Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Punishment in modern societies
Punishment in modern societies
Punishment and society in 1892
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Punishment in modern societies
Derek Bentley’s case evidently highlighted the unjust nature of some punishments within Britain, in this case hangings and it could be argued that this case was one of the main reasons for the abolition of the death penalty. On the other hand, there were other individuals and acts that led to a change in attitudes such as the Criminal Justice Act of 1948 that led to the abolition of whippings among many other things. It cannot be stated that Bentley was the sole reason for changing attitudes, but his case was undoubtedly a ‘key turning point in changing attitudes to crime and punishment’.
Derek Bentley a 19-year-old child was hanged for a murder that he did not commit and the case elicited a social and political uproar that marks this change
…show more content…
Uschanov commented on the initial societal views affirming that the “sentiment of the public was clearly on his side, and petitions for mercy were signed by huge numbers of people, including 200 MPs from all parties.” This leads to the idea that the public and their attitudes were changing because they understood the sometimes unjust nature of the penal system and that if a grave miscarriage of justice did occur and a man was wrongfully hanged, then there is no way to go back on their decision, thus representing the case of Derek Bentley did lead to a change in attitudes in society. Furthermore, the quote evokes the message that parliament saw the injustice in the case and had decided to petition against the hanging of Bentley, but to no avail. Although their pleas did go unnoticed, it still represented how the government were starting to recognise that hangings, especially in convoluted cases like Bentley’s, should be …show more content…
Jeremy Bentham had proposed the implementation of the panopticon to create the allusion of an all-seeing eye for the prison guards. Millbank prison, built in 1821, had been completed on lines by Bentham and by the 1830s, there were plans for many other prisons to be built in the same manner. Bloy states that, “it was thought that humanitarian methods used in prisons had failed and what was needed instead was a tougher and uniformly enforced system of prison discipline”, presenting the change in attitudes towards punishment within prisons. A reason for this was down to wanting to reduce recidivism and the government along with penal reformers felt that there was a need for prisoner reform, but also a ‘proper deterrent and punishment’. Through these new reforms came better living conditions, but also new punishments such as the crank, and treadwheel both mentally degrading to the prisoner. By the end of the 1840s the decision had been made that ‘prisoners were forbidden to talk to each other and were stripped of their identity’. This policy of the ‘separate system’ was a major development in the role of punishments throughout a multitude of prisons. Pentonville, erected in 1842, influenced ‘fifty-four other prisons’ that had been built on the ‘same plan’. In comparison to the case of Bentley and the outcomes of how society itself developed
March 30, 1981 was a peaceful day. President Ronald Reagan was walking outside enjoying the fresh air when suddenly shots were fired. Six shots were fired in total, but only one shot hit Reagan due to a bullet that ricocheted. Luckily, Reagan was hit in the abdomen; therefore, he survived. The “mastermind” behind the attempted assassination was a man named John Hinckley. Hinckley believed by going through with this assassination it would be a romantic scenario for himself to confess his undying love for the actress Jodie Foster. Before long it was time for the Hinckley trial and after hearing his side of the story, the jury came to the conclusion that he was crazy. Hinckley was later found not guilty by reason of insanity and admitted to
In “Bring Back Flogging”, Jeff Jacoby argues why the current criminal justice system in America is not effective or successful. As a solution, he suggests that America should bring back the old fashioned form of punishment once used by the puritans, flogging, as an alternative to imprisonment (198). This article originally appeared in the op-ed section of the Boston Globe newspaper. Therefore, the primary audience of this article is people who want to read arguments about controversial topics and have probably read some of his other articles. His argument that the current criminal justice system is not working is extremely convincing. He appeals to pathos and uses statistics to prove that thesis and to persuade the audience.
An inmate by the name of Gary Graham drew several protestors to a Huntsville unit in the year 2000; they were there in opposition to Graham’s execution. This day finally came after nineteen years on death row and four appeals. With him being a repeat offender he was not new to this side of the justice system, but after being put in prison he became a political activist who worked to abolish the death penalty. People who stood against his execution argued that his case still had reasonable doubt, he was rehabilitating himself, and his punishment would cause major harm to his family. Aside from that you have the advocates arguing that you have to set example for others, so you must carry out the punishment that was given, and while the execution may harm the offender’s family it will give the victims’ families closure for his crimes.
In his essay “Bring Back Flogging,” columnist Jeff Jacoby attempts to convince his audience that flogging is an effective method to punishing criminals. He begins by bringing his audience back the 17th century and describes a time when Puritans punished any wrong-doers, listing the names of the victims, their crimes, and their punishments. Jacoby then compares and contrasts the two methods of punishment, flogging and incarceration, thus effectively luring the audience further into his argument. Although his argument appears to persuade his readers into seeing the advantages of flogging, his essay as a whole is ineffective due to lack of knowledge on the justice system, poor essay structure, and disrespect toward his audience.
Prisons act as a total institution where inmates are put on a strict schedule and fall under one of the most gruesome forms of social control. Because of this, many inmates rebel resulting in prisons having to increase security and impose stricter punishments. As a result of this, less effort has been put into helping mentally ill inmates. The term panopticon, coined by Bentham illustrates the concept that the prison design would allow guards to see into cells but not allowing prisoners to see out. Thus, this would allow guards to have omniscient power over the inmates. Fortunately, this never worked as a prison, however prison has created a type of mental health panopticon. This allows for mentally ill parents to feel like they are always being observed; similarly to that of an experiment. Despite prisons best attempt to equally serve all inmates to the best of their ability, prioritizing security and punishment has lead to a mental health panopticon. As a result, prisons environments have exacerbated negative behaviours, created an inhumane environment for prisoners and lack the means to aid in mental health.
Robert states that it was the Americans that invented the prison. "The history of prison in America is the history of a troubled search for solutions." Before we had prisons in America, criminals where dealt with in a swift and brutal manner. Many prisoner where dealt with by corporal or capital punishment. Jails did exist in this time but they were "primarily for pretrail detention" stated Pray.
The death penalty continues to be an issue of controversy and is an issue that will be debated in the United States for many years to come. According to Hugo A. Bedau, the writer of “The Death Penalty in America”, capital punishment is the lawful infliction of the death penalty. The death penalty has been used since ancient times for a variety of offenses. The Bible says that death should be done to anyone who commits murder, larceny, rapes, and burglary. It appears that public debate on the death penalty has changed over the years and is still changing, but there are still some out there who are for the death penalty and will continue to believe that it’s a good punishment. I always hear a lot of people say “an eye for an eye.” Most people feel strongly that if a criminal took the life of another, their’s should be taken away as well, and I don’t see how the death penalty could deter anyone from committing crimes if your going to do the crime then at that moment your not thinking about being on death role. I don’t think they should be put to death they should just sit in a cell for the rest of their life and think about how they destroy other families. A change in views and attitudes about the death penalty are likely attributed to results from social science research. The changes suggest a gradual movement toward the eventual abolition of capital punishment in America (Radelet and Borg, 2000).
Have you ever wondered why people are so interested to learn about the suffrage of others? Over twenty-five years, the population of prisoners has nearly sextulped. Reaching about 1.7 million since 1996, which is almost equal to the population to Houston, Texas, the fourth largest city in the nation (Elliott Currie). All we focus on is how they did it? and why? In other words, many people interpret crime as entertainment, and don’t think about the negative effects taking place in the world or even more that individual. In some cases the innocent are being accused of unlikely punishment but how do they determine? Considerably, the death penalty has been the topic of discussion these past years. This so called “penalty” is becoming the prime consequence in most cases. I think that the use of the death penalty as punishment is wrong because of the psychological effects it has on prisoners, time spent on death row in cases of innocents, and the costly outcome.
He proposed a Panopticon prison. The circular design consisted of a guard’s tower in the center surrounded by barred cells in a circular formation. By this means guards could have continuous, unseen surveillance both visually and acoustically. Prisoners would never know if they were being watched and in theory behave to avoid punishment. The Panopticon design would have many critics and allies in subsequent centuries. Many years later, Michel Foulcault would write that”… the Panopticon is an ideal architectural figure of modern disciplinary power. The Panopticon creates a consciousness of permanent visibility as a form of power, where no bars, chains, and heavy locks are necessary for domination any more”. Proponents of Bentham’s design felt that is was a “tool of oppression and social control”. This radical design was never permitted to be built at the time in Britain, but would be later realized in several modified circular designs in the 1880s as well as at Illinois Penitentiary near Joliet and Presidio Modelo in Cuba in the 20th
I will accomplish this by first providing you with a brief history of the death penalty, then I will discuss grounds for justifying the death penalty, and finally I will dispute some of the popular arguments against the death penalty. To start off, I will discuss the history of the death penalty. The first established death penalty laws date as far back as the Eighteenth Century B.C. in the code of King Hammaurabi of Babylon, which codified the death penalty for 25 different crimes. Death sentences were carried out by such means as crucifixion, boiling, beheading, drowning, beating to death, burning alive, and impalement. In the Tenth Century A.D., hanging became the usual method of execution in Britain.
Furthermore, it will be looking at whether punishment could be re-imagined, and if so, what would it entail? The use of prison as a form of punishment began to become popular in the early 19th century. This was because transportation to colonies had started to decrease; transportation was the removing of an individual, in this case an offender, from its country to another country; usually for a period of seven to ten years and in some cases for ever. During this time prison was now being used as a means for punishment, this was in response to the declining of transportation to colonies. Thus, instead of transporting offenders to other colonies, they were now being locked away behind high walls of the prison.
Capitol punishment has not always been a controversial issue. For most of history, most governments have punished numerous crimes by way of death. However, in the mid-18th century critics of this form of punishment began to emphasize the worth of the individual. They considered these practices unjust. The controversy and debate continue today.
There are many false impressions floating around through American society concerning the death penalty; this paper hopes to clarify some of the more prominent, noticeable ones.
The controversy between whether criminals who have committed heinous crimes should be charged with the death penalty has been debated worldwide. Putting people to death, judged to have committed certain extremely abhorrent crimes, is a practice that has been around for a long time. However, in the later half of the twentieth century, it has become a controversial issue. As a supporter of the death penalty, I believe that it is essential part of the criminal justice system to deter crime. There are several reasons it should be in effect including: proof that capital punishment does deter crime that would warrant this sentence, retribution for heinous crimes, and the morality of punishing someone who has committed a crime so horrendous.
Capital punishment is now illegal in many countries, like the United Kingdom, France and Germany, but it is also legal in many other countries, such as China and the USA. There is a large debate on whether or not capital punishment should be illegal all over the world, as everyone has a different opinion on it. In this essay, I will state arguments for and against the death penalty, as well as my own opinion: capital punishment should be illegal everywhere. Firstly, many believe capital punishment should be reinstated in the United Kingdom because of the financial cost of prisoners. Annually, it costs about £26,978 per prisoner when they are in jail.