Carl Sandburg Chicago

1115 Words3 Pages

Home is a nearly impossible thing to find, but those who find their homes will stand up for it no matter what. Carl Sandburg’s “Chicago” does a fantastic job of capturing the relationship between a man and his city. The narrator in the piece defends his city in a protective and almost romantic manner. Sandburg displays the intricate and under-discussed relationship through lavish and descriptive language, humanizing personification, and superb sentence structure. Sandburg marvelously utilizes language throughout the piece to encapsulate the connection between the narrator and his home of Chicago. The language used paints the exact picture needed for the audience to do the majority of the work of discovering the relationship between the narrator …show more content…

The narrator forces the audience to see images of citizens of the city who have worked hard and are terrified of the future, but despite that, they continue to smile. By creating a contrast between the surface-level disgust that the citizens must live through and the secret joys beneath said citizens, the audience can swiftly gather that the narrator isn’t just ignorant of his city’s faults, but instead has learned to embrace them. The narrator, upon being told that his city is “crooked” (Sandburg, 8) and “brutal” (Sandburg, 9) does not back down and concede, but instead, he stands up for his home. Despite the accusations that the narrator must somewhat agree with, he stands up for his home and begs for the city’s naysayers to “show me another city with lifted head singing so proud to be alive and coarse and strong and cunning.” (Sandburg, 13) Once again the narrator takes on the horrible things about his home and embraces them. He doesn’t …show more content…

The poem opens in a conversationally unnatural format. The narrator describes his city as the “Hog Butcher for the World / Tool Maker, Stacker of Wheat” (Sandburg, 1-2) and calls his city “City of the Big Shoulders.” (Sandburg, 5). The structure sets the scene for the rest of the piece as the narrator talks about his city in an unfocused manner. Opening the poem by establishing a basic understanding of how our narrator sees his home in simple, short sentences, allows the audience to quickly get comfortable and gather an idea of what the rest of the poem has in store. Sandburg’s understanding of the connection one has to their home is more than pleasant, however. The distant and split sentences throughout the poem match not only the narrator’s thoughts about their city, but also reflect the natural flow of an argument which reinforces the theme of a man and the pride he feels for his city. For example, the structure on lines 11-16 focuses on long, drawn-out sentences while retaining sharpness with each word and paragraph space. Then, the split of the established pattern from lines 17-18 continues the argumentative feeling of the sentences, but now takes a more hopeful and blissful tone. Then, in a genius maneuver, Sandburg ends the poem with the beginning lines of the piece, but

Open Document