Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Private cars and public transport compare and contrast
Private car vs public transportation
Advantages and disadvantages of private transportation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Car Ownership
Car ownership is a large determinant of the use of transportation that individuals utilise. Cars are not necessarily cheap and considering that they depreciate in value, owners tend to use them exclusively so they feel as if they’re maximising their investment and satisfaction with their purchase.
Level of Personal Income
Personal income will affect the transportation choices that individuals can make. A limited income acts as a constraint, which may reduce and restrict the transportation choices at their disposal. If they cannot afford a car which they deem to be reliable, they may be stuck with commuting via bus and/or train. Individuals who have a large disposable income will typically maximise their satisfaction by opting
…show more content…
Individuals who drive cars will systematically perceive the travel characteristics (cost, travel time, ease of use and so on) as being better than they truly are – this is due to limited exposure as observed throughout behavioural economics. Perceptions of travel are also commonly derived from the media and advertisements. Cars are often promoted as objects of status, power, luxury and personal freedom.
Availability of Public Transportation
Residents who live within Perth and Sydney’s inner-city suburbs are likely to have fantastic public transport infrastructure at their doorstep. Residents living in outer suburbs are typically not as fortunate and in some areas, makes car ownership more or less of a necessity. Even when public transportation services are available, services which fall outside of ‘peak hours’ are often infrequent and the distance between bus stops and stations can be significant. This can result in further inefficiency and less reliance for individuals.
Time and
…show more content…
If an individual’s income were to increase however, the demand for the cheap cars will decrease while the demand for costly cars will increase. Therefore, cheap cars are considered inferior goods, while luxury cars are considered normal goods when income is low, individuals tend to opt for public transport.
For example, consider the two graphs below. The graph on the left is representative of two normal goods, in this (ridiculously expensive) instance; a luxury car and a jet ski. The graph on the right, is representative of two inferior goods, in this instance; steak and hamburgers.
Prices of Vehicles: As previously mentioned, a car can be both a normal and an inferior good – dependent upon its relative price and the individual’s income. If the prices of cars in general increase, the demand for cheaper cars will obviously increase. Public transport also becomes an appealing substitution as individuals can save money on not needing to buy / own a car, depending on their level of
In the July 1997 issue of Commentary, James Q. Wilson challenges the consensus among academia’s finest regarding the automobile in his bold article, Cars and Their Enemies. Directed towards the general public, his article discredits many of the supposed negatives of the automobile raised by experts, proves that the personal car is thriving and will continue to thrive because it meets individual preference over other means of transportation, as well as presents solutions to the social costs of cars. Wilson emphasizes that no matter what is said and done in eliminating the social costs of the automobile, experts are not going to stop campaigning against it.
...mpensation for transport is less severe on the consumer's budget. Consequently, Americans who save more money will also be able to better afford the costs of living, which reduces homelessness, a large problem in the U.S.
Not everything that is expensive is better. Rich people can get everything they want, but middle class people need to think if they need it, or they can find the same thing cheaper. Most people try to find cheaper things, but some buy expensive things, because they think that it will help them to feel that they are rich. First, people buy those expensive things, and after that they are in debt. Expensive things need a lot of money, but people don’t have them, so they use credit cards to buy for that. According to the article “All that glitters is not gold” says that auto exhibition 32% of attendees bought a car and 56% of attendees reported they were going to buy a car in the near future. It shows that that people don’t have money, but they saw that other people bought the car, and they want it also. My parents just last week bought a new car, because our old one broke. My dad said that everyone has big, and new cars, so we need to buy a costly car like other people have. I thought that it was a stupid idea to look at expensive car, but anyway he found a good car, nor costly, nor cheap car. It is middle cost, and it is a wonderful car. Running after expansive things people forget to look of prices. They forget that they will need to pay for that thing for many years after they buy
public transit networks. But just how serious is the burden of car ownership, and how exactly does
Another thing to note is that that a good car deserves a choice place in our lives. I am not advocating the need for a very expensive Car but one that would
Not everything that is expensive is better. Rich people can get everything they want, but middle class people need to think if they need it, or they can find the same thing cheaper. Most people try to find cheaper things, but some buy expensive things, because they think that it will help them to feel that they are rich. First, people buy those expensive things, and after that they are in debt. Expensive things need a lot of money, but people don’t have them, so they use credit cards to buy for that. According to the article “All That Glitters Is Not Gold” 32% of attendees who were at the auto exhibition bought a car and 56% of attendees reported they were going to buy a car in the near future. It shows that that people don’t have money, but they saw that other people bought the car, and they want it also. For example, my parents just last week bought a new car, because our old one broke. My dad said that everyone has big and new cars, so we need to buy a costly car like other people have. I thought that it was a stupid idea to look at expensive car, but anyway he found a good car, nor costly, nor a cheap car. The cost is in the middle, and it is a wonderful car. Indeed, running after expensive things people forget to look at prices. They forget that they will need to pay for that thing for many years after they buy
Car advertisements are everywhere in the media, news, and decide what car fits your social class. They force it into your head that you are not whole until you have the car of your dreams. Advertisers like Cadillac and Mercedes make people of wealth think they need to spend tons of money for this luxury car just to establish themselves and show their wealth. They advertised on the media that...
