Cardinal Richelieu's Contribution to the Growth of the French State

1438 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Cardinal richelieu's goals of france essay

Armand-Jean du Plessis de Richelieu was born in 1585, and would become the future chief minister of the French monarchy from 1624 to 1642. When he was born, on his cot was the motto, Regi Armandus, meaning "Armand for the King" . This statement would arguably become one of the truest statements in history, as Richelieu would eventually play a very important part in firmly establishing the power of the French monarchy over its subjects and the power of France as a world power . Richelieu has been seen by different historians in two ways; one being a ruthless despot who would do whatever he possibly could to achieve his goals, and the other being of a brilliant politician who transformed France into one of the greatest and most powerful nations and monarchies in the world. However, some historians, such as Knecht argue that both of these views are interlinked. The Machiavellian principle, "the ends justify the means", applies greatly to Cardinal Richelieu, as he was a very ambitious politician, and would do anything that he saw as possible to strengthen the position of France and the king. Koenigsberger argues that, in relation to the wars of religion, "royal authority was restored largely by the energy of Louis XIII's chief minister, Cardinal Richelieu" .

Richelieu had many advantages being chief minister. One of these advantages was that he was a cardinal. The Catholic Church was an extremely powerful institution in France, and with one of their representatives in such a high position of parliament, it would be in the church's interest to support him wholly for their own ends. Wedgwood also argues that the church "would not readily tolerate an attack upon its main representative in council" . Theoretically, with the support of...

... middle of paper ...

...out of touch with its people. After his death, his policies were continued and this had a detrimental effect in the long run.

In conclusion, although Cardinal Richelieu's policies contributed greatly to the growth of the French state and monarchy, they also led to its decline with the French revolution in 1789.

1848 words

Bibliography

C. V. Wedgwood: Richelieu and the French Monarchy

English Universities Press LTD, Aylesbury 1965

G. R. R. Treasure: Seventeenth Century France

Rivingtons (Publishers) Limited, London 1966

Elizabeth Wirth Marvick: Louis XIII

Yale University Press, USA 1986

Orest A. Ranum: Richelieu and the Councillors of Louis XIII

Oxford University Press, London 1963

R. J. Knecht: Richelieu

Longman Group UK LTD, Essex 1991

H. G. Koenigsberger: Early Modern Europe 1500 - 1789

Pearson Education LTD, Essex 1987

Show More
Related

  • Differences Between Louis Xiv And Peter The Great

    674 Words  | 2 Pages

    Louis XIV is considered the “perfect absolutist” and he has been said to have been one of the greatest rulers in France’s history. He came up with several different strategic plans to gain absolute

    Read More

  • Sun King Louis Xiv Dbq

    1280 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Edict of Nantes had given Protestants, or Huguenots, in France the ability to practice their religion without fear of violence or persecution. Enacted in the late 1500s in an effort to resemble France after the destruction of the French Wars of Religion, the Edict of Nantes served as a means to unite the French population and end the violence that often accompanied religious persecution. Louis’ decision to revoke such a peace-promoting edict, in an effort to homogenize his country and align his subjects with his own beliefs, clearly illustrates his giving of priority to his own agenda, as opposed to that which would best benefit his country. However, while the claim that the Revocation of the Edict of Nantes was detrimental to French society, seems to be disproven by Doc 6, which essentially asserts that the king’s revocation has resulted in the rapid conversion of “whole towns” and describes the king as “the invincible hero destined to… destroy the terrible monster of heresy”, the author’s inherently biased point of view must be addressed. This description, which could be used as evidence to support the fact that Louis did act in interest of the state, must be taken with a grain of salt as the author himself, a member of the Assembly of the Clergy, does not even have the best interest of the state in mind; rather, he is

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast French And Latin American Revolutions

    740 Words  | 2 Pages

    The French revolted due to political, economic, and social injustices. Politically, the government was a mess. An absolute ruler can only be beneficial to the people if they cater to

    Read More

  • French Revolution Dbq Essay

    1455 Words  | 3 Pages

    In addition to the economic issues, France also held an Estate System that led to heavy social inequality. This oppression of the Third Estate along with the financial problems that fell on the common people would lead to the French Revolution. Overall, the people of France revolted against the monarchy because of the unsuccessful estate system and the inequality it led to, because of the new enlightenment ideas that inspired them, and because of the failures of the monarchy. First, the French Revolution was a result of the failed estate system and the extreme economic and social inequality it led to.

    Read More

  • The Most Successful Absolute Monarch in Europe was Louis XIV of France

    1549 Words  | 4 Pages

    Of all the absolute rulers in European history, Louis XIV of France was the most powerful, and the best example because of his successes, being able to continue his complete control even after failures, his ability to be able to use France’s money in any way he wanted, such as the Place of Versailles, taking away the nobles power, and his ability to delegate impotant jobs to smart yet loyal people.

