Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A topic on violence in films
Violence in movies
Violence in Hollywood films
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: A topic on violence in films
The movie Neighbors (2014) is about a family, Mac, Kelly and their new born daughter, who are settling into a quiet neighborhood until a fraternity moves into the house next door. The fraternity keeps the couple up at night because they are being to loud which ultimately leads to a ‘war’ between the couple and the fraternity. Each of the main characters are trying to prove that they have more power and establish their male dominance over one another. This paper will highlight the masculinities and place emphasis on the main male characters in this movie, the father, Mac, and the fraternity president, Teddy.
To begin, I will discuss some of Mac’s masculine qualities and traits he exhibits throughout the movie. Mac, played by Seth Rogen, is
…show more content…
There was no physical violence between the two, but there was acts of threats and violence to attempt to make the other one weak and give up by leaving and finding a new home. For example: Mac broke the fraternity house water pipe and flooded their basement, while Teddy, more aggressively, took Mac’s cars airbags and placed them on his seat at work and around his house. I viewed this level of dominance from Mac as trying to take down the entire house, rather than physically trying to take down one individual. I believe Mac realized his physical strength against Teddy, or all of them, would not gain him anything. He decided to sneak around and ruin their house or fraternity by taking them all down, and making him the dominant male out of them all. Teddy on the other hand is trying to take one man down, by making Mac feel inferior and that he is unable to touch him and Mac’s only option is to give up and …show more content…
Mac, Seth Rogen, is portrayed as a male who feels emasculated and is trying to regain his masculinity by defeating Teddy and the rest of the fraternity to move on with his life and raise a happy family. Although I may not have touched on every single male character, as there are a lot since it was a fraternity, the movie excels by portraying different qualities and traits in the other actors. I enjoyed this movie because it was comical, and although there was a conflict between two male parties, it didn’t necessarily resolve in a physical fight which many films has resulted to. This leaving a comical impression and people enjoying each of the characters a little bit more and seeing them as who they are and not what they look
In Kimmel’s essay “’Bros Before Hos’: The Guy Code” he argues that the influence of society on masculinity is equal to or greater than biological influences on masculinity. In the essay, Kimmel uses various surveys and interviews to validate his argument. He points to peers, coaches, and family members as the people most likely to influence the development of a man’s masculinity. When a man has his manliness questioned, he immediately makes the decision never to say or do whatever caused him to be called a wimp, or unmanly. Kimmel’s argument is somewhat effective because the readers get firsthand accounts from the interviewees but the author does not provide any statistics to support his argument.
Both Shotgun Lovesongs by Nickolas Butler and Population: 485 by Michael Perry explore ideas of masculinity and manhood, but I think Butler shares a more diverse representation of masculinity through his different characters. What it means to be a man The concept of masculinity is considered as the qualities and characteristics of a man, typical of what is appropriate to a man. In this article, A Community Psychology of Men and Masculinity: Historical and Conceptual Review, the authors Eric S. Mankowski and Kenneth I. Maton, analyze four main themes: "Men as gendered beings, the privilege and damage of being a masculine man, men as a privileged group, and men’s power and subjective powerlessness. " The second and fourth themes are described as paradoxes that have created difficulty in efforts to analyze and understand men’s gender and masculinity." However, the point of view of masculinity that Perry raises in population 485 has a different aspect.
The figure of the ‘new lad’ has been a feature of popular culture in the United Kingdom, United States, and elsewhere since the early 1990s. In the book, The Trouble with Men: Masculinities in European and Hollywood Cinema, the author relates to Nick Hornby’s, a screenwriter and English novelist, thoughts on lads. He states that there are two versions of the modern male that have anxieties between the two main constructions of contemporary masculinity: New man and New Lad (Phil Powrie 2004, pp.84). By the start of the twentieth century, the word ‘masculinity’ was always associated with the word ‘crisis’; this is now portrayed in ‘lad flicks’. Masculinity is the central object of contemporary ‘lad flicks’; they combine different genre elements to focus specifically on difficulties that face contemporary masculinity. The male characters in these films...
... Macduff, was able to figure out that Macbeth was behind the murders. He went to England to get help from King Edward to overthrow Macbeth. When he gets back to Scotland he confronts Macbeth and then kills him. The truth of his acts caught up with him and he got what he deserved. This play is a prime example of why people need to think about the reality of their actions and think about how it will affect them in the future.
Over time, the image of men has changed. This is due mostly to the relaxation of rigid stereotypical roles of the two genders. In different pieces of literature, however, men have been presented as the traditional dominate figure, the provider and rule maker or non-traditional figure that is almost useless and unimportant unless needed for sexual intercourse. This dramatic difference can either perpetuate the already existing stereotype or challenge it. Regardless of the differences, both seem to put men into a negative connotation.
Smith, Jeff, and Chloe Beighley. "Normalizing Male Dominance: Gender Representation in 2012 Films." Grand Rapids Institute for Information Democracy. N.p., 12 Feb. 2013. Web. 1 Apr. 2014.
