Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of divorce in Christianity
Effects of divorce in Christianity
Relationship between law and religion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of divorce in Christianity
Cause and Effect Essay - Christianity Causes Divorce “Bible Belt Couples ‘Put Asunder’ More,” the New York Times proclaimed on May 21 of this year: “The divorce rate in many parts of the Bible Belt is roughly 50% above the national average.” So much for the notion that secularism is to blame for the decline of traditional families, among other frequently lamented social ills. Apparently, in a least a few states, the divorce rate correlates to an excess of piety, not the absence of it. What do we make of this amusing correlation? I doubt that religiosity directly causes divorce, but in some cases it may cause marriage, by condemning premarital sex and cohabitation as sinful; and marriage, of course, is the one indisputable cause of divorce. Marry in haste; divorce when you come to your senses. “I had this vision that this is just what people do; Get married, have kids and Christ comes back,” one Oklahoma divorcee told the New York Times. She remarried, but a great many Oklahomans apparently prefer living in sin. (Religion may not cause marriage after all.) According to the Times, the number of unmarried cohabitating couples in Oklahoma increased 97 percent in the past ten years. It increased 125 percent in Arkansas and 123 percent in Tennessee. The average national increase in unmarried couples for the same period was 72 percent. Statistics like these are deeply troubling to God-fearing social conservatives like Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee, who declared a “marital emergency” in his state; and Oklahoma Governor Frank Keating, who has initiated a multimillion dollar campaign to strengthen marriage by sending publicly funded “marriage ambassadors” to talk shows and public schools and providing premarital education. ... ... middle of paper ... ...tates, when the Supreme Court held that Mormons could be prosecuted for entering into polygamous marriages. Thus, Judeo-Christian notions of marriage are incorporated into law while historic Mormon beliefs about marriage are criminalized. As Utah polygamist Tom Green recently learned, laws against multiple spouses are still liable to be enforced. Green, who boasted five wives and an estimated twenty-five to thirty children, was convicted of four counts of bigamy (and one count of nonsupport). He was not a particularly sympathetic defendant: one of his wives was only fourteen when he married her, and he could not support all the children he promiscuously fathered. So, it’s probably not fair to say he was prosecuted because of his religious beliefs, but he was prosecuted in spite of them. He is not a particularly virtuous man, but he is, after all, a religious one.
Most of this persecution had come from anti-polygamist Christians. This is ironic because the anti-polygamists believed in the Bible, but not polygamy, one of its teachings. Many of God’s righteous followers in the Old Testament practiced polygamy. Abraham married Hagar, Sarai’s handmaiden (Genesis 16:1-3). Jacob was married to Leah, Rachel, Billah, and Zilpha all at the same time. In the Doctrine and Covenants, a book of modern revelation used as scripture by the LDS church, it states that "in nothing did they [the Old Testament prophets] sin save in those things they received not of me [God]"(132:38). Quickly one sees that God gave those women to the prophets of old because they were righteous.
"The Persecution of the Mormons." Constitutional Rights Foundation . Constitutional Rights Foundation USA, 2014. Web. 20 Mar. 2014. .
What do you think of the way Lord Capulet behaves in Act 3 Scene 5 and
religious persecution from the rest of America, as they were unable to. lead normal lives in Central America. What is the non-Mormons attitude towards Polygamy? Polygamy (in a large proportion of American’s opinions) was seen to be. wrong in the eyes of God.
At the start of Act 2 Scene 2 Romeo is very immature in saying a few
Act 3, scene 5 is a vital scene in the play, as it shows how the
Waldrep, C. The Use and Abuse of the Law: Public Opinion and United Methodist Church Trials of Ministers Performing Same-Sex Union Ceremonies. Law and History Review, 30, 953-1005.
Harmer-Dionne, Elizabeth. "Once a Peculiar People: Cognitive Dissonance and the Suppression of Mormon Polygamy As a Case Study Negating the Belief-Action Distinction." JSTOR. JSTOR. Web. 19 Oct. 2010. .
change of mood in Act 5, Scene 1. I will include what Romeo says and
...God. No matter how much society tries to lead Catholics astray, we are to reject abortion and abide by God’s laws.
Shakespeare's play, King Lear, tells a tale of misshapen oath through a series of betrayals and treason. When one is too deeply in love with his or her own world, he or she tends not to hear, purposefully, of the advice given by any other, if the given information is not to his liking. Such ignorant engrossment in one's illusions brought out a theme that a man's benighted misconceptions can lead to the ruination of his or her once unblemished world.
While the Episcopal Church recognizes a woman’s right to terminate her pregnancy, the church condones abortion only in cases of rape or incest, cases in which a mother’s physical or mental health is at risk, or cases involving fetal abnormalities. The church forbids “abortion as a means of birth control, family planning, sex selection or any reason of mere convenience.” (Liu)
There are a number of factors that influence the rate of persons marrying outside of their religion, which are pertinent to all denominations and religions. The number of eligible marriage partners who are of the same faith group is limited and therefore it is more likely for individuals to look outside of their faith group for a spouse. Increasing enrollment at colleges and universities puts more young people of different faiths away from home and into social contact. Movement from ethnic neighborhoods into the more heterogeneous suburbs lowers barriers to interfaith dating. As secular influences gain strength and church attendance rates fall, young people are being increasingly raised in homes that have little religious commitment, which has been shown to increase the rate of interfaith marriages.
The Catholic religion claims that “deliberately causing an abortion is a grave moral wrong.” (BBC, 2009) Many of the Catholic religious officials stand behind this statement, Pope John II stating in his encyclical that “I declare that direct abortion, that is, abortion willed as an end or as a means, always constitutes a grave moral disorder, since it is the deliberate killing of an innocent human being.” While the Catholic religion has negative views on abortion, according to a research survey conducted by the Guttmacher Institute shows that 28% of women obtaining abortions identify as Catholics. (Guttmacher Institute, 2009) On September 1st, Pope Francis announced that all Catholic priests would be empowered to offer absolution for the “sin of abortion” during the church’s Holy Year of Mercy. (The New York Times, 2015) Pope Francis states that “I have met so many women who bear in their heart the scar of this antagonizing and painful decision, what has happened is profoundly unjust; yet only understanding the truth of it can enable one not to lose hope.” (The New York Times, 2015) Although Pope Francis is allowing religious acceptance of abortion for the Holy Year of Mercy, the Vatican states that Pope Francis is not changing his views on abortion
Legalizing same-sex marriage can change our country for the better. One of the benefits of legalizing same-sex marriage is it can strengthen families. Andrew Koppelman, a professor of law at Northwestern University, adds, “The sexual revolution is not merely the story of the decay of the old ways. It has seen the emergence of a new ethic that in many ways produces stronger, more functional families that serve children’s needs better than the old model” (qtd. in Jost, 273). As Koppelman asserts, legalizing same-sex marriage actually makes families more functional and stronger, contrary to people who oppose same-sex marriage claim. Same-sex marriage can also help reduce the children in foster homes because it gives them a better chance at being eligible to adopt children. Megan McArdle, a journalist and blogger, argues, “The idea that there is something so wrong with same-sex households that it would be preferable for these children to go two or four or six years without permanent parents is senseless. There is no evidence to this claim” (McArdle). As McArdle points out, there is nothing wrong with letting same-sex couples adopt children. Allowing same-sex couples to adopt can help reduce the children in foster homes. There is no evidence that shows that same-sex couples are not fit to be parents. Another benefit of allowing same-sex marriage to