More handpicked essays just for you.
Political aspects of the American Revolution
Political aspects of the American Revolution
Corruption in politics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Revolution always finds a way to stir up society. One fact that is always predictable about revolution is that it will bring change, whether good or bad. Lack of sovereignty, corruption, and inequality between social classes are and has been the main causes of revolution. Revolution is a change in the way the government functions. One of the most known revolutions is the American Revolution, where Americans fought for their independence against Great Britain. Even if it may risk some lives revolution will try to attain a more equal and enhanced life for the community.
Currently Brazil is going through an economic crisis. The government is abusing its powers, important political figures are accepting bribes, and economic corruption is
…show more content…
all unlashing in this South American country. An estimated of $3 billion in bribes were paid to Petrobas executives who shared their new wealth with political figures, which was all part of a complex scheme. Petrobas is the government-controlled oil company. Now street protests are being organized to dispute the demonstration of corruption and wasteful government spending. There is also a rebellion group led by some of the figures that are jumbled up in these corruption scandals that are trying to impeach the current president, Mrs. Dilma Rousseff. It won’t be such an easy task because this rebellious group has been trying to prevent inspection on their own affairs. At this moment there is no proof that the president was tied between the briberies, and a declining economy is not an impeachable offense, so at the moment the court is investigating to find evidence against the president. Being passed on from Ukraine and now to Russia the majority of the Crimean Tatars are not happy with the outcome. Before Crimea was passed on to Russia most Crimean Tatars wanted to be a part of Russia, but now they are regretting that decision. During summer the prime minister, Sergei Aksyonov, of Crimea went to a public beach where protesters were complaining about life under Russian rule. They have been waiting to be liberated from Ukraine, but being under Russian rule made it from bad to worse. Government corruption, freedom of speech and assembly getting taken away from them, ineptitude, and venality are all reasons that frustrate most of the Crimean Tatars. They have also been isolated from other countries in the way that cell phone signals drop and credit cards from other countries do not work. Other Crimean Tatars disagree and feel now being a part of Russia was a good idea because now they feel safe. The moment Turkey allowed the U.S. for help to fight against ISIS it sent off a bomb to some Turkish citizens. They did not approve the idea of having the U.S. “invade their territory”. “Our struggle will continue until imperialism and its collaborators leave our country and every parcel of our homeland is cleared of U.S. bases,” the group said in a statement on its website,” (To Many in Crimea, Corruption Seems No Less At Home Under Russian Rule New York Times). Monday the tenth of August attackers opened fire outside the United States Consulate. This was one of four incidents that occurred on Monday. Luckily, no police officers were injured in the attack, but this group isn’t ready to give up until they get what they want. They were part of the anti-American Revolutionary People’s Liberating Party-Front and the Kurdistan Worker’s Party, or P.K.K. After having an ongoing rebellion for more than three decades the government views the P.K.K. as a threat. The increase in violence also comes from political instability after the national elections that took place June seventh. All of these three articles show that actions do speak louder than words, but sometimes there’s a little bit more action than needed.
When the population feels held down by unfair restrictions in society, religion, the economy, or the government they will try to find away to get rid of these limitations to feel equal amongst the community. Sometimes the government only worries on how the outcome will affect them in a situation and do not worry about the people’s need, which frustrates the community so they set up protest and revolts, and sometimes may even attack. In Turkey, Brazil, and Crimea all are struggling through rough times with corrupt governments. In both Crimea and Brazil the political figures are getting arrested on corrupt charges or not doing all the work that needs to be done. When government funds reveal that the money is missing from these funds because some of the cabinet members decided to take the money for their own good, it puts the community to question the …show more content…
government. At first the population of these three countries thought that they were making the right decision in political leaders, little did they know how much these wrong decisions would affect them. In all three countries the inhabitants feel like they are undergoing through situations that they do not feel comfortable with. For example, Turkey does not welcome the U.S. with warm hands, in Brazil the people do not feel comfortable having Mrs. Rousseff as their president, and in Crimea there freedom of speech and most human rights are getting taken away from them in the blink of an eye. Brazilian protesters and the P.K.K. don’t have the cleanest record. The P.K.K. have had an ongoing battle with the Turkish government for over decades and has done malicious acts. While on the other hand some of the Brazilian protestors have been involved in some corruption scandals. This comes to show that the government isn’t always the one that makes the mistakes. Sometimes the society causes the corruption on itself. Governments can be as cunning as fox hiding its secrets or real intentions away from society. In Crimea they brainwashed the community by enforcing them that life would be better in Russia and in Brazil the government kept their $3 billion scheme all between political figures and Petrobas executives. Even though all three events fall under the same category of revolution, their reasons to why that may be are different.
