Catcher In The Rye And To Kill A Mockingbird Comparison Essay

692 Words2 Pages

Through the development of characters that are outsiders, literature is a way of questioning the values of society which is recognized throughout, Harper Lee’s novel ‘To Kill a Mockingbird’ and J.D. Salinger’s novel ‘The Catcher in the rye’. These two stories feature completely different plots, although the two books show multiple overlapping themes. Outsiders are often perceived to be the odd one out, and they show this by the way they act, and the way they make themselves known. Both Scout from ‘To kill a mocking bird’, and Holden from ‘The Catcher in the rye’ are seen as foreigners but for wholly different reasons.
Unlike Scout, Holden shares his past experiences as a distressed minor, where the entire story is spoken through his own distraught mind. The novel takes place in first person which allows Holden to speak his mind although more often than not it disfigures experiences had by him. Salinger illustrates the reasoning behind Holden’s immaturity by demonstrating his untrustworthy qualities.
I think Holden Caulfield shows both his personal …show more content…

Immediately.”
Scout does not at all like the idea of becoming a young lady and by using a hyperbolic metaphor of the walls closing in on her and the dress acting as a ‘as exaggeration and figure of speech which emphasizes the persona’s feeling of desperation It is commonly perceived that as a society it is mandatory for everyone to grow up and become an adult. But this is not the case for Scout, as she wants to cling onto her childhood much like Holden.
To kill a mockingbird and the catcher in the rye have two main things in common and that is that both protagonists have unceasing troubles of letting go of things and growing older. An example of this is when Holden says,
“The best thing, though, in that museum was that everything always stayed right where it was. Nobody’s move

Open Document