Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of technology on modern police
The emergence of community policing in the United States
Impact of technology on modern police
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of technology on modern police
Police Practices and Operations Paper
Introduction
The nature of policing from the local, state, and federal are changing in the 21st century. As crime has evolved and gotten more sophisticated so as law enforcement. Especially in a post 9/11 world of emerging threats of terrorism, law enforcement had to adapt and overcome. They had to change their underlying model of how they operate in the communities they serve. The law enforcement in the past 2 years have been embracing new technology to be more proficient at reducing crime and being more responsive to the needs of the community the operate in as well. This paper will focus on new operational methods that police agencies are using in the 21st century. Also cover the current trends that
…show more content…
A system that can be flexible and tailored to the communities they operate in. Public Safety and law enforcement needs vary within the USA from rural police agencies to big city police departments like the NYPD. The solution that arose is COPPS which is short for Community Policing and Problem Solving model (COPPS) ("The Traditional, Bureaucratic Policing Model And The Contemporary Model Of The Community Policing Era", 2013). This model took a decentralized approach where police offices were put in store fronts and shopping centers to have a more visible approach than the standard precinct model. This allowed to deliver police services to a broader population and increase visibility to the community ("The Traditional, Bureaucratic Policing Model And The Contemporary Model Of The Community Policing Era", 2013). This also allowed more proactive policing strategies that could leverage technology and the latest cutting edge techniques, more on that later. Another added benefit is that local police that adopted this model were seen as a viable partner with the neighborhood or community which could establish trust and better relations. This leads to better intelligence and tips that helps reduce the overall crime. Even within the police agency this forced administrators to change their leadership style from a dictatorial style …show more content…
Using the same social media platform as a way to keep a finger on the pulse of the community which can prevent riots in distressed communities. Another powerful tool is body cameras or ‘cop cams’ which has already changed the dynamic of policing in communities. This adds an extra layer of accountability in police/public interactions. Be a boon to large metro police departments in recent wake of victim shootings by police. May offer a clear cut perspective in shooting victim cases that are questionable at best (Stanley, 2015). Reduce the number of wrongful death lawsuits which can drain the coffers of police departments that could be spent on better training and equipment for law enforcement (Stanley, 2015). Aid the police officer in searches and routine traffic stops where the body camera is an impartial witness (Stanley, 2015). As computing gone mobile so will policing where the leveraging of smart mobile devices from tablets, IPads, and smartphones (Peet, 2013). Policing will become app based with databases, search warrants, or issuing a simple citation can be done from one’s fingertips. This will help untether police from their patrol cruisers and help them better interact with the community at large. If technology in whatever form isn’t abused can be a powerful measure to radically change how small and large police
A, Braga & D, Weisburd. 'Police Innovation and Crime Prevention: Lessons Learned from Police Research over the Past 20 Years'. Paper presented at the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) Policing Research Workshop: Planning for the future, Washington, DC. 2006. p. 22.
There are topics brought up about the incident in Ferguson and other police shootings that did or did not have body cams. There have been talks in communities about trying to reduce the police misconducts in the communities and the workplace. It is proven that officers who didn’t wear body cams had 2 times the illegal use of force incidents. This article will help me prove further that body cameras being worn will help reduce so many incidents, not saying all incidents
Marques, O. (2013, October 7). Police Operations [Lecture]. SSCI 1000 Introduction to Criminal Justice. University of Ontario Institute of Technology. Retrieved November 18, 2013
According to Kelling, Pate, Dieckman, & Brown (1974), patrol is the “backbone” of police work. This belief is based around the premise that the mere presence of police officers on patrol prohibits criminal activity. Despite increasing budgets and the availability of more officers on the streets, crime rates still rose with the expanding metropolitan populations (Kelling et al., 1974). A one year experiment to determine the effectiveness of routine preventive patrol would be conducted, beginning on the first day of October 1972, and ending on the last day of September 1973.
Describe the various "styles of policing" discussed in this chapter. Which do you think are the most popular today? Which do you think are the most effective? Due Date March 11, 2005
By approaching these ideas with solid research goals and planning, researchers have come up with two basic crime fighting strategies that can increase police effectiveness. The first strategy Community Policing, which addresses immedia...
Police Body Cameras Due to devastating events that have occurred between policemen and civilians, law enforcements find it liable for police officers to be fitted with body cameras. In doing so it is thought to bring an increase in trust in the community, reduce brutality and crime, as well as elucidate good cops still around. I feel body cameras will bring more awareness to police departments when it comes to the honesty in their staff’s actions when they are unsupervised. They can be used as hard evidence in courtrooms, to help make the correct judgment on the situation in question.