To start of, there are different types of reasons why revolts and protests commence. For example, Crimea is fighting for their rights, better connection, and to break the ice from nearby countries. Brazil does not feel that their government officials are to be trusted, due to previous scandals. While Turkey feels that the U.S. is invading their country and controlling it; there is lack of self-government. Even though the U.S. is only trying to fight against ISIS not with the Turkish people. Turkey also takes the leading hand by expressing more violence than the other two countries. As Brazil’s economy can’t get any worse, the public has spoken and is now trying to impeach their current president Mrs. Dilma Rousseff. The inhabitants of these countries are not only fighting for what they believe in, but they are also fighting for what is right.
Revolution is an ongoing theme that happens throughout history and will happen in the near future. There is no such thing as a perfect government, but there is a way to get there. Society should communicate more with each other, people shouldn’t always try to be sneaky when doing business because that may lead to fraud, etc. which may lead to corruption and a false economy. But as long as there’s some sort of revolution there is going to be change for the
people.
While the Brazilian Revolution emerged largely from the influence of the American Revolution, some variation remains between those two revolutions in exactly how those revolutions were executed and what the reasons for them were.
According to Webster’s Online Dictionary, revolution is “a sudden, radical or complete change.” During the early settlement of the British colonies, settlers became so culturally different from those in Great Britain that they already seemed to be their own country. This is what John Adams meant in saying, “What do we mean by the Revolution? The war? That was no part of the Revolution; it was only an effect and consequence of it. The Revolution was in the minds of the people… years before a drop of blood was shed at Lexington.” In fact, the revolution began years before the colonists began to feel mistreated by the British. As they arrived in the new colonies, they noticed many major differences in the society and culture of this new place. As time went on, they learned about the colonies and the society there, and eventually, they evolved their cultures and lifestyles to comply with this new society. The primary changes the colonists the colonists made were in their economic system, their lifestyle, and their freedoms. In England, the economic system was primarily industrious, while in it was agriculture. In addition, the colonists, especially those in the south, relied very heavily on slave labor for agricultural purposes. In Great Britain, however, slavery did exist, but it was not relied upon for a functional society. The final change the settlers made in the New World was religion. In Great Britain, the king forced everyone to join the Church of England and leave the Roman Catholic Church. When in the colonies, settlers could go back to whatever religion they desired, so colonial religion was extremely diverse. Therefore, three main changes or “Revolutions”
Revolution is briefly described as an attempt to overthrow a government to start a new one. The American Revolution took place between 1775 and 1783 and was a fight for American Independence from England. In 1764, the first of many “Intolerable Acts” were passed. The British Parliament began to excise tax on the American colonies without representation, sparking the great conflict. The British were continuing to incorporate new ways to make more money. England was the most powerful country at the time with an intimidating military, so this wasn’t a hard task to complete. The American Revolution was very Revolutionary because, it jump started the abolition of slavery, it brought about many political and social advances, and served as a stepping stone towards a democracy and a strong centralized government.
Throughout history, countless uprisings have occurred. Historians classify any forcible overthrow of a government or social order in favor of a new system as a revolution. The success or failure of a revolution is directly related to the revolution’s causes and consequences. The French Revolution was more successful than the Nicaraguan Revolution, because the Nicaraguan Revolution left the country in social and financial ruin, foreign powers had much greater interference, and it precipitated a period of political unrest with multiple leadership changes. One cause of both revolutions was that people from all social classes were discontented.
To start it all off, the regime did not just occur from one day to the next. There were years of build up to the eventual bust up. Janio Quadros was elected as president in 1960 after Juscelino Kubitschek was in charge; he based his entire campaign on criticizing Juscelino and to outright corruption in his government. Taking his idea to a new level, Janio made his symbol a broom because he intended to clean the government up. Janio was only president for two years but during his tenure he increased Brazil’s relations with communist countries which did not make his opposition comfortable (Evanson). In 1961 he resigned as president and his vice president, Joao Goulart, was to be made into president. However when this happened Joao was in China and some of the heads of the military tried to prevent him from becoming president because they thought he was a communist and they did not want a communist head of state (Breneman).
