Capital Of The 21st Century Summary

717 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Essay on economic disparities

Imagine watching and reading the news about politics and economics, and we wondered how they are related to each other. First of all, economics is about money, income, and wealth, whereas politics is about government and voting. The book, Capital of the 21st Century, written by Thomas Piketty, can describe the relationship between politics and economics and demonstrate the theories and methods of political economy. Merely, the relationship between economics and politics has become the impact in society, due to the economy’s performance, which is politically a domain. If economics is not political, there is no bias nor prejudice on how the economy’s performance is improved. But, it is up to those who are elected to weigh in on this and decide. Many issues or concerns, in economics, are somewhat political due to the fact people make different choices (e.g. spending money for something). Also, the government always took fortunes out of our pockets and it is up to us to get them back as of this year or next. One method of the relationship between politics and economics is the inequality in the U.S., which is a system that is more democratic in some ways, though republic in some dimensions. Higher inequality of labor income …show more content…

Individual types of political-economic systems view the ideal relationship between state and market, and between freedom and equality, in different ways. Liberalism is the key in a political-economic system because it deals our freedoms individually over collective equality and the power of markets over the state. Liberals favor laissez-fair and strong protections for capitalism, which is the other key in this system. “Piketty points out that liberals were eager to demonstrate that growth helped people and therefore had evidence that capitalism was perfectly stable (p.

Show More
Related

  • Liberal Franklin D. Roosevelt vs. Conservative Herbert C. Hoover

    1529 Words  | 4 Pages

    Today, the definition of the term “liberal” is relatively uncontested, and its content is relatively well defined. A liberal today is someone who advocates for governmental solutions to various problems, not for unaided individual freedom. Liberals today trust and call for governmental action, not for the type of self-determination supported by Hoover. Contemporary liberals believe in individual freedom, but they typically advocate f...

    Read More

  • Conservative and Liberal Ideologies in Regard to Health Care

    715 Words  | 2 Pages

    Liberalism is an ideology which advocates equality of opportunity for all within the framework of a system of laws. It includes a belief in government as an institution whose primary function is to define and enforce the laws. Furthermore, a Constitution, must be developed not solely by one ruler but by representatives of the elite groups. Therefore, liberalism invariably involves a belief in the need for legislative bodies which represent the influential groups. The Constitution then defines ...

    Read More

  • Response Of Socialism To Classical Liberalism

    748 Words  | 2 Pages

    Commanding Heights: Social Assignment 1. Response of socialism to Classical liberalism: Classical liberalism is an ideology that embraces the principles of individualism such as rule of law, individual rights and freedoms, private property, economic freedom, self-interest, and competition. Classical liberalism stresses the importance of human rationality. Just as it values political freedom, classical liberalism also holds freedom to be the basic standard in economics, and believes the most beneficial economic system to be the free market. Whereas, the term socialism, when generally used, refers to any ideology that believes that resources should be controlled by the public for the benefit of everyone in society and not by private interests for the benefit of private owners and investors.

    Read More

  • Inequality In The Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx

    430 Words  | 1 Pages

    The fundamental contradiction of liberalism is that it produces inequality. In order to guarantee individual rights, in fact, a liberal government cannot force its citizens to promote equality. Furthermore, in a capitalist economy there is an incentive to produce on a mass scale, and the best way to increase productivity is to reduce the cost of labor; by reducing the cost of labor, the owners of the factories become richer, while the actual workers earn less money than they ought to. According to Karl Marx, this is the main problem of Liberalism: it somehow legalized inequality among people. So, in The Communist Manifesto, Marx explains why a total revolution of the society is inevitably going to happen.

    Read More

  • Income Inequality Dbq

    662 Words  | 2 Pages

    Throughout the years, “ U.S income inequality has been increasing steadily since the 1970s and now has reached levels not seen since 1928” (Source A).

    Read More

  • Income Inequality in the United States

    795 Words  | 2 Pages

    Belsie, Laurent. “The Causes of Rising Income Inequality.”.N.p., 5 Mar. 2009. Web. 30 Apr. 2014

    Read More

  • Income Inequality In The United States Essay

    1035 Words  | 3 Pages

    Income inequality in the United States, as of 2007, has reached levels not seen since 1928. In 1928, the top one percent received nearly 24% of all income within the United States (Volscho & Kelly, 2012). This percentage fell to nearly nine percent in 1975, but has risen to 23.5% as of 2007 (Volscho & Kelly, 2012). Meanwhile, in 2007 (see

    Read More

  • Comparing Classical vs. Modern Liberalism

    1802 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...th the classical view that wages would drop to prohibit unemployment because of Trade Unions, and claim that according this view unemployment would enter a vicious spiral. The implications of this are that Modern liberal economics advocates the state managing the economy and that logically the state has a role to play in helping people achieve the self-fulfillment that liberalism works towards. This is consistent with the Modern liberal view of freedom effectively as an ‘enabling process’.