A vehicle is one of the biggest purchases a person will ever make. Over the years, the prices of an automobile have increased due to the rise of inflation. Due to a price index, the price of an automobile changes over a certain period of time. Economists compare averages of automobiles to calculate the cost of each vehicle that presents itself on a car lot. When all of the above is calculated within the purchase of an automobile, it affects every area of making the automobile to selling the automobile. All of these factors are impacted together for the automobile industry as a whole.
... Also important is the price of complements, or goods that are used together. When the price of gasoline rises, the demand for cars falls.
Types of goods will help us determine whether demand for cars is elastic or inelastic. If a good is considered to be a luxury rather than a necessity, the greater is the price elasticity of demand (McConnell & Brue, 2004). Cars can be deemed as necessary due to a need for transportation. Other types of cars can be classified as luxury. A person who needs to be able to get from one place to another will have the need for a car. An old vehicle may suffice. In such a scenario, buying a brand new car is more likely to be a luxury rather than a necessity. If car prices go up, people are more inclined to just keep driving their old vehicles. In essence, the cars already on the road would serve as substitutes for new cars. However, over a longer period of time, old cars tend to wear out and the elasticity of demand for vehicles is less.
The same effect also leads to a decrease in the consumption of good 2.on the other hand; there is an increase in the consumption of good 1 due to the income effect. The same effect also leads to decrease in the consumption of good 2. The overall effect makes the consumer of goods 1 and 2 to be less declined towards purchasing the inferior good.
Think for a second here, what do you use almost every day to get to where you need to go? An automobile is probably what you are thinking of because just about everyone has one. Automobiles have become so common; nine out of every ten families in the United States own some type of vehicle. Now Imagine going through everyday life without one it would be nearly impossible! Automobiles have had a very positive impact on the world and on many people’s lives. However they have also taken quite a negative effect on the world and in life. Automobiles make it very easy to get to and from where you are going. Although automobiles have polluted the world and have taken lots of natural resources to keep going they are still a nice luxury many cannot live without. Automobiles are very reliable if they are kept in good condition and would not have to rely on public transportation.
Most of cities that people live are sequentially growing, daily routine of many people are also adapted for surrounding in the present. A lot of people have to spend most of their time with travelling though long distances to get from one place to another for connecting their businesses or other purposes by transportation. Most people use public transportation such as BTS and MRT to go each places while many people are using their own cars to travel. Thereby, both transportations have the same destination that is taking and moving people. People can choose vehicles from alter reasons depend on how people are responded to their needs by public transportation and private car that are different in convenience of travelling, expenditure of money and security of travel.
If you use public transport you spend on your journey as and when you need to travel, whereas if you own a car you are paying for it all the time, even if you are not using it, as insurance, tax and MOTs need constantly maintaining.
The most important reason why ownership of private vehicles should not be banned is that vehicles are an essential part of modern city living. Without vehicles, a lot of inconveniences will occur. For example, people would be forced to walk quite a distance to school, in the case of students, or to other places. They need to go through the hassle of waiting for and using public transport. This can be quite the problem in rural areas where public transport is unreliable at best and can even be non-existent. According to (Jong Gatoona 2010), One reason people avoid public transport is that it wastes valuable time. When it comes to going somewhere, public transit will in most cases take more time to reach the desired destination when compared to driving there. For example, 30-40 minutes of driving will instead take 45-65 minutes when public transit is used. This estimate of course does not factor the time taken waiting for vehicles to arrive i...