    Read More

  • French Absolutism and the French Revolution

    2294 Words  | 5 Pages

    that contributed to the rise and fall of the French Monarchy. The ideas of the

    Read More

  • French Revolution Dbq

    1293 Words  | 3 Pages

    Alexis de Tocqueville, felt that the Revolution’s objective was no longer liberty, which in his opinion is what it should have been. Tocqueville insisted that the failure of not making liberty a primary objective is what brought down the French Revolution and impacted revolutions for years to come. He was concerned that all future revolutions would fall short and face shortcomings if liberty was not the main objective to create a legacy of the revolution. His theories show strength based upon the fact that in the beginning, the Revolution had clear goals and objectives, however towards the end it lacked sufficient proof that liberty was the objective at the end of the

    Read More

  • Louis XIV and Absolute Monarchism

    373 Words  | 1 Pages

    Louis XIV (the fourteenth) was an absolute monarch. He was often called "the Sun King," and ruled over France. He devoted himself to helping France achieve economic, political, and cultural prominence. Many historians believe the phrase "absolute power corrupts absolutely" mirrors Louis' reign. Louis XIV revoked the Edict on Nantes, changing the economy of France in one motion. By creating the city of Versailles and being a major patron of the arts, Louis was very influential on French culture. He made France go almost bankrupt from his costly wars and failures. Louis was very corrupt in his power, and it shown in all he did to change France; he got what he wanted, when he wanted it.

    Read More

  • John F. Kennedy

    1151 Words  | 3 Pages

    the legacy he left behind, and how when he died the country was never the

    Read More

  • Voltaire's Affect on Modern Western Society

    962 Words  | 2 Pages

    The French Revolution was a period of upheaval in France, during which the French governmental structure and Catholic clergy underwent a large change due to Enlightenment ideas. The commoners of France began to revolt after hearing the ideas of famous philosophes like Voltaire. Voltaire was a deist who believed that the Catholic Church and its doctrines were not to be trusted since they used propoganda to get followers rather than the actual religion. He believed it was unfair that there wasn’t any religious freedom since you were expected to be a Catholic. He spoke openly about this, which of course got him into a lot of trouble. Nevertheless, the French commoners took his word into thought and decided to act upon what he said by revolting against the church. Voltaire’s ideas also critized royal absolutism because they had, in his opinion, too much power. He favored an elightened absolutist, which is an absolutist who adopts Enlightenment ideas. Once again, the French commoners took this to heart and agreed with Voltaire that the French government was too ...

    Read More

  • Government And The French Revolution

    708 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...ed to the church, but the National Assembly classified it as a religious act to help better society. The new French government created a new Constitutional Church. It was permitted to continue working under the suspicions of the government due to its passed relationship with the Ancien regime. It was not until Napoleon that the Catholic Church was returned to its former glory.

    Read More

  • The Absolute Monarchy Of France In The 17th Century

    731 Words  | 2 Pages

    An Analysis of the Absolute Monarchy of France in the 17th Century This historical study will define the absolute monarchy as it was defied through the French government in the 17th century. The term ‘absolute” is defined I the monarchy through the absolute control over the people through the king and the royal family. All matters of civic, financial, and political governance was controlled through the king’s sole power as the monarchical ruler of the French people. In France, Louis XIII is an important example of the absolute monarchy, which controlled all facts of military and economic power through a single ruler. Udder Louis XIII’s reign, the consolidation of power away from the Edicts of Nantes to dominant local politics and sovereignty

    Read More

  • The French Revolution and Christianity

    1720 Words  | 4 Pages

    During the latter part of the 18th century, to be a French citizen almost certainly meant that you were Catholic as well. People outside the Catholic church were denied complete ...

    Read More

  • Causes and Effects of the French Revolution

    2273 Words  | 5 Pages

    The French Revolution was spread over the ten year period between 1789 and 1799. The primary cause of the revolution was the disputes over the peoples' differing ideas of reform. Before the beginning of the Revolution, only moderate reforms were wanted by the people. An example of why they wanted this was because of king Louis XIV's actions. At the end of the seventeenth century, King Louis XIV's wars began decreasing the royal finances dramatically. This worsened during the eighteenth century. The use of the money by Louis XIV angered the people and they wanted a new system of government. The writings of the philosophes such as Voltaire and Diderot, were critical of the government.

    Read More

  • The French Revolution: 1789 - 1799

    539 Words  | 2 Pages

    The French Revolution, which occurred from 1789 to 1799, was a time where the monarchy was overthrown, a republic was formed, and limits were put on the church. The French Revolution ended with the rule of Napoleon Bonaparte in 1799. The French Revolution created France’s legislative assembly, which is still in place today. Many would argue that the Enlightment was a cause of the French Revolution, but the Enlightment was not one of the main drivers for the Revolution. The bad living conditions, France’s monarchy, and the involvement in the American Revolution and other wars caused the French Revolution.

    Read More

More about Cardinal Richelieu's Contribution to the Growth of the French State

Open Document