Which means all people, not giving thought to any struggle in the past. A revolution is a radical and pervasive change in society and the social structure, especially one made suddenly and often accompanied by violence. As stated before, society changed, but the social structure of the society did not. When observing historical context, this can be a revolution because social structures either reverted back to the old ways then changed to an extent.
The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines revolution as “a sudden, radical, or complete change,” but the meaning of revolution and rebellion has evolved over time. In today’s more open-to-interpretation society its meaning has come to envelope a broader array of subjects. The development of rebellion and revolution as a theme can be seen throughout literature in works such as William Shakespeare's Hamlet, George Orwell’s 1984, and Jon Krakauer's Into the Wild. Revolution changes from the known definition that can be applied to The French and American Revolutions, as seen in 1984 and to a lesser extent Hamlet, to a humanistic idea of an inner conflict within an individual as in Into the Wild. Nevertheless, the incongruities of the ideas of revolution in these literary works does not lessen the truth that there is an innate desire to rebel and defy a status quo in all humans.
Revolutions start, because a community of people needs change. Typically, this results in one leader being overthrown and a new leader being established. In Animal Farm, by George Orwell, Napoleon becomes the new leader. In the industrial revolution, Samuel Slater was the father of the revolution. Another similarity most revolutions share is the establishment of a new set of rules is. In Animal Farm, Napoleon introduces the commandments. In the Industrial Revolution, people started to get new ideas of what to invent which changed the way they thought. Furthermore, Revolutions sometimes fail because people break away completely or start to alter the rules. In Animal Farm, the character Mollie leaves completely. Also the pigs start to alter the rules for their own needs. In the Industrial Revolution, ideas and inventions fail. Revolutions fail when their leader isn’t strong enough, popular enough, or good enough. The success or failure of a revolution depends on the value of the leader.
“Brazil is the largest country on the continent of South America and the fifth largest continent in the world. It is full of natural resources and agricultural land. In the current economic times the development and growth of any economy have come to a near stop or at least to a drastic slowdown. The face of the global economic environment has changed and various new countries are beginning to alter the way their country and the rest of the world do business. Being the Chief Economist of a billion International Corporation, I would be ready to invest in Brazil, which will lead to revenue growth and place its years ahead of our competitors. A nation like Brazil has turned around their own economic troubles and is
Conclusion: Brazil with the rest of the BRIC nations have a long way to go before their current economic development translates into benefits for the majority of the population. Fortunately, Brazil has great strengths. Thanks to its efficient and entrepreneurial farmers, it is the world’s third-biggest food exporter. Even if the government has made the process slower and costlier than it needed to be, Brazil will be a big oil exporter by 2020. It has several manufacturing jewels, and is developing a world-class research base in biotechnology, genetic sciences and deep-sea oil and gas technology. The consumer brands that have grown along with the country’s expanding middle class are ready to go abroad. Despite the recent protests, it does not have the social or ethnic divisions that blight other emerging economies, such as India or Turkey.
There was a sudden turn of events; causing Brazil's economy to fail, not only in the society but financially. High unemployment and inflation is starting to become in intense problem for Brazilians. Brazilians are not ready for dishonest behavior, and acts of bribery in the government. Investigators found that before the reelection of Rousseff in 2014 there was a bribery scandal with the state run
Through history, there have been many examples of power corruption that lead to different consequences. Revolutions are the consequences of power corruption.
Revolutions start in oppression and injustice, in the weakening of political authorities, in new ideas and in the activities of small groups of determined activist. For example, oppression and injustice was the reason for the start of the Haitian Revolution. The weakening of political authorities in the Latin American and French revolutions, and the new ideas of the Enlightenment influenced the American, French, Haitian, and Latin American revolutions. Finally, the activities of small groups of determined people were especially influential to the feminist revolution. Revolutions that occur because of oppression and injustice are mostly in a societies in countries where there is a lot of social and economic injustices which lead to uprisings
A revolution is an overthrow of social order to favor a new system and the Industrial Revolution altered the entire framework of the country. Before the Industrial Revolution, the United States had been a mostly rural population. With the changes in manufacturing and transportation, the population shifted from being agriculturally oriented to industrial oriented. The Industrial Revolution was an extraordinary revolution that allowed the country to break away from old methods to accept the new.
The argument that makes up the elements of a Revolution, requires a historical understanding of what separates them from other social movement. Also, it is important to learn what defines them; and what else we can say about them. Many people have very little understanding of what a successful revolution looks like. Which is why it being common for people to dismiss the possibility or wrongly assume a what constitutes a Revolution.