Case Study Of Six Sigma DMAIC Process

713 Words2 Pages

For my second project I chose a case study of an automotive manufacturing company. The featured article did a case study on the successful implementation of six sigma DMAIC process along with Beta correction. The authors of the article studied the baseline performance of the process of the automotive manufacturing company, in order to identify the potential causes of the process related problem. They collected various types of data on all the identified potential causes and different types of statistical analysis like regression analysis, hypothesis testing and Taguchi methods were performed in order to identify the main causes. They used Beta correction technique to monitor the process in the control phase. And the results were observed. For …show more content…

So this was identified as the priority area for the organization to focus. The authors and the management decided to address the problem using Six sigma DMAIC, as the cause and the solution of the problem was still unknown. As the part of Define phase, a team was formed with Assistant manager production as the team leader and seven other team members. The team decided to consider the ‘plunger taper’ and ‘foot thickness’ as the critical to quality characteristics. In the measure phase they analyzed the collected data using Minitab software. The total gauge repeatability and reproducibility values were found to be 9.71% and 4.1% respectively, for foot thickness and plunger tape. The results were presented in the paper. As the next step of the measuring phase, p value was determined, and it was less than 0.05. The p-value is the measurement of how likely it is to get the spot data if no real difference existed. Therefore, a small p-value indicates that there is a small chance of getting this data if no real difference existed. For the Analyze phase the team member brain stormed, in order to find the root cause of the problem, they also made cause and effect diagram for variation in plunger taper and variation in foot thickness. While doing the analysis the p value for ANOVA and for the regression grinding stock and Barrel roundness were found to be less than 0.05 which confirmed that these two has a significant impact on plunger taper. During the improve phase the team decided that there is no risk associated with any of the found solutions. So they prepared an implementation plan for all the solutions with details of responsibility and target date for implementation. In the control phase it was made sure that the benefits and knowledge achieved form the six sigma projects are sustained for the long term

Open Document