Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Whether celebrities have their privacy
Whether celebrities have their privacy
Celebrities deserve privacy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Whether celebrities have their privacy
Privacy for Mental and Physical Health
The recent Celebrity 4chan hack that released hundreds of private photos of celebrities has called into question the ethics of the paparazzi and created a controversy on Celebrity privacy. With the Internet full of gossip columns and tabloids that cover every aspect of celebrity’s lives, from interviews and exclusive photos to stars caught with no make-up on or walking their children to school it creates questions about privacy. Is there a line where some information should never be exposed? What can the public not see? Perhaps the most important question of all, Do celebrities have a right to privacy? I would say yes; celebrities have a right to privacy for their mental and physical well-being, and having the privacy most celebrities desire would be easier if there wasn’t a market for tabloids.
In this controversy some celebrities and columnists accept that publicity comes with the job and fully accept the perks and the drawbacks of being famous. Though it should be noted that some celebrities, have accepted the public attention but feel like their children are out of bounds. Another opinion is yes, celebrities deserve privacy they are humans too. Celebrities are “just like us,” as so many tabloids like to point out; they do their grocery shopping, they pump their own gas. They are just like everyone else
…show more content…
In Spears’s case a string events led up to her rechecking into rehab in 2007. Some of these events included the paparazzi getting pictures of Britney driving in her car with her child on her lap then escalated to the paparazzi getting multiple “crotch shot” pictures of up Spears’s skirt. It got to a point where Britney Spears was constantly followed paparazzi and it wasn’t until, after Britney shaved her head, went to rehab, and took an umbrella to a paparazzi’s car that the public started to question Britney’s need for
Celebrities like acting and singing for the public, but it does not mean fame is really their thing. Celebrities sometimes just like acting because it is what they like and want privacy. During an interview with Today, an American talk show, the popular actor Johnny Depp was interviewed and according to Liat Kornowski, Deputy Director of Growth and Analytics, The Huffington Post, he mention that being famous is like being a fugitive when he stated, “...and then you start to realize that for the past 10 or 15 years you've been going into restaurants through the back door, scurrying along greasy floors, trying to get to some private room. It's not unlike living like a fugitive." Johnny Depp likes his career, but might not appreciate that he needs to hide from paparazzi and can not take his children to take a walk to the park or the streets because of cameras following him almost every public place he goes. Many celebrities have the same opinion as Johnny Depp when people do not give celebrities the privacy to enjoy a day out with their children and family for one day with no one bothering them. When people say that celebrities are rude it can be because the celebrities do not want attention drawn to their child. Celebrities can have all the fancy clothes and pay hundreds of dollars on it but should
The question of paparazzi threatening privacy and First Amendment rights is often to situational to argue in a conventional manner, but certainly there are many facets of the issue which can be addressed in a quite straightforward manner. Celebrities who feel they have the right to privacy in public places often muddy the waters of this issue. Oddly enough, those celebrities who have chosen to speak out against what they feel are violations of their privacy most always begin their campaigns with a large press conference. In other words, they gather together those people they wish to not only suppress but also berate in hopes that these people will use their positions and skills to carry these celebrity's messages to the public. Is often seems that theses celebrities want it "both ways" in that they appreciate coverage when they have a movie, record, or book coming out, but not at any other time.
...uld be justifiable to emphasize that a good number of them find it sickening to miss the limelight. . Nonetheless, it goes without mentioning that celebrities get exploited because some gossip stories explore the things that would otherwise be considered to be private.
This obsession with celebrities i belave is one of the largest problems facing america today. and if the situation does not get under control our country will soon be completely lost in the drama and hysteria that is our celebrity obsessions.
...drug addict. Thus, what seems more likely is that in the future, the media would be more careful in choosing a celebrity for exposition to the public and the celebrity would in no time chose to go to the court regarding any information that they did not want to make public and has been publicized. References Lubbock, Mark (2003) "I Want to Be Alone" -the Naomi Campbell Cases. Information Technology Briefing Cozens, Claire, 'Weak' Campbell case offers no media safeguard, claims lawyer, Tuesday October 15, 2002, Guardian Unlimited, http://media.guardian.co.uk/pressprivacy/story/0,7525,811913,00.html “Naomi Campbell wins privacy case”, March 28, 2002, CNN.com, http://www.cnn.com/2002/SHOWBIZ/News/03/27/england.campbell/ “A Defeat For Naomi Campbell, A Victory For Privacy?” 18 October 2002, Legal Commentary, http://www.legalday.co.uk/lexnex/simkins/simkins181002a.htm
The public has been able to have access into celebrities’ private lives thanks to the “paparazzi”. Definitely, celebrities will always be in front of the camera. It comes with the frame. Nevertheless, it does not justify photographing the lives of people at the expense of their privacy. Society always wants to keep an eye on their favorite celebrities’ lives.
Due to her struggle with abusing amphetamines and fighting for custody of her children, Britney Spears has a major meltdown in 2007. This meltdown, including her shaving her head of her hair so no one would be able to test her for drugs, led to Britney attacking paparazzi, which changed the public’s view of Britney Spears. Her actions in 2007 made her seem like not only a star gone wild, but a bad mother.
In addition, if someone was fallowing you, taking pictures and bullying you every day single day, you would instantly report them to the police and they would without a doubt get the stalkers arrested, and they would get a restraining order. But if a celebrity calls the cops saying that there is someone following them and harassing them, no one is willing to protect them, because they are not able to stop the paparazzi for good. It 's like all celebrities are being punished for being rich and successful. Nobody deserves
After observing and researching all the sources portraying celebrities I have came into a conclusion that todays society it seems like all we want is to be accepted and we tend to look at other people and judge. Its not right, we all are different and thats what makes the world go round. It would be a pretty boring world if we were all the same. Celebrities deal with this everyday, I think the paparazzi know more about some celebrities lives than they actually do. They judge them for who they are and what they do, it is not right nor fair.
Paparazzi has made a huge impact in almost everyone's lives. People can see it everyday, from favorite news channel to social websites. People also tend see it in magazines, and in some rare cases entire books. Without it, celebrities wouldn't be nearly as famous as they are today. The intensity of it varies from place to place. For example, France is well known to respects the lives of celebrities and their kids, while other places like Hollywood try to even make conflict with them. (“What is Paparazzi?”) Media attention can affect everyone's life from celebrities and their families to ourselves.
Much of today’s society seems obsessed on what actors/actress, athletes, and music artist are wearing, eating, who they are marrying, dating, where they are vacationing, what affairs they are having or have had, and how they live their everyday lives. What’s so interesting about this obsession is as a society we are implacable and often place celebrities on a pedestal, only to destroy them when they are illusive or promiscuous. Media outlets are swift to report when celebrities are in trouble but quickly forget all their accomplishments. It’s as if we want them to be perfect but once they are associated with a scandal we embark on destroying their reputation and character. Should society hold celebrities to higher standards just because they are paid millions for endorsements and a craft they worked hard to perfect? Do we as a society have the right to castigate celebrities when they misbehave? Do celebrities have the right to become livid when they are focused on for their immoral behavior? Do they love the media attention only when it benefits them? Before we can answer the above questions, would we, furthermore, can we live our life as a celebrity if given the opportunity?
For example, an ex-reality television star Heidi Montag from the popular reality television show called ‘The Hills’, she and her husband Spencer Pratt have supposedly called gossip magazines on what is going on with their lives and supposedly their truth on what really happened between Montag and Montag’s ex best friend Lauren Conrad a famous fashion designer. A writer named Jamie E. Nordhaus wrote a book called Celebrities’ Right to Privacy: How Far Should the Paparazzi Be Allowed to go, Nordhaus talks about how celebrities use the media for ‘free publicity’, they always want to get their 15 minutes of fame and want the world to know who they are. Usually their ‘publicity stunt’ that they use can sometimes bring them to higher places or sometimes just leave them where they are now. Nordhaus establishes that, “An argument exists that if celebrities expect to use the press for their personal gain, they should expect to be used by the press in return” (Nordhaus 307). In other words, Nordhaus believes that if the celebrity shouldn’t act dumb pretending that they don’t know that they are using
Should celebrities have their right to privacy? Before newspapers, television, and the internet, ordinary people were not exposed to endless stories about celebrities. Today however, we are bombarded with information about who is dating whom, where they eat, and what they wear from magazines such as People, Entertainment Weekly, and Star. Also, most ordinary people respect the rights of others to a private life. However, some people are just obsessed to get information out of celebrities.
When it comes to the topic of should the private lives of famous people be off limits to the media, most of us will readily agree that no private life should be entirely off limits. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of how the media always finds their way into the life of the artist. Whereas some are convinced that the media should not interfere into the private lives of the celebrity, others maintain that because even if they make a lot of fans happy, they can always live a life of loneliness. I agree that the private lives of a famous person should be off limits to the media because they might have everything in the world but underneath all that they might be living their life melancholy and loneliness.
The term paparazzi is defined as a freelance photographer, usually one who takes candid pictures of celebrities for publication. The term originated from the surname of the 1959 Federico film, La Dolce Vita. Now, the connotation that arises from the word “paparazzi” is much stronger than just a freelance photographer. The paparazzi are annoying, persistent photographers who, in essence, stalk their celebrity victims and go to any length necessary to get the photograph they desire. But, the paparazzi are doing their job to please the public. Paparazzi tend to target celebrities that fascinate the public; the public’s obsession encourages the paparazzi in their pursuit. The public never calls out the paparazzi for invading the celebrities’ privacy; they only call them out when harm or threats come to the celebrity (Nordhaus 286).