Character Analysis: The Killer Angels

935 Words2 Pages

When a nation is divided, so are it’s people. The American Civil War demonstrates this because of the two divided sides: the union and confederacy. In The Killer Angles it is extremely evident that the people and nation are divided. The novel portrays the different perspectives and opinions of soldiers and commanding officers throughout the Battle of Gettysburg. In the novel The Killer Angels by Michael Shaara, James Longstreet fought for glory, Robert E. Lee fought for his homeland, and Joshua Chamberlain fought for an ideal. First, we will evaluate Longstreet’s motives.
Before the war, Longstreet had recently lost his children, causing him depression throughout the war. The commanding officer, Stonewall Jackson, passed away in the battle of
Gettysburg, so Longstreet became second in command. However, that didn’t help him get Lee to fight a defensive war like he wanted to. Just because Longstreet wanted to fight a defensive war, did not mean he didn’t have aspirations to win. Longstreet fought for the recognition from the people and soldiers around him. He wanted an audience and people to respect and admire him, which is what he got. It is obvious that he fought for …show more content…

Longstreet fought for glory because his goal was to win the war and for people to recognize him. Homeland was fought by Robert E. Lee because he cared about his roots and loved ones. Chamberlain wanted everyone around him to fight for each other, so that each and every one of them could have a better life when the war ended, which represents fighting for an ideal. The Killer Angels did an amazing job of portraying the different values that people fought for in the Battle of Gettysburg. The battle was very stressful for many of the commanders, but the confederacy ended up winning. Even though the themes throughout this book were mostly related to war, the book can also relates to people’s lives nowadays and what they choose to live

Open Document