Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Controversy over capital punishment
Case against capital punishment
Case against capital punishment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Controversy over capital punishment
I. Introduction
a. No one would ever want to hear the words, "We the jury, find the defendant guilty." Just imagine how an innocent person would feel knowing that they are sentenced to die in an unjust way. Innocent people are found guilty often for actions of someone else. The results of innocent people said to be guilt can cause stress on the families and wrongful death of a human being.
b. There are thirty-two states in this world that still support capital punishment. Yet, over 140 people have been exonerated and freed of capital punishment since 1973. When talking about capital punishment, society tends to forget the family members of the prisoner. A family member that has been charged with capital punishment whether guilty or innocent puts a family under tremendous stress believe it or not.
c. Capital punishment should be suspended because of the chance of executing an innocent person, the stress on families, and the importance of life.
II. Thesis Point #1
Capital punishment should be suspended because of the chance of executing an innocent person.
a. Over one hundred and forty people have been exonerated and freed of capital punishment since 1973.
b. Since 1973, according to the non-profit Death Penalty Information Center in Washington, D.C., 115 people have been released from America's death rows with evidence of their innocence (Recinella, 20).
c. DNA plays an important role in proving ones innocence.
d. Innocence has made its way of becoming a strong argument in capital punishment over the past decade because abolitionists have been able to point to the near-execution of inmates whose innocence is supported by post-conviction DNA tests (Aronson, 605).
Innocent people died every day from being wrongfully accused.
III...
... middle of paper ...
...ce, stress on families, and importance of life. Capital punishment should only be used when clear evidence is presented to prove that a person is guilty of a serious criminal offense.
Works Cited
1. Aronson, Jay D., and Simon A. Cole. "Science And The Death Penalty: DNA, Innocence, And The Debate Over Capital Punishment In The United States." Law & Social Inquiry 34.3 (2009): 603-633. Academic Search Complete. Web. 15 Nov. 2013.
2. Gray, James P. "Essay: Facing Facts On The Death Penalty." Loyola Of Los Angeles Law Review 44.3 (2011): S255-S264. Academic Search Complete. Web. 16 Nov. 2013.
3. Recinella, Dale S. "No To The Death Penalty." America 191.13 (2004): 18-20. Academic Search Complete. Web. 16 Nov. 2013.
4. Williams, Armstrong. "The death penalty vs. the right to life." New York Amsterdam News 18 Mar. 1999: 8. Advanced Placement Source. Web. 16 Nov. 2013.
“DNA Testing and the Death Penalty.” ACLU: American Civil Liberties Union. 3 Oct. 2011. Web. 22 April 2014.
Adams, Cindy. “The Death Penalty as Just Punishment.” Does Capital Punishment Deter or is it a Biased Process? 3 Sept. 2008. 30 May 2010 < http://penal-system.suite101.com/article.cfm/the_death_penalty_as_just_punishment>.
Dieter, Richard C. "Innocence and the Death Penalty: The Increasing Danger of Executing the Innocent." DPIC. Death Penalty Information Center, 1 July 1997. Web. 12 Dec. 2014. .
The Death Penalty Should Be Enacted In Illinois Due to the recent releases of newly exonerated Death Row inmates, individuals and organizations are calling for a moratorium- a cooling off period for state executions. The cases of just a few inmates makes it apparent that this would be a necessary step to save innocent lives. After 17 years in prison, Illinois Death Row inmate Anthony Porter was released from jail after a judge threw out his murder conviction following the introduction of new evidence. This reversal of fortune came just two days before Porter was to be executed. As reported in USA Today, Porter's release was the result of investigative research as conducted by a Northwestern University professor and students. The evidence gathered suggested that Porter had been wrongly convicted. Were these new revelations and the subsequent release of Porter a lucky break or a freak occurrence? Not likely, reports DeWayne Wickham, also of USA Today. He points out that since the reinstatement of the death penalty in the United States in 1976, of those sentenced to death, 490 people have been executed while 76 have been freed from Death Row. This calculates into one innocent person being released from Death Row for every six individuals that were executed. This figure correlates with the 1996 U.S. Department of Justice report that indicates that over a 7-year period, beginning in 1989, when DNA evidence in various cases was tested, 26% of primary suspects were exonerated. This has led some to conclude that a similar percentage of inmates presently serving time behind bars may have been wrongly convicted prior to the advent o...
In conclusion, capital punishment is an unjustifiable act used to punish criminals. The death penalty is not only expensive, but it also lowers our morality. Desmond Tutu once said, "To take a life when a life has been lost is revenge, not justice." America is meant to be a country that symbolizes justice and the act of the government killing people, regardless of whatever reason, contradicts that. Therefore, the United States should outlaw capital punishment and convert to an alternative punishment, such as life imprisonment without parole, where the criminal can spend the rest of his life locked in a cell and living with what they did, to become the justifiable country it’s known as.
25 Hugo Adams Bedau, The Death Penalty in America: Current Controversies (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997) 250.
Mappes, Thomas A., Jane S. Zembaty, and David DeGrazia. "The Death Penalty." Social Ethics: Morality and Social Policy. 8th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2012. 105-53. Print.
“The case Against the Death Penalty.” aclu.org. American Civil Liberties Union, 2012. Web. 12 Feb. 2013
The death row not only consists of murderers, but it could also include a large number of innocent people whose lives are at risk. In the past 35 years, over 130 people have been taken out of the death row because of new evidence proving their innocence. This shows that the death penalty process is very faulty and contains many errors when it comes to convicting a person of a crime. There was an average of three exonerations per year from 1973 to 1999 which soon rose to an average of five per year between 2000 and 2007 ( Cary, Mary Kate). The ...
Pasquerella, Lynn. “The Death Penalty in the United States.” The Study Circle Resource Center of Topsfield Foundation. July 1991. Topsfield Foundation. 03 Feb 2011. Web.
“Since the reinstatement of the death penalty in the United States in 1976, 138 innocent men and women have been released from the death row, including some who came within minutes of execution. In Missouri, Texas and Virginia investigations have been opened to determine if those states executed innocent men. To execute an innocent person is morally reprehensible; this risk we cannot
Americans have argued over the death penalty since the early days of our country. In the United States, only 38 states have capital punishment statutes. As of year ended in 1999, in Texas, the state had executed 496 prisoners since 1930. Laws in the United States have changed drastically in regards to capital punishment. An example of this would be the years from 1968 to 1977 due to the nearly 10 year moratorium.
Fein, Bruce. "Individual Rights and Responsibility - The Death Penalty, But Sparingly." Speech. American Bar Association. Feb. 2003. Web. 20 Nov. 2013.
Secondly, many believe that capital punishment is right because of the justice given to the victim’s family. These family members feel l...
Since 1973 over 90 people who had been sentenced to death in the USA have been proved wrongfully convicted; of those, ten were exonerated as a result of DNA testing. A poll conducted jointly by both political parties in 2000 showed that when reminded of cases in which death row inmates had ultimately been released on the basis of DNA evidence, 64% of Americans favoured a temporary halt to executions while steps were taken to ensure that the system worked fairly.