Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Capital punishment does not deter crime effectively
Capital punishment as a deterrent to crime
Why capital punishment deters crime
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Capital punishment does not deter crime effectively
Capital Punishment for Embezzlers in Indonesia
Corruption starts to be main concern of all countries. Transparency International found that from 177 countries, there were no countries that 100% clean of corruption. There are various ways to make people do not want to commit crime, especially corruption. Spending time in prison for couple years, returning all money they take, paying fines, or life imprisonments are common punishment for embezzlers. Some countries such as China, Vietnam, and South Korean use capital punishment as one type of punishment to reduce the chance of doing corruption. Indonesia is one of many countries that legalized capital punishment, but it has never been used for corruption. The government of Indonesia mostly use
…show more content…
Therefore, capital punishment must be emphasized in order to reduce the level of corruption. This essay will emphasis on level of corruption in Indonesia, advantages of capital punishment, and then propose several solutions, such as making a better justice system, making less expensive capital punishment than life imprisonment, and imitating other countries’ system on capital punishment.
Level of corruption in Indonesia is getting higher each year and spreading throughout Indonesia. In 2013, Indonesia’s position on Corruption Perception Index is 114th among 177 counties (RI Improves Ranking On Global Corruption Perception Index). According to Transparency International, Indonesia score of corruption was 32 out of 100 which 0 means highly corrupt and 100 means clean from corruption. There are many people who work for government found corrupting government funds. Former president of Indonesia, Soeharto, took state funds around $15 billion to $35 billion for his family needs (“Corruption Continue to Plague in Indonesia”). In addition, one of the politicians in Indonesia accused former president of Indonesia, Susilo Bambang
…show more content…
The first country is China. In fact, country with the most executed embezzlers in the world is China (Biao). The government of China really concern about corruption that growing so quickly and determine with their law. There are more than a hundred people who work for government executed in China (“China Executes Corrupt Hangzhou and Suzhou Officials”). For instance, the China sixth richest woman in 2006, Wu Ying, was sentence to death for illegal fundraising (Rapoza). The other embezzler is Liu Zhijun. Liu Zhijun, Former Minister of Railway, was sentenced to death for bribery and power’s abuse (Kaiman). He received £6 million and facilitated eleven people to win contracts. Afterward, a former vice-mayor of Hangzhou and vice-mayor of Suzhou were sentenced to death for taking $46 million (“China Executes Corrupt Hangzhou and Suzhou Officials”). Other high-profile officers also punished, such as a former head of the country 's main nuclear firm (“China Executes Corrupt Hangzhou and Suzhou Officials”). By actively punishing embezzlers with capital punishment, China’s score in Corruption Perception Index increased one point between 2012 and 2013 (Transparency International). The second country is Vietnam. Vietnam Development Bank’s director was punished after confirming fake loans of $89 millions (McCoy). In addition, Bac
that society has a moral obligation to protect the safety and the welfare of its
The capital punishment has been cited as a reasonable sentence by those who advocate for retribution. This is essentially when it comes to justice so that people take full responsibility for their individual actions. Studies have proved that the decision to take away life of a person because they committed a certain crime serves to perpetuate the crime in question. It also serves to enhance the progress of organized and violent crime. It has been noted that various flaws in the justice system has led to the wrong conviction of innocent people. On the other hand, the guilty have also been set free, and a plethora of several cases has come up when a critical look at the capital punishment has been undertaken. Killers hardly kill their victims deliberately, but they probably act on anger, passion, or impulsively. In this regard, it is not proper to convict them exclusively without
Capital Punishment has been a controversial issue in society for centuries. It stands as a significant topic in our community due to its ambiguity in creating and maintaining a less vulnerable society. Skeptics of Capital Punishment are against it in the case of supposedly moral grounds such as wrongfully accusing the subject of the crime as well as the suggestion that human life should be a right for everyone and no one should have the capability to deprive anyone of it. Others argue that it is a highly justifiable method of punishment in serious criminal cases and that society would become a more guarded place if it were more prominently enforced. As a result of the controversy revolving around Capital Punishment, it has been abolished in many countries but remains intact in some. In regards to the positive effects of Capital Punishment, it should be the preferred method of penalizing murderers compared to a lifetime jail sentence, as it protects society, is the most justifiable manner of punishment and warns potential murderers.
Capital punishment, a topic that is constantly debated, is questioned on whether or not it serves its purpose which is to deter criminals and if it is morally acceptable. It is my goal to evaluate arguments that promote or reject capital punishment and its deterrence factor. It would be beneficial comparing crime statistics for states that uphold and states that abolish capital punishment. Finally, an investigation of criminals facing the death penalty and their thoughts as well as modern prison conditions will provide insight to this debate. Capital punishment could be a great deterrent to crime or it may have no effect at all.
The death penalty is the lawful killing of a human being after a trial by
Have you ever thought about if the person next to you is a killer or a rapist? If he is, what would you want from the government if he had killed someone you know? He should receive the death penalty! Murderers and rapists should be punished for the crimes they have committed and should pay the price for their wrongdoing. Having the death penalty in our society is humane; it helps the overcrowding problem and gives relief to the families of the victims, who had to go through an event such as murder.
