture in Western Europe.
...e had so far. The Church found that learning and culture was very important in spreading the beliefs of God. They wanted several people to start earning an education, so civilians could read the books that were related to cultural beliefs. These three traditions have impacted the Middle Ages during Charlemagne’s reign. He incorporated these studies from other cultures into his way of governing the country. His court and the Church were led by using these standards, which proves the equal balance of these two groups. The Western culture has changed in many ways, however, Charlemagne’s influence has not stopped becoming an impact throughout this culture and many more.
Charlemagne also known as Charles the Great, created a legacy that is greatly honored still to this day. He is seen as one of the greatest conquerors ever because of territories he conquered, the diversity he created, and the building of one of the greatest empires known to mankind. Since the fall of Rome, most of the continent of Europe has not been ruled by someone, until Charlemagne came along. Charlemagne was the founder of the Holy Roman Empire and was the one person to practically lead Europe out of the Dark Ages.
Charlemagne, or Charles the Great, reigned during a time of much turmoil and upheaval in Europe during middle ages. Charlemagne’s background and family history contributed much to his rise to power. The triumphs of his past lineage prepared him to take on the task of governing the Frankish Empire, and defending it from invaders. Charlemagne accomplished much during his supremacy. He not only brought education back into medieval Europe, but also invented an efficient way to govern his people. His conquests against the many adversaries of the Holy Roman Empire expanded his empire across the majority of Europe. His conquests also formed strong ties between the Catholic Church and the State. Charlemagne’s drive to convert Europe’s primitive and pagan tribes to Christianity nearly effaced the Saxons, whom he battled with for the majority of his reign. The crowning of Charlemagne as Holy Roman Emperor created a turning point in history. Within years after his death, however, his once great empire amounted to nothing. Charlemagne’s reign as King of the Franks and as Holy Roman Emperor greatly influenced the course of Europe during the middle ages.
St.Henry II was born in Albach, Hildesheim, Germany, 973. His feast day is July 13. This is the story of a man who became a holy emperor and was a wise ruler. He led and defended the Holy Roman Empire and he promoted peace in Europe so war wouldn’t come upon them. St. Henry is known as the patron saint of the childless and lame. He was the last of the Ottonian Empire. Henry was the son of Gisela and Henry II, Duke of Bavaria.
The Catholic King of the Franks was known as Charlemagne. Charles the Great was also a name used to refer to this king. The Franks were a tribe located in Germany. He became their king in 771. Charlemagne was amongst the most renowned, greatest and powerful rulers who existed in the Early Middle Ages. He is also referred to as the father of Europe”. As a medieval emperor, he ruled in the largest part of the Western Europe. His reign lasted for 47 years beginning from 768 to 814 (Gelfand, 20). During his reign, he managed to make several accomplishments. He managed to accomplish his targets by spending much time in warfare and converting his Germanic followers to Christianity. He is
Before analyzing the subject, Charlemagne, we must first look into the man who written about the interesting figure. With Two Lives of Charlemagne, Einhard is one of the writers involved in the biography of Charlemagne. As the introduction is written, Einhard’s life is marginal documented. Probably not being an “important figure”, Einhard’s life, possibly didn’t matter in comparison to leaders like Charlemagne. The things that
The rule of Emperor Charlemagne over the Carolingian Empire in the West marked a reawakening of the imperial ideal, a reemergence of education and a literate landed elite, and a rebirth of centralized government. Though he would not preside over the rebirth of Rome, Charlemagne’s left a legacy which would influence the development of western European government and cultural institutions for centuries to come. His Europe was new, though born from and tied to the old.