    Read More

  • Embracing Modern Liberalism: The Role of Welfare Capitalism

    1305 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the source, the author states that individuals who want to pursue wealth are not able to if, the state rejects the pursuit of profit by putting fear and insecurity into individuals. Welfare capitalism looks to be the solution, since there is freedom to produce without fear and conflict. The source is addressed to what degree should modern liberalism be embraced? The author of the source fully embraced the ideology of pro-modern liberalism. This is hinted by the key terms “welfare capitalism and state” are major characteristics of pro-modern liberalism, since they now have the right to produce and make a profit, but, also have a social safety net in case you fall into debt making it welfare capitalism while working with the population to produce. The author’s perspective of the source can also be agreed by VIP John Maynard Keynes, because he promoted Modern

    Read More

  • Income Inequality

    939 Words  | 2 Pages

    Income inequality has affected American citizens ever since the American Dream came to existence. The American Dream is centered around the concept of working hard and earning enough money to support a family, own a home, send children to college, and invest for retirement. Economic gains in income are one of the only possible ways to achieve enough wealth to fulfill the dream. Unfortunately, many people cannot achieve this dream due to low income. Income inequality refers to the uneven distribution of income and wealth between the social classes of American citizens. The United States has often experienced a rise in inequality as the rich become richer and the poor become poorer, increasing the unstable gap between the two classes. The income gap in America has been increasing steadily since the late 1970’s, and has now reached historic highs not seen since the 1920’s (Desilver). UC Berkeley economics professor, Emmanuel Saez conducted extensive research on past and present income inequality statistics and published them in his report “Striking it Richer.” Saez claims that changes in technology, tax policies, labor unions, corporate benefits, and social norms have caused income inequality. He stands to advocate a change in American economic policies that will help close this inequality gap and considers institutional and tax reforms that should be developed to counter it. Although Saez’s provides legitimate causes of income inequality, I highly disagree with the thought of making changes to end income inequality. In any diverse economic environment, income inequality will exist due to the rise of some economically successful people and the further development of factors that push people into poverty. I believe income inequality e...

    Read More

  • Comparing Two Idealogies - Neoliberalism and Keynesianism

    1367 Words  | 3 Pages

    Our lives are greatly affected by our culture, ecological environment, political environment and our economic structure. The overarching method of organizing a complex modern society relies heavily on the founding economic theories regarding method of production, method of organization, and the distribution of wealth among the members of. This paper, specifically deals with the views and theoretical backgrounds of two dominant theories of the past century, Keynesianism and Neo-liberalism. Our social economic order is product of the two theories and has evolved through many stages to come to where it is today. The two ideologies rely on different foundations for their economic outcomes but both encourage capitalism and claim it to be the superior form of economic organization. Within the last quarter of the 20th century, neo-liberalism has become the dominant ideology driving political and economic decisions of most developed nations. This dominant ideology creates disparities in wealth and creates inequality through the promotion of competitive markets free from regulation. Neo-liberal’s ability to reduce national government’s size limits the powers and capabilities of elected representatives and allows corporations to become much larger and exert far greater force on national and provincial governments to act in their favour. Hence, it is extremely important at this time to learn about the underlying power relations in our economy and how the two ideologies compare on important aspects of political economy. In comparing the two theories with respect to managing the level of unemployment, funding the welfare sates, and pursuing national or international objectives, I will argue that Keynesianism provides far greater stability, equ...

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Conservatism

    712 Words  | 2 Pages

    As both "conservatism" and "liberalism" have had various meanings sooner or later and transversely countries, the word liberal conservatism has been used in relatively different sanity. In political science, the word is used to pass on to ideologies that merge the support of capitalism, for instance value for contracts, protection of private property and free market require reference to validate with the principle in natural discrimination, the significance of religion, and the worth of traditional integrity need reference to validate in the course of a construction of inadequate, legitimate, representative government (Abdou & Zaazou 2013). It contrasts with traditional liberalism and particularly aristocratic conservatism, rejecting the belief of correspondence as a little in discordance with human nature, instead emphasizing the thought of natural inequality (Crozier. 2012).As the conservative thought in democratic countries hold typical liberal institutions such as the rule of law, private property, market economy, and constitutional representative government, the liberal factor of liberal conservatism

    Read More

  • Divided We Stand Summary

    2604 Words  | 6 Pages

    The American President, Barack Obama, recently described inequality as the “defining issue of our time”. This paper discusses whether the evidence of changing patterns of inequality in the OECD Countries since 1980 supports Piketty’s claim based on his recent book entitled Capital in the Twenty-First Century, (Piketty, 2014a). The book looks at data from some two dozen countries and covers the period from the 17th century; and considers wealth in terms of assets as well as incomes. Piketty’s book makes a major contribution by putting forward a theory of natural economic evolution under capitalism (Saez, 2013). His dire prediction of more economic inequality in the future and his proposed remedy: a global tax on wealth has been well received by the political left, and as can be expected, his work and conclusions have received very strong criticisms from the political right (he has been described as an unrealistic or confused Marxist).

    Read More

  • Free College Admissions Essays: Passion for Economics

    445 Words  | 1 Pages

    The crucial importance and relevance of economics related disciplines to the modern world have led me to want to pursue the study of these social sciences at a higher level. My study of Economics has shown me the fundamental part it plays in our lives and I would like to approach it with an open mind - interested but not yet fully informed.

    Read More

  • Liberalism In International Relations Essay

    1846 Words  | 4 Pages

    Economic liberalism is an economic system organized on individual lines, which means the greatest possible number of economic decisions are made by individuals or households rather than by collective institutions or organizations. ... Historically, economic liberalism arose in response to mercantilism and feudalism.

    Read More

More about Capital Of The 21st Century Summary

Open Document