Capital Punishment Essays - For the Common Good. Putting to death people judged to have committed certain extreme Terrible crimes are a practice of ancient standing, but in the United States. in the second half of the twentieth century, it has become a very controversial issue. Changing views on this difficult issue led the Supreme Court to abolish capital punishment in 1972 but later upheld it in 1977. The 'Standard' of the 'Standard' Although capital punishment is what the people want, there are many.
A death penalty is the sentence of execution for murder and some other capital crimes. Capital punishment can also be applied for treason, espionage, and other crimes. The death penalty, or capital punishment, may be prescribed by Congress or any state legislature for murder and other capital crimes. The Supreme Court has ruled that the death penalty is not a per se violation of the Eighth Amendment 's ban on cruel and unusual punishment.
Americans have argued over the death penalty since the early days of our country. In the United States only 38 states have capital punishment statutes. As of year ended in 1999, in Texas, the state had executed 496 prisoners since 1930. The laws in the United States have change drastically in regards to capital punishment. An example of this would be the years from 1968 to 1977 due to the nearly 10 year moratorium. During those years, the Supreme Court ruled that capital punishment violated the Eight Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment. However, this ended in 1976, when the Supreme Court reversed the ruling. They stated that the punishment of sentencing one to death does not perpetually infringe the Constitution. Richard Nixon said, “Contrary to the views of some social theorists, I am convinced that the death penalty can be an effective deterrent against specific crimes.”1 Whether the case be morally, monetarily, or just pure disagreement, citizens have argued the benefits of capital punishment. While we may all want murders off the street, the problem we come to face is that is capital punishment being used for vengeance or as a deterrent.
During the spring semester I read Evangelium Vitae: The Gospel of Life. Paragraphs 27 and 56 of this encyclical prompted a discussion of the death penalty with other students. Their first reaction was that the Pope was against it and that he was saying that the penalty has no justification. There was general resistance to the suggestion that while the Pope's attitude toward the death penalty is, to put it mildly, unfavorable, he did not flat out say that it was immoral, wrong, without justification.
The Ethics of Capital Punishment Ethics is "the study of standards of right and wrong. " philosophy dealing with moral conduct, duty and judgement. ' [1] Capital Punishment is the death penalty for a crime. The word "capital" in "capital punishment" refers to a person's head as in the past. people were often executed by severing their heads from their bodies.
Corruption consists in the illegitimate agreement between a corruptor and a corrupted, in which they abuse of their public power in order to obtain personal benefit. Bribery and corruption is something that has been going on for years. According to Allen, “officials perceive themselves as immune to any penalties for demanding and receiving bribes” which she states that it is one of the main reasons for bribery and corruption in underdeveloped countries. According to Transparency International, an organization committed exclusively to end corruption, three of the most corrupt countries in the world are Somalia, North Korea and Afghanistan. This does not mean that corruption is only seen in underdeveloped countries. In international business, corporate employees often find themselves dealing with corruptors in foreign countries and, in most cases, they will give in.
Crime is everywhere. Wherever we look, we find criminals and crime. Criminals have become a part of our daily lives. Does this mean we let them be the darkness of our society? No, definitely not. Eliminating crime and criminals is our duty, and we cannot ignore it. Getting the rightly accused to a just punishment is very important. Some criminals commit a crime because they have no other option to survive, but some do it for fun. I do not advocate death penalty for everybody. A person, who stole bread from a grocery store, definitely does not deserve death penalty. However, a serial killer, who kills people for fun or for his personal gain, definitely deserves death penalty. Death penalty should continue in order to eliminate the garbage of our society. Not everybody deserves to die, but some people definitely do. I support death penalty because of several reasons. Firstly, I believe that death penalty serves as a deterrent and helps in reducing crime. Secondly, it is true that death penalty is irreversible, but it is hard to kill a wrongly convicted person due to the several chances given to the convicted to prove his innocence. Thirdly, death penalty assures safety of the society by eliminating these criminals. Finally, I believe in "lex tallionis" - a life for a life.
Conceptualizing Corruption in South Africa Conceptualizing Corruption in South Africa Amr Taha El Baba Lebanese American University SPECIFIC PURPOSE: To persuade my audience that corruption could cripple the progress in South African societies. Crime and corruption are not relevant to the degree of poverty present in a country as some of you might think. Corruption is a social phenomenon that every society deals with, regardless of the level of development in the country. What makes corruption a dangerous social phenomenon is its ability to adapt to the conditions present in any country.
Kearney, A.T. (2001). Corruption and the Globalization Index. Last access on 27 March 2005 at URL: http://www.globalcorruptionreport.org/download/gcr2001/data_and_research.pdf NAIM, Mois´s (1995). Corruption Eruption. Last accessed on 2 April 2005 at URL: http://www.carnegieendowment.org/publications/index.cfm?fa=view&id=648 MORAN, Robert T. and RIESENBERGER, John R. (1994)