Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Romeo and juliet character analysis
The character of tybalt romeo and juliet
Romeo's character analysis in Romeo and Juliet
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Romeo and juliet character analysis
Character Essay – Tybalt
“What, drawn, and talk of peace? I hate the word, as I hate hell, all Montagues, and thee. Have at thee, coward!” This is a very telling line from Tybalt, a character from Romeo and Juliet, Shakespeare’s highly acclaimed Romantic Tragedy. Tybalt Capulet, ‘Prince of Cats’ (the cousin of Juliet) is violent young man, and acts as the foil, or opposite, of Benvolio. Tybalt has many negative attributes, like arrogance and aggressiveness, but perhaps the cause for this is the fact that loyalty and bravery are two of his strongest traits, and combined with the harsh environment of war, bloodshed and inter-family feud that he was brought up in, it was perhaps inevitable for Tybalt to turn into the most hateful and despised antagonist of this iconic
…show more content…
and moving theatrical masterpiece, still relevant in our society today. Tybalt displays arrogance through his apparent self-belief that he is superior to almost everyone, especially the Montagues. When someone has such a level of haughtiness, it is almost unavoidable that he treats most others with such disdain. “This, by his voice, should be a Montague. Fetch me my rapier, boy. What, dares the slave. Come hither, covered with an antic face, to fleer and scorn at our solemnity?” Just in the way Tybalt speaks one can see how arrogant he is. The disdain he shows for others makes it practically unpreventable to produce more hate between the two houses of Montague and Capulet. Tybalt acts as the foil, or opposite, of Benvolio, Romeo’s kind and witty friend whom strives to keep the peace between the two houses. He and Tybalt could not be more different in character, but also the audience’s view of them: the audience needs a character they can boo and hiss at, and in this case it’s Tybalt, whilst Benvolio is looked fondly upon and supported. One of Tybalt’s strongest traits is his aggressiveness. This is portrayed well in the scene of the Capulet masked ball. Romeo and his friend’s had stolen into the ball in disguise, yet Tybalt recognised him. He was extremely angered at the fact that the son of the house of Montague, his sworn enemy, had intruded into his family’s party. “To strike him dead I hold it not a sin.” In modern English this translates to; “I do not consider it a crime to kill him.” Tybalt would without further thought have acted upon these words, killing Romeo with no remorse, if his uncle, Lord Capulet, had told him to refrain, as he did not want a scene. After petulantly answering his superior back, he reluctantly and ungraciously agrees to back down. Tybalt leaves the party, vowing that Romeo would pay. He talks of his aggressiveness himself – “Patience perforce with willful choler meeting makes my flesh tremble in their different greeting.” In other words – “The combination of forced patience and pure rage is making my body tremble.” This anger affects him physically, making him shake, due to him trying to keep his aggressive personality in check. With such anger pure fury towards another, his hate is undeniable. Tybalt shows how we should not act towards others, it simply builds hate and divide, creating rifts between people, which pride and prejudice can render them almost impossible to heal. It is Tybalt’s good traits combined with his childhood environment that caused his negative characteristics to flourish. Without his extreme sense of loyalty and honour to his family, he would not be the strong, self-assured character that he is. As written above, Tybalt considered it not a crime to kill Romeo. The lengthened quote actually reads: “Now, by the stock and honor of my kin, to strike him dead I hold it not a sin.” Or: Now, by the honour of our family, I do not consider it a crime to kill him.” This is Tybalt’s loyalty showing through his anger – it is for his family that he without hesitation would kill. Without this almost astounding sense of loyalty to his family, we would not have out antagonist, our person to blame. He reflects the theme of hate very well in this sense, for all his strongest traits combined make him a bitter and cold person. His heart is poisoned and his eyes are blinded with hate for the Montague’s, as that is all he knows. He is unable to see the good in others if they are of that house. For example, when Romeo refuses to fight him, and also when Benvolio tries to keep peace between the servants, Tybalt cannot see their good intentions, only that they are, in his eyes, cowards. His undying loyalty to his family is in the end what causes him to be killed – if he had not killed Mercutio in cold blood, Romeo would never have murdered Tybalt in extreme sadness and rage. Tybalt is an extremely brave character, constantly putting himself in danger to protect his family’s honour.
