Capital Punishment In Canada

Homicide is wrong. We have been taught this unquestionable truth since childhood. One might wonder what Capital punishment is. It is when somebody who is blamed for perpetrating a wrongdoing is killed as a discipline for his or her crime. Capital Punishment has been a questionable theme for a long while. It was utilized as a part of the past as a strategy to make fear, so that potential wrongdoings could be avoided. Capital punishment may have been abolished in Canada, but it is still utilized as a part of numerous different nations till this day. Furthermore the reason this is a dubious point is that is frequently considered as an unethical approach to punish the suspect. The death penalty is ethically wrong and is not the right way to manage

Wrongdoing in Canada is genuinely low because of imprisonment and legitimate law authorization, while other nations that do have the death penalty have a higher crime rate. We do not have to utilize the strategy for retribution to punish people, as Ghandi once stated an eye for an eye will make the entire world blind. This essentially implies that if we execute individuals as a method for retribution there would be nobody left. For instance if a man is convicted carrying out a crime in Canada he would be sentenced imprisonment rather than a death penalty, since it has been abolished in Canada. This is a viable discipline in light of the fact that the suspect would be sentenced for his or her existence with no parole.This punishment will be just to all and would not require the life of the suspect. Capital punishment at times could be a cruel punishment, the method of execution vary from fire squad to electrocution which is ethically wrong. The alternate methods avoid these situation so that the suspect does not have to face cruel unethical

There have been cases of innocent individual receiving a death penalty who did not commit crime as there situations where the innocent individual was framed or had similar characteristics to the suspect. For example Carlos DeLuna who was an innocent man was convicted of murder in 1983, he was executed in 1989. It was later proven that Carlos DeLuna was in fact innocent and the one who committed the crime was a man with a similar name Carlos Hernandez, who had a record of crimes (Death Penalty Information Center 1). This example just give us another reason to abolish the death penalty because it shows us the cold truth about the innocent lives that at are at risk. This goes back to the first point because if the man was sentenced imprisonment instead of death penalty he would be later dismissed from jail without the cost of his life, but the innocent people who did not get lucky had to go through a cruel punishment for the actions of someone else. Our society teaches its youth that violence does not solve anything which is ironic because they are the ones who allow capital