This era is where the shift from a centralized task force has gravitated to a decentralized task force, causing some friction from both the community and the officers that serve it. Police are told that they are needed to listen to the concerns for the community; however, law enforcement is still the primary goal. Police forces now have to defend the values for which the forces were built upon. The idea of problem solving has come into question with police discretion towards certain run-ins with the law. Williams and Murphy argue it is due to the lack of sensitivity from minorities and the concern on crime itself than the community. Kelling and Moore contradict Williams and Murphy, with Kelling/Moore suggesting the era is more about listening to concerns of the community and improving the citizen satisfaction. But both the article came to the conclusion of the silent underlying problems that are becoming more of a “quiet riot” with the police and the
There have been lots of modern technologies introduced in the United States of America to assist law enforcement agencies with crime prevention. But the use of body-worn cameras by police personnel brings about many unanswered questions and debate. Rising questions about the use of body cam are from concern citizens and law enforcement personnel. In this present day America, the use body cameras by all law enforcement personnel and agencies are one of the controversial topics being discussed on a daily base. Body worn cameras were adopted due to the alleged police brutality cases: for instance, the case of Michael Brown, an African-American who was shot and killed by a police officer in Ferguson, Missouri, on August 2014, Eric Garner died as a result of being put in a chokehold by a New York police officer, and John Crawford, shot and killed by a police officer at a Walmart in Beavercreek, Ohio.
Law enforcement officers make an oath to serve and protect, and they are expected to uphold this oath to the best of their ability, but recently there has been an increase in the number of civilian deaths at the hands of law enforcement. Since the rise in this alarming trend, public distrust of law enforcement officials is at an all-time high. This has caused the public to demand the use of body worn cameras be made mandatory. Some people argue that imposing this new technology can cause unintended problems such as, violating privacy laws or interfering with how police interact with the public. However, these concerns can be easily solved once more policies are created to guideline usage. High profile
Thesis: By implementing Body cameras there will be more effective ways to monitor police activity the ability to protect civilians and law officials will greatly increase. Today I would like to share more with everyone the huge issue police brutality plays in our society and hopefully by the end of my speech you will want police officers to wear mandatory body cameras as well.
Reformers wanted to stray away from political influences and believed that policing should be in the control of police executives (Peak, 2015). While the Political era’s goal was social services, the Reform Era began to shift policing to controlling crime. In addition, the police organizations were reorganized through the study of scientific theory of administration advocated by Fredrick Taylor, which led to the development of maximizing police efficiency (Peak, 2015). To improve professionalism within police departments, O.W. Wilson began emulating what J. Edgar Hoover did with the FBI. In 1924, the FBI director began to raise eligibility standards to develop an incorruptible force. As a result, it had a direct influence on local police agencies by placing emphasis on education, training, honesty and professionalism. Professionalism in police departments came about in the form of new Technological advances and a focus on crime fighting. During this period there were three major advances in technology: two-way radio, police cars and the telephone. Unlike the problems faced during the political era, the advent of these technologies changed everything. With two-way radios, supervisors now had the capability to notify patrol officers of calls and maintain accountability. Patrol cars allowed for greater mobility, which led to officers responding to calls more efficiently. Then telephones allowed for citizens to have a direct line to the police and were encouraged to call for any problem. However, while the advances in technology greatly increased police efficiency, it had unexpected consequences. In contrast, during the political era, officers patrolled on foot, which allowed them to engage citizens and develop a relationship within the community. With the use of police cars, officers no
make police work more effective and efficient. Hanser and Gomila (2015) noted, “The criminal justice system does not operate in a social vacuum; rather, it is directly impacted by this sense of rapid and continual cultural change” (p. 7). In light of globalization, law enforcement organizations must change the way it operates in a world where criminal activities and terrorism are more geographically diverse and sophisticated.
Technology over the years has improved in the criminal justice system. Ever since the 1960s criminal justice systems have used technology to advance and gain a better knowledge of the different issues and encounters officers may face. Technology is used to improve the day-to-day operations, decrease operation cost and increase strategic planning and tactical approaches.
Throughout the years, technology has been increasing in both good and bad ways. Technology is now being used to contact people through social media, link people together through group chats, and also spy on people. Although connecting with people instantly on social media is the upside to technology usage, people often tend to share private information that can be used in the wrong way which is the downside of technology. As both technology and crime increases, technology usage is now being increased to help solve crimes. Many years ago, without the usage of technology, many aspects of a crime was not questioned or the resources to uncover certain evidence were both time consuming and/or expensive. The Police Chief Magazine list many technological improvements that have been put in place to