“Boy, this shall not excuse the injuries that thou hast done me. Therefore turn and draw.” Tybalt says this to Romeo, as he is always ready for a fight. Tybalt’s bravery allows him to confront his enemies with confidence and self-assuredness, which is where his arrogance stems from. Alas, Tybalt does not use this bravery for good, to stand up to the two rival houses and bring peace, but to provoke it, shedding more blood, including that of the innocent. This is another example of how Tybalt reflects the theme of hate in Romeo and Juliet. His courage to put his own life at stake, in one sense, could be seen as ignorance – unable to see the stupidity of the situation he finds himself and his family in – a blood feud, the origins, and thus the meaning, or purpose, of it, lost in time. It is pointless. There are many such people in our world today – there always have been. Misguided beliefs and prejudice renders them unable to see the good in others and how much better the world would be without war. Indeed, Shakespeare helps us to understand that this mentality is wrong and has no purpose but
misery. In conclusion, Tybalt is an important, complex character in Shakespeare’s Romantic Tragedy, Romeo and Juliet. He shows the traits or characteristics of arrogance, loyalty, aggressiveness, and bravery, and is reflected as the polar opposite of Benvolio. These, combined together with his childhood environment of bloodshed, result in Tybalt becoming the despised antagonist and foil of Romeo. His inability to see the good in others, the stupidity in the feud, and the reason for peace, causes Tybalt to be a fine example of how Shakespeare can cause a character to perfectly reflect one of the most prominent yet terrible themes in the play, and indeed, in life – Hate.
When two lovers gaze at each other’s eyes, their heart rates synchronize. This is what happened to Romeo and Juliet. Both when living, and dead. There are many people to blame for the death of the two star-crossed lovers, but one person lit the match and ignited the flame. Tybalt is to blame for Romeo and Juliet’s death.
In “The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet” by William Shakespeare, two very young people fall in love but cannot be with each other because of the feud in between their families. The feud ends when Romeo and Juliet both kill themselves because of heartbreak over the other. The minor characters Mercutio, Tybalt, and Friar Lawrence serve as foils to Romeo, to help support the theme of patience.
In the Shakespearean play, Romeo & Juliet, aggression is represented in different ways by the different characters in the play. Tybalt, Romeo, Benvolio, and the others all have their own way of dealing with hate and anger. Some do nothing but hate while others can’t stand to see even the smallest of quarrels take place.
When asked by Benvolio to make peace in the streets, Tybalt bluntly responds,” talk of peace, I hate the word. As I hate hell all Montagues.” This is the attitude of Tybalt throughout the play. He believes he is doing all for the best and uses violence as his tool. He gets angry at the ball with Romeo being there, “villain as a guest,” and believes it best to defend his family’s honor by later taking revenge. When Tybalt finds Romeo, he thinks it best to fight him and when he ends up killing Mercutio he believes he has done his duty by causing Romeo the same hurt he has brought Tybalt, “the injuries that thou hast done me.”
In William Shakespeare’s play, The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet, Tybalt is from the house of Capulet and cousin to Juliet. Tybalt is young, macho, aggressive, impatient, high-tempered, cocky, and a skilled swordsman. Based on the humors, Tybalt could be considered choleric. He is introduced as an antagonist in the play because he causes a fair share of conflict. Tybalts’s death can be narrowed down to three reasons, his immaturity, Romeo, and his pride and honor.
In Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, the audience witnesses a great amount of familial pride when Tybalt shouts to an opposing family member, “What, drawn, and talk of peace? I hate the word, as I hate hell, all Montagues, and thee. Have at thee, coward,” (Shakespeare, Romeo and Juliet, Act 1.1 pg 12). In the play Romeo and Juliet, Shakespeare depicts two feuding families who once had a legitimate reason to be mad at one another, but now continuously fight each other fueled purely by family pride. This everlasting conflict between the Montagues and the Capulets illustrate to the audience how having too much family pride places a restriction on familial unity.
Romeo, enraged at the killing of one of his dearest friends, challenges Tybalt to a fight for revenge, saying:
Hasty actions created by mankind's careless actions throughout history. They are people who don’t think through about their decisions properly, tend to make more mistakes. Written by William Shakespeare, Romeo and Juliet are about two young, star-crossed lovers who are secretly in love with each other. However, they have found themselves facing obstacles left and right, and have very few allies on their side. They’re thrown into these challenges because Mercutio wanted to protect Romeo’s pride, however, Tybalt intervenes and challenges Romeo to a duel, but Romeo doesn’t want to fight Tybalt. Thus, Mercutio decides to take the challenge upon himself and duels with Tybalt. Nonetheless, Mercutio, Tybalt, and Romeo’s thoughtless action had brought upon grief and trouble into the feuding families throughout the play.
In conclusion, the irony is that their love, and death, was able to do what their lives could not, to end the feuding between the Montague’s and the Capulet’s. It is with this thought that I shall examine “the thin line between love and hate” which is evidently shown on many occasions, such as when Romeo uses his love for Juliet to remove his hate for Tybalt “Tybalt, the reason that I have to love thee doth much excuse the appertaining rage” and also the play itself is evident of this, Romeo and Juliet’s love was so strong for each other, that they were able to overcome hate and also the hate that others possessed towards each other.
Tybalt uses gentle expressions such as ‘love’ only to sharply accuse Romeo if a villain. Although somewhat insignificant, this sentence structure adds to the cruelty that Tybalt portrays. Romeo does not want to fight and explains reasons as to why, however Tybalt will not accept that he is not fighting someone and Mercutio gives Tybalt the perfect reason and opportunity to start a fight. Shakespeare seems to want the audience to sees Tybalt’s urge to pick fights as a big reason for the tragedy.
This hatred causes many brawls including one in Act 3 scene 1. This brawl is a pawn of fate that pulls Romeo further apart from Juliet. In this scene Tybalt is upset because he believes that Romeo had crashed the Capulet ball, though in reality he had no harmful intentions. He is blood thirsty and wants to battle Romeo. Romeo is Mad, passionate and hasty. He is already symbolically dead and Mercutio and Benvolio believe that he is in no state of mind to fight, and if he were to do so he would not stand a chance against Tybalt, the prince of cats. Mercutio Is worried about this so in his attempt to protect Romeo he fights Tybalt which unleashes a big fight. Tybalt kills Mercutio. This upsets Romeo so much that he kills Tybalt because he was overwhelmed with passion and makes a hasty decision. Now bringing things back to the Capulet ball. Fate begins with Tybalt hearing Romeo express his love for Juliets beauty aloud and becomes filled with anger because he believes that Romeo is there to crash party since he is a Montague. If Tybalt never heard that, he would have never instigated a fight and Romeo would not have been exiled. This is fate rearranging time and circumstance to pull Romeo farther away from
Another episode of fate, or rather dramatic irony, happens when Romeo somehow misses getting a letter from Tybalt Capulet, his enemy, challenging him to a duel. Romeo, unknowing of the tragic letter sent to him, but not gotten, goes to tell his friends of his beautiful bride, but, in return, comes face-to-face with none other than Tybalt, his loathed enemy, the kin to his new bride, Juliet. As soon as Romeo shows up, though, he is greeted by Tybalt’s insults, calling him a villain, but instead of stepping up to Tybalt’s challenge, though, Romeo backs down, saying, “Tybalt, the reason that I have to love thee doth much excuse the appertaining rage to such a greeting. Villain I am none. Therefore farewell. I see thou knowest not me.” After harsh words are spoken, families are disgraced, and names are scorned, Romeo finally just backs away. Mercutio, though, cannot let his man be put to disgrace, so he decides to defend Romeo’s name.
Now, Romeo has been banished from the land of Verona, away from his sweet Juliet. When Juliet learns of Tybalt’s death by the hand of Romeo, she first states “my husband lives, that Tybalt would have slain” with Romeo as the focal point (3.3.115). In the next line, she reiterates this same idea by stating, “and Tybalt’s dead, that would have slain my husband” with Tybalt as the focal point (3.3.116-117). This reiteration of the same idea from two different perspectives, facilitates a sense of logic and illustrates how Juliet is attempting to connect the dots and make sense of all that she has just been informed of in regards to how she should feel towards Romeo. As Juliet’s family is in mourning of Tybalt and is crying over his corpse, Juliet tells her nurse that her tears will not be caused by the death of her cousin but by the banishment of her beloved husband, Romeo. The imagery used in the line “wash they his wound with tears,” generates a sense of great mourning by quantitating the amount of grief that the Capulet family is experiencing in response to Tybalt’s death to the number of tears that they are crying, which is so much that their tears could wash Tybalt’s wounds (3.3.141). In this instance,
Shakespeare shows throughout the play how the characters continue to forgive the ones they love, even in the harsh circumstances. Angered by the death of his good friend Mercutio, Romeo slays Tybalt. “This gentleman, the Prince’s near ally, /My friend, hath got this mortal hurt In my behalf-my reputation stained /With Tybalt’s slander-Tybalt, that an hour /Hath been my cousin.”(3, 1, 104-108). Juliet could have been very angry with Romeo since Tybalt was her cousin but she was more heartbroken over Romeo’s exile. Shakespeare displays that Juliet’s love for Romeo overpowered the hate she had for him killing Tybalt. In addition, Shakespeare displayed that love conquers hate through the relationship between Juliet and her father, Lord Capulet. Near the end of the play Capulet told Juliet that she had ...
The sharp clangs of the shiny, metal swords sound throughout the still air. One sword is fueled by burning anger, while the other is merely moving in self-defense, not choosing to cause such a racket. There is always going to be people in the world who are nothing alike… and many times those people don’t get along. A prime example of this is Tybalt and Benvolio, two characters in one of the world's most well-known tragedies. In William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, Benvolio, a kindhearted peacemaker, and Tybalt, an impulsive swordsman, are character foils because of how their opposite traits complement each other.