In 1971 on June 17, President Richard Nixon delivered a special message to the Congress on drug abuse prevention and control. During the presentation, Nixon made it clear that the United States was at war with this idea of drug abuse. What baffled Americans then, and still baffles Americans today, is that we are at war with our own nation with drugs; it is not some foreign affair like the media tends to focus on with Mexico. Nixon stated that at the time of his speech, what was implemented to control drug abuse was not working…“The problem has assumed the dimensions of a national emergency. I intend to take every step necessary to deal with this emergency, including asking the Congress for an amendment to my 1972 budget to provide an additional $155 million to carry out these steps. This will provide a total of $371 million for programs to control drug abuse in America.”(Wolleey and Peters) Since the publicizing of the term “War on Drugs” in 1971, it has been used by many political candidates in elections over the years. In the movie, it was stated, “ every war begins with propaganda …[and] the war on drugs has never been actually on drugs… [Additionally] drug laws are shaped less by scientific facts, but more by political [reasoning].” (Jarecki) The movie, The House I Live In, directly relates to certain themes and terminology that were discussed in Martin and Nakayama’s Intercultural Communication in Contexts book, that have been used in class. Through the analyzing and comparing of The House I Live In and Intercultural Communication in Contexts an individual can begin to localize the ideals behind this everlasting war on drugs; some ideals focus on terms from the text like ethnocentrism, diversity training, and culture while ...
Throughout life individuals face many challenges testing their values and personality one situation at a time. In the evocative novel The Outsiders by S.E. Hinton themes of growing up and innocence are shown. Ponyboy is not your average 14 year old he is part of a gang known to many as the Greasers. He encounters many situations testing his values and beliefs. Having lost both his parents recently he and his brothers stick together like a true family but this relationship is tested when Darry hits Ponyboy. He also experiences the loss several close friends in a very short period of time. Throughout this novel, Ponyboy encounters many life changing experiences that prove he is a dynamic character.
Fight Club is not about winning or losing. Paul Palahniuk’s Fight Club is about the issues of masculinity in our modern capitalist society. It is a novel about men who resist conforming to what society defines as masculine. In our present day culture, men are presented with the ideal form of masculinity that they are expected to achieve such as being successful in the work place, going to the gym, and grooming yourself to look attractive. The unnamed narrator of the story undergoes an identity crisis, which is a result of capitalism; he struggles to find himself by going through various support groups before finally attending Fight Club. The consumer driven society has replaced the traditional values of masculinity, which creates conflicts and becomes the catalyst for Fight club: a place to re-masculinize through physical combat.
"How Fight Club Relates to Men's Struggles with Masculinity and Violence in Contemporary Culture." HubPages. Web. 22 Feb. 2011. .
Ruddell, Caroline. "Virility and vulnerability, splitting and masculinity in Fight Club: a tale of contemporary male identity issues." Extrapolation 48.3 (2007): 493+. Literature Resource Center. Web. 9 Dec. 2013.
Although neither take a significant role in the novel, Jack and Leon Tallis are critical starting points to understanding the expectations of masculinity. Beginning with Jack Tallis, we are not told outright, but it seems masculinity includes being the provider for the family, even if that means long nights away from the home. Emily has come to expect the “phone call from the department to say that Mr. Tallis had to work late and had to stay up in town” (96). But, this also implies Jack Tallis is having an affair, suggesting being involved with multiple women and sexual superiority is a right of those claiming masculinity. From the example set forth by Leon, readers can also assume the “gift of avoiding responsibility” and the ability to “float free” is also bestowed upon men if they so desire it as an option (96). From this limited view of masculinity readers are shown both freedom and power as key
From well-respected Director Craig Ross, the film Blue Hill Avenue is a story about four tight knit friends living in the streets of rough a 1980’s Boston. The main characters of the film are Tristan, E Bone, Simon, and Money, these four characters grow up together hustling the streets. After finding a way to make money the four characters go from small time hustlers to big time dope dealers under the guidance of their supplier, Benny who is the main villain of the film. Through the adventure of the storyline, these four friends highlight the characteristics of what it is to embrace traditional masculinity and what it is to be a man.
The narrator is emasculated in many ways from; his addiction to consumer products, work life, spirit animal, and Tyler Durden. In the novel the Narrator is a consumerist and has the common issue of his things owning him. “The addictions and afflictions of the male characters in Fight Club are directly connected to the film 's interest and investment in the 'disenfranchising ' and 'emasculating ' effects of late capitalist consumer society on masculine identities” (Iocco, Melissa). His insomnia turns out to control his life, causing him to turn to the support group “Remaining Men Together” where he copes with these terminal victims. The Narrator is shown by Tyler Durden that his job is an emasculating factor that he does the same thing over and over again, and that his job sucks. “The men who participate are, apparently, attracted to Fight Club because it allows them to get away from the drudgery and repetition of work life, satisfying a desire to experience something ‘real’ ”(Iocco, Michelle). In the Narrator’s power trips he witnesses his spirit animal is a Penguin. His power animal states his weakness of masculinity, puny and harmless. His power animal explains the Narrator’s life before Tyler and Fight Club. Tyler Durden shows up and the narrator is still overshadowed by him, belittling him more and more through Marla Singer, because Marla is turned on
“How much can you know about yourself if you have never been in a fight?” asked Tyler Durden as he pleads to get hit in the face? Notably, the book Fight Club shows the late 20th century man feel emasculate due to how society has evolved overtime, and eventually tries to regain his manhood in a violent and powerful fashion. The unnamed narrator in Fight Club characterizes with these types of men. His alter ego Tyler Durden helps the narrator identify his masculinity and how society has affected it. They both go through a passage of manhood that includes the formation of Fight Club and later on Project Mayhem, the narrator regains his masculinity by brawling strangers, and later on by causing anarchy. Fight Club shows how much empowerment men use to have, and how the loss of that has men feeling less masculine.