Y: I appreciate that you compare Cedric Price with the other architects about concept and design; I Have some questions about your simulation, I think it is interesting and based on some thought about
Y: I have some questions about your simulation, actually this kind simulation is quite interesting, I understand it is based on some thought of Cedric Price, but I am wondering why you did this? I think if you conduct with this kind of simulation, you want to verify some concept about Cedric Price, I am not so convinced what is verified? what was confirmed? Could you explain the relation between this simulation and his formal work (his original design)
T: explain the simulation. compare what is Cedric Price's work and immediate feedback, ....
Y: If the Cedric Price said the qualitative feedback is quite important, maybe you will devise the numbers or the frequency of the feedback that if you can should some instance feedback case is better perform than the other cases, than probably that can be the verification of your state. So if you have those kinds of relationship than I can understand why the rather one is so important and how they are related. Science that kind of relationship is missing for my opinion, so I am a little bit pazzd that of the feedback will show should take
Ima: I think your computer code is so interesting that can make many beautiful drawings.
Maybe you have found Cedric Price's concept had related to some kinds of computational design, so I think your originality is that you found the Cedric Price's thinking relate to computational design, but I feel some problem about that your simulation whether it is correct or incorrect, it is a mystery. How do you estimate that your program is correct or incorrec...
... middle of paper ...
...inacy idea in their work, and bring that idea to apply in the architecture, because we need some examples.
Now it is meaningful to see Price's projects in terms of contemporary architectural method, Cedric Price's limitation is using the temporary objects as his method, however, now sustainability or duration are the key words for architecture, it is changing at the same time continue, in the contract, Price emphasis on the temporary architecture. How do you think about that?
In Professor Ohno's common, because the projects didn't realized in the physical world only existent as a system, so in your literature review you mentioned about the multiple interaction and muli-agent- system, can the agents contribute to the culture, history and sociality? if you can explored more in that aspect, that will be even better for the thesis in the real design investments.
So rational engagement with architecture is a more effective means to comprehend and understand architectural form.
In this paper I will present two differing views on the topic of the design argument. In particular, I will explain William Paley's view supporting the design argument and Bertrand Russell's view against the design argument. After a presentation of the differing views, I will then evaluate the arguments to show that William Paley has a stronger argument.
“Form follows function.” Every great Modern architect thought, designed by and breathed these very words. Or at least, their design principles evolved from them. Modern architects Le Corbusier, Mies van der Rohe, Frank Lloyd Wright, Pierre Chareau, and Rudolf Schindler to name a few believed that the function determined the space whether the space was solely for a particular purpose or they overlapped to allow for multiple uses. Form didn’t just follow function, function defined the space. By focusing on the relationship between the architecture and the interior elements, Chareau’s Maison de Verre expanded the idea of functionalism to include not only the architecture but also the space it creates and how people function within that space.
Baudrillard, Jean. "Simulacra and Simulations." Jean Baudrillard, Selected Writings, ed Mark Poster. Stanford University Press, 1998, pp.166-184.
The later computational model WEAVER++ was put forward by Levelt, Roelofs, and Meeyer (1999) derived from Lefvelt (1989).
In order to create innovative public architecture, considered to be the most civic, costly, time intensive and physical of the arts, the project holds a degree of risk, strife, and negotiation . Overcoming these tasks and creating worthy public architecture is a challenge designers try to accomplish, but are rarely successful. The people involved in a potential public building, can be larger than the building itself. Public architecture tries to please all, even the doubters and critics, but because of the all these factors, a building is closer to failing than succeeding.
In the final lecture of the bigger picture Elly Ward discusses the idea of morality in architecture. What I found particually relavant to buchlis talk was her view on the power of suggestion. She asked if we...
During the college, Structure Systems course drew my attention towards the relationship between architecture and technology. I remember that I chose Walt Disney Concert Hall building as a case study for an assignment in this course, and I was impressed by the impact of the computer technology on the design of the building, and how the architect “Frank Gehry” used technology to transform his Incomprehensible sketches to real buildings. Since then, my objective centered on integrating technology in my designs and my researches in spite of all criticism I faced and still face. This objective was applied firstly on my undergraduate thesis where I wanted to emphasize the impact of technology on mass composing phase of the design concept. At the beginning, the thesis was acclaimed by many members of the Evaluation Committee, but it received a lot of praise at the end. Even during my career experience in the National Consulting Bureau, I attempt many times to login technology in my works, but the efforts failed because of the avoidance of building unusual and uncommon designs by local people and government. Consequently, I returned to the traditional style in the design for locals while used my creativity in the participation in the international...
In general, modern architecture is characterized by the simplification of form and the creation of ornaments from structures and themes of buildings. As stated by US General Service administration (2003), it is a term applied to an overarching movement, with its exact definition and scope varying widely [US General Service administration (2003)]. Form follows function is a famous principle associated with the modern architecture as well as industrial designs of 20th century. This principle stated that the shape of a building or object should primarily be based upon its intended function or purpose. This particular essay going to illustrate the following questions from historical and contextual basis. How did Louis H. Sullivan’s “form follows function” turn out to be the fundamental concept of modernist architecture? What did drive Louis H. Sullivan to construct his famous philosophy “Form follows function”? From different perspective to argue that question, it will be considered whether “form follows function” was the fundamental concept of modern architecture or not. To argue with that, understanding about the philosophy “form follows function” and modernist architecture is necessary.
According to recent David Fisher’s Dynamic Tower, as it appears for many years all the buildings were stable, but nowadays for example, David Fisher’s Dynamic Tower is a new thinking for future architecture. The rotating tower shows three main futuristic patterns or revolutions. The first revolutionary is about it’s shape, which changes it’s look continuously, and with this each floor rotates distinctly. The second revolution that the Dynamic Tower brings is the system of construction, beside the concrete use, the tower is made of prefabricated unites ,including flooring water piping air conditioning , this units made of steel, aluminum, carbon fiber also other modern materials. The third revolution is came with joining technology with environment (The Dynamic Team, 2014). “Time is the most powerful dimension of our lives. All our life depends on time," states Fisher. "Today's life is dynamic, so the space we are living in should be dynamic as well, adjustable to our needs that change continuously, to our concept of design and to our mood," he states, in a media publication. Buck...
The computer model that was developed by three intellectual chemists is not only about chemistry. Without help from quantum physics and advanced computer technology, the computer would not have been created. These studies allowed the chemists to simulate small and large molecules. With this research information, it is arguable that the computer has become more important in the research of chemistry.
Though architecture is seen to play only a small part of human lives, when the society is considered at large, it becomes very useful for human needs such as shelter, social function, technology, art, economics, politics, science and more . According to Adam (2008), this explains why architecture can be viewed as a mirror to society. For this purpose, architects try to link architectural designs to analyse the
Architecture is a unique process that involves many problem-solving abilities, thus it is more than a beautifully designed aesthetic presentation. It not only encompasses, but far surpasses many basic elements of design as it factors in human behavior, economics, geography and many other crucial challenges. All of these elements are integrated together to create a systematic and functional form.
... architectures would led to a more organic organization beneficial to the people that choose to make their lives in this city. Although this model of a sustainable city is not a perfectly closed loop, it lays the foundation for one that is. Over time, with constantly evolving and improving technology and new methods of design from the scale of products to buildings, the gaps in the loop could be closed, and a “true” sustainable city could be fully realized.
However, the undeniable fact that the architect designs with acquired beliefs and experiences in his/her life, results in the building having attributes to subjectivity its architect. By reading any written work, we are slightly introduced to the world of its writer, in such manner buildings can also perform as a dialogue between the architect and its users, which should be read to understand the designs objectives. The architectural creation is not made out of nothing, and consciously or unconsciously the designer uses forms from history-effective consciousness, not necessarily buildings of the past, resulting in a dialogue between forms. The progressive forms can relate and communicate to its users by this dialogue, only spoken directly through the context that they reside in and their surrounding