Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of literature in history
Cheese and the worms sparknotes
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of literature in history
The Cheese and the Worms by Carlo Ginzburg lets us understand the life and times of a miller, from the rural mountain town of Montereale, made to stand trial for his views on God and religion. In this story, we are able to see how the life of a commoner does not need to be shown through statistics. Through the lens of Menocchio’s trial documents, we have the ability to see how one man saw the world and how he interacted with others in his small town. Through his interactions with other citizens of his time, we are able to draw conclusions about the world around him. Stories such as Menocchio’s give us an important understanding of relationships in cultures lost to history. With Menocchio’s story, we are better equipped to understand his …show more content…
Thus, this shows us the uniqueness of Menocchio compared to others who renounced their heresy to the court. Not only this, but he takes sole responsibility for his words. For this, we have a record of him. Had he not had the courage to stand up to his inquisitor we would not have had this amount of records from the courts. Thusly, this shows how Menocchio had more courage than his fellow heretics. Menocchio told the court his beliefs in a somewhat eloquent fashion and had the ability to argue on his own behalf. He had no education beyond primary school and his training to operate the mill. He had the courage to stand up for himself and state to the priests that they did not follow the true path of righteousness, that the church created the sacraments for money, and that the church and state hid behind Latin to conspire against the poor. These would have seemed as damning attacks against the hierarchy. Consequently, we understand that Menocchio stayed true to his word to rebuke his superiors. Menocchio carved for himself a place in history because he had the braveness to stand up to the …show more content…
Consequently, this gave him access to the world larger than his geographical boundaries. Additionally, it gave him a higher position in his local community. Not everyone was literate in that time period and Menocchio did not necessarily need to learn how to read or write. In learning how to read, Menocchio gave himself a better understanding of how his world worked. He taught himself logic and reasoning to the point that he could represent his fellow tenets in court against his lord, showing us how well he had the respect of those around him. While he would not have had the ability to do this if the printing press did not succeed, it still shows the initiative that Menocchio had to bolster himself. learning to read Menocchio took knowledge from multiple sources and created, for himself, a new idea. In doing this Menocchio created his own cosmogony based on a mix of oral traditions and written works. Menocchio had the ability to secure his place in history because he learned to read. Without this, he would not have had the ability to postulate as complicated of ideas or argue with the priests as fluently. Thus, we can conclude that Menocchio would not have made history had he not learned to read. His reading, and his job as a miller gave him more legitimacy in his town which made him more influential in his
This paper seeks to show the comparison and the scrutiny of “"The Mad Trapper"” as a novel and its adaptation as a film. Both as a book and as a film it provides a good fiction which attracts an affluent legacy of folks, fables and myths. Rudy Wiebe’s recent novel The Mad Trapper (1980), the legend, presents a basis for the frame. Further than any distress with chronological events, the writer categorically depicts legendary dimensions to intertwine his fiction into conflict. Weibe’s argument, nevertheless, is not merely involving thermo and Albert Johnson; his contention lies amid the impending desires of self independence and reliability and the problem of multifaceted and distant progress.
Anti-Semitism is the hatred and discrimination of those with a Jewish heritage. It is generally connected to the Holocaust, but the book by Helmut Walser Smith, The Butcher’s Tale shows the rise of anti-Semitism from a grassroots effect. Smith uses newspapers, court orders, and written accounts to write the history and growth of anti-Semitism in a small German town. The book focuses on how anti-Semitism was spread by fear mongering, the conflict between classes, and also the role of the government.
John Proctor is, at first, willing to offer up a false confession that his life may be spared. Inevitably, John Proctor possesses that fateful attribute known to fall fatal to many human beings - pride. While he has, indeed, been ashamed of his many sins throughout his life, Proctor's soul still clings to his pride and his good name, however soiled it may have become. On the morning scheduled for his execution, Proctor wrestles with the realization that one more sin so heaped upon the rest in his life will make precious little difference in the end; "I cannot mount the gibbet like a saint. It is a fraud. I am not that man.... My honesty is broke... I am no good man. Nothing's spoiled by giving them this lie." (126) He attempts to calm his pride by telling himself that the other accused witches who will not give false testimony to save themselves from the gallows have every right to do so; they led lives free of blame. He, however, he tells himself, did no such thing; what right has he to hang among the righteous? "Let them that never lied die now to keep their souls. It is pretense for me, a vanity that will nor blind God nor keep my children out of the wind." (126) Thus the conviction first reached by John Proctor is to save his life rather than to throw it away in mock martyrdom.
?What is left when honor is lost?? Publilius Syrus' quote, though dating from 100 B.C., still seems pertinent to our era (Quotations). Many people still feel that once integrity is lost they are nothing and many are willing to stand up to keep their integrity. Without integrity, we are nothing. During the time that Arthur Miller wrote his most famous play, The Crucible, innocent men and women are accused of having Communist leanings. Their whole lives are ruined in a short amount of time because they refuse to compromise themselves by selling out their friends. Miller tries to make a statement about these unfair trials by comparing them to the Salem witch-hunts and trials of 1692. The main protagonist of his play is a man named John Proctor who is accused of witchcraft but stands up to maintain his name and his honor, even though he is hanged for it. During the H.U.A.C. trials some took stands for their beliefs with the knowledge of possibly being shunned by society. Knowing this, instead of taking the cowards' way and giving the names of their friends, they refuse to tell the committee anything in the same way that John Proctor stands up against a court that is ruining the lives of innocent people.
In “In Defense of Literacy,” Wendell Berry explains literacy is a requirement, not an embellishment. Literacy is more than the ability to just read and write; it's also the ability to understand what a person is reading and make sense in what a person is writing. While some people may think that achieving literacy requires hard work and gets little outcome, I think that literacy makes people more ambitious, confident, more attentive, and more prosperous in life than those who are not literate. Joining in on conversations and voicing ones philosophies is easier if people are literate and educated, and people feel worthy of themselves when they have the ability to do so. People are more determined in life, whether it is with their professions
For the Greeks, Homer's Odyssey was much more than just an entertaining tale of gods, monsters, and men, it served as cultural paradigm from which every important role and relationship could be defined. This book, much more so than its counter part The Iliad, gives an eclectic view of the Achean's peacetime civilization. Through Odyssey, we gain an understanding of what is proper or improper in relationships between father and son, god and mortal, servant and master, guest and host, and--importantly--man and woman. Women play a vital role in the movement of this narrative. Unlike in The Iliad, where they are chiefly prizes to be won, bereft of identity, the women of Odyssey are unique in their personality, intentions, and relationship towards men. Yet, despite the fact that no two women in this epic are alike, each--through her vices or virtues-- helps to delineate the role of the ideal woman. Below, we will show the importance of Circe, Calypso, Nausicaa, Clytaemestra, and Penelope in terms of the movement of the narrative and in defining social roles for the Ancient Greeks.
In the book Eating Animals by Jonathan Safran Foer, the author talks about, not only vegetarianism, but reveals to us what actually occurs in the factory farming system. The issue circulating in this book is whether to eat meat or not to eat meat. Foer, however, never tries to convert his reader to become vegetarians but rather to inform them with information so they can respond with better judgment. Eating meat has been a thing that majority of us engage in without question. Which is why among other reasons Foer feels compelled to share his findings about where our meat come from. Throughout the book, he gives vivid accounts of the dreadful conditions factory farmed animals endure on a daily basis. For this reason Foer urges us to take a stand against factory farming, and if we must eat meat then we must adapt humane agricultural methods for meat production.
In McCarthy’s novel The Road, one of the main issues deals with cannibalism and the moral/ethic issues of survival. Though McCarthy depicts cannibalism negatively in this post-apocalyptic world, it is apparent that cannibalism is necessary for humans to survive when there is no real food to eat. Whether they know what’s actually good vs what is actually bad, they still have a reason to try and stay alive even though things are absolutely terrible around them. Staying alive, to carry the fire for the good of humanity. In a world where everything is just coming to an end, people resort to eating each other in order to stay alive. Where there are bad and good people, but what does it actually mean to be bad? Eating human beings or not helping those people in need of help?
During this essay the trail of Socrates found in the Apology of Plato will be reviewed. What will be looked at during this review is how well Socrates rebuts the charges made against him. We will also talk about if Socrates made the right decision to not escape prison with Crito. Socrates was a very intelligent man; this is why this review is so critical.
Having the knowledge to read and write may take someone into a completely different universe, it allows to see reality or escape from reality. It gives a better understanding of what goes on in the world, that being good or bad depending on how he wants to see it. Malcolm X wrote a short story " A Homemade Education," about how, his experience in prison allowed him to gain knowledge and to grow as an individual. Learning to read and write showed him, how to be mentally alive in a way that changed his life forever. He took it as an ability to grow, to make a change for himself and possibly make a difference in the world. Malcolm X explained how it 's never too late to get an education, there is always time for one to change in life. It is
Contrary to this widely accepted myth, I will try to demonstrate that Socrates' argument was erroneous, which made his decision less rational. In fact, had he decided to escape, his behavior would not have represented an unjust act. Although his argumentation and dialogue with Crito seem more like a moral sermon, his ...
"Who Moved My Cheese?" tells a story of change, of how we react to it, and the trouble we can find ourselves in when we don't follow that change. The story is about four characters, two mice, and two "little people." The characters live in a maze chasing cheese. The cheese represents anything we chase after in life and believe it will make us happy. The story details the trials and troubles we all have in daily lives.
With fewer than fifty published poems Elizabeth Bishop is not one of the most prominent poets of our time. She is however well known for her use of imagery and her ability to convey the narrator?s emotions to the reader. In her vividly visual poem 'The Fish', the reader is exposed to a story wherein the use of language not only draws the reader into the story but causes the images to transcend the written work. In the poem, Bishop makes use of numerous literary devices such as similes, adjectives, and descriptive language. All of these devices culminate in the reader experiencing a precise and detailed mental image of the poem's setting and happenings.
In the final scene of Othello, the hero, with that utter lack of self-consciousness of self-criticism which is the height of human vanity, strikes a heroic attitude, makes an eloquent plea for himself, at the height of his eloquence stabs himself – and the innocent spectator feels a lump in his throat or dissolves in te...
For example, I can usually use verbal communication to effectively communicate what I want to say, but there are some situations where talking is not the most efficient option. In these situations, I use my ability to read and write to try to express my feelings and communicate my ideas through writing in the form of texts, emails, or letters. Without literacy, I would not be able to send texts to my parents informing them that I need a ride and I would not be able to look up information about events happening around me. Fredrick Douglas was also able to use his ability to read to figure out how to communicate his thoughts. In his writing, Fredrick Douglas described how he would have thoughts about slavery and his situation but he would always ignore the thoughts until they went away, but after reading “The Columbian Orator” and some of Sheridan’s speeches, he was “enabled…to utter [his] thoughts, and to meet the arguments bought forward to sustain slavery…” (Douglas 102). These readings allowed Douglas to organize his silenced thoughts and to figure out how to communicate his ideas to other people and go on to eventually write and give speeches against slavery. Fredrick Douglas proved that communication and literacy are closely linked by explaining how reading the someone else’s’ thoughts